News

  • Idaho Statesman: Taxpayers paid $14 million for an Idaho hatchery — and all its fish have been dying

    hatchery.springfieldBy Rocky Barker
    November 16, 2017 Only 157 endangered Snake River sockeye salmon returned to the Sawtooth Valley this year — and not one of them came from a $14 million hatchery built to help their recovery.

    The Springfield Hatchery opened in eastern Idaho in 2013, paid for by the Bonneville Power Administration — a federal agency that markets power from dams in the Northwest and whose ratepayers provide a major source of funding for regional salmon recovery. It was designed to add up to 1 million more sockeye that could be released into Redfish Lake Creek near Stanley.

    But Idaho Department of Fish and Game biologists discovered the young salmon smolts have been dying after their release because of stress.

    “What we have learned is that water chemistry appears to be a significant contributor to reduced survival,” Jesse Trushenski, a fish health expert with the department, said when the problem was announced at a meeting Tuesday.

    The water in the Springfield Hatchery has an unusually high level of calcium carbonate, making it extremely “hard” while Redfish Lake Creek’s water is unusually “soft,” said Paul Kline, Fish and Game assistant chief of fisheries. When the smolts were released into the creek, they suffered a physiological shock.

    It has taken Fish and Game three years to solve the mystery of the low survival numbers of Springfield-raised sockeye.

    Read the full story here at the Idaho Stateman.

  • E&E News: Lower Snake River ‘temperature diet’ looks to shed degrees

    dam.lowergraniteLower Snake River Dam ©EcoFlight

    By Jennifer Yachnin
    09/13/2024

    Federal and state officials plan to spend the next year figuring out how to address the “heat pollution” in the Lower Snake River, ratcheting down summer water temperatures in a bid to bolster a struggling population of fish.

    Flows in the 140-mile stretch of river in southeastern Washington state regularly spike above 70 degrees Fahrenheit in the summer months. The warm water creates unfavorable conditions for migrating salmon and steelhead, further complicating an already arduous journey that many will not survive.

    This plan won’t address what all agree is one big factor contributing to the hot water: four dams that tribes and environmental advocates want to see come down. Instead, the Army Corps of Engineers, which operates the dams, and the Washington State Department of Ecology, are searching for other ways to put the region on a "temperature diet."

    Those efforts could result in lowering the levels of some or all of the four reservoirs at different times, among the options to speed water through the system to keep temperatures within acceptable ranges.

    "It's not as simple as pressing a button and dropping the temperature of the river. There are limited ways to go about reducing water temperature," said Miles Johnson, the Columbia Riverkeeper's legal director.

    In the meantime, the Biden administration, Washington and Oregon and four tribal nations are contemplating how that portion of the river could be returned to a free-flowing state, which would require winning congressional approval to breach the Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite dams. While that would help cool down the water, tearing down dams is unlikely to happen anytime soon, given intense Republican opposition to the idea and the region’s current reliance on the hydropower they generate.

    The effort to tackle Lower Snake River temperatures is the result of a legal battle launched by Columbia Riverkeeper and other organizations, which sued the Army Corps in 2014 alleging the agency was discharging "oil and heat pollution" into the river without Clean Water Act permits. The effort focused on both oil leaks into the river from turbines and other components of the hydropower facilities, as well as the discharge of used "cooling water," or flows used to lower the temperature of the facilities.

    While salmon and steelhead throughout the Columbia River Basin have been on the decline for decades, several Snake River species are in particular peril, listed under the Endangered Species Act as either endangered or threatened.

    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a victory for the environmental groups in 2019, prompting an EPA evaluation of the rivers that dictated temperature reduction targets for each of the reservoirs.

    The target for the Lower Snake River, formally known as the temperature “total maximum daily load” (TMDL), is set at a maximum of 68 degrees Fahrenheit to ensure salmon and other fish can lay eggs, spawn and migrate.

    The Army Corps issued its "Water Quality Attainment Plan” to achieve those temperature goals earlier this year but that proposal was rejected by the Washington State Department of Ecology in June, because it "fails to include necessary details of the water quality temperature goal and potential actions."

    State officials criticized the plan’s contention that the Army Corps is already meeting some requirements through its current practices, such as injections of cold water from an Idaho reservoir.

    In response, the Army Corps said it will aim to revise its plan over the course of the next year, led by a working group that includes state officials and tribal representatives, along with federal agencies including EPA, the Bonneville Power Administration, Bureau of Reclamation, NOAA Fisheries and the Fish and Wildlife Service.

    “The Corps is committed to implement temperature control strategies and meet the load allocations in the Columbia and Lower Snake Rivers Temperature TMDL,” the agency wrote in an August letter. “While the Corps has analyzed and implemented multiple water temperature improvement actions over the years, the work is not done.”

    Coming in hot
    Although the dams contribute to the temperature problem, the Snake River is already vulnerable to running hot.

    Flowing from the eastern slopes of the Cascade Range, the Lower Snake River collects warm water as it flows through an area on the Idaho and Oregon border.

    That includes water from the Salmon River, an undammed, mostly wilderness area, that spiked to a high of 76 F this summer, said Chris Peery, a fish biologist in the Army Corp’s Walla Walla District.

    “There's no way to control or moderate these temperatures,” Peery explained. “But that's just normal temperatures now that… with climate change, we are getting lower flows in the system and warmer weather.”

    The warm water creates a challenge for migrating salmon, which will halt their migration when water temperatures rise above 68 F, or what scientists refer to as a “thermal barrier.”

    But pausing a salmon’s journey can be particularly risky, since most salmon stop feeding once they enter fresh water and rely solely on fat stores for their journey to spawning grounds.

    The endangered Snake River sockeye salmon faces a particularly tough journey, traveling nearly 900 miles from the Pacific Ocean to the Sawtooth Valley lakes in Idaho, which is at an elevation of 6,500 feet.

    But Peery notes that the warm water feeding into the river would create a challenge for water managers even if the Lower Snake River dams were to be removed.

    “This area gets hot in the summertime. It always has gotten hot in the summertime,” Peery said, noting that historic temperature data for the region is limited in the decades before the federal government built the dams in the 1960s and '70s.

    Among the few records available, he pointed to data from the late 1950s that shows water temperatures in July and August at or above 75 F.

    “If, for example, we could wave a magic wand and take out the dams today, we would still see temperatures like this in the Lower Snake River, especially with documented warmer weather,” Peery said.

    But Chad Brown, a supervisor for Water Quality Management in the Washington State Department of Ecology, said that while high temperatures do naturally occur in the river, storing water behind dams creates additional heat and maintains those temperatures for a longer period of time.

    “Although those temperatures may get higher naturally without the dams, it’s the magnitude and the duration that the fish are exposed,” Brown said.

    Brown added that his agency is focused on how to improve the region’s temperatures incrementally.

    “What we're asking for is that methodical process to ensure that we're looking at all different options and really looking at those that are reasonable and feasible,” Brown added.

    He pointed to the potential for “selective withdrawal” from reservoirs, in which water is funneled through a structure’s lowest outlets to tap the coldest available flows, rather than solely through hydropower facilities that sit higher up.

    Finding balance
    The Army Corps currently relies almost exclusively on water from behind the 717-foot tall Dworshak Dam — located to the east in Idaho — to moderate temperatures in the Lower Snake River.

    “The water that comes out of Dworshak is 42 degrees year round,” Peery said, and later added: “It's a very valuable resource, but it's kind of the one-trick pony. Once we release it, it's gone, and we won't be able to replace that water again until the next flood season, next spring runoff, and so it has to be managed really closely.”

    The releases from the Dworshak reservoir can account for as much as one-third of the overall water in the Lower Snake River in the summer months, lowering the river’s temperature an average of 2 to 3 degrees, Peery explained.

    As the water flows through the river, its dams and reservoirs, that temperature will typically rise as it mixes more thoroughly at each step with existing flows.

    To assist migrating salmon, the Army Corps has also focused on installing infrastructure to provide cooler water to fish exiting 100-feet high ladders or fishways, a series of 1-foot-high pools that allow the fish to move over a dam.

    “These exits, obviously, are near the surface of the river, and again, that's where this warmest water is in the system,” Peery said. New pumps push cooler water up from the base of the dam to allow fish to continue their migration, rather than hitting a “thermal barrier” of warm waters.

    Environmental advocates argue that the Army Corps could do more, however, such as by lowering the levels of the existing reservoirs.

    That’s because temperatures in the reservoirs are dictated by a variety of other factors. In addition to the temperature of water entering the facilities, things like air temperatures and the volume of a reservoir can affect how quickly water warms and how hot it gets.

    Partially emptying those facilities would also amplify the effects of the cold water released from Dworshak Dam, since it would need to cool a smaller volume of water.

    Peery acknowledged that reducing water levels in the reservoirs would likely decrease temperatures, it would also mean the Army Corps could fail to meet its additional mandates on the river system.

    If water levels in reservoirs are dropped too low, for example, it could disrupt transportation on the waterway. Similarly, a minimum water level is required for hydropower production.

    “The Corps has multiple missions that we’re authorized by Congress to fulfill,” Peery said, pointing to hydropower, environmental stewardship, navigation, recreation and flood management “We don’t have a choice to pick and choose which ones we’d like to do. We have to do them all simultaneously.”

    “There definitely are some compromises that have to be made at times,” he added.

    Johnson, with the Columbia Riverkeeper, said he is encouraged by the Army Corps' decision to reshape its plans with the working group but remains skeptical that the agency will achieve the necessary temperature reductions.

    “The Corps doesn’t get to take potential solutions off the table because they might conflict with other uses of the reservoir,” Johnson said. Instead, he said he’d like to see the agency analyze all potential solutions to the water quality problems then address whether those solutions are feasible.

    To illustrate the challenges faced by migrating fish in the region, Johnson points to low rates of success for the endangered Snake River sockeye salmon attempting to reach their spawning grounds.

    Preliminary data provided by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game shows as of late July that among the approximately 1,800 Snake River sockeye to pass the Bonneville Dam — the first major barrier to fish migrating in the Columbia and Snake rivers — 55 percent reached the Lower Granite Dam, the last of the four Lower Snake River facilities.

    By comparison, in 2023 only 22 percent of those fish reached the Lower Granite Dam — a particularly disastrous year thanks to warm temperatures — and in 2022 data showed about 66 percent.

    Johnson said while he would prefer to see the dams breached, he would otherwise like to see EPA and the Army Corps utilize "sophisticated water quality monitoring models" to determine five to 10 options for altering the river's temperature.

    “It’s pretty clear what [the Washington State Department of] Ecology’s rules say and what Ecology wants to have happen but given the Corps' apparent unwillingness to take responsibility for the heat pollution that they’re causing, they’ll continue to try to find ways to not really address all potential solutions,” Johnson said. “We’ll keep pushing them to do that."

    E&E News: Lower Snake River ‘temperature diet’ looks to shed degrees

  • KNKX: Orca task force adds 13 recommendations at final meeting as 'biological extinction' looms

    Orca.LeapingTheir goal is clear: to prevent Puget Sound’s iconic Southern Resident killer whales from going extinct. Solving that problem is anything but simple.

    The task force convened by Gov. Jay Inslee to save the orcas added 13 new recommendations this week, at its final meeting. The additions to the group’s so-called “Year 2 Report” cover more than 100 pages, adding climate change and population growth to the list of issues complicating orca recovery.

    The governor’s task force – created after an executive order from Inslee in March 2018 – is comprised of several dozen experts. They represent everything from salmon recovery groups to commercial fishing interests to local agencies, tribes, marine traffic and whale watch tour operators.

    They met 10 times at venues across the state, discussing anything that might touch the life of an endangered orca.

    There were some rifts along the way: a proposed moratorium on whale watching that was ultimately rejected by lawmakers; conflicts about immediate removal of the Lower Snake River dams.

    Despite all that, the group wrapped up the work harmoniously on Monday at the Intellectual House in Seattle.

    The task force identified pressure from population growth in the Puget Sound region as one of the less obvious, yet hardest, problems to solve. Contaminants in the runoff from cars, roads and developments that impede salmon runs have led to the loss of fish habitat, despite millions spent on recovering it.

    “We’ve had lawns on the books to protect the environment for decades now. And our attempt to get to no net loss simply isn’t working,” said Will Hall, Shoreline mayor and the only city representative on the task force.

    Hall pushed for a rewrite of a recommendation on population growth, insisting it should point toward local policies to prevent habitat loss, not just minimize it. 

    “The goal in what we’ve been talking about in the task force is how do we focus our future growth and population – and our future development – so that that actually results in net benefits to the environment, instead of making things worse,” Hall said.

    He pointed to redevelopment as an opportunity to improve things such as stormwater runoff —adding that it doesn’t have to be more expensive.

    In year one, the task force focused on three main threats to the orcas survival: increasing Chinook salmon numbers so the orcas get enough food, cleaning up waterways to reduce the toxicity that shows up in their blubber and makes them ill, and reducing disturbance from vessel traffic, which interferes with their ability to hunt. The  task force issued 36 recommendations, to which they’ve now added. Work has started on only about half of the initial recommendations and been completed (in the form of laws passed) on only five.

    TRIBES ABSTAIN

    Still, members of the group seemed hopeful as they get ready to submit their final report to the governor Nov. 8.

    After that, the governor is expected to hold a special meeting with tribes to discuss the report. The tribes have made it clear that they want recognition as sovereign nations with co-management rights.

    Many were at the table during the final meeting of the orca task force. But they withheld their approval of the final documents, abstaining when it came time to vote.

    “Because we’ve long been requesting a more appropriate forum to engage tribes in their capacity as sovereigns and as the co-managers – to address orca recovery issues that is in a lot of ways synonymous with salmon recovery,” said Cecelia Gobin, conservation policy analyst with the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission. Gobin added that a lot of good work has been done on the task force. But the treaty tribes want to make sure tribal concerns and treaty rights remain at the forefront.

    NOT FAST ENOUGH

    None of this is moving fast enough for orca demographer Ken Balcomb, senior scientist with the Center for Whale Research, who started studying and photo-identifying the local orca population long before most others on the task force.  

    Balcomb opted not to attend the final meeting.  He says the end of the line for Puget Sound's iconic killer whales is closer than most people think. 

    “Biological extinction – lack of reproduction – is almost there now. If we go at this rate, we have at most, what’s left of this reproductive generation,” Balcomb said. “Ten or twelve years and then (they’ll) be biologically extinct.”  

    Balcomb says the task force should have taken bold action to urge removal of four dams on the Lower Snake River, to make more Chinook salmon available. Instead, a new round of discussions is starting, about whether they can be removed at all.

    In August, experts declared that three Southern Resident orcas were presumed dead. Their count now stands at just 73, including two babies that are less than a year old. The whales showed up in the Puget Sound region only twice this summer, an unusual absence that researchers attribute to the scarcity of salmon here.

  • Lewiston Tribune: Layoffs come to call at Lewiston's Port

    By ELAINE WILLIAMS

    April 9, 2015 12:00 am

    barging.graph.declineLewiston Port Manager David Doeringsfeld talks about the container shipping situation at Portland, Ore., that has now stopped container traffic to the Lewiston port on the Columbia-Snake river system. Port Commissioner Mike Thomason listens during the Wednesday meeting.

    Two of the four employees at the Port of Lewiston's container operation are losing their jobs and another is being cut to half time as their employer faces the reality of no longer handling shipping containers.

    One employee will remain to cover whatever business the port finds for its dock, and will be assigned other duties, such as maintenance.

    The container yard's scheduler is the employee who is going to part time. She will do bookkeeping and provide technical expertise as the port looks for new customers.

    "She knows a heck of a lot more about pricing and moving commodities than I do," said Port Manager David Doeringsfeld.

    The layoffs were announced at Wednesday's port commission meeting, just one day after Hapag-Lloyd confirmed it would no longer call on the Port of Portland in Oregon. More than a dozen community members and economic development experts attended the meeting, asking questions about the issue or offering to help.

    The news prompted the Port of Lewiston to suspend its container operations indefinitely. Hapag-Lloyd shipped most of the containers that originated in Lewiston and traveled the Snake and Columbia rivers to Portland on their way to overseas destinations.

    Hapag-Lloyd was one of two remaining container carriers at the Port of Portland, where almost all outbound cargo from the Port of Lewiston goes before being transferred to oceangoing ships. Another, Hanjin, left Portland in March.

    Exactly what effect the change will have on the port's finances is not clear. Doeringsfeld predicts the loss for this fiscal year could be in the neighborhood of $20,000.

    By comparison, container operations generated $1.5 million for the port in fiscal years 2007 through 2014, Doeringsfeld said, including $900,000 from megaloads.

    It's too soon to know about next year since the port could find new users for the dock, he said, such as makers of wood pellets, clay or large pieces of equipment like rock pickers that might be rolled on or off a vessel.

    Lewiston port commissioners said they have been dealing with the possibility of discontinued container shipping on many fronts.

    In one instance, Commissioner Jerry Klemm wrote an email to a labor leader he knows. Klemm asked for the labor leader's help in seeking a resolution to conflict between union workers and Portland container terminal operator ICTSI Oregon, which has been blamed for slow handling of containers at the Port of Portland. The email recipient, Klemm said, acknowledged the communication.

    "The union has sought to improve operations only to be rebuffed by ICTSI management," International Longshore and Warehouse Union spokeswoman Jennifer Sargent wrote in an email.

    "We hope that ICTSI revises its 'take it or leave it' approach with their workforce, customers and vendors, because it's been tremendously hurtful to the entire region," Sargent wrote.

    ICTSI did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    The Lewiston port commission has also brought the issue to the attention of Idaho Gov. C.L. (Butch) Otter and Idaho Department of Agriculture Director Celia Gould, said Port Commissioner Mary Hasenoehrl.

    The hope was they might influence Oregon's governor, who appoints Port of Portland commissioners, Hasenoehrl said.

    Oregon Gov. Kate Brown has been following what's unfolding at the Port of Portland closely, said Chris Pair, a spokesman at her office in Salem.

    "We're engaged in negotiations," Pair said. "It isn't something we just let happen."

    Brown unveiled a $250,000 project Wednesday to compile a list of recommendations for Oregon's 2016 Legislature to help small- and medium-sized businesses with their transportation challenges.

    Regardless of how successful those efforts are, Hasenoehrl said the Port of Lewiston will continue to be relevant.

    "We still have a lot of work to do with our economic development," she said.

    In other business, Port of Lewiston commissioners allocated $10,000 for a new public outreach initiative with the ports of Clarkston and Whitman County, which are also contributing $10,000 each.

    "The committee shall have the authority to collect and disseminate information and to engage services of consultants and experts on an as-needed basis," according to a description of the initiative in an agreement approved by all three ports.

    ---

     

  • Patagonia's The Cleanest Line: Save Money, Save Salmon, Save Mike: Free the Snake

    orca eating salmon CFWRAugust 21, 2015

    By Steve Hawley

    Meet Mike. He’s 21 years old, 20 feet long, weighs about 10,000 pounds. He speaks a language that was taught to him by his elders: a series of squeaks, clicks and squeals that allow him to coordinate hunting strategies with his clan. His species is the apex predator in the eastern Pacific. He also babysits.

    Mike is often seen protectively swimming alongside his younger siblings, part of a group of 80 orcas known as the Southern Residents that spend their summers fishing in the vicinity of Puget Sound. But over the past decade the babysitting gigs have been too few and far between. Not enough young orcas are making it through pregnancy, birth and into adolescence. Toxicity is a problem, as it is for all the world’s large marine mammals. But lack of food—Chinook salmon—is a death sentence. Acknowledging as much, NOAA put Mike and the rest of the Southern Residents on the Endangered Species list in 2005.

    It takes around 600,000 Chinook salmon to feed the Southern Residents each year. In winter, these whales feed on Chinook just outside the mouth of the Columbia, where the fish stage for their migration as far as a thousand miles upriver.

    Columbia/Snake Chinook are endangered too. A cabal of national agencies that likes to call themselves the federal family has spent $9 billion over the past 30 years on a salmon recovery plan that hasn’t recovered any fish. Reliance on hatcheries, trap and haul schemes, and Rube Goldberg style techno-fixes at the dams themselves have made it possible for these agencies to put off making difficult decisions. Bad policy, bad science, and inept management have been masked by some luck with the weather and the courts. Yet the cardinal rule about getting by on luck is that it has to run out.

    The lucky streak ended on the Columbia this year. Little snow and rain and a scorching hot June and July have helped push water temperatures beyond what salmon can stand. A minimum of a quarter million adult sockeye salmon died in hot water in the Columbia and Snake last month. Century-old six- to ten-foot-long sturgeon are washing up dead along the banks of these two rivers. Worse yet, the winter we didn’t have in 2015 is likely a preview of the winters we won’t have on a regular basis in the future. Climate projections suggest what looks like a disaster for fish this year might look routine a half-century from now.

    The federal family has little to say and wants nothing to do so far with revamping the thoroughly plugged river to meet present or future needs for fish. They pass off this year’s debacle as an unlucky bout of hot weather. But the fact is, water impounded behind a dam works as a giant solar collector. A deadly heat sink. While this year is hot, the dammed Snake River has made an annual summer tradition out of exceeding temperature standards mandated by federal and state law. A computer model created by the EPA calculates the capacity for warming in these sweltering reservoirs. According to this model, four dams on the lower Snake River have the capacity to heat the river by double-digit degrees Fahrenheit. Cooling the river by half that much even in a summer like this one would transform the Snake from a slackwater deathtrap back into the migration corridor it has been for millions of years. But cooling the river requires a change in tactics.

    A popular term among environmental wonks is “mitigation,” which the dictionary defines as “lessening the force or intensity of something unpleasant.” The mitigation mindset has plagued river and fish recovery efforts all over the country, because as the meaning of the word suggests, mitigation stops short of doing away with the unpleasant thing altogether. There is no mitigating for high water temperature on the Snake River. The unpleasant thing has to go. Four of them to be exact: Ice Harbor, Little Goose, Lower Monumental and Lower Granite Dams. Doing so would grant unfettered access to 5,500 miles of heat resistant high-elevation salmon-bearing streams, the arteries and veins of 4.4 million acres of wilderness habitat in Oregon, Washington and Idaho. As a bonus, getting rid of these dams, it has been calculated by economists and engineers, would be a net economic benefit to the region.

    Writer Wendell Berry coined the phrase “solving for pattern” as the antidote to the mitigation mindset. He described it as imagining and acting on “a solution that leads to a ramifying set of solutions.” It’s hard to think of an act that exemplifies solving for pattern as well as getting rid of a high-cost, low value dam.

    A year after the utility company PacifiCorp blew a hole in the bottom of Condit Dam on the White Salmon River, Chinook spawned on clean gravel beds not a hundred yards from where the dam had stood. Further North in Washington state, the Elwha’s robust estuary rebuild, courtesy of sediment settling at its mouth that had for a century been trapped behind two dams, is happening so fast it seems like science fiction.

    And on the Klamath River, after devastating fish kills due to tepid water in 2002, ranchers, Indian tribes and conservationists hammered out a hotly contested agreement that will rid that river of four fish killing dams. Better yet, a few Klamath locals with traditionally opposing interests, people that had hated each other on general principle for generations, are now working together to get an utterly dysfunctional Congress to finalize their dam removal deal. At least two former Klamath adversaries have admitted they now golf together.

    We like the idea of old enemies putting aside their difference to play games for some of the same reasons we like to watch highly intelligent, charismatic creatures like Mike nurturing and protecting their young. Both are stories about taking good care, about wild possibilities coming true, the grace to be had in not just living up to but living well with our shared responsibilities.

    Mike and I are neighbors. Our neighborhood was until recently one of the richest marine ecosystems anywhere, one that stretches from the continental shelf to the continental divide. It was all powered by a river that was the top Chinook producer on the planet. We both badly want some semblance of that richness back. The river feeds us both. But Mike’s life depends on it. So let’s solve for pattern once more. Save money. Save salmon. Save Mike. Free the Snake.

    It’s time to act. Please contact President Obama today!

    Visit our partners at Save Our Wild Salmon to email President Obama AND call the White House comment line: (202) 456-1111. When you call, urge the President to “Please remove the four lower Snake River dams in Southeastern Washington state to save the longest, highest migrating salmon on the planet, and the Pacific Northwest’s endangered Southern Resident orcas.”

    Steve Hawley is a writer from Hood River, Oregon. He’s at work on a documentary film about the connection between orcas and salmon. To learn more, visit dammedtoextinction.com. He’s also working on a book with DamNation co-producer Matt Stoecker about future prospects for healthy rivers around the world.

    Check out the blog with full photos and video links here.

     

     

    Learn more about our campaign to Free the Snake at Patagonia.com.

  • Q13 Fox: Scientists warn of salmon extinction if Snake River dams stay

    October 24, 2019

    By Simone Del Rosario Q13.Scientist.LetterSEATTLE -- Dozens of scientists are urging lawmakers to breach four dams along Eastern Washington's Snake River, declaring salmon are at risk of going extinct if they don't. In a letter signed by 55 scientists, representatives from Washington, Oregon and Idaho declared that hot water is harming salmon and steelhead in the Columbia-Snake River Basin. They say the reservoirs behind the eight dams in the system are a big part of the problem. When water temperatures rise above 68 degrees Fahrenheit, salmon die. In late summer and early fall, these scientists say the dams push temperatures more than 6 degrees higher on average, reaching dangerous thresholds. Currently, the federal government is studying the impacts the dams have on threatened fish after a federal judge ruled the last plan was inadequate to protect the environment. "They must do more than just tweak the system a bit to deal with the temperature," said Rick Williams, a former fisheries consultant for Northwest Power and Conservation Council. "We will fail to solve the hot water problem, and fail to restore salmon runs, if federal agencies select any long-term plan that does not include removal of lower Snake dams." Williams told Q13 he predicts salmon and steelhead will disappear from his home state of Idaho within 20 years if the dams remain. Congress ultimately authorizes the federal projects along the river and several members have already pushed back against calls to breach the dams, citing power production and agricultural uses as reasons to keep them. Over the years, the federal government has spent $16 billion trying to mitigate the impacts the dams have on fish. The river system is home to 13 species listed on the Endangered Species list. The endangered southern resident orcas also rely on the chinook salmon that come from the Snake and Columbia rivers.

  • SOS Blog - Salmon, jobs, ESA defended; bad riders linger

    Hood_River_Bridge.web

    Thanks to today's House vote of 224-202, the bipartisan amendment from Rep. Norm Dicks (D-WA), Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA), and Rep. Colleen Hanabusa (D-HI) has eliminated the anti-salmon, jobs, and ESA "Extinction Rider" from the final spending bill (H.R. 2584).

    Read more over at the SOS Blog.

  • 'It Takes Our Purpose': With No Salmon, Yurok Tribe Struggles With Identity

    tribe.yurokBy Lisa Morehouse
    November 29, 2017

    The Yurok tribe has fished for salmon in the Klamath River for centuries. Salmon is essential to Yurok ceremonies, for food, and for income. But this fall, the number of Chinook swimming up the Klamath, in the Pacific Northwest, was the lowest on record, threatening the tribe's entire culture and way of life.

    Erika Chavez and Jerome Nick Jr., cousins who work for the Yurok Tribal Fisheries Department, are patrolling the Klamath River in the far northwest corner of California. Nick perches in the front of the boat, with Chavez at the helm as they head to the mouth of the river. "Just checking to see if there's any tribal members fishing," Chavez says. "Then we're gonna head up to the bridge to see if anyone's there."

    Today, the cousins are also are volunteering to catch salmon for tribal elders — the only fishing allowed this year.

    Chavez slows the boat so Nick can pull up a net they set a couple hours ago. The verdict?

    "No fish," Nick says, shaking his head.

    The cousins are alone on the water today. In a normal year during commercial fishing season, Nick says, "practically this whole area is nets, all the way up to the bridge. You just see corks on the water, the river's so packed with nets."

    Without people on the river fishing, the salmon have a chance to travel up river to spawn. "At least that's my hope," Chavez says.

    Unlike a lot of Yurok, Nick didn't grow up fishing. He moved here six years ago to get away from family drama in Oregon. Now, when he's not working the overnight shift at WalMart, he's on the water. "I work here with my cousin and she keeps me sane," he says. "She's my rock."

    Chavez grew up with her family camping right here for the summer. Her grandma would make fry bread, and she and her great-grandma would watch everyone fish. Chavez started fishing when she was nine. "My partner was my auntie, she's the one that taught me, and our whole bottom of our boat was filled with fish. Everyone was catching plenty for their families. It was beautiful."

    For the Yurok, a rich salmon harvest means covering the basics. "It feeds our family," Chavez says. "When commercial's here we use that money to buy our kids school clothes."

    Chavez usually fishes for her grandma. "I get her 10 to 15 fish every year, so it's in her freezer for the whole year," she says. This year, "she'll have to deal with deer meat or elk meat or something."

    About five minutes away in the town of Klamath, thousands of Yurok tribal members and friends gather every August for the tribe's Salmon Festival. There's a parade, and a stick game that looks to my untrained eye like a cross between wrestling and field hockey. At the 55th Annual Yurok Salmon Festival, Oscar Gensaw cooks salmon the traditional way, on redwood skewers around a fire pit. This year, though, the tribe had to buy salmon from Alaska.

    True to the festival's name, there's salmon cooked in the traditional Yurok way. Around the edge of a long, narrow fire pit, salmon skewered on redwood sticks form a kind of crown. Oscar Gensaw monitors the scene, wearing a T-shirt that reads: Fish Boss.

    "When you first start cooking, you get those fat rings around the fish like a ring on a tree," Gensaw says. "When the fat starts dripping out of each of those rings you know that side is done."

    Gensaw grew up in Klamath and has three sons and a baby daughter. "My main goal is to pass this onto my boys so one day I can be the ultimate fish boss, and be on the side when they cook," he says with a laugh. But he wants to teach them with salmon caught in the Klamath — not the fish he's cooking with today.

    "These come from Alaska," he says. The tribe had to buy this salmon, for the first time in the history of the festival.

    The tribe works with federal agencies every year to estimate the fall run and to decide how many salmon can be caught. So few Chinook were expected to return to spawn this year that commercial fishing was shut down to protect them. The Yurok were allowed to catch just over 600 salmon, in a tribe of 6,000.

    Those low numbers are the end result of drought, disease, and a long history of habitat destruction. The Yurok place much of the blame on upstream dams that have blocked salmon from ancient spawning grounds for over a century. After years of debate and struggle, four dams are set to be removed by 2020.

    In the parade, Annelia Hillman commands the megaphone for the Klamath Justice Coalition, chanting, "Undam the Klamath, bring the salmon home." She tell me that tribes along the Klamath have had to fight logging, gold mining, the dams, and now a proposed natural gas pipeline. "If we're putting our water at risk like that, we're putting life on earth at risk," she says.

    Hillman's a youth social worker, and she says, when the balance with the river is off, the Yurok feel the effects. "When we can't be in our river, can't eat our fish, it kind of takes our purpose away. We have one of the highest suicide rates... and I think that's directly correlated to our lack of salmon and our inability to continue our way of life," Hillman says.

    The Yurok have fought for years to maintain their ties to the Klamath River and its salmon. In the 1960s, game wardens arrested many Yurok time and again for gillnet fishing on the river, a practice banned by the state. One young man, Raymond Mattz, challenged the arrests. His fight went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reaffirmed the tribe's fishing rights.

    His nephew, Paul Mattz Van Mechelen, runs Paul's Famous Smoked Salmon on Highway 101. Customers know he's open if there's smoke coming from the traditional fire pit in front. "That's my Yurok Weber!" he jokes.

    Paul Mattz Van Mechelen, who runs Paul's Famous Smoked Salmon, has had to buy salmon from fishermen hundreds of miles away instead of fishing for Chinook in the Klamath River, just 50 feet from his California shop.

    Van Mechelen opened the shop 16 years ago after his grandmother came to him in a dream. A steady stream of customers comes to sample and buy the wild Chinook salmon he prepares with flavors like garlic, lemon pepper and teriyaki. Usually, he gets his stock from the Klamath River.

    "Not the last two years, though," he says. "I had to go to the Columbia River," hundreds of miles away in Oregon, where he buys from native fishermen. Gas, and payment for fish, are big expenses for a business owner who usually fishes about 50 feet from his store.

    The losses go deeper than just finances. "I got a great niece — she's only 2 — but she helped start up the boat and and smiled and did all that last year," Van Mechelen says. "Her auntie was five when she pulled in a fish. So that whole part of learning and teaching them who they are and what this river gives to them is kind of life in one way."

    When I ask him to explain that, that fishing is who Yurok are, Van Mechelen gets emotional, even stepping out of the store for a minute.

    "I had my grandma at a young age tell me I had fish blood. I didn't understand it, I didn't know why. But we're all fishing people."

    And when you have fish blood but you have to stay away from fishing in hopes of keeping salmon here in the future? "It's sad to stay next to a river and wake up and not see fish go by," Van Mechelen says. "That's the saddest part. It's bad enough you dream about it."

    All he can do, he says, is pray the salmon come back.

    This piece is part of the series California Foodways and was produced in collaboration with the Food & Environment Reporting Network, a non-profit, investigative news organization. Broadcast versions of this story aired on KQED's The California Report and NPR's Here & Now.

    Read the story at NPR here: https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/11/29/561581193/it-takes-our-purpose-with-no-salmon-yurok-tribe-struggles-with-identity

  • "Commercial Fisheries, Salmon, and Orcas" - by Candace Calloway Whiting in the Seattle PI's City Brights

    by Candace Calloway Whiting
    From Seattle PI's City Brights

    seattle.brightlightsTurn on any health/talk show, and it is not long before your might hear the host touting the benefit of eating salmon. We are told that the fats present in salmon and a few other species of fish are good for our hearts, and it is recommended that we eat moderate portions of those fish twice a week.

    That is all well and good...except there are so many mouths to feed; over 300 million Americans at present, and nearly 7 billion people on the planet. If even just 10% of us eat salmon twice a week, we are talking about a tremendous amount of fish. How in the world will we ever manage to catch enough? Can we? It would seem that much is riding on the ability of the commercial fishermen and women to provide us with the salmon we need, yet leave some for the orcas, without driving wild salmon to extinction. It's a tall order...

    Read more of Whiting's article.

  • "River of Renewal"- Salmon, Dams, Orcas, and You

    by Candace Calloway Whiting

    The following is part one of a five part series on the intertwined fates of salmon in the Columbia and Snake Rivers and southern resident killer whales.

    orcasThe other night I just happened to catch on the PBS station KCTS the second half of an excellent documentary about the Klamath River, called "River of Renewal". I found the part that I watched to be coherent and insightful, and regret that I missed the first half. Although the Klamath River runs through Oregon/California, the film covers the same issues we face here in Washington as we consider removal of dams in the Snake/Columbia river basin.

    Read more of Whiting's Intro.

    Part 2 - Timeline: Salmon, Dams, and Orcas

    Part 3 - How Many Fish Do The Orcas Need?

    Part 4 - How Many Fish Do The Orcas Need? (Part Two)

    Part 5 - And Baby (Orca) Makes 5!

    Part 6 - Commercial Fisheries, Salmon, and Orcas

    And the latest: Have A Heart SeaWorld, And Let Corky Go Home

  • 2017 Year in Review: Much done – much to be done

    2017 has been a big year. With your support and with help from our many partners, we’ve accomplished a tremendous amount and laid the groundwork for new gains in 2018. Our collective efforts are helping better meet the needs of struggling wild salmon and steelhead populations now as we build the public and political foundation to free the lower Snake River, to modernize the U.S. – Canada Columbia River Treaty, and more.

    The effects of overzealous dam building last century are now combining with the intensifying impacts of climate change. Wild salmon and steelhead of the Columbia-Snake River Basin – and the people and fish and wild life that depend upon them - need resilient rivers, cool waters, and reconnected habitats.2017 Flotilla.greg1

    Removing the four lower Snake River dams. Modernizing Columbia River Treaty. Giving voice to the river, its fish and wildlife, its Tribal and non-tribal communities. SOS is working for big, visionary changes - protecting our lands and waters, rebuilding an irreplaceable ecosystem, investing in diverse communities.

    Read on to review some of SOS’ major accomplishments this year, but know that more is needed – especially so in the Trump era. Salmon, orca, and fishing communities face huge challenges today.

    Thank you for being part of the SOS community. We appreciate your generous support and hope that you can help us to leverage and defend our victories - and make new progress in 2018 - with a fully tax-deductible gift before the end of this year.

    And you can take a look at our donor gifts and raffle items here.

    With your help, we will continue to mobilize our members and move the politicians to protect, restore, and reconnect the healthy, resilient habitats that wild salmon and steelhead need.

    Here are just some of our major accomplishments this year:

    • Organizing for dam removal: SOS and allies dominated the court-ordered NEPA Review Public Scoping Process1mccoy.sea.inside.jb. Together, we mobilized more than 2,000 people for public meetings and rallies, generated almost 400,000 comments supporting dam removal, and helped allies to submit nearly two dozen detailed policy comments. Reflecting big changes in the Northwest, some significant regional actors expressed clear support for a thorough dam removal analysis - including the City of Lewiston, States of Washington and Oregon, Columbia Basin Tribes, EPA, Seattle City Light, and several others.
    • Helping salmon now: SOS member groups – in alliance with the State of Oregon and Nez Perce Tribe - secured additional court-ordered spill starting in 2018 that will increase juvenile fish survival through the federal labyrinth of dams and reservoirs and increase adult salmon returns. The court’s order also increased scrutiny on questionable spending on the lower Snake River dams as we decide their fate.
    • Securing action for orca: SOS’ strategic organizing work with OSA spurred Governor Jay Inslee to establish an Emergency Orca Task Force (link) (SOS will ensure that Columbia-Snake salmon figure prominently) and moved the Puget southern resident killer whales j2 and j45 chasing salmon crSound Partnership to pass a resolution highlighting the urgency facing Southern Resident orca and the critical need rebuild salmon populations in the Columbia-Snake Basin and elsewhere in order to feed our region’s hungry, struggling orca community.
    • Stopping harmful legislation: SOS led a successful effort last winter to kill a misleading, anti-salmon resolution in the Washington State Legislature. And right now we’re in a battle to stop HR 3144, introduced in Congress by Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers. We’ve generated good media coverage and editorials - and organized significant opposition in Congress. That said – this bill is still very much alive and our work to stop it must continue.
    • Organizing contacts to elected officials: SOS has coordinated hundreds of thousands of letters and emails to targeted members of congress and Northwest Governors in 2017 re: salmon, climate, orca, increased spill, NEPA Review, Columbia River Treaty, and more. We’ve organized and participated in dozens of meetings with elected officials and/or their staff. You can take action here!
    • Educating, Organizing, Mobilizing: In 2017, we hosted and co-hosted several dozen events in the region: presentations, outings, rallies. We’re both talking and listening; we’re educating and engaging people to act on behalf of these inter-connected issues of resilient rivers and watersheds, salmon and orca, community and economy, clean energy and climate. The 3rd Annual Flotilla to Free the Snake! organized with Nimiipuu Protecting the Environment, Friends of the Clearwater, Idaho Rivers United and many other organizations and businesses drew 350 people despite smoky skies and forest fires. See a 7 min. video from our friends at Wingspan Media here (link coming soon).
    • interfaith.2Pursuing shared solutions: SOS continues to reach out to stakeholders including farmers and utilities to listen and learn, and to look for common ground. Restoring and reconnecting the resilient rivers salmon and steelhead need must address the needs of local communities. We hope tp foster conversations on the economic benefits that removing dams and restoring the lower Snake River will bring to the region. We’ll continue to have these conversations and look for ways to expand these dialogues in the months ahead.
    • Developing new information: We’re working with our partners to identify and develop accurate, up-to-date analyses and reports to educate the public and politicians and to inform policy. We joined forces, for example, with Columbia Basin Tribes to hire economists at Earth Economics to assess the value of Columbia Basin's 'natural capital' – clean water, fish and wildlife, flood abatement, etc. And there is more in the works: SOS and its members are working with expert firms on similar types of reports that can help inform the region’s thinking about recovery options and paths forward. Look for these in the first half of 2018.
    • Generating media coverage: in just the last year, leveraging the NEPA Review, impending Treaty negotiations, salmon and orca population trends, organizing rallies and events, energy and economics, our program work has helped generate well over one hundred stories, editorials and op-eds – print, radio, and online. You can find them here on our new and improved website!

    With your support, we’ll continue to making progress in 2018 to:

    • sockeye copyProtect, restore and reconnect the healthy rivers and resilient habitats that wild fish need now – and over time.
    • Mobilize people and keep moving the politics.
    • Stop the attacks on our salmon and our rivers – like HR 3144 – and defend and expand our gains that are helping salmon and orca and fishing communities.
    • Envision what a restored lower Snake River corridor could look like and the economic, recreation and cultural benefits it would provide to towns and communities.
    • Build new alliances and work with Northwest people on shared solutions.
    • Bird-dog the court-ordered NEPA environmental review – to ensure the dam removal analysis – its costs and its benefits – are fully and fairly considered.
    • And much more!

    Thank you for being part of the SOS community. With your support, and working with others, we can achieve the big, systemic changes the Pacific Northwest ecology and economy need to survive and thrive in the 21st century - with resilient rivers, abundant wild salmon and steelhead, and vibrant communities.

    2017.EOY.collage

  • 400,000 citizens submit comments calling for removal of the lower Snake River dams

    February 2017

    1mccoy.sea.inside.jbDespite efforts by the “Action Agencies" to bury an important public comment process amidst a chaotic election cycle and the year-end holidays, conservation and fishing advocates did an excellent job generating media coverage, contacting elected officials, and organizing comment and turnout at more than a dozen public meetings in support of restoring wild salmon populations and removing the four costly dams on the lower Snake River in eastern Washington.

    The board and staff of the Save Our wild Salmon Coalition send out a huge "THANK YOU!" to all the organizations, businesses and individuals that mobilized during the recent NEPA Public Comment Period - to spread the word, make presentations, educate friends and family, submit comment, attend rallies and meetings, and much more!

    More than 2,000 citizens attended rallies to "Free the Snake" and the agencies’ public meetings and close to 400,000 people from across the Northwest and nation submitted their official public comments expressing support for the restoration of a freely-flowing lower Snake River as a critical part of any legally valid salmon protection plan in the Columbia Basin.

    -- View photos from the public meetings (and the 2016 Free the Snake Flotilla) across the region here. --

    The Agency-led NEPA Public Scoping and Comment Period closed on February 7, 2017 but only after significant numbers of citizen comments, detailed policy comments and dozens of media stories. More than 50 stories and opinion pieces appeared last fall and early winter in print, online and on television and radio and included salmon, orca, fishing, and river advocates' concerns and perspectives. There were also numerous citizen and community leader meetings with state and federal elected officials.

    -- See a listing of and links to the media coverage of the Fall 2016-Winter 2017 NEPA Review Public Scoping and Comment Period here. --

    1mccoy.workman

    In addition to hundreds of thousands of citizen comments, scores of entities in the region also submitted detailed public comment – delivering recommendations to the Action Agencies about issues of critical concern as they begin what must be a full, fair, comprehensive and transparent NEPA Review and consideration of all salmon restoration alternatives, including the removal of the four high-cost, low-value lower Snake River dams.

    Below find a partial list of official comments from federal agencies, Tribes, States, utilities and NGOs asking the Action Agencies to, among other things, carefully, thoroughly and fairly consider the costs, benefits, opportunities and tradeoffs associated with the removal of the four federal dams on the lower Snake River.

    -- Read selected excerpts concerning the lower Snake River dams from EPA, Nez Perce Tribe, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, Pacific Fisheries Management Council, Washington State, Oregon, City of Lewiston, Seattle City Light, and others here. --

    1comment cards.web

    Links to complete public comments below from:

    State of Oregon

    State of Washington

    Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission

    Nez Perce Tribe

    Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Pacific Fisheries Management Council

    Seattle City Light

    National Wildlife Federation

    Save Our wild Salmon Coalition/Earthjustice

    Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association

    Coastal Trollers Association

    NW Energy Coalition / Idaho Conservation League

    Natural Resource Defense Council

    Sierra Club

    Orca-Salmon Alliance

    Natural Resource Economics

    BACKGROUND: The three Northwest Dam Agencies – Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation recently completed the first phase – Public Scoping and Official Comment Period - of a court-ordered NEPA EIS Analysis. On May 4, 2016, United States District Court in Portland rejected the federal government’s 2014 Salmon Plan for the Columbia/Snake River Basin based on violations of the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. This was the fifth consecutive federal salmon plan for the Columbia/Snake Rivers to be rejected now by three judges across twenty years.

    Following on his May ruling, presiding Judge Michael Simon ordered NOAA-Fisheries in July to produce a new, legally-valid and science-based Salmon Plan (or Biological Opinion) by December 2018. He also ordered the Northwest dam “Action Agencies” to complete a full, fair, and comprehensive NEPA Review and produce an Environmental Impact Statement that updates critical information and considers all reasonable salmon restoration measures, including the removal of the lower Snake River dams – an option that the agencies have steadfastly avoided even analyzing for two decades.

    -- Read more on the May 2016 Simon Ruling here. --

    1Free the Snake Seattle 12.1.16

  • A Northwest first – wind over water!

    windmills garrett downenA recent Oregonian article explores how earlier this month, for the first time ever, wind generated more power in the Pacific Northwest than water. This is a milestone reflecting the diversification of the region’s hydro-heavy power portfolio. Thus far wind-over-water has been a brief occurrence, but one sure to become more common as additional wind projects go online.

    The Oregonian article quotes the Renewable Northwest Project’s Cameron Yourkowski about how wind and hydro can work well together in our region. Sometimes, however, barriers arise. During the last two springs – amid the juvenile salmon’s downriver migration and high river flows – the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has cut transmission access to the region’s wind power producers rather than decreasing hydropower to leave grid space for the electricity that those wind turbines produce.

    BPA inaccurately claims that the extra spill - more water going over the dams rather than through the turbines - that would have been caused by cutting back hydro generation would harm migrating salmon and steelhead. The best and latest science, however, supports wind and salmon, not BPA. More spring spill the last two years would have benefitted both wind producers and salmon and steelhead returns.

    What our region really needs are effective, comprehensive solutions that work well for wind, for hydro - and for salmon. BPA should honor all of its public responsibilities and reposition itself as a regional leader providing clean, affordable, renewable energy – including hydro and wind – while protecting and restoring healthy, harvestable populations of wild salmon and steelhead in the Columbia and Snake rivers.

    Salmon, fishing and clean energy advocates, along with businesses and others, believe this is one of the important issues that could be tackled through regional stakeholder talks. It’s time to get them started!

  • ABC News: Snake River among top 10 most endangered rivers in the US, conservation group says

    A series of dams is threatening the local salmon population.

    By Kayna Whitworth, Alyssa Pone, andHaley Yamada
    April 23, 2021

    blog 120206 Ice Harbor oil spillWatch the video here: https://abcn.ws/3eyKGGN

    Conservation group American Rivers has named Snake River, which passes through four Western states, the most endangered river in the country due to a series of dams that it says are threatening the existence of the river’s native salmon population.

    “They’ve never been closer to extinction than they are today. We’ve got to remove the four dams on the lower Snake River,” said Amy Souers Kober, an American Rivers spokesperson.

    The Snake River Basin is home to half of all Pacific salmon in the lower 48 states, the group wrote in a statement.

    The fishing industry in the region alone generates $5 billion annually and supports more than 36,000 jobs, according to American Rivers.

    “When people don’t come to fish, then the cash registers aren’t ringing and that’s had a pretty big economic impact,” said Mark Deming, of Northwest River Supplies, an outdoor gear and equipment company.

    For decades, some environmental activists have been advocating for breaching, or getting rid of, the earthen portion of the dams, on the river. But the dams also serve a purpose for farmers, supporting their 5 million acres of land in southeastern Washington State alone, and aiding in the transportation of 10% of the nation’s wheat exports, which travel by barge, according to the Idaho State government.

    Wheat farmer Tom Kammerzell said the river system is environmentally friendly and cost effective.

    “There’s a very slim margin of profits in wheat,” said Kammerzell. “It would be impossible to continue to be able to produce [without the river].”

    Currently, Idaho Rep. Mike Simpson wants to have $33.5 billion from President Joe Biden’s infrastructure plan earmarked to save the Snake River. His plan includes removing the earthen part of the dams to clear the waterways, replacing the energy produced at the dams, and upgrading the transportation and irrigation services that the dams provide, hoping to make the communities that the river serves, like the farmers, whole until they can supplement shipping methods.

  • Al Jazeera America: Salmon people pray for sacred fish to return to historic home

    crt.woman copyNorthwest tribes urge US and Canada to revise Columbia River Treaty to allow safe passage for salmon crossing dams

    October 5, 2014

    by Kevin Taylor

    KETTLE FALLS, Wash. — Along a rocky shore where his ancestors gathered for millennia at once thundering but now flooded rapids, Richard Armstrong stepped into the Columbia River to pray.

    With eyes closed, Armstrong, a member of the Okanagan Nation Alliance, pounded a rhythm on a small hide drum and prayed and sang in a Salish dialect. His prayers urged the U.S. and Canada to renegotiate the Columbia River Treaty, which has cut salmon off from this stretch of water.

    For thousands of years, Native people had gathered at these falls to spear and net the leaping fish. Armstrong is a descendant of the last salmon chief who regulated the bustling fishery.

    But since 1942, adult chinook and sockeye salmon returning from the ocean have been blockaded more than 100 miles downstream by the Grand Coulee Dam, a high-head hydropower dam with a massive concrete face 551 feet high. It was built with no provision for fish passage.

    The Columbia River Treaty, which was negotiated in the 1950s and signed in 1964, aimed to generate hydropower and protect cities like Portland, Oregon, from flooding by building five high-head hydropower dams. But they didn’t provide for fish passage, and small bands of Native people in the U.S. and Canada weren’t consulted, though they stood to lose a fishery central to their nutrition, economy, religion and culture. Some 2,300 settlers as well as Indians were flooded out of fertile valleys in Canada that now fill and empty like bathtubs by dams built to regulate downstream river flow and light distant cities.

    The salmon have been absent here for 72 years — for roughly three human and 15 salmon generations. Is that long enough to seem unchangeable?

    “While we’ve protected Portland from flooding, people forget we’ve permanently flooded upriver,” said D.R. Michel, executive director of the Upper Columbia United Tribes (UCUT), a coalition of Northwest tribes. Michel said the reservoirs, which can fluctuate up to 40 feet, have permanently displaced thousands of people,
    “We’ve swung so far to the other side, where everything is about bottom lines and profit. It’s just a short-sighted way of looking at things,” he added.

    “As a society, we really need to talk about the cost of things,” said John Sirois, a former chairman of the Colville Confederated Tribes who now works for UCUT. “Who’s really being hurt so I can have cheap power and be protected from floods?”

    One might think salmon don’t have a prayer to hurdle Grand Coulee or the additional high-head dams (with no fish ladders) that were built after it.

    And yet it’s been a summer of prayer up and down the river. In August alone, there were 17 interfaith vigils conducted between Astoria, Oregon, where the Columbia is nine miles wide at its mouth, to Canal Flats, British Columbia, some 1,243 river miles away in the Canadian Rockies, where it bubbles out of the ground.

    A common hope expressed at the vigils was that the U.S. and Canada will modify the Columbia River Treaty by adding ecosystem-based function. This is a fancy way to say that dams should be re-engineered for salmon to pass and that water levels be managed to help with migration and to preserve the nests, known as redds, that salmon build in gravelly shallows.

    The first chance either party could terminate or change the treaty is in 2024, with 10 years’ notice. That 10 years began this month, and since December, both the Bonneville Power Administration and Corps of Engineers and the British Columbia provincial government — the U.S. and Canadian entities involved — have endorsed adding ecosystem-based function. The endorsements came with a variety of caveats — mainly getting salmon past Grand Coulee Dam, which is often thought to be impossible or prohibitively expensive.

    “I was a bit surprised,” said Matt Wynne, vice chairman of the Spokane Tribe and current chair of UCUT. But, he said, tribes had begun talking to the Corps of Engineers and BPA about returning salmon stocks as early as 2008.

    Wynne, Michel and others say tribes are not relying solely on an opaque, decade-long process through the treaty, but also seek leverage via the federal Power Act and provisions of individual dam relicensing agreements.

    When it came to the treaty, Wynne said the corps and BPA suggested the 15 river tribes in the far-flung Columbia River Basin, which reaches from the Canadian Rockies to Nevada via the tributary Snake River, first make a unified statement. It may have seemed reasonable enough, but Wynne and others knew how often the disparate tribes disagreed. To him, it seemed a cynical ploy to pin failure on the tribes.

    This time, Wynne said, “The tribes said, ‘We’ve got to protect the river — we’ve got to protect the resource,’ and we came up with a common views document.”

    Into these undercurrents of politics and history is where Armstrong waded out to pray in what has, since 1942, become known as the Ceremony of Tears. But the mood was different this summer. Rows of people lining the shore behind Armstrong were invited to pick up river rocks off the beach and knock them together, making their own private prayer.

    Over the stilled water of Lake Roosevelt, the 165-mile-long reservoir behind Grand Coulee Dam, stretching nearly to Canada, came a staccato sound.
    Tok! Tok! Tok!

    The steady clacking of rocks in dozens of hands, brown and white, beat time along with small drums. When Armstrong ended his prayer, people were invited to throw the rocks into the water so that their prayers might be heard too.

    The clacking, it was said, is the sound salmon hear when a free-running river is sluicing at high flood, knocking rocks along the river bottom.

    Despite their blocked passage, the salmon still come — or at least they try to. About 150 miles downriver from the ceremony, at the Chief Joseph Dam, constructed below Grand Coulee in 1961, native chinook salmon this summer bumped nose-first into its concrete face.

    Randy Friedlander, a tribal member and fisheries biologist for the Colville Confederated Tribes, said it’s almost tragic to watch successive generations of wild chinook batter themselves against this unjumpable obstacle.

    “There are still native salmon hitting the face of Chief Joe every year. They’re saying, ‘When are we going to get by this thing?’” he said.

    Though building a fish ladder high as a skyscraper at Grand Coulee appears daunting, Friedlander said engineering solutions are probably simpler than political solutions.

    The venerable practice of trap and haul is already an option. For decades, salmon have been netted and transferred into trucks or barges to get around dams. It’s low-tech but cheap.

    More complicated systems known as floating surface collectors, or gulpers, have been constructed to get downstream-migrating juvenile salmon past the dams. The tiny smolts are guided through a complicated network of raceways and tanks with the aid of cranes and cable-guided barges.

    While gulpers have dramatically reduced smolt mortality, they can cost tens of millions of dollars.

    Late this summer, fish cannons have made bemused headlines from Gizmodo to NPR. But Vince Bryan III, CEO at Whooshh, said his company’s innovative solution to fish passage is gentle. The “cannons” are flexible tubes originally designed to move freshly picked fruit without bruising. The tubes work almost like pneumatic tubes in old office buildings, with a slight lowering of pressure in front of an object to create steady movement.

    “Clearly the fish needed help, and we had this technology we thought was pretty good at moving stuff very gently,” Bryan said. As Whooshh has gotten more involved with testing and redesigning its tubes to handle live fish, salmon appreciation has deepened as well.

    “The Native nations and the First Nations of Canada, certainly what you hear from them is that salmon is a spiritual thing. It’s fundamental to their culture. I think we as humankind have to be looking at it the same way,” he said.

    Right now, a projected record return of 1.6 million fall chinook salmon are swimming up the Columbia and Snake rivers. Despite billions of dollars spent on fish passage and endangered species protection, Bryan said that’s only 10 percent of the historical population.

    Friedlander said he is confident that salmon, which turn red when about to spawn, will spread like scarlet fire into the thousands of miles of tributary habitat and reclaim their place. They will overcome slackwater reservoirs, silt at gravel nesting sites and toxic heavy metals from smelters. “Salmon seem to be very determined,” he said.

    Still, he conducts a private ritual for this outcome.

    When he catches some of the first chinook to bump against Chief Joseph Dam each summer, he drives the 40-odd miles to the upriver side of Grand Coulee, where he cleans the fish and returns their remains to the stretch of river that was once their home.

    “An elder explained to me one time we have to respect the salmon and take care of it, return it back to the river where it came from rather than throwing it away,” Friedlander said.

    “Salmon really is one of our sacraments,” said Sirois. “It goes far deeper than just property or a resource.”

  • Al Jazeera: Fight Over Dams in the Northwest

    snakeriverconfluenceDecember 2, 2015.

    Al Jazeera TVL  Fight Over Dams in the Northwest:  Northwest Tribes Seek to Clear the Snake River.

    View here

    .

    .

    .

  • Alaska Public Media: Record warm water likely gave Kuskokwim salmon heart attacks

    July 12, 2019

    By Anna Rose MacArthur

    Salmon.DeadAs record high temperatures swept Alaska, many people said that the heat was killing them. For Kuskokwim salmon, it was actually true. Never-before-seen temperatures in the Kuskokwim River likely sent salmon into cardiac arrest.

    Earlier this week, water temperatures near Bethel broke into the lower 70s, marking the highest river temperature that’s ever been recorded in early July. This spell was part of a heat wave that shot thermometers to their highest point ever in towns across Alaska.

    During this time, residents along the lower Kuskokwim River from Tuntutuliak to Akiak reported dead salmon floating downstream. Salmon don’t function well past 70 degrees, and the water had pushed just above that limit.

    “Essentially, what could happen is salmon metabolism speeds up to the point that they’re having heart attacks and going belly up and floating downriver,” explained Alaska Department of Fish and Game biologist Ben Gray.

    Gray and his crew boated from Bethel to Akiak to check it out. Along the way, they counted about 20 dead salmon. Warm water is also the suspected cause of the higher than normal amounts of parasites infesting salmon harvested along the river. That warm water is coming from the ocean. Kuskokwim Bay has clocked about 10 to 12 degrees above average throughout the summer, and each tide pulls that warm water into the lower river.

    “And that water is pushing upriver,” Gray said, “and it’s mixing, and we’re having a profile in the water right now where it’s a solid 68 to 70 degrees all the way through.”

    Meanwhile, residents throughout the Norton Sound region have reported large numbers of dead pink salmon that have yet to spawn, floating in warm waterways.

  • AP - Matt Daly, May 1st: Feds seek delay in developing NW salmon plan

     

    ap_logo
    by Matthew Daly
    Associated Press Writer
    WASHINGTON,May 1st, 2009 -- The Obama administration is reviewing a Bush administration plan for balancing the needs of people and salmon in the Columbia River Basin - a plan that has been criticized by a federal judge as doing too little to help salmon.  In a letter Friday to a federal judge, the Justice Department said top officials in the Obama administration want more time to "more fully understand all aspects" of the plan that was sent by the Bush administration to U.S. District Judge James Redden in Portland, Ore. Redden had set an informal Friday deadline for the government to respond as it explores options in the case. Redden heard arguments in March in a longrunning dispute over how to balance Columbia Basin energy and utility needs with imperiled salmon and steelhead. Environmentalists have argued that salmon populations cannot recover without removing some dams, especially the migration bottleneck to Idaho created by four dams on the Lower Snake River in Washington state. Redden told the NOAA Fisheries Service at the March 6 hearing that their plan for balancing endangered salmon runs against electricity production on 14 federal Columbia Basin hydroelectric dams still needs work, particularly in the area of habitat improvement. Federal agencies have acknowledged that the dams threaten the survival of fish, but said that extensive habitat restoration, changes in salmon hatchery operations and plans to let more water pass through Columbia and Snake River dams should mitigate the problem. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration submitted a 10-year plan last year after others were rejected by Redden. Officials said the plan, called a biological opinion or bi-op, would help fish passing through the dams survive. Environmentalists sued, saying the plan did too little to restore salmon populations. Todd True, an attorney representing the National Wildlife Federation and other environmental groups, called the delay request encouraging. "It indicates that the leadership of the new administration wants to take a hard look at this biological opinion, and we welcome that look," said True, who works for the environmental group Earthjustice. Witt Anderson, a spokesman for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Portland, said the delay would give officials of the new administration time to familiarize themselves with all the issues in the complex case. Jane Lubchenco, the new administrator of NOAA, was among those attending high-level meetings on the case in recent days. "They want to take a look at all of it," Anderson said, including fish habitat, hydropower, salmon harvest and hatchery operations. "They recognize this is an interconnected system, and they want to look at all of that to get a good clear understanding," Anderson said. At the March court hearing, Obama's Justice Department defended the Bush plan, saying it will help the survival of fish. The plan has been backed by state governments in Idaho, Washington and Montana and by most Columbia River tribes - a new development in the long-running argument. Four Northwest Indian tribal governments - Yakama, Warm Springs, Umatilla and Colville - agreed to the plan, which committed the federal agencies to giving the tribes $900 million to spend toward salmon. The state of Oregon and the Spokane and Nez Perce Indian tribes have not backed the federal plan. Redden warned last year that he would give the job of restoring Columbia Basin salmon to an independent panel if the government failed again. He has not eliminated the possibility that hydroelectric dams on the Lower Snake River could come down if necessary to ensure fish restoration and survival.
  • AP News: Columbia River's Salmon Are at the Core of Ancient Religion

    columbiagorge

    Aug. 15, 2022
    By DEEPA BHARATH

    ALONG THE COLUMBIA RIVER (AP) — James Kiona stands on a rocky ledge overlooking Lyle Falls where the water froths and rushes through steep canyon walls just before merging with the Columbia River. His silvery ponytail flutters in the wind, and a string of eagle claws adorns his neck.

    Kiona has fished for Chinook salmon for decades on his family’s scaffold at the edge of the falls, using a dip net suspended from a 33-foot pole — like his father did before him, and his son will after.

    “Fishing is an art and a spiritual practice,” says Kiona, a Yakama Nation elder. “You feel exhilaration in your body when you dip that net in the water and feel the fish. Then, you’re fighting the fish. The fish is fighting you, tearing holes in the net, jerking you off the scaffold.”

    He finds strength, sanctity, even salvation in that struggle. The river saved Kiona when he returned from the war in Vietnam. As he battled addiction, depression and trauma, the river gave him therapy no hospital could.

    When he lies on the rocks by the rushing river and closes his eyes, he hears the songs and the voices of his ancestors. The water, he says, holds the history of the land and his people.

    “It heals you.”

    ___

    From its headwaters in British Columbia where the Rocky Mountains crest, the Columbia River flows south into Washington state and then westward and into the Pacific Ocean at its mouth near Astoria, Oregon. Just below the confluence with the Snake River, the Columbia's largest tributary, the river turns through the Cascade Mountain Range, carving out the Columbia River Gorge.

    It's a spectacular canyon, 80 miles long and up to 4,000 feet deep, with cliffs, ridges, streams and waterfalls. The landscape and colors change dramatically from the brown hills, shrubs and sagebrush at lower elevations to the lush greens of ponderosa pines, fir and larch trees higher up. Eagles and ospreys nest all along the river.

    For thousands of years, Native tribes in this area have relied on Nch’i-Wána, or “the great river,” for its salmon and steelhead trout, and its surrounding areas for the fields bearing edible roots, medicinal herbs and berry bushes as well as the deer and elk whose meat and hides are used for food and ritual. That reliance transcends the material realm into the spiritual, as the acts of gathering, consuming and respecting those foods are inextricably linked to the tribes' religious practice.

    Yet the river is under threat. Warming waters linked to climate change endanger the salmon, which need cooler temperatures to survive. Hydroelectric dams on the Columbia and its tributaries have curtailed the river's flow, further imperiling salmon's migration from the Pacific upstream to their freshwater spawning grounds. Industrial pollution are also threats; testing by the Columbia Riverkeeper, a nonprofit that aims to protect water quality, shows that fish caught in the area are contaminated with flame retardants; polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs; and heavy metals.

    Pollution and climate change are not only threatening the health of the river and its habitat, but also the millennia-old spiritual traditions that hold Native communities together.

    ___

    “We are the salmon people or river people,” says Aja DeCoteau, executive director of the Portland-based Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, which represents the interests of the four Columbia River treaty tribes — Yakama, Umatilla, Warm Springs and Nez Perce — in policy, advocacy and management of the basin. “Without water there are no fish, plants or herbs.”

    Each year the tribes honor the salmon, roots, berries, deer and elk — which they believe were originally placed in the land for their sustenance — with what are known as “first food ceremonies.” When children catch fish, dig roots or pick berries for the first time, they are stood up before their elders in the longhouse and recognized as food gatherers.

    Elders speak of how streams flow from the mountains sanctified by the prayers of ancestors who went there to commune with the spirits. These rivulets then flow down and merge with the Columbia. If Nch’i-Wána is the main artery of the land, those streams are like the veins that feed it. So even the smallest creek is vital and sacred.

    At communal meals, tribe members typically begin and end with water — “You take a drink of water to purify yourself before you eat and you end the meal with water to show respect for what you’ve eaten,” DeCouteau says.

    Tribes also use the river's water and rocks for rituals such as sweat lodge purification ceremonies, held in low, dome-shaped structures where river rocks are heated along with herbal medicine.

    “After you sweat and pray, there is also the practice of jumping in the river to cleanse yourself,” DeCouteau says. “It’s hard to continue practicing these rituals when the river is so contaminated.”

    ___

    Whether the day is 100 degrees or nine below zero, Terrie Brigham takes her fishing boat out every day before the crack of dawn. Her family, members of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla, owns Brigham Fish Market in Cascade Locks, a bucolic riverbank town of some 1,500 residents about an hour's drive east of Portland. Her grandfather erected the family’s scaffolds in the 1950s.

    On a cold June morning, Brigham watches proudly at the scaffolds as her 23-year-old nephew, Brigham Campbell, fights a large Chinook salmon thrashing about in his dip net. He secures the fish and holds it up with smile, and she lets out a loud whoop and captures the moment on her cellphone.

    Fishing has been the family’s life and livelihood for generations, but it’s also a big part of her spiritual identity. Brigham speaks of her scaffold as if it were a temple, and her boat an altar.

    “To me, the river is sacred. The water is sacred. The fish are sacred.”

    Each year when Brigham catches the first fish of the season, she utters, “Thank you, Creator.” Then she puts a rope around its mouth so it can be used in the longhouse as part of the ceremony to welcome the fish back, known as the First Salmon Feast.

    That first fish is always shared with others in the community, even if each person might get just a single bite.

    ___

    Bill Yallup Jr. was 6 when Celilo Falls “drowned,” as he puts it.

    Known as Wyam to Native people, the thundering cascade was a sacred place where for 15,000 years Indigenous tribes netted salmon as the fish jumped upstream. It was also their economic nerve center, with the salmon trading for all manner of goods from feathers to copper to wampum, beads crafted from shells.

    Yallup’s family came to Celilo Falls from Toppenish, Washington, when he was an infant.

    “My mom cooked with water from the river,” he says. “You could hear those falls for miles. It was sacred sound.”

    The falls fell silent in 1957 when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers erected The Dalles Dam, flooding the area and creating the Celilo Lake reservoir. His father brought him to Lyle, Washington, when he was 17. He learned to fish there.

    As a young man, Yallup dreamed of a career in Hollywood as a writer and actor. He played a tribal elder in the show “Northern Exposure," a 1990s CBS comedy-drama series about quirky residents of a fictional small town in Alaska that ran for five seasons.

    But, the mighty river has an unfathomable pull, and it drew him back. It reminds him of who he really is, Yallup says: “I'm a fisherman."

    In his deep baritone, he enjoys telling stories of the river that have been handed down over generations.

    A tale he has told hundreds of times narrates how Coyote, one of the most important characters in tribal mythology, brought the salmon back to the big river. The fish had left after a legendary battle between Mount Hood and Mount Adams, both portrayed as women in the story, caused the salmon to drain into the ocean. The fish told Coyote they would come back, but only if they were respected.

    Young salmon, or smolts, swim down the Columbia to the ocean, where they grow for between one and five years. Then they migrate back upstream to spawn. Some are caught and become a source of sustenance for the people, and others die and become one with the environment. The cycle repeats over and over.

    “The sacredness of this river," Yallup says, “lies in the sacrifice the salmon make each time they fulfill their promise to come back.”

    ___

    The Whitefoots are a large family spread across the West Coast. The best-known member of the clan, Patricia “Patsy” Whitefoot, is an advocate for missing and murdered Indigenous women. A member of the Yakama Nation, she often travels along the river meeting family members and attending traditional tribal gatherings.

    Her activism is as much a part of her Native identity as her religious practice is.

    “If you are Indian, you’ll be political all your life,” she says.

    On a recent afternoon, she visits cousins Debra and Sandy Whitefoot, who live near the Bonneville Dam in an “in-lieu fishing site,” lands set aside by Congress to compensate tribes whose villages were inundated by dams.

    Many families here live in trailers without restrooms, lights or drains, and Debra, as executive director of the nonprofit Nch’i-Wána Housing, works to provide homes for Native people living along the river.

    “My mom saw the world go by at Celilo,” she says, wiping away tears. “We have lost so much. We’re experiencing intergenerational trauma. My hope is I can make a village or a few villages for my people so we can heal and move forward.”

    Sandy is smoking freshly caught salmon. She arranges the cleaned and cut-up pieces in trays and places them in a wooden smoking shed by the river. She has a job in a sandwich shop, but this, Sandy says, is “what I do.”

    The first fish she ever caught was a steelhead off her father’s scaffold.

    “It was one of the most exciting moments in my life,” she says.

    Debra's son, Aaron Paul, and his partner, Betty Jean Sutterlict, live by the river as well. When their son, Bennie, finished high school last year, he had his graduation photo taken on the scaffold wearing a vest embroidered with an eagle carrying a salmon. He now attends Salish Kootenai College in Pablo, Montana, and hopes to major in fisheries and wildlife.

    Debra is proud of young people like her grandson, who grew up by the river doing homework under a streetlight, and are now going to college to learn about protecting their natural resources.

    “They give me hope.”

    ___

    It was worries over the spring salmon's disappearance from the river that inspired Elaine Harvey to get her bachelor’s degree in aquatic and fishery science. She is also concerned for species like the Pacific lamprey, which has “been around since the dinosaurs” but today faces possible extinction.

    Now a fish biologist for Yakama Fisheries, Harvey says what keeps her up at night is what she calls a “race to harness green energy” that has brought multinational corporations to the Columbia.

    “Wind turbines and solar farms are impacting our archeological sites, cultural resource sites, wildlife and fish,” she says, pointing to a sacred mountain near the John Day Dam that the Native people call Push-pum. “Our root fields are on that mountain. We could lose access to our food.”

    The tribes are also focused on preserving areas in tributaries such as the Klickitat and White Salmon, two glacial rivers that provide cold water for migrating salmon.

    Harvey hopes to impart this knowledge and sense of stewardship to her children and grandchildren.

    “We travel with kids to fishing stations, hunting grounds and root fields,” she says. “We give them the experience of camping on our lands.”

    She connects to the land by sleeping on the ground and cooking on an open fire, just as her ancestors did when they were traveling these lands on horseback and by foot.

    Harvey says she will never leave the river because that’s what she was taught by her elders.

    “We have a real, deep connection to all these places. Our blood line is here.”

    ___

    Harvey’s cousin, Bronsco Jim Jr., was appointed mid-Columbia River chief when he was 21 and in that capacity performs longhouse services, first food ceremonies and funerals. He knows many sacred songs, one of which talks about the birth of the first salmon at a spot in the Columbia River.

    “God’s authoritative word comes down upon (the salmon’s) body,” Jim says. “He jumps out of the water in a circular movement, and in that one revolution, he was given life.”

    Sunlight streams into the longhouse during a recent ceremonial meal with elders at historic Celilo Village. Supported by tall wooden beams, the building has at its center the altar, a rectangle of earth that Jim cleanses with water before the service begins.

    Jim is wearing shell earrings and a beaded necklace with the pendant of a horse’s silhouette honoring his ancestors who rode them. His soft, measured speaking voice rises into song, echoing throughout the room. It has no words but is a deep, visceral, prayerful sound capable of evoking goosebumps or tears.

    Tribal members seated around a table bearing the first foods — in order, salmon, roots, berries — join in softly, waving their right hands away from their bodies and then inward toward their chests. The gesture harnesses the light and energy around them and delivers it to their hearts, Jim explains. Tribal beliefs forbid capturing these solemn services in video or photographs because that would freeze the prayers in time and prevent their transmission to the Creator.

    In Native families that inhabit the Columbia Basin, education about first foods begins at home and continues in these longhouses, accompanied by teaching and ceremony. Deeply held beliefs also dictate the rules of food gathering.

    “You can't just casually go out to gather food,” Jim says.

    The ceremony for each of the foods is performed at a different time of year depending on when they become available. The salmon are the first to appear in the spring. The roots are ready to be dug in the summer and different berries are picked in the summer and the fall.

    Community members are required to wait for that first feast to honor each food before they head out to harvest it. In the longhouse and out in the mountains, the food-gathering is accompanied by song.

    “These songs and ceremonies are part of everything we do,” Jim says. “We need the river and these foods in our lives.”

    Losing these irreplaceable foods and their sources could cost them their spiritual identity, he says.

    "They feed our body and soul.”

     

    https://apnews.com/article/sacred-rivers-world-news-religion-salmon-columbia-febad78e1827491be777585772c5218b

  • AP News: Conservationists, tribes say deal with Biden administration is a road map to breach Snake River dams

     Emily Nuchols salmonBy Gene Johnson
    December 14, 2023

    SEATTLE (AP) — The U.S. government said Thursday it plans to spend more than $1 billion over the next decade to help recover depleted populations of salmon in the Pacific Northwest, and that it will help figure out how to offset the hydropower, transportation and other benefits provided by four controversial dams on the Snake River, should Congress ever agree to breach them.

    President Joe Biden’s administration stopped short of calling for the removal of the dams to save the fish, but Northwest tribes and conservationists who have long sought that called the agreement a road map for dismantling them. Filed in U.S. District Court in Oregon, it pauses long-running litigation over federal operation of the dams and represents the most significant step yet toward breaching them.

    “Today’s historic agreement marks a new direction for the Pacific Northwest,” senior White House adviser John Podesta said in a written statement. “Today, the Biden-Harris Administration and state and Tribal governments are agreeing to work together to protect salmon and other native fish, honor our obligations to Tribal nations, and recognize the important services the Columbia River System provides to the economy of the Pacific Northwest.”

    The Columbia River Basin, an area roughly the size of Texas, was once the world’s greatest salmon-producing river system, with at least 16 stocks of salmon and steelhead. Today, four are extinct and seven are listed under the Endangered Species Act. Another iconic but endangered Northwest species, a population of killer whales, also depend on the salmon.

    Dams are a main culprit behind the salmon’s decline, and federal fisheries scientists have concluded that breaching the dams in eastern Washington on the Snake River, the largest tributary of the Columbia, would be the best hope for recovering them, providing the fish with access to hundreds of miles of pristine habitat and spawning grounds in Idaho.

    Conservation groups sued the federal government more than two decades ago in an effort to save the fish. They have argued that the continued operation of the dams violates the Endangered Species Act as well as treaties dating to the mid-19th century ensuring the tribes’ right to harvest fish.

    Republicans in Congress who oppose the breaching of the dams released a leaked copy of the draft agreement late last month.

    “I have serious concerns about what this agreement means for the future of our region,” Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, a Republican from Washington, said in an emailed statement Thursday. “It jeopardizes the energy, irrigation, and navigation benefits that support our entire way of life, and it makes commitments on behalf of Congress without engaging us.”

    Under the agreement, the U.S. government will build enough new clean energy projects in the Pacific Northwest to replace the hydropower generated by the dams — the Ice Harbor, Little Goose, Lower Monumental and Lower Granite.

    The agreement includes a compromise regarding dam operations — providing for additional water to be spilled in the spring, fall and winter to help some salmon runs such as spring and summer Chinook, while reducing the spill required in late summer, when energy demand is high and production is especially profitable. That could harm fall Chinook, said the environmental law firm Earthjustice, which is representing environmental, fishing and renewable energy groups in the litigation.

    The federal Bonneville Power Administration, which operates the dams, will spend $300 million over 10 years to restore native fish and their habitats throughout the Columbia River Basin, though it said the agreement would result in rate increases of only 0.7%. Two-thirds of that money will go toward hatchery improvements and operations, and the rest will go to what the agreement refers to as the “six sovereigns” — Oregon, Washington and the four tribes involved: the Yakama Nation, the Nez Perce Tribe, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs.

    Combined with other fish-restoration funding, the federal government will be spending more than $1 billion over the next decade, the White House said.

    The U.S. will also conduct or pay for studies of how the transportation, irrigation and recreation provided by the dams could be replaced. The dams made the town of Lewiston, Idaho, the most inland seaport on the West Coast, and many farmers in the region rely on barges to ship their crops, though rail is also available.

    The agreement “lays out a pathway to breaching,” said Shannon Wheeler, chairman of the Nez Perce Tribe. “When these things are replaced, and the Pacific Northwest is transforming into a stronger, more resilient, better place, then there’s a responsibility... to make the decisions that are necessary to make sure these treaty promises are kept.”

    Utility and business groups Northwest RiverPartners, the Public Power Council and the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association have opposed the agreement.

    “This settlement undermines the future of achieving clean energy goals and will raise the rates of electricity customers across the region while exacerbating the greatest threat to salmon that NOAA scientists have identified – the warming, acidifying ocean,” Northwest RiverPartners said in a news release Thursday.

    There has been growing recognition that the harms some dams cause to fish outweigh their usefulness, but only a few lawmakers in the region have embraced the idea. Dams on the Elwha River in Washington state and the Klamath River along the Oregon-California border have been or are being removed.

    In 2021 Republican Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho proposed removing the earthen berms on either side of the four Lower Snake River dams to let the river flow freely, and to spend $33 billion to replace the benefits of the dams.

    Last year, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and Washington U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, both Democrats, released a report saying carbon-free electricity produced by the dams must be replaced before they are breached. Inslee declined to endorse breaching the dams during a conference call with reporters on Thursday, but he said figuring out how to replace their benefits would enable Congress to make a better decision.

    “I don’t think this agreement makes anything inevitable, but it does make it much more likely that we’ll have the information we need to make the decision,” he said.

    In October, Biden directed federal agencies to use all available resources to restore abundant salmon runs in the Columbia River Basin, but that memo too stopped short of calling for the removal of the dams.

    “The energy needs of the Pacific Northwest should not rest on the backs of salmon,” said Donella Miller, fisheries science manager with the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. “What’s good for the salmon is good for the environment, and what’s good for the environment is good for the people.”

  • AP News: US acknowledges Northwest dams have devastated the region’s Native tribes

    dams by LowerSnakeRiver

    June 18, 2024
    By Gene Johnson

    The U.S. government on Tuesday acknowledged for the first time the harms that the construction and operation of dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers in the Pacific Northwest have caused Native American tribes.

    It issued a report that details how the unprecedented structures devastated salmon runs, inundated villages and burial grounds, and continue to severely curtail the tribes’ ability to exercise their treaty fishing rights.

    The Biden administration’s report comes amid a $1 billion effort announced earlier this year to restore the region’s salmon runs before more become extinct — and to better partner with the tribes on the actions necessary to make that happen. That includes increasing the production and storage of renewable energy to replace hydropower generation that would be lost if four dams on the lower Snake River are ever breached.

    “President Biden recognizes that to confront injustice, we must be honest about history – even when doing so is difficult,” Interior Secretary Deb Haaland and White House Council on Environmental Quality Chair Brenda Mallory said in a written statement. “In the Pacific Northwest, an open and candid conversation about the history and legacy of the federal government’s management of the Columbia River is long overdue.”

    The document was a requirement of an agreement last year to halt decades of legal fights over the operation of the dams. It lays out how government and private interests in early 20th century began walling off the tributaries of the Columbia River, the largest in the Northwest, to provide water for irrigation or flood control, compounding the damage that was already being caused to water quality and salmon runs by mining, logging and salmon cannery operations.

    Tribal representatives said they were gratified with the administration’s formal, if long-belated, acknowledgement of how the U.S. government for generations ignored the tribe’s concerns about how the dams would affect them, and they were pleased with its steps toward undoing those harms.

    “This administration has moved forward with aggressive action to rebalance some of the transfer of wealth,” said Tom Iverson, regional coordinator for Yakama Nation Fisheries. “The salmon were the wealth of the river. What we’ve seen is the transfer of the wealth to farmers, to loggers, to hydropower systems, to the detriment of the tribes.”

    The construction of the first dams on the main Columbia River, including the Grand Coulee and Bonneville dams in the 1930s, provided jobs to a country grappling with the Great Depression as well as hydropower and navigation. But it came over the objections of tribes concerned about the loss of salmon, traditional hunting and fishing sites, and even villages and burial grounds.

    As early as the late 1930s, tribes were warning that the salmon runs could disappear, with the fish no longer able to access spawning grounds upstream. The tribes — the Yakama Nation, Spokane Tribe, confederated tribes of the Colville and Umatilla reservations, Nez Perce, and others — continued to fight the construction and operation of the dams for generations.

    “As the full system of dams and reservoirs was being developed, Tribes and other interests protested and sounded the alarm on the deleterious effects the dams would have on salmon and aquatic species, which the government, at times, acknowledged,” the report said. “However, the government afforded little, if any, consideration to the devastation the dams would bring to Tribal communities, including to their cultures, sacred sites, economies, and homes.”

    The report was accompanied by the announcement of a new task force to coordinate salmon-recovery efforts across federal agencies.

    AP News: 'US acknowledges Northwest dams have devastated the region’s Native tribes' article link

  • AP News: White House, tribal leaders hail ‘historic’ deal to restore salmon runs in Pacific Northwest

    AP News Ceremony Signing Feb 23 2024Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, third from left, stands with Chair Gerry Lewis of the Yakama Nation, fourth from left, as they and others pose for a photo following a ceremonial signing ceremony in Washington, Friday, Feb. 23, 2024. The ceremonial signing is an agreement between the Biden administration and state and Tribal governments to work together to protect salmon and other native fish, honor obligations to Tribal nations, and recognize the important services the Columbia River System provides to the economy of the Pacific Northwest. (AP Photo Susan Walsh) 

    By Matthew Daly
    February 23, 2024

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration, leaders of four Columbia River Basin tribes and the governors of Oregon and Washington celebrated on Friday as they signed papers formally launching a $1 billion plan to help recover depleted salmon populations in the Pacific Northwest.

    The plan, announced in December, stopped short of calling for the removal of four controversial dams on the Snake River, as some environmental groups and tribal leaders have urged. But officials said it would boost clean energy production and help offset hydropower, transportation and other benefits provided by the dams should Congress ever agree to breach them.

    The plan brokered by the Biden administration pauses long-running litigation over federal dam operations and represents the most significant step yet toward eventually taking the four Snake River dams down. The plan will strengthen tribal clean energy projects and provide other benefits for tribes and other communities that depend on the Columbia Basin for agriculture, energy, recreation and transportation, the White House said.

    “Since time immemorial, the strength of the Yakama Nation and its people have come from the Columbia River, and from the fish, game, roots and berries it nourishes,’' Yakama Nation Chairman Gerald Lewis said at a White House ceremony.

    “The Yakama Nation will always fight to protect and restore the salmon because, without the salmon, we cannot maintain the health of our people or our way of life,’' Lewis said, adding that Columbia Basin salmon are dying from the impacts of human development.

    “Our fishers have empty nets and their homes have empty tables because historically the federal government has not done enough to mitigate these impacts,’' he said. “We need a lot more clean energy, but we need to do development in a way that is socially just.’'

    Lewis was among four tribal leaders who spoke at the hourlong ceremony at the White House complex, along with Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek and an array of federal officials.

    The agreement, formally known as the Columbia Basin Restoration Initiative, “deserves to be celebrated,’' said Jonathan W. Smith, chairman of the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation.

    The settlement “takes the interests of all the stakeholders in the Columbia Basin into account,’' he said. “It lays out a pathway to restore salmon and steelhead to healthy and abundant levels and moves forward with the necessary green energy transition in a socially just and equitable way.’'

    Corinne Sams of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation called the signing ceremony a historic moment, not just for the tribes, but also for the U.S. government “and all Americans in the Pacific Northwest. My heart is big today.’'

    The Columbia River Basin, an area roughly the size of Texas, was once the world’s greatest salmon-producing river system, with at least 16 stocks of salmon and steelhead. Today, four are extinct and seven are listed under the Endangered Species Act.

    Dams are a main culprit behind the salmon’s decline, and federal fisheries scientists have concluded that breaching the dams in eastern Washington on the Snake River, the largest tributary of the Columbia, would be the best hope for recovering them, providing the fish with access to hundreds of miles of pristine habitat and spawning grounds in Idaho.

    Conservation groups sued the federal government more than two decades ago in an effort to save the fish. They have argued that the continued operation of the dams violates the Endangered Species Act as well as treaties dating to the mid-19th century ensuring the tribes’ right to harvest fish.

    Friday’s celebration did not include congressional Republicans who oppose dam breaching and have vowed to block it.

    Dams along the Columbia-Snake River system provide more than one-third of all hydropower capacity in the United States, said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, a Washington Republican who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee. In Washington state, hydropower accounts for 70% of electricity consumed.

    The Snake River dams “helped transform Eastern Washington into one of the most productive agricultural regions in the world,’' including 40% of America’s wheat, Rodgers said in a statement.

    Rodgers denounced “secret negotiations” led by White House senior adviser John Podesta, which she described as “an attempt to breach the Lower Snake River dams.’' Podesta and other officials have “ignored the concerns of people who live in the Pacific Northwest and who would be significantly impacted if these dams were breached,’' Rodgers said.

    Podesta and other speakers at the White House ceremony looked past those concerns, with few even mentioning the dams.

    “President Biden understands that the Columbia River is the lifeblood of the Pacific Northwest, for its culture, for its economy and for its people,’' said Brenda Mallory, chairwoman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

    “The historic agreement is charting a new and exciting path to restore the river, provide for clean energy and live up to our responsibilities and obligations to tribal nations,’' Mallory said. “I’m confident we will secure the vision... of securing a restored Columbia River Basin, one that is teeming with wild fish, prosperous to tribal nations, (with) affordable clean energy, a strong agricultural economy and an upgraded transportation and recreation system.’'

    White House, tribal leaders hail ‘historic’ deal to restore salmon runs in Pacific Northwest article link

  • AP Story: Judge gives NOAA Fisheries last chance on salmon

    seattletimeslogo_home
    by Jeff Barnard, AP Environmental Writer
    GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) -- The federal judge overseeing efforts to make the Columbia Basin's federal hydroelectric dams safer for salmon is giving the Obama administration one last chance to come up with something better that won't violate the Endangered Species Act.

    U.S. District Judge James Redden in Portland on Wednesday gave NOAA Fisheries Service until Feb. 19 to decide whether to voluntarily take back their proposed improvements to the Bush administration plan, known as a biological opinion.

    The judge said this can fix procedural problems with the Obama administration revisions that prevent him from considering them. But he added that there are deeper flaws, and urged the agency to produce a stronger plan based on the best available science, as the law requires.

    "I will not sign an order of voluntary remand that effectively relieves Federal Defendants of their obligation to use the best available science and consider all important aspects of the problem," the judge wrote. "This court will not dictate the scope or substance of Federal Defendants' remand, but Federal Defendants must comply with the ESA in preparing any amended/supplemental biological opinion."

    Redden warned NOAA fisheries that he will view with "heightened skepticism" any attempts to deal with the issues superficially.
  • AP: Advocates vow to continue efforts to remove Snake River dams

    By Nicholas K. Geraniosneil.recfish1.web
    
October 5, 2020

    SPOKANE, Wash. (AP) — Environmental groups are vowing to continue their
fight to remove four dams on the Snake River in Washington state they
say are killing salmon that are a key food source for endangered killer
whales.



    But instead of working with federal agencies, conservationists intend
to seek removal of the dams through the political or legal systems.



    Agencies of the U.S. government announced in late July that the four
huge dams will not be removed to help salmon migrate to the ocean. That
 decision was finalized Tuesday in a so-called Record of Decision.



    The decision thwarts the desires of environmental groups that fought
for two decades to breach the dams.



    ``This is definitely not the end,'' said Robb Krehbiel of Defenders of
 Wildlife. ``I don't see how this doesn't end up in court.''



    But he is also encouraged by signs that governors of Northwest states,
 particularly Democrats in Oregon and Washington, are looking for a
negotiated solution.

    

"To say we need a new approach, that we need leadership from our
elected representatives, and that we need to find a solution that works
 for all of us is to state the obvious,'' said Todd True, an attorney
 for Earthjustice.



    The ROD was issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of
 Reclamation and Bonneville Power Administration, and sought to balance 
the needs of salmon and other interests.



    The plan calls for spilling more water over the dams at strategic times 
to help endangered salmon migrate faster to and from the ocean, a
tactic that has already been in use.



    Dam critics have panned the Trump administration plan as inadequate to
save salmon, an iconic Northwest species. They contend the dams must go
if salmon are to survive.



    ``To us, the lower Snake River is a living being,'' said Shannon K.
Wheeler, chair of Idaho's Nez Perce Tribe. ``We are compelled to speak
 the truth on behalf of this life force and the impacts these concrete
barriers on the lower Snake have on salmon, steelhead, and lamprey.''



    The tribe will go to court, to Congress and to state capitols to find a
way to restore the river, Wheeler said.



    Scientists warn southern resident orcas are starving to death because
 of a dearth of chinook salmon that are their primary food source. The 
Pacific Northwest population of orcas — also called killer whales — was 
placed on the endangered species list in 2005.



    The dams have many defenders, including Republican politicians from the 
region, barge operators and other river users, farmers and business
 leaders.



    Republican members of Congress from the Northwest hailed the recent
 federal decision.



    ``Federal water infrastructure makes our way of life possible 
throughout the West,'' said U.S. Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash., as part of
 a joint statement that included similar sentiments from Reps. Cathy 
McMorris Rodgers and Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington, Rep. Russ 
Fulcher, R-Idaho, and Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore.

    

The Pacific Northwest Waterways Association, made up of river users,
 also defended the dams.



    ``Salmon, orcas and other wildlife are threatened by climate change,''
said Executive Director Kristin Meira. ``The clean power and efficient
 commerce provided by the system’s hydroelectric dams and navigation 
locks are key to our region’s ability to reduce our carbon footprint.''



    The four hydroelectric dams were built from the 1960s to the 1970s
 between Pasco and Pomeroy, Washington. Since then, salmon populations
 have plunged.



    The dams have fish ladders that allow some salmon and other species to
 migrate to the ocean and then back to spawning grounds. But the vast
 majority of the fish die during the journey, despite $17 billion spent
 so far on efforts to save them.



    The 100-foot (30 meter) tall dams generate electricity, provide
 irrigation and flood control, and allow barges to operate all the way 
to Lewiston, Idaho, 400 miles from the Pacific Ocean.



    The federal agencies concluded that removing the four dams would
 destabilize the power grid, increase overall greenhouse emissions and
 more than double the risk of regional power outages.



    The four dams are part of a vast and complex hydroelectric power system
 operated by the federal government in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and
 Montana. The 14 federal dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers together
 produce 40% of the region’s power — enough electricity for nearly 5 
million homes.



    But the dams have proven disastrous for salmon that hatch in freshwater
 streams, then make their way hundreds of miles to the ocean, where they 
spend years before finding their way back to mate, lay eggs and die.



    The dams cut off more than half of salmon spawning and rearing habitat,
 and many wild salmon runs in the region have 2% or less of their
 historic populations, according to the Center for Biological Diversity.



    On the way to the ocean, juvenile salmon can get chewed up in the dams’
 turbines.



    In all, three federal judges have thrown out five plans for the system
 over the decades after finding they didn’t do enough to protect salmon.



    The most recent case occurred in 2016, when a federal judge in
 Portland, Ore., ordered dam managers to consider removing or altering 
the four dams. That order led to Tuesday's record of decision.

    

``The differences between the plan adopted by these agencies today and
 the plan the court rejected in 2016 are hard to discern,'' True said
 Tuesday. ``And the plan the court rejected in 2016 was not materially
 different from plans the court had rejected in 2003, 2005, 2009 and
 2011.''



    The Save Our Wild Salmon coalition contended federal agencies cannot 
deliver a comprehensive solution. Rather, the effort must be led by
 stakeholders, tribes, politicians and citizens, the coalition said.

  • AP: Canada Cries Foul on Columbia deal; U.S. plan exact opposite

    Posted: Friday, October 18, 2013 12:00 am

    columbiagorgePORTLAND, Ore. - Canada said the U.S. should pay more in hydropower for getting recreational and other benefits under an international treaty governing operations of the fourth-largest river in North America.

    The U.S., however, has recommended the opposite. It wants to send less hydropower across the border if the Columbia River treaty is renegotiated.

    The treaty dates to 1964 and has no expiration date. But as of next year, it will allow either side to give 10 years notice of intent to renegotiate or cancel. So, this year, both sides are laying out their bargaining positions.

    Under the treaty, Canada stores water behind three dams for flood control and to maximize hydropower generation.

    The U.S. paid Canada $64 million for the flood control. And every year, it sends Canada half the electricity generated at downstream U.S. hydropower dams.

    Earlier, when Canada didn't need hydropower, the U.S. instead paid it about $250 million annually, and Canada used the money to finance the construction of its three Columbia River dams.

    For the past 20 years, however, the U.S. has sent power to Canada now valued at up to $350 million.

    The U.S. now says that because it has paid off the cost of the Canadian dams, the U.S. should send less power as part of its Canadian Entitlement obligations.

    If those obligations are reduced, officials said, the financial benefits would be used to reduce hydropower costs in the Pacific Northwest and to help improve the river ecosystem.

    But in draft recommendations released by the government of British Columbia on Wednesday, the Canadians say the U.S. also needs to provide compensation for benefits other than flood control and hydropower, including recreation, navigation and ecosystem benefits.

    Other points of difference between the U.S. and Canadian recommendations include flood control and fish passage. While the U.S. wants to pursue a joint program with Canada to study the possibility of restoring fish passage on Columbia's main stem to Canadian spawning grounds, Canada indicates restoration of fish passage and habitat is not a treaty issue.

  • AP: Leaked document says US is willing to build energy projects in case Snake River dams are breached

    dams by LowerSnakeRiver

    By Hallie Golden and Rebecca Boone
    November 29, 2023

    SEATTLE (AP) — The U.S. government is willing to help build enough new clean energy projects in the Pacific Northwest to replace the hydropower generated by four controversial dams on the Snake River, according to a leaked Biden administration document that is giving hope to conservationists who have long sought the removal of the dams as a key to restoring depleted salmon runs.

    Still, Congress would have to agree before any of the Lower Snake River dams in Washington state are removed, and that’s unlikely to happen in the near future.

    The document is a draft agreement to uphold 168-year-old treaties with four tribes in the Pacific Northwest that preserved their right to harvest fish in the river, among other things.

    The Columbia River Basin was once the greatest salmon-producing river system in the world, with at least 16 stocks of salmon and steelhead, according to the document. But today, four are extinct and seven are listed under the Endangered Species Act. Conservationists say dams built in the basin are primarily to blame.

    Conservation groups and tribes sued the federal government in an effort to save the struggling fisheries, and both sides notified the court earlier this fall they were close to reaching an agreement that could put the the lawsuit on hold. They have until mid-December to submit an agreement.

    Amanda Goodin, a lawyer for the environmental group Earthjustice, which is representing a coalition of environmental, fishing, and renewable energy groups in the litigation, said their goal throughout the mediation has been to prevent the extinction of salmon, restore the ecosystem and replace the energy provided by the dams.

    “We hope to be able to say on Dec. 15 we’ve achieved that goal, but if we can’t reach that goal or discussions fall apart, we will be prepared to resume litigation on Dec. 15,” she said in a statement. Due to confidentiality rules, she said they would not discuss the specifics of the draft agreement.

    In civil cases, mediation talks are generally confidential, but Washington state Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican, included a link to the draft agreement in a press release Wednesday. Newhouse has opposed breaching the dams, saying they are essential for agriculture, flood control and transportation as well as electricity.

    “It is imperative that our constituents, whose livelihoods depend on the Columbia River System, have a comprehensive understanding of this document’s contents so they can anticipate and prepare for the wide-ranging impacts that will inevitably be felt across the region should the commitments detailed in this document be realized,” Newhouse and three other Republican representatives — Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington, Cliff Bentz of Oregon, and Russ Fulcher of Idaho — wrote to President Joe Biden.

    The draft agreement says the government will help plan and pay for tribes in the Pacific Northwest to develop enough clean energy resources to serve as replacement power for the lower Snake River dams, whether or not Congress authorizes dam removal.

    The draft also includes billions of dollars in funding for analyzing the region’s energy needs, improving transportation infrastructure, making the power grid more resilient and restoring salmon, steelhead and other native fish runs in the Columbia River basin. Oregon and Washington would be partners in the effort along with the four tribes and the federal government.

    There has been growing recognition across the U.S. that the harms some dams cause to fish outweigh their usefulness. Dams on the Elwha River in Washington state and the Klamath River along the Oregon-California border have been or are being removed.

    The Yakama Nation and the Nez Perce Tribe declined to comment on the document, while the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation was not immediately available for comment and Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs did not respond to a request for comment.

    Alyssa Roberts, spokesperson for the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said the negotiations are ongoing.

    “As part of the court-approved confidential mediation with Tribes, States, and other parties to develop a long-term, durable path forward, the U.S. Government is developing a package of actions and commitments that we are discussing with all parties involved in the mediation,” she said in a statement.

    Utility and business groups Northwest RiverPartners, the Public Power Council and the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association called the draft agreement the “greatest threat” for the region in a joint statement released Wednesday, saying dam breaching would hurt the region’s ports and farmers and could raise electricity prices.

    “This proposal turns its back on over three million electricity customers as well as the farming, transportation, navigation, and economic needs of the region,” the groups wrote.

    The pros and cons of dam-breaching have been debated for years, but only a few lawmakers in the region have embraced the idea.

    In 2021 Republican Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho proposed removing the earthen berms on either side of the four Lower Snake River dams to let the river flow freely, and to spend $33 billion to replace the benefits of the dams for agriculture, energy and transportation.

    Last year, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and Washington U.S. Sen. Patty Murray released a report saying carbon-free electricity produced by the dams must be replaced before they are breached. Eliminating the dams would also dramatically change the way farmers in Idaho and Washington and Oregon transport their crops, forcing them to rely on truck and rail transportation instead.

    The town of Lewiston, Idaho, is home to the most inland seaport on the West Coast, and farmers in the region rely on barges to ship their crops. There are no nearby railroads, and shipping trucks must traverse winding and sometimes treacherous river-side roads. Other lawmakers — including Idaho Rep. Mike Crapo and Sen. Jim Risch and Montana Rep. Steve Daines — have argued that the government should find other ways to save the fish.

    In October, Biden directed federal agencies to use all available resources to restore abundant salmon runs in the Columbia River Basin, but Biden’s memo stopped short of calling for the removal of the dams.

    The Lower Granite, Ice Harbor, Little Goose and Lower Monumental dams were built in the mid-1900s. On average, the four dams produce about 1,000 MW of power throughout the year, though they can produce as much as 2,200 MW during peak energy demand, according to the non-profit NW Energy Coalition. Roughly $17 billion in infrastructure improvements, some of it forced by litigation, has done little to restore the fish to historical levels.

    https://apnews.com/article/dams-breach-salmon-endangered-fish-93cf340825bdcfe60e28297b4ec21b41

  • AP: Lower Snake 3rd most endangered river

    ap_logo
    April 7, 2009
    by Nicholas K. Geranios, Associated Press Writer
     
    Spokane, Wash. — Four dams that are blamed for damaging salmon runs on the lower Snake River in Washington place the waterway third among the nation's most endangered rivers, according to an annual report by American Rivers.  The conservation group on Tuesday said the Sacramento and San Joaquin river system in California topped this year's list. 
     
    Environmental groups for years have sought the removal of the four dams on the Snake as the only way to restore the salmon. They contend the dams and the slackwater reservoirs they create are hostile to the migrating fish. Dam supporters cite other factors in the decline of salmon runs.
     
    Lower Granite, Little Goose, Lower Monumental and Ice Harbor dams were built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the middle of the last century. The dams are along the Snake in southeastern Washington from near Pullman to the Tri-Cities.
     
    The Bush administration supported the dams, but environmentalists are hoping the Obama administration will seek removal.
     
    "Taking out the four lower Snake River dams and giving an endangered river a much-needed chance to recover is smart business," Paul Fish, head of Mountain Gear, an outdoor retail company based in Spokane, said in the American Rivers report.
     
    "A restored Snake River will mean abundant salmon, more outdoor recreation and fishing opportunities, and more jobs for the Northwest," he said. "The Obama administration has an opportunity to transform an endangered Snake River into a working Snake River."
     
    U.S. Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., a staunch supporter of the dams, said both salmon and the dams can be saved.  "The citizens of the Northwest overwhelmingly oppose tearing out the four Snake River Dams," Hastings said recently. "We can recover fish runs and protect our dams."
     
    The dams generate electricity and provide irrigation water. The reservoirs behind them allow barges filled with grain and fuel to travel up and down the Snake and Columbia rivers, rather than by truck on highways.
     
    "It's time we again stand up and speak out against dam removal as an extreme action that won't help fish but will increase energy prices, hurt our economy and cost us jobs," Hastings said.
     
    Every year, the four dams kill as many as 90 percent of juvenile salmon and steelhead that migrate downstream to the ocean, American Rivers said. All the river's salmon runs are either threatened with extinction or already extinct.
     
    The organization chooses its most endangered rivers from nominations made by environmental groups and considers the value of each river to people and the environment, the level of the threat it faces and pending decisions that could affect it in the next year.
     
    Rivers from Pennsylvania to Alaska also made this year's list. Rounding out the top five were Georgia's Flint River, Mattawoman Creek in Maryland and the North Fork of the Flathead River in Montana.
     
    Columbia Basin salmon returns have historically been the West Coast's largest. They numbered 10 million to 30 million per year, but overfishing, habitat loss, pollution and dam construction over the past century caused the numbers to dwindle.
     
    Dozens of populations have gone extinct, and 13 are listed as threatened or endangered species, making it necessary for federal projects such as the hydroelectric system to show they can be operated without harming them. The last three plans for balancing salmon and dams, known as biological opinions, failed to pass legal muster and the issue is bogged down in courts.
    ---
     
    On the Net:
    Report: http://www.AmericanRivers.org/EndangeredRivers
  • AP: March 6th, 2009: Federal judge faults plan in NW salmon dispute

    ap_logo
     
     
     
     
    March 6, 2009
    by Mary Hudetz
     
    PORTLAND, Ore. – The federal agency in charge of saving salmon in the Columbia River Basin from extinction should have a plan in place to remove dams on the lower Snake River if necessary, a federal judge said Friday.
     
    U.S. District Court Judge James A. Redden, who heard arguments in a longrunning dispute over how to balance energy and utility needs in the Columbia Basin with salmon and steelhead, said he has not eliminated the possibility that the hyrdroelectric dams could come down to ensure restoration and survival of imperiled salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River Basin.
     
    "I don't know that breaching of the dams is the solution," he said. "I hope it's never done, but that's the last fallback."
     
    Former President George W. Bush had vowed the dams would stay. President Barack Obama has yet to weigh in.
     
    Environmentalists have argued that salmon populations cannot recover without removing some dams, especially the migration bottleneck to Idaho created by four dams on the lower Snake River.
     
    Redden told NOAA Fisheries Service that their plan for balancing endangered salmon runs against electricity production on 14 federal Columbia Basin hydroelectric dams still needs work, particularly in the area of habitat improvement.
     
    Federal agencies have acknowledged that the dams themselves threaten the survival of fish, but relied on extensive habitat restoration, modifications to dams spillways, and changes in salmon hatchery operations without major changes to the amount of water going through turbines.
     
    At the start of the daylong hearing, the federal government agreed to let more water pass through Columbia and Snake River dams to help young salmon migrate to the ocean.
    Colby Howell, a U.S. Department of Justice attorney, said the move was a compromise because the spilled water doesn't go through turbines to generate power and adds millions of dollars to Bonneville Power Administration costs.
     
    Conservationists, meanwhile, have maintained more spills remain the biggest factor in greater numbers in recent salmon returns.
     
    Federal officials submitted a 10-year plan in May after others were rejected by Redden. They said the plan would help fish passing through the dams survive. Environmentalists sued, saying the plan did too little to restore salmon populations.
     
    "It seems to ensure extinction," said Howard Funke, a lawyer for the Spokane Indian Tribe, one of two tribes in the region to side with the environmentalists.
     
    But federal officials defended the new plan, saying it will help the survival of fish.
     
    They also noted the new plan has been backed by Idaho, Washington and Montana and by most Columbia River tribes — a new development in the long running argument.
     
    Four Northwest Indian tribal governments — Yakama, Warm Springs, Umatilla and Colville — agreed to the plan, which committed the federal agencies to giving the tribes $900 million to spend toward salmon.
     
    The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Montana and the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho also sided with the federal agencies. But like the Spokane, the Nez Perce Tribe would not back the federal plan.
     
    Despite his comments on the biological opinion, Redden on Friday praised the federal and state officials' and tribal leaders' collaboration.
     
    "We've worked incredibly hard on this," Howell told Redden. "We deserve a chance."
    Todd True, attorney for the legal group Earthjustice, however, said it would do little to improve conditions for salmon.
     
    "Salmon don't swim in collaboration," Todd True said. "They won't return in greater numbers because of a new collaboration — no matter how sincere."
     
    Columbia Basin salmon returns once numbered an estimated 10 million to 30 million, but overfishing, habitat loss, pollution and dam construction over the past century have caused their numbers to plunge.
     
    Dozens of populations are extinct, and 13 are listed as threatened or endangered, making it necessary for federal projects such as the hydroelectric system to show they can be operated without harming them.
     
    The last three plans for balancing salmon and dams failed to pass legal muster.
    Each of the dams kills only a small percentage of the millions of young salmon headed to the ocean, but that adds up to a major death toll.
  • AP: NW delegation demands start of Columbia River treaty talks

    CRT.Delegation.Ltr copyBy NICHOLAS K. GERANIOS
    Associated Press
    April 15, 2015

    The letter expressed concerns about the slow pace the Obama administration is taking on considering the Columbia River treaty with Canada.

    SPOKANE, Wash. (AP) — The entire congressional delegation from Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana is demanding that the Obama administration begin negotiations with Canada to update the landmark Columbia River Treaty.

    Updating of the treaty, signed in 1964, affects the economy, environment, and flood control needs of millions of residents of the four states, along more than 1,200 miles of the Columbia River and its tributaries.

    The letter sent this week expressed concerns about the slow pace the Obama administration is taking toward the complicated matter.

    The treaty governs operations of dams and reservoirs on the fourth-largest river system in North America. It has no expiration date, but either country may cancel it or suggest changes beginning in 2024 with 10 years’ notice.

    Download the Letter here.

  • AP: Study: Chinook salmon are key to orcas all year

    By Gene Johnson
    March 5, 2021

    Dukes orcas thinkstock WEB 01252018 640x427Associated Press SEATTLE — For more than a decade, Brad Hanson and other researchers have tailed the Pacific Northwest’s endangered killer whales in a hard-sided inflatable boat, leaning over the edge with a standard pool skimmer to collect clues to their diet: bits of orca poop floating on the water, or fish scales sparkling just below the surface.

    Their work established years ago that the whales depend heavily on depleted runs of Chinook, the largest and fattiest of Pacific salmon species, when they forage in the summer in the inland waters between Washington state and British Columbia.

    But a new paper from Hanson and others at the NOAA Fisheries Northwest Fisheries Science Center provides the first real look at what the whales eat the rest of the year, when they cruise the outer Pacific Coast — data that reaffirms the central importance of Chinook to the whales and the importance of recovering Chinook populations to save the beloved mammals. By analyzing the DNA of orca feces as well as salmon scales and other remains after the whales have devoured the fish, the researchers demonstrated that while the whales sometimes eat other species, including halibut, lingcod and steelhead, they depend most on Chinook. And they consumed the big salmon from a wide range of sources — from those that spawn in California’s Sacramento River all the way to the Taku River in northern British Columbia.

    “Having the data in hand that they’re taking fish from this huge swath of watershed across western North America was pretty amazing,” Hanson, the study’s lead researcher, said Wednesday. “We have to have hard data on what these whales are actually doing.”

    There are officially 74 whales in the three groups of endangered orcas, known as the J, K and L pods of the southern resident killer whales. Three calves have been born since September, but those are not yet reflected in the count because only about half of the babies survive their first year.

    Facing a dearth of prey, contaminants that accumulate in their blubber, and vessel noise that hinders their hunting, the whales are at their lowest numbers since the 1970s, when hundreds were captured — and more than 50 were kept — for aquarium display. Scientists warn the population is on the brink of extinction.

    The paper, published Wednesday in the journal PLOS One, suggests that efforts to make Chinook more abundant off the coast in the nonsummer months could especially pay off, and that Columbia River Chinook hatchery stocks are among the most important for the whales. It also suggests that increasing the numbers of nonsalmon species could help fill the gaps for the whales when Chinook aren’t available in the open ocean.

    NOAA has already used some of the data, which has been available internally as scientists awaited the study’s publication, in proposing what areas to designate as critical habitat for the whales. Officials could use it in prioritizing certain habitat restoration efforts or in timing hatchery production of salmon to best benefit the whales, said co-author Lynne Barre of the National Marine Fisheries Service’s Protected Resource Division.

    The information could also be key in setting limits for fisheries.

  • AP: Tribes sue Coast Guard over tanker-traffic risk to orcas

    By The Associated Press
    April 26, 2017

    orca.breachIn a complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle, the tribes argue that the Coast Guard has failed to consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service over the impact on killer whales of the tanker traffic it regulates.
    The Tulalip and Suquamish tribes are suing the Coast Guard, alleging a failure to protect endangered orcas from the risk of oil spills associated with tanker traffic in the Strait of Juan de Fuca.

    In a complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle on Tuesday, the tribes argue that the Coast Guard has failed to consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service over the impact of the tanker traffic it regulates on the killer whales. The tribes say the risk has increased significantly since the Canadian government approved the expansion of the TransMountain pipeline last November. That decision is expected to increase tanker traffic in the Strait of Juan de Fuca sevenfold.

    The Coast Guard did not immediately return a message seeking comment.
    The tribes are represented by the environmental law firm Earthjustice. They seek an order requiring the Coast Guard to avoid harm to the whales until the agency consults with the fisheries service.

    http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/tribes-sue-coast-guard-over-tanker-traffics-risk-to-orcas-in-strait-of-juan-de-fuca/

  • AP: Unique Idaho salmon numbers rise, but extinction looms

    By Keith Ridler
    Nov 26, 2020

    

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A unique population of salmon that for thousands of
years has been reproducing in one of Idaho’s wildest places experienced
a small increase in adults returning to spawn this year.



    But the number of chinook salmon returning to the Middle Fork of the
Salmon River and its tributaries is just a tiny fraction of historic
numbers, experts said.

    

“More is better, but it’s still abysmal numbers,” said Russ Thurow, a
research fisheries scientist with the U.S. Forest Service based in the
small city of Salmon. “We’re bouncing around just above extinction."

    A survey completed in September of spawning beds found that about 900
chinook salmon, which can surpass 20 pounds, returned this year
compared to 320 last year.



    Most of the basin is protected in the Frank Church River of No Return
Wilderness. It contains about 460 miles of still pristine spawning
habitat that in the 1800s experienced an annual return of an estimated
150,000 adult salmon.



    Spawning bed surveys from the 1950s and 1960s led to an estimate of
nearly 50,000 salmon returning those years before the runs plummeted
following the completion of dams on the Snake River.



    Middle Fork Salmon River chinook salmon have a pristine habitat, are
not influenced by salmon hatcheries and are rarely caught by anglers
based on studies that track tagged salmon. That isolates dams used for
hydropower as the main problem limiting the fish’s recovery.



    Salmon from Idaho must pass through four dams on the Snake River in
eastern Washington and four more on the Columbia River.



    Throughout the Columbia River Basin, more than $16 billion has been
spent over the past three decades trying to save salmon and steelhead.



    In a decision criticized by environmentalists, the U.S. government in
July announced that four huge dams on the Snake River in Washington
state will not be removed.



    “Until we do a better job of reducing those harms caused by the hydro
systems, and especially for Snake River fish, I think that we’re going
to continue to spend a lot of money and not deliver results,” said
Joseph Bogaard of the Save Our Wild Salmon coalition.

  • AP: Wyden welcomes federal agency’s plan to seek consensus on saving salmon

    Friday, December 14, 2012 Associated Press

    The federal agency in charge of saving salmon has hired two consensus- building groups to ask Northwest leaders what long-term steps should be taken to overcome persistent conflicts over restoring dwindling salmon and steelhead runs.

    The move was welcomed Thursday by U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden in a statement to The Daily Astorian.

    NOAA Fisheries Service has hired the Oregon Consensus program at Portland State University and the William D. Ruckelshaus Center in Washington state to interview 150 people. Their initial report is due this summer.

    Barry Thom, deputy regional administrator for the agency, said they are looking for a regional picture of what people think it will take to bring about recovery for the fish.

    States, Indian tribes, conservation groups, fishermen and farmers have long had different views on how to regulate fishing, dam operations, hatcheries and irrigation withdrawals.

    Sen. Wyden has pressed for all groups to work together for some time.

    “As I said earlier this year, I have great faith in collaborative discussions and I support stakeholders meeting to talk about an issue that is so vitally important to the Pacific Northwest - the recovery of the salmon,” he said in a statement to the newspaper. “I commend NOAA for taking steps to engage all the interested parties in looking at the long-term recovery of the salmon.”

    The interviewers will be neutral, NOAA said, and responses will not be attributed to specific people to promote candid conversations.

    The effort, outlined in a NOAA letter to 150 groups this week, will cost more than $200,000, with roughly 50 additional slots set aside for interviews of people mentioned in initial conversations. NOAA wants a basinwide plan that integrates the local recovery plans developed in the Columbia and Snake River basins, Thom said.

    A bigger challenge is reaching consensus on the right mix of fishing restrictions, hatchery reforms, dam modifications and habitat restoration to bump 13 runs of salmon and steelhead off the endangered species list.

    Interest groups on both sides applauded NOAA’s first step, saying the’d welcome a more comprehensive, collaborative approach to salmon recovery. Lawsuits have driven the process for more than a decade.

    A broad approach would expand the focus beyond hydroelectric dams, said Terry Flores, executive director of Northwest River Partners, whose members include utilities, farmers and ports on the Columbia and Snake.

    “There are so many things actually going on, if we can understand how they link up that’s a good thing,” she said.

    Gilly Lyons, policy director for Save our Wild Salmon, said, “Maybe it will get a more constructive conversation going.”

    http://www.dailyastorian.com/news/local/wyden-welcomes-federal-agency-s-plan-to-seek-consensus-on/article_48360790-4610-11e2-ab3d-0019bb2963f4.html

  • AP/Seattle Times: Feds reject removal of 4 Snake River dams in key report

    Feds reject removal of 4 Snake River dams in key report

    By Gillian Flaccus
    Feb. 27, 2020

    The Associated Pressdam.lsr1

    PORTLAND, Ore. — A long-awaited federal report out Friday rejected the idea of removing four hydroelectric dams on a major Pacific Northwest river in a last-ditch effort to save more than a dozen species of threatened or endangered salmon, saying such a dramatic approach would destabilize the power grid, increase overall greenhouse emissions and more than double the risk of regional power outages.

    The four dams on the lower Snake River in Eastern Washington are part of a vast and complex hydroelectric power system operated by the federal government in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana.

    Environmental groups who have pushed for years for the dams to come down to help salmon recover immediately blasted the report. The three agencies in charge of overseeing the sprawling hydropower system recommended a different alternative that includes a variety of strategies, including fine-tuning the amount of water that spills over the dams for fish.

    “Rather than seizing this opportunity to heed the public’s call for working together for a solution that revives salmon populations, the draft plan is built on the same failed approach the courts have rejected time and again,” said Todd True, an attorney for Earthjustice who has represented the Nez Perce Tribe, the state of Oregon, environmentalists and fishing groups in ongoing litigation over the dams.

    “We need a different approach and leadership from elected officials.”

    Oregon Gov. Kate Brown has voiced support for demolishing the Snake River dams.

    The 14 federal dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers together produce 40% of the region’s power — enough electricity to power nearly 5 million homes, or eight cities roughly the size of Seattle. They also contain a system of locks that allows cities nearly 500 miles (800 kilometers) inland from the Pacific Ocean access to Asian markets via barges that float down the massive rivers to the sea. Roughly 50 to 60 million tons of cargo navigates the Snake and Columbia river system each year.

    At the same time, the towering dams have proven disastrous for salmon that struggle to navigate past them on human-made fish ladders as they swim upstream to spawn and die after spending most of their lives in the Pacific Ocean. Salmon are unique in that they hatch in freshwater streams and then make their way hundreds of miles to the ocean, where they spend years before finding their way back to their natal streams to mate, lay eggs and die.

    Snake River sockeye were the first species in the Columbia River Basin listed under the Endangered Species Act in 1991. Now, 13 salmon runs are listed as federally endangered or threatened. Scientists also warn that southern resident orcas are starving to death because of a dearth of the chinook salmon that are their primary food source.

    The Puget Sound population of orcas — also called killer whales — was placed on the endangered species list in 2005. A mother orca that carried her dead baby on her back for 17 days brought international attention in 2018 as their numbers have dwindled to fewer than 80 animals.

    The U.S. government has spent between $15 billion and $17 billion on improved salmon passage over years, but nothing has changed for the salmon, True said. He added that both the Pacific Northwest’s power supply and ability to use energy more efficiently have vastly improved in the past 20 years.

    The Bonneville Power Administration, which sells the power from the system, “is looking at a very different future than they were 10 years ago, or even five years ago,” he said.

    Opponents of dam removal say they want salmon to flourish, but they aren’t sure breaching four major hydroelectric dams will help — and it could instead damage the regional economy and the stability of the power
    supply.

    Reservoirs behind some of the dams allow the Bonneville Power Administration to even out the more erratic power supply from wind and solar by spilling water to generate electricity on short notice. And a move away from low-cost coal plants in the Pacific Northwest has some worried about what the future could hold for ratepayers if the Snake River dams are removed, said Kurt Miller, of Northwest River Partners, which represents community-owned utilities across Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Montana.

    “This is a much, much bigger issue than the Snake River dams. If worldwide salmon populations are doing poorly because of climate change and carbon, does it make sense to tear out 1,000 average megawatts of carbon-free electricity?” he said.

    “For so many reasons, it’s bad public policy.”

    The report Friday addressed those concerns when it discussed the option of breaching the dams.

    Hydropower generation would decrease by 1,100 average megawatts under average water conditions, and 730 average megawatts under low water conditions, the report said. The risk of a regional power shortages would more than double and the lowest-cost replacement power would be $200 million a year, the report said. Those adjustments would increase the wholesale power rate up to 9.6%, the authors wrote.

    U.S. District Judge Michael Simon ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation and the Bonneville Power
    Administration to revisit the impact of the hydroelectric system in 2016 while overseeing litigation over salmon.

    In all, three federal judges have thrown out five plans for the system over the decades after finding they didn’t do enough to protect salmon.

    The report Friday is a draft and will be subject to 45 days of public comment. A final report — including the agencies’ final decision — is expected in September.

  • Associated Press in the Seattle Times: US, Canada to begin talks in 2018 on Columbia River Treaty

    CRT.river.photo1A half-century-old agreement between the United States and Canada governing hydropower and flood-control operations along the Columbia River needs to be updated to deal with modern-day issues, such as environmental protections, said U.S. Sen. Patty Murray. By NICHOLAS K. GERANIOS, The Associated Press
    December 16, 2017

    Members of Congress from Washington state are praising the decision to start negotiations early next year over the future of a half-century-old agreement between the United States and Canada that governs hydropower and flood-control operations along the Columbia River.

    Lawmakers from across the Pacific Northwest have been pressing the U.S. government to reopen Columbia River Treaty talks for several years. The 1964 agreement doesn’t have an expiration date, but either country can cancel most of its provisions after September 2024, with a 10-year minimum notice. The U.S. Department of State on Dec. 7 announced its intention to enter talks with Canada over the treaty.

    The Columbia starts in British Columbia and flows more than 1,200 miles, mostly in the U.S., to the Pacific Ocean. “The Columbia River Treaty is of immense importance to the economy, environment and culture of Washington state and the Pacific Northwest,” said Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash.

    But it needs to be updated to deal with modern-day issues facing the region, such as environmental protections, she said.

    Modernizing the treaty to balance flood control, hydropower generation and environmental protections could benefit both countries, said Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.

    Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., whose district includes portions of the river, has pushed for years to reopen treaty talks.

    “We must move forward with renegotiations to ensure this agreement remains mutually beneficial,” McMorris Rodgers said.

    The treaty over time developed a “Canadian entitlement” that makes U.S. electricity consumers pay Canada more than they should for power benefits, she said.

    “It is estimated that our constituents overpay this entitlement by 10 times the reciprocal benefit,” said McMorris Rodgers, who ranks fourth in House leadership.

    Northwest utilities make an annual payment of $250 million to $350 million to Canada. The payments were intended to reimburse Canada for building storage dams to benefit downstream power generation. But an outdated formula overpays Canadians, a coalition of more than 80 Northwest utilities has contended.

    The payments affect the monthly bills of 6.4 million U.S. electric customers in the Pacific Northwest.

    British Columbia officials have said they need a better accounting of the benefits Americans get from the vast amounts of water stored north of the border.

    Indian tribes in both countries would like the heavily dammed Columbia to flow more like a natural river, with additional releases of water in dry years to aid struggling salmon and steelhead runs. Tribes have also said new negotiations might produce agreement on reintroducing extinct salmon runs above Grand Coulee Dam in Washington state.

    In British Columbia, residents living along the river want more stability in reservoir levels.

    The treaty was originally intended to reduce the risk of floods in downstream cities like Portland, and to develop additional hydropower capacity.

    It led to the construction of three large storage reservoirs in British Columbia (Duncan, Mica and Keenleyside).

    The treaty also spurred the construction of the giant Libby Dam in Montana.

    All told, these projects doubled the storage capacity of the basin — and dramatically reduced the river’s natural spring flows. But the treaty did not cover the impacts on fish and wildlife populations.

    A group of conservation, fishing and religious organizations say that should change.

    “Modernizing the treaty … is not just an opportunity but also a critical need given the challenges salmon face in the 21st century,” said Samantha Mace, of the Save Our Wild Salmon Coalition.

    The new talks are an opportunity to include “ecosystem-based function” — or health of the river — as a formal component, on equal footing with flood risk management and hydropower production.

    “We aim to prod both countries to achieve that goal,” said Greg Haller of the environmental advocacy group Pacific Rivers.

    That could include improved river flows to aid salmon’s migration to the ocean and improve water quality. It would also mean improved fish passage and reintroduction of salmon and steelhead into areas made inaccessible to salmon by dams in the U.S. and Canada.

    NICHOLAS K. GERANIOS

  • Associated Press: Environmental groups want work halted on Snake River dams

    snake-river-damsjpg-0a737256e566bbe3Keith Ridler, Associated Press, Tuesday, January 10,
    2017

    BOISE, Idaho (AP) ˜ Environmental groups are asking a federal court to halt 11 infrastructure projects on four lower Snake River dams in Washington state that could ultimately be removed if a pending review determines the dams need to come out to help salmon.

    The 45-page notice filed late Monday in Portland, Oregon, estimates the cost of the projects at $110 million.

    The National Wildlife Federation and the other groups in a separate, 29- page filing also late Monday asked that the federal government be ordered
    to spill more water in the spring over the four Snake River dams and four more on the Columbia River to help migrating salmon.

    A federal judge ruled in May that the U.S. government hasn't done enough to improve Northwest salmon runs and ordered an environmental impact statement that's due out in 2021, urging officials to consider removing the dams.

    The environmental groups contend that infrastructure improvements shouldn't be allowed at the dams during the review.

    "These kinds of investments should be suspended to ensure a level playing field for all of the alternatives agencies must consider, including the alternative of lower Snake River dam removal," Kevin Lewis of Idaho Rivers United said in a statement.

    The review process is being conducted under the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA, an umbrella law that covers the Endangered Species Act. Thirteen species of salmon and steelhead on the Columbia and Snake rivers have been listed as federally protected over the past 25 years. Four of the listed species are found in Idaho.

    The Snake River dams cited in the documents are Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite. They're the four lowest dams on the 1,000-mile-long Snake River, itself a tributary to the Columbia River.

    The four dams are managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and were built in the 1960s and 1970s.

    Scott Lawrence, a Seattle-based spokesman for the federal agency, didn't immediately return a call from The Associated Press on Tuesday.

    The $110 million listed in the document filed Monday is an estimate by the environmental groups that said the Army Corps of Engineers declined to provide precise numbers. The groups say more than half of the money is being spent on Ice Harbor Dam and includes new turbine blades.

    "The Corps is continuing to commit major capital resources to restoring and extending the useful life of the four lower Snake River dams without hesitation or pause," the court document states.

    The groups say the expenditures could be used to argue the dams shouldn't be removed.

    http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/us/article/Environmental-groups-want-work-halted-on-Snake-10847382.php

  • Associated Press: House backs bill to block spill of dam water to help salmon

    LoneFish.jpg

    By MATTHEW DALY and NICHOLAS K. GERANIOS, Associated Press

    April 25, 2018

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. House approved a bill Wednesday that would effectively stop the spilling of water from four Pacific Northwest dams to help migrating salmon reach the Pacific Ocean.

    The bill, approved 225-189, would prevent any changes in dam operations until 2022. It was sponsored by Republican Reps. Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Dan Newhouse, both of Washington state. Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Battle Ground, was a co-sponsor of the legislation.

    They say the four Snake River dams provide hydropower, flood control and other benefits while already allowing record salmon runs.

    “We are recognizing the role dams play in the Northwest and that dams and fish can co-exist,” McMorris Rodgers, the fourth-ranking House Republican, said after the vote.

    “There’s only one sensible way to balance the health of our salmon runs with residents’ need for low-cost, hydropower energy in the Northwest — and that’s to restore a scientifically backed operations plan,” Herrera Beutler said. “On behalf of our salmon, our Northwest ratepayers, our economy, and our environment, passing H.R. 3144 is vital to ensure that we’re relying on collaboration and science to best manage our river system.”

    Critics, however, blame the giant dams, built in the 1960s and 1970s, for killing wild salmon, an iconic species in the Northwest. Environmentalists have pushed to remove the dams to aid salmon recovery.

    The bill now goes to the Senate. “I urge my colleagues in the Senate to come forward and support our dams,” Newhouse said.

    But at least one Northwest senator vows to oppose the legislation.

    Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., in February sent a letter to Senate and House leaders expressing her concern with the bill. She said Wednesday she stands by that opposition.

    “There is an ongoing legal process intended to account for all uses of our critical river system and a court-mandated comprehensive review that everyone can participate in, so I oppose this legislation that would cut off and politicize what should be a robust and transparent process,” Murray said.

    Once one of the greatest salmon fisheries in the world, the Columbia-Snake river system now has more than a dozen endangered salmon runs.

    Democrats have argued that on-going studies of the dams, including whether they should be removed, must go forward.

    The four dams — Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite — span the Snake River between the Washington cities of Pasco and Pullman. Together they produce about 4 percent of the region’s electricity.

    Proposals to remove the dams have percolated in the Northwest for decades, and have devolved into a largely partisan issue with Democrats generally on the side of fish and Republicans for keeping the dams.

    The government has spent some $15 billion over the decades to increase salmon runs, with mixed results.

    In March 2017, U.S. District Judge Michael Simon of Portland, Oregon, ordered the dams to increase spillage beginning this spring. Federal agencies estimated that increasing spill from early April to mid-June would cost ratepayers $40 million in lost power revenues this year.

    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld Simon’s order.

    The dams operate under a plan to protect salmon created by a collaboration of federal agencies, states and Indian tribes during the Obama administration.

    Simon found the plan does not do enough. He ruled a new environmental study is needed and it must consider the option of removing the dams. He also wrote that wild salmon were in a “precarious” state.

    McMorris Rodgers countered that the number of salmon returning from the ocean to spawn is high.

    “We have been in court now for 20 years,” McMorris Rodgers said.

    The House bill would delay changes to the 2014 plan for dam operations until 2022, she said.

    “The experts … should be the ones deciding how to best manage this system,” Newhouse said. “Not a judge in Portland, Oregon.”

    Northwest RiverPartners, which represents a group of river users, hailed the bill as good news for salmon.

    Salmon “will continue to benefit from protections that are already working,” director Terry Flores said.

    But environmental groups were dismayed by the bill.

    “This legislation ensures that we continue on the same costly, ineffective path that has seen continued declines in wild salmon in the Pacific Northwest,” the environmental groups said in a joint press release.

    The bill “would push salmon closer to extinction,” they contend.

    Columbian staff writer Katy Sword contributed to this report.

  • Associated Press: Northwest lawmakers seek progress on Columbia River Treaty

    The Associated Press
    July 1, 2021

    crt.photo.copySPOKANE, Wash. (AP) — A bipartisan group of 21 Northwest lawmakers called on President Joe Biden to prioritize a long-running effort to renegotiate a 60-year-old treaty that governs how the United States and Canada share the waters of the Columbia River Basin.

    In a Tuesday letter to Biden, Washington Republican Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Washington Democratic Sen. Patty Murray and Oregon Democratic Rep. Peter DeFazio led the group urging the president to update the Columbia River Treaty.

    The Spokesman-Review reported efforts to revise the treaty, which was signed in 1961, began in 2013 amid concerns over salmon runs, flood risk and electricity the U.S. sends to Canada under the accord.
    “Modernizing this treaty is critically important to protecting our region from flood control risks and ensuring we can continue to lead with clean, renewable, reliable, and affordable hydropower,” McMorris Rodgers said in a statement.

    The treaty, which took more than 20 years to negotiate, came together after a 1948 flood washed away what once was Oregon’s second-biggest city, Vanport. It provided for the construction of one dam in Montana and three in British Columbia, completed between 1968 and 1973, that together more than doubled the amount of reservoir storage in the basin, providing benefits for both flood prevention and generating power.

    Most of the treaty’s provisions don’t have an expiration date, but half a century after its signing, changing conditions spurred an effort to modernize it. The Bonneville Power Administration and the Army Corps of Engineers — which together form the U.S. entity responsible for the agreement — began a review of the deal in 2011 and recommended a series of changes to the State Department in 2013.

    The recommendations included letting more water flow through the dams in spring and summer to improve fish passage, decreasing the treaty’s impact on tribal resources and updating flood management plans. The BPA and Army Corps of Engineers also recommended changing a provision known as “the Canadian Entitlement,” which requires the U.S. to send cash and half of power generated downstream to Canada in exchange for the water resources.

    The BPA and Army Corps of Engineers have estimated the value of the Canadian Entitlement to be between $229 million and $335 million a year, contending the current treaty gives the U.S. a raw deal. Canadian negotiators have argued the current entitlement is fair. Either country can terminate the treaty with 10 years’ notice, but neither has done so.

    The letter was signed by lawmakers from Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana.

    A State Department spokesperson said Friday the agency doesn’t comment on congressional correspondence but promised to consult with lawmakers on the treaty.

    The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

  • Associated Press: Orca population in Puget Sound falling

    orca eating salmon CFWRNot only are Puget Sound’s resident killer whales continuing to decline in numbers, but their behavior is changing, too, according to scientists. The orcas seem to be splintering from their basic social groups and spending less time together.

    August 30, 2014

    FRIDAY HARBOR — With two new deaths this year and no new calves since 2012, the population of endangered killer whales in the Puget Sound continues to decline.

    The number of whales in the J, K and L pods has dropped to 78, a level not seen since 1985, according to a census by the Center for Whale Research. Adding to the concerns, the whales appear to be “splintering” from their pods, which are their basic social groups.

    Since 1976, Ken Balcomb of the research center has been observing the Puget Sound orcas, or Southern Residents as they’re known among scientists. Balcomb compiles an annual census of the population for submission to the federal government.

    Historically, all three pods of orcas have come together in the San Juan Islands during summer months, often feeding and socializing in large groups, Balcomb noted. But for the past few years, the pods have divided themselves into small groups, sometimes staying together but often staying apart.

    “What we’re seeing with this weird association pattern is two or three members of one pod with two or three from another pod,” Balcomb said. “It’s a fragmentation of the formal social structure, and you can see that fragmentation going further. They are often staying miles and miles apart and not interacting.

    “If we were trying to name the pods now, we couldn’t do it,” he added. “They aren’t associating in those patterns anymore.”

    Among killer whales, offspring tend to stay with their mothers for life, sustaining identifiable “matrilines” that typically contain youngsters, their mothers and their grandmothers. So far, the matrilines have stayed together, though many of these groups are now smaller.

    Balcomb suggests the primary factor for the population decline is a lack of food for the killer whales, which generally prey on chinook salmon passing through the San Juan Islands on the way back to Canada’s Fraser River. The whales have a strong preference for chinook, typically larger and fatter fish, but they will eat other species of salmon and even other fish sometimes.

    “The salmon issue is huge, and it is ongoing,” Balcomb said.

    Chinook runs continue to decline in most areas, and state and federal salmon managers seem unable to turn the situation around, he said. Society’s dependence on hatcheries, harvest and hydropower have diluted the wild-salmon populations and made long-term recovery increasingly difficult.

    The two orcas that are missing and presumed dead are L-53, a 37-year-old female named Lulu; and L-100, a 13-year-old male named Indigo. Lulu’s mother died in 2010, and she never had any siblings nor offspring of her own. Both were members of L pod, the Kitsap Sun reported.

    During the 1960s and early 1970s, the Southern Resident population was reduced dramatically when orcas were captured for marine parks and aquariums throughout the world. After that practice ended, their numbers grew to 98 in 1995, then dropped to 80 in 2001 — the year the whales were proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Since then, their population has gone up and down by a few whales each year, dropping from 88 in 2011 to 78 today.

    In the early days of killer-whale research, females of reproductive age typically had a calf every five years or so, Balcomb said. If that pattern were to return, the population would be growing again, he said.

    “If everybody crosses their fingers and hopes for a return to that pattern, we could have eight babies next year,” he said. “But the chances of that happening are pretty slim.”

    Meanwhile, the number of “transient” orcas, which prey on sea mammals, appears to be increasing.
    Transients used to frequent Puget Sound in winter months, Balcomb said, “but we’re seeing an increasing trend of occurrence of transients year round.”

    Transient orcas historically traveled in small groups, but now their groups are growing larger, possibly because the population of marine mammals, upon which they prey, can support more of these top-level predators.

    Since transients don’t eat fish, they are not in competition for food with the Southern Residents. And, as they have done since the first observations, transients still tend to move away when Southern Residents approach, Balcomb said.

    “Transients change direction when Southern Residents are around, and there is no evidence of combat,” he said.

    View article in Seattle Times here.

  • Associated Press: Washington governor opposes House bill on Columbia, Snake River dams

    insleeBy The Associated Press

    SPOKANE, Wash. Washington Gov. Jay Inslee is opposed to a bill introduced by Republican U.S. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers that would reduce spill over Columbia and Snake river dams, and prevent the breaching of four Snake River dams in eastern Washington state.

    In a letter to leaders of the House Natural Resources Committee and the Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans, the Democratic governor this week said the bill would harm "ongoing efforts to improve future salmon and dam management."

    "I am committed to preserving the benefits of our hydropower dams in a manner that is in balance with protecting and restoring salmon," said Inslee, who urged lawmakers to oppose the bill.

    McMorris Rodgers said Wednesday that Inslee was putting politics over science.

    "After 20 years of litigation we must get out of the courtroom and continue investments into habitat restoration and fish recovery," McMorris Rodgers, who represents the eastern third of the state in Congress, said. "That's what my bipartisan bill ensures."

    This is the latest battle in a long-running conflict between opponents and supporters of the four hydroelectric dams on the Snake River which are blamed for reducing the production of wild salmon and steelhead on the Columbia and Snake river system.

    Introduced last summer, the bill would keep in place the Federal Columbia River Biological Opinion until 2022. That's a plan created by a coalition of federal agencies, states and tribes to protect migrating salmon while continuing to operate the dams.

    A federal judge has ruled that the biological opinion doesn't do enough to rebuild endangered salmon and steelhead populations.

    U.S. District Court Judge Michael Simon of Portland, Oregon, has ordered a new environmental review, which is required to include a look at breaching the four Snake River dams.

    The bill would also effectively overturn an April decision by Simon requiring the Army Corps of Engineers to spill more water for fish at eight Columbia and Snake river dams starting next year.

    Environmentalists say the increased spill over the dams would deliver out-migrating juvenile salmon more quickly to the ocean, reducing mortality. Opponents say it would reduce hydropower production.

    The dams have fish ladders, but many salmon still die during migration in and out of the river system.

    Robb Krehbiel, Northwest representative for Defenders of Wildlife, said the bill seeks to lock in conditions that have failed to restore salmon runs.

    "Dam operations and salmon management in the Columbia Basin are in desperate need of updates," Krehbiel said.

    Northwest RiverPartners, which includes farmers, utilities, ports and businesses, has contended the bigger spill would increase electric bills in the Northwest, while doing little to help fish and possibly even harming them. Too much spill creates high gas levels in the water that can harm juvenile fish, they said.

    http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2017/12/washington_governor_opposes_ho.html

  • Atmos Magazine: The Frontline - To Our Relatives in the Water

    Across the Pacific Northwest, many tribal nations see the salmon and orcas as relatives, but recent heat waves are challenging the ability for them to survive. The Frontline examines efforts to save these endangered species and their cultural significance.

    2018.orca.flotillaBy Yessenia Funes
    July 19, 2021

    Many rivers along the Pacific Northwest coast eventually empty out into the ocean. These are the waters several communities of orcas call home, including the Southern Resident killer whales. And the rivers are what give them life because of the chinook salmon that spawn in them. You see, these orcas eat almost exclusively chinook salmon year-round. A study earlier this year found that the fish make up the vast majority of the orca’s diet—and both are at risk of extinction.

    The heat waves that keep rocking the West are only exacerbating a delicate situation. Fifteen tribal nations came together earlier this month to advocate for the orcas and salmon. There, they made their hope clear: The clearest way forward in protecting these species is to remove dams that block critical habitat in the Northwest’s Columbia River Basin. Whether that happens may bank on President Joe Biden’s infrastructure package. Dam removal ain’t cheap.

    Welcome to The Frontline, where animals matter, too. I’m Yessenia Funes, climate editor of Atmos. The weather has been relentless in the West. It started in June with a record-breaking heat wave and continues. This week will be the fourth heat wave in five weeks, the Washington Post reports. These temperatures are unprecedented for the Pacific Northwest—and a terrifying glimpse of what’s to come as the climate continues to change.

    As Misty MacDuffee sat sweating before her computer in British Columbia, Canada, during last month’s historic heat wave, reality struck her: “This is it. This is insane,” thought the biologist and program director of the Raincoast Conservation Foundation’s wild salmon program. She was reading temperature maps, receiving heat alerts, and following the temperature spikes throughout the globe. After her dog, her mind immediately went to another animal: the salmon.

    Chinook salmon prefer the cold; they need it to survive. Such unprecedented heat is deadly for them. Without sufficient chinook in the years to come, the Southern Resident orcas may suffer—and so will the Salish Sea people who call them relatives.

    “All of our past decision making is really coming home to haunt us now,” MacDuffee said, speaking of the government failure to address greenhouse gas emissions and the environmental degradation in British Columbia.

    The science suggests salmon can only withstand water temperatures up to around 71.6 degrees Fahrenheit (22 degrees Celsius) before their bodies begin to fail, MacDuffee said. You see, the cold water carries more oxygen. And salmon require plenty of oxygen to complete their thousands-mile long journeys to their birthplace to spawn their young.

    Young salmon are a bit more resilient. Some can survive water temperatures as high as 84.2 degrees Fahrenheit (29 degrees Celsius) for short periods of time if they’re not swimming and acclimated to warm water, but most can’t tolerate more than 75.2 degrees Fahrenheit (24 degrees Celsius) when they’re swimming. In California’s Sacramento River, officials are expecting nearly all juvenile salmon will die. There, air temperatures are soaring above 100 degrees Fahrenheit (37.8 degrees Celsius).

    That’s bad news for the Southern Resident orcas, which are the only endangered species of killer whale in the U.S. They swim along the waters from central California up to southeast Alaska, but toxic contaminants, shipping vessels, and food shortages are threatening their very survival. Only 75 of these majestic creatures remain today. And they won’t eat much else besides chinook salmon.

    All 14 runs of chinook salmon (one of which dwells in the Sacramento River) have some level of federal protection due to their threatened nature. They’re the largest species of Pacific salmon. That’s why the Southern Resident orcas love them so much, MacDuffee said. The fish were large enough to split among the family.

    “Their culture is to share those fish,” she said

    But chinook have been shrinking over the last century, in part, because they aren’t living as long. Overfishing, habitat loss, and dams have all contributed to the chinook’s downfall. So not only are there fewer fish in the ocean—they’re smaller, too. Without enough food to eat, the orcas become more vulnerable to everything else stressing their bodies: legacy ocean contaminants and noise from ships. The loss of this year’s salmon runs may hurt the fish—and the orcas—for years to come, said Michael Weiss, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Exeter and biologist with the Center for Whale Research.

    “Births and survival [of orcas] are really strongly correlated with the annual abundance of chinook salmon,” Weiss said.

    That’s why tribal nations from across the Pacific Northwest are partnering with government officials on a plan to save these sea creatures. From July 7 to 8, 15 nations gathered on the Squaxin Island Reservation along Puget Sound for the first-ever Salmon Orca Summit. These Salish Sea tribes have long depended on the salmon for food, sustenance, and culture. The way many see it, “the orca are the first people of this place,” Lynda Mapes of the Seattle Times reported. And all relatives—from tribal members to their finned kin—are suffering without the salmon.

    “We consider [tribal nations] co-managers of salmon in Washington state,”said Tara Galuska, the orca recovery coordinator with the Governor Salmon Recovery Office for Washington state. “They’re real leaders and big players in restoration actions.

    Tribal nations want to immediately see policymakers take steps to remove four dams from the lower Snake River, the nation’s fourth-largest river and a tributary of the Columbia River. This ecosystem is a “salmon sanctuary,” said Bill Arthur, who chairs the Snake-Columbia River Salmon Recovery Campaign with the Sierra Club. That’s because the river cuts through higher elevations in this corner where Washington, Idaho, and Oregon meet. The water is naturally cooler, which will help protect the salmon as global heating makes other areas uninhabitable for them.

    Idaho Rep. Mike Simpson released a $33 billion proposal earlier this year to remove the dams and find alternatives for the energy and irrigation they currently provide. The president’s infrastructure package could help fund such an expensive project, but he’s struggling to build support from Republicans. Having Simpson on board could help build a case for dam removal with or without Biden’s $3.5 trillion infrastructure bill—but it won’t be easy.

    “That was huge,” Arthur said, speaking to Simpson’s support.

    Unfortunately, little will save the salmon or the orcas if leaders don’t take climate action seriously. Dam removals would help buy leaders some time until they figure out how to address the planet’s rising temperatures. They won’t save these species—and their cultural significance to Salish Sea tribes—on their own.

    “It’s not just trying to fix what we’ve damaged,” said Deborah Giles, a killer whale researcher with the University of Washington’s Center for Conservation Biology and research director of Wild Orca, a nonprofit dedicated to saving the Southern Resident orcas. “It’s a matter of being proactive in limiting our carbon footprint right now and into the future.”

  • B.C. Releases Draft Columbia River Treaty Recommendations

    Posted on Friday, October 18, 2013 

    Columbia River GorgeCanada’s British Columbia Province this week released draft recommendations for a new Columbia River Treaty, saying the current treaty “does not account for the full range of benefits in the United States or the impacts in British Columbia,” and that salmon migration above Grand Coulee is not a treaty issue.

    The draft recommendations say the “ongoing impacts to the Canadian Columbia Basin to meet Treaty requirements should be acknowledged and compensated for.

    “All downstream U.S. benefits, such as flood risk management, hydropower, ecosystems, water supply, recreation, navigation and any other relevant benefits, including associated risk reduction arising from coordinated operations compared to alternatives available to each country, should be accounted for and such value created should be shared equitably between the two countries.”

    While the Canadians are suggesting higher compensation levels are warranted to take into account “a full range of benefits” to the U.S., at this stage in the process the United States has a different point of view.

    On Sept. 20, the “U.S. Entity” released its draft recommendations, and in a cover letter said, “There is widespread concern that the method included in the Treaty for calculating Canada’s share of its power benefits is outdated and no longer equitable, resulting in excessive costs to regional ratepayers. Finally, there is broad interest in reaching agreement with Canada on how we will conduct coordinated flood risk management operations post-2024 under the terms of the Treaty.

    (For a more complete look at the U.S. draft recommendations, go to CBB, Sept. 27, 2013, “U.S. Releases Draft Recommendations For ‘Modernizing’ Columbia River Treaty” http://www.cbbulletin.com/428444.aspx”)

    Some have suggested restoration of salmon runs above Grand Coulee Dam should be part of the treaty negotiations. But the Canadian draft recommendations say, “Salmon migration into the Columbia River in Canada was eliminated by the Grand Coulee Dam in 1938 (26 years prior to Treaty ratification), and as such is not a Treaty issue. British Columbia’s perspective is that restoration of fish passage and habitat, if feasible, should be the responsibility of each country regarding their respective infrastructure.”

    The Columbia River Treaty now under review in Canada and the United States was created primarily to provide reduced flood risk and support hydropower generation in a river system that springs from British Columbia and flows down through Washington and Oregon to the Pacific Ocean. Major tributaries supply water from Montana and Idaho.

    The Columbia River Treaty, signed in 1964, calls for two "entities" -- a U.S. Entity and a Canadian Entity -- to implement, and amend, the treaty. The U.S. Entity, created by the president, consists of the administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration (chair) and the Northwestern Division Engineer (member) of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Canadian Entity, appointed by the Canadian Federal Cabinet, is the British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority (B.C. Hydro).

    Four storage reservoirs on the Columbia River system remain the most obvious product of the treaty. Together, the three dams built in Canada (Duncan, Mica and Keenleyside — also known as Arrow) doubled the amount of water that could be stored, adding 15.5 million acre-feet of capacity. And the construction of Libby Dam on the Kootenai River in northwestern Montana created another large storage reservoir, Lake Koocanusa.

    The treaty called for the United States to pre-pay Canada, a total of $64 million, as each Canadian treaty dam was put into operation. This payment covered implementation of annual flood control plans for the first 60 years of the Treaty, through September 2024.

    The treaty specified that power generation benefits were to be shared equally by the two countries, but since the energy was not immediately needed to serve its demand, Canada sold the first 30 years of the Canadian Entitlement to a U.S. consortium of utilities for $254 million in 1964. The value of the Canadian Entitlement, combined with pre-payment for flood risk management, helped finance Duncan, Keenleyside and Mica dams.

    Now that the 30-year contracts have expired, the United States delivers the Canadian Entitlement energy to BC Hydro over Bonneville Power Administration transmission lines. BPA estimates that this energy entitlement is worth between $250 million and $350 million a year, according to a U.S. Entity fact sheet.

    The following draft recommendation and principles “reflect the outcomes of the British Columbia Treaty Review process to date:”

    -- The primary objective of the Treaty should be to maximize benefits to both countries through the coordination of planning and operations.

    -- The ongoing impacts to the Canadian Columbia Basin to meet Treaty requirements should be acknowledged and compensated for. The level of benefits to the Province, which is currently primarily in the form of the Canadian Entitlement, does not account for the full range of benefits in the United States or the impacts in British Columbia.

    -- All downstream U.S. benefits, such as flood risk management, hydropower, ecosystems, water supply, recreation, navigation and any other relevant benefits, including associated risk reduction arising from coordinated operations compared to alternatives available to each country, should be accounted for and such value created should be shared equitably between the two countries.

    -- Treaty provisions post-2024 should be fixed for a sufficient duration to provide planning and operational certainty while allowing for adaptive mechanisms to address significant changes to key components and interests.

    -- Implementation of post-2024 flood control obligations will be consistent with the Treaty requirements that a Called Upon Flood Control request can only be made when forecasts of potential floods indicate there is a reasonable risk of exceeding 600,000 cubic feet per second at The Dalles, and the United States must make effective use of all related storage in the United States before seeking additional help from British Columbia.

    -- To supplement Called Upon Flood Control, a coordinated flood risk management approach should maximize the benefits and mitigate impacts and risks to multiple U.S. interests as compared to Called Upon Flood Control regime post 2024 which includes effective use of U.S. reservoirs.

    -- Ecosystem values are currently, and will continue to be, an important consideration in the planning and implementation of the Treaty.

    -- The Province will explore ecosystem based improvements recognizing that there are a number of available mechanisms inside and outside the Treaty.

    -- Operating conditions of Canadian Columbia basin dams and reservoirs are subject to provincial and federal licensing including water Use Plans where they exist, and consideration of aboriginal rights under the Canadian constitution.

    -- The Province will seek improved coordination on Libby Dam and Koocanusa Reservoir operations.

    -- Salmon migration into the Columbia River in Canada was eliminated by the Grand Coulee Dam in 1938 (26 years prior to Treaty ratification), and as such is not a Treaty issue. British Columbia’s perspective is that restoration of fish passage and habitat, if feasible, should be the responsibility of each country regarding their respective infrastructure.

    -- Adaptation to climate change should be incorporated in Treaty planning and implementation.

    -- The Canadian Entities (Province of British Columbia and BC Hydro) will continue to engage First Nations and communities throughout any negotiation process.

    -- Canadian Columbia Basin issues not related to the Treaty will be addressed through other government programs and initiatives.

     For more information: http://www.cbbulletin.com/428719.aspx

  • Blogs getting the word out: Obama to release revised Bush salmon plan - May 19th, 2010

    blog.salmonWhile Columbia & Snake River wild salmon & steelhead remain on the brink, their story is swimming in abundance throughout the blogosphere.

    As we mentioned last week, the Obama administration is on the cusp of a decision that will determine the strength of the Endangered Species Act and the fate of wild salmon and steelhead in the Columbia and Snake Rivers.

    News of this upcoming decision is spreading. Take a look at any and all of the blogs below. The key word here is share. Please forward any of these links to your friends and family in an email or post one to any of your favorite social networks. Thank you!

    You can also find updates on Facebook and Twitter.
  • Boil On Columbia

    Bonneville damThe water temperature of the Columbia River at Bonneville Dam hit 73 degrees on August 18.  This is the watery equivalent of a sick canary in a coal mine.  

    So far this summer, 80 days of water temperatures 70 degrees or above have occurred at the federal dams on the Snake and Columbia Rivers, including 30 straight days at Ice Harbor Dam and 20 straight days at Bonneville Dam.

    Water in the 300 miles of uninterrupted slackwater behind federal dams in these two rivers is always warm in summer. But it’s getting warmer, with more to come. This is bad for people, salmon, communities and economies.

    The optimal temperature range for juvenile and adult salmon in Northwest rivers is 55-64 degrees.  Stream temperatures above 70 degrees hit them hard, particularly when maintained over extended periods of time in extended stretches of river, like this year. Seven years ago scientists identified human-caused warming of river temperatures as a key factor in the decline of Columbia and Snake River salmon. Today the problem is worse, and in the coming years will be worse still.  

    The harm to salmon presages harm to people.  Last week an SOS colleague spent time on the lower Snake below Lewiston, and called the river fetid.  This is someone who knows rivers, and knows a healthy river from a sick one.  The Lower Snake is growing sicker with each summer.

    This is a big problem for people and fish.  Warming water is not confined just to slackwaters behind dams, but slackwaters make it worse and last longer, and a whole lot of the Columbia and Snake Rivers are now slackwaters.  In a future post I will ask what the agencies in charge of the dams are doing about it, and suggest some things Northwest people can do.

    Meanwhile, here’s a new chorus to an old song.  Woody Guthrie is 100 years old this year; no one can beat him in the song biz, but he’s not writing anymore so we have to try to keep his great song alive 70 years after he wrote it.  If you can come up with another version, send it to Amy Baird, amy@wildsalmon.org or sing it in a voicemail - 503.230.0421 x13   

    Warm on Columbia warm on
    Warm on Columbia fry on
    You’re not boiling yet but it’s coming along
    So salmon and steelhead, so long
    [or] So friend salmon and steelies, so long

     

  • Boise Weekly: Dams, Megawatts and Poached Salmon

    U.S. District Judge: "Inaction is not an option"

    By George Prentice, August 3, 2016

    news1 salmonwilly ryanjohnsonThe room in the Hoff Building was packed on the blistering hot afternoon of July 26 during the Idaho Environmental forum's latest effort to deconstruct the debate of salmon recovery versus the Northwest's network of hydropower dams. Even regular attendees of IEF forums were stunned by the overflow attendance.

    "You know what? I think a lot of these people are lawyers," whispered an Idaho Department of Environmental Quality employee to a tablemate. It was an excellent observation.

    "We've invited attorneys from opposing sides to participate," said Greg Hahn, associate vice president for communications at Boise State University and event moderator. "They declined."

    But Todd True, who has spent the past three decades defending wildlife and lands for Earthjustice, accepted and for the next 60 minutes, he delivered a message of urgency in the decades-long debate over the salmon struggling to navigate the Snake River dams as they migrate to the cool spawning waters of central Idaho.

    "Living without those dams in order to save the salmon is not an unsurmountable problem. We can do this," said True. "The Bonneville Power Administration is fond of saying that there is a 97 percent survival rate of juvenile fish through the Columbia/Snake hydropower system—but you want to be very careful with that number. For example, it doesn't take into account the losses at each of the eight dams. Add to that the increased temperatures at reservoirs behind the dams. Then there's the stress of going through the hydro system. The fish are victims of something called 'delayed mortality.' The real juvenile survival rate? It's closer to 50 percent."

    Three hours from Boise, at the much-cooler Redfish Lake Lodge in the Sawtooth National Forest, officials were happy to report one salmon had managed the 900-mile migration from the Pacific Ocean, swimming past Portland, Ore.; The Dalles, Ore.; spillways across the Snake River and the eight massive dams on the Snake River to the spawning waters near the Sawtooths.

    "I've been here 18 years. It amazes me to watch the dynamic of the salmon—one year having one fish and another year seeing 1,800," said Jeff Clegg, general manager of the Redfish Lake Lodge. "I don't know all the reasons of how or why some fish are able to make their way back here, but I do know that people talk about it. It's exciting, and they want to know more."

    From his vantage point at the Idaho Fish and Game headquarters in Boise, fisheries staff biologist Russ Kiefer said the salmon that showed up at Redfish Lake on July 20 made the journey from Bonneville Dam (about 40 miles east of Portland, Ore.) in 33 days.

    "We know that because we put glass-encapsulated computer chips in the many of the juveniles, and we can track them online," said Kiefer, pointing to the University of Washington's Data Access in Real Time or DART tracking system. "Obviously, a lot of people kept wanting to know when the first salmon arrived at Redfish this year, especially considering how things were last year."

    Last year was a deadly one for sockeye salmon: Most died in the too-warm waters of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers. Additionally, biologists noted many of the fish suffered extreme stress, ending up with gaping ulcers or sores, bulging eyes and shredded skin.

    "And that's the stress that I talked about, "said True. "They truly suffer from a delayed mortality."

    Altering or removing those dams would be a giant mistake, though, according to the Bonneville Power Administration, the federal power broker that administers the network of dams cherished by electric utilities throughout the region. As an example, the four dams on the lower Snake River generate an average of 1,022 megawatts annually, which is enough energy to power a city the size of Seattle every year. But opponents point to a 2009 report from the NW Energy Coalition showing that even if the region's carbon-emitting coal plants went dark and the four dams ceased operating, there is "enough affordable energy efficiency and renewable energy resources in the Northwest to satisfy load growth."

    True couldn't agree more.

    "The numbers I've seen... about 950 megawatts coming from the four lower Snake River dams, primarily in the spring, due to snow run-off," he said. "But compare that to the non-hydro renewable energy, which is about 2,500 MW. Plus, there is 1,500 MW more in the pipeline, heading our way, much of it solar. That's much, much more than hydro."

    Though some argue renewable sources are inconsistent because "the wind doesn't always blow" or "the sun doesn't always show," True said it's important to find a way to help the Northwest become more dependable on wind and solar and less on hydro power.

    "It's a solvable problem," he said. "We still have time to find alternative solutions. People, this is not an insurmountable problem. One study says if hydro would go away, customer bills would actually go down. Another study says that customer bills might go up, but less than $1 a month."

    Regardless of whether this year's salmon run is more robust than 2015 or is further indication of the species' decline, something has to give.

    In October 2005, U.S. District Judge James Redden issued an order to the U.S. government in to correct its dam operations on the Snake and Columbia rivers in order to recover salmon.

    "The government's inaction appears to some parties to be a strategy intended to avoid making hard choices and offending those who favor the status quo," wrote Redden. "Without real action from the agencies, the result will be the loss of the wild salmon."

    Redden retired in 2011, handing the case to U.S. District Court Judge Michael Simon who doubled-down in May of this year, telling dam operators continued inaction was not an option.

    "For more than 20 years, the federal agencies have ignored the admonishments and continued to focus essentially on the same approach," wrote Simon. "These efforts have already cost billions of dollars, yet they are failing. Many populations of the listed species continue to be in a perilous state."

    True said the U.S. government asked Simon for five more years to come up with a solution.

    "And Judge Simon said, 'OK, you want some more rope? Fine, here you go,'" said True. "And to those of you who think you've seen this movie before, I would say that this isn't Groundhog Day. It's more similar to The Same River Twice."

    True was referring to the 2003 documentary film that took its title from a saying by 6th century B.C. Greek philosopher Heraclitus: "You cannot step twice into the same river." True is saying change is inevitable; and significant change to how we generate electricity and its dramatic impact on endangered salmon is right around the river bend.

    http://www.boiseweekly.com/boise/dams-megawatts-and-poached-salmon/Content?oid=3861173

  • Boise Weekly: Salmon Runs in 2019 Expected to Be Lower Than 2017, 2018 

    August 7, 2019

    By Xavier Ward

    Salmon.Sockeye.UnderwaterNew numbers from Idaho Fish and Game show that sockeye salmon returns are at their lowest in a decade.  Only 53 fish have crossed the final dam on the Lower Snake River, which is fewer fish than both 2018 and 2017 at this time. At 228 sockeye returns, 2017 saw the lowest rate of fish returning to their spawning grounds in more than a decade, Fish and Game numbers show.  Millions of federal dollars go to salmon conservation issues every year, while arguments about how to actually save the salmon continues to unfurl. Whether to breach the four dams on the Lower Snake River is the subject of much of that debate, and central to that is the economics of dam removal.

    Conservationists argue the dams are the main, but not sole, impediment to the salmonids' journey home, but those with an interest in keeping the dams hope to find ways to restore salmon populations without pulling out the federally owned hydropower dams. The dams are operated by the Bonneville Power Administration, a federal entity.

    One of the biggest questions for those involved is how much economic value the dams actually provide, and how do the fish stack up to that value?

    According to a report by ECONorthwest, an economic consulting firm based in Washington, pulling out the dams makes economic sense. Others who are in favor of keeping the dams, however, are not convinced by the results of the report.

    "We started working on this more than a year and a half ago, and we were charged with a broad look at the economic value of taking out the dams," said Adam Domanski, the project manager and author of the report.

    His conclusion: "Society would be better off."

    According to the report, removing the dams would amount to an $8.65 billion value increase to the area. While there are costs associated with grid upgrades, the overall economic impact would be positive. The cost of removing the dams is estimated at $1.08 billion, while the cost of grid upgrades is right around $2.21 billion. There would also be some additional costs for irrigation.

    However, stacked up with the nearly $11 billion added from non-use values and $1 billion extra in recreation opportunities, removing the dams is estimated to be a net positive, according to the report. Non-use values are an economic value showing the cost of something if it is not used. It is a common measurement in the valuation of natural resources.

    Domanski said the report is a comprehensive, unbiased approach to looking at dam breaching. He noted that the researchers considered all potentially impacted parties including farmers, irrigators and grain shippers.

    'This isn't an advocacy piece. This was objective research," Domanski said. "We are trying to look at the broad lens, holistic view."

    Others who have a vested interest in keeping the dams question the outcome of the study.

    "The report falsely suggests that this complex challenge of reconciling the need for the dams and protecting our iconic salmon can be easily resolved," Pacific Northwest Waterways Association Executive Director Kristin Meira wrote. "In fact, the path it recommends would devastate towns, businesses and families in southeast Washington, northern Idaho and much of the rural Northwest."

    Meira went on to write that the report mischaracterizes the benefit to small communities in the Pacific Northwest by assuming jobs would be created through dam removal.

    The Lower Snake and Columbia rivers are undoubtedly economic assets for grain farmers in the area. In fact, 53% of all U.S. wheat makes its way down the Columbia River, and the Lower Snake River accounts for 10% of all U.S. wheat shipments. Removing the dams would lower the river levels to the point where barges could no longer ship grain down the river.

    Additionally, the dams provide power for the area. While conservationists argue that the amount of power produced by the four Lower Snake River Dams could easily be replaced with other renewable sources such as wind or solar, small communities throughout the Pacific Northwest use the power produced by the dams.

    "The concerns are large and wide. The four Lower Snake dams at capacity can provide over 3,000 megawatts," said Will Hart, executive director of Idaho Consumer-Owned Utilities Association. His organization represents power users in 22 small Idaho cities, selling them power at cost. Power from the Bonneville Power Administration makes up 96% of all utilities provided to the small rural communities, Hart said.

    Taking the dams offline would hurt the Bonneville Power Administration, therein hurting the power users represented by Hart's organization.

    "For us, that would translate definitely to rate increases," Hart said.

    The economic study from ECONorthwest was not the kind of evidence Hart wants to see in the conversation of saving the salmon from extinction. Hart is a member of Gov. Brad Little's Salmon Workgroup, and he hopes to come up with a solution that helps increase salmon population numbers to a sustainable level without injuring local power users. To date, there has been little objective evidence that the dams are actually hurting the salmon, he believes.

    "There's science and there's facts, then there's advocacy science and advocacy facts," he said.

    The federal government will release an environmental impact statement regarding the dams in the coming months, which Hart said he believes will help set the record straight.

    In the meantime, Hart hopes to keep working toward Idaho solutions to save the state's legacy fish.

    "I think there's a lot of good we can potentially do around the table together," he said.

  • Boise Weekly: The Most Complex Natural Resource Issue In The West, Part 1 of a three-part series on Lower Snake River dam removal

    July 24, 2019

    By Xavier Ward

    slider.spill.damHistorically, millions of salmon would swim from the Pacific Ocean up the Columbia and Lower Snake rivers to ancestral spawning grounds in Idaho. After birthing smolts that would keep the salmon population healthy, the current would push the fish back to the ocean and the process would repeat. It's a natural cycle that happens less every year. Now a few thousand salmon swim to spawn in the cold mountain waters of central Idaho's Clearwater basin.

    "Idahoans have done a lot to protect this habitat for salmon and steelhead," said Justin Hayes, director of the Idaho Conservation League. "It's worth pointing out that much."

    The decline in salmon is a complex issue. The euryhaline breed of fish prefers cold water, and rising ocean temperatures pose a problem. However, the sticking point for those trying to save wild salmon in Idaho are the hydropower dams on the Lower Snake and Columbia rivers.

    Conservationists have tried for years to breach the federally owned dams to no avail. It's not just power officials who want the dams in place, but also grain shippers who use barges to transport crops down the river from Lewiston, the furthest inland seaport in the lower 48.

    To Hayes' mind, the solution to increasing the population of wild salmon in Idaho is by no means simple, but if it doesn't involve breaching four dams on the Lower Snake River, it's not tenable. "It has to involve dam removal," he said. "People want, I believe, to restore wild abundant fish that are ecologically meaningful."

    There have been efforts to circumvent dam removal. All dams have a fish ladder, which allows the salmon to swim up and around, but that's hardly intuitive after thousands of years of travelling directly up the river to home spawning grounds, Hayes said.

    For the journey down, the least-fatal way for the salmon to get past the dam is actually spilling over into the river below. Some even survive being sucked into the hydropower turbine and spat out the other side, he said, but each year, fewer fish make the journey home.

    Hayes said environmental scientists have pinpointed the number of dams that need to be removed. If four of the eight dams on the Lower Snake and Columbia rivers are taken out, salmon should be able return in numbers that will enable a slow recovery.

    Dams slow the pace of the river, allowing the water to heat up in the reservoirs created along the river, creating less-than-ideal conditions for salmon smolts. This has also allowed predatory fish species like pike and largemouth bass to gobble small salmon along the way.

    One of the bigger problems, however, is the amount of time it takes to get to the ocean. Before the dams, salmon could reach the ocean in roughly two weeks. Now, with all the blockages, it can take up to two months. All the while, a metamorphosis of these fish is taking place: going from freshwater to saltwater fish.

    "It's akin to saying you went from breathing air to breathing water, it's an amazing physiological change they undertake," Hayes said.

    While conservationists say dam removal is the issue, some depend on the dams for business purposes. Jeff Sayre, spokesman for CHS Primeland, a grain-shipper based in Craigmont, said the dams keep rivers at a level that allow shippers to haul wheat down the river to Portland, Oregon, where it is shipped all over the world. Without those dams on the river, the river levels would drop to a point where barges could no longer use the river for passage.

    "You just drop it off at Lewiston and down the river it goes," Sayre said.

    The river acts as one of the largest thoroughfares for grain shippers in the country. All told, 10% of all U.S. wheat is shipped down the Columbia River, he said.

    Each bushel of wheat sells for roughly $6, and each year anywhere between 20 and 25 million bushels are shipped on the river, making the economic impact of the dams significant. Grain isn't an afterthought for these small communities, it is the only economic driver, Sayre said.

    Conservationists have pushed for alternative forms of shipping, but Sayre said nothing is as cost-effective or efficient as shipping on river barges.

    Carrying one ton of cargo, a barge travels 573 miles using the same amount of fuel as a semi tractor trailer would in 155 miles and a train would in 413 miles. There is some rail infrastructure in the area, but it's outdated and hasn't been used for years, he said. It would require a significant investment and expansion of the existing lines. Even then, rail lines can't ship as much wheat as a river barge.

    "It gets very complicated on the alternative transportation systems," he said. "The rail doesn't go anywhere from here like it used to go."

    While it seems the sides are diametrically opposed, Sayre said he has never met a farmer who wants wild salmon to go extinct in Idaho. But for them, the river is helping to keep farmers afloat.

    "It's a complicated web of ideas," Sayre said. "I don't think there's any silver bullet for getting these fish back."

    Sayre also questioned whether the dams are really to blame. Recently, sewage spills in the Puget Sound have toxified salmon habitat, and climate change has raised ocean temperatures, potentially causing fish death. As the conversation of how to save Idaho salmon moves forward, Sayre and his cohorts are ready to come to the table and look for a solution.

    "It's a complicated web and hopefully we can figure out some common ground," Sayre said.

  • BPA stifling opportunities for salmon, wind, and jobs

    windmills garrett-downen SMALLYou’ve likely noticed an increase in posts on our website and blog about wind energy, the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and strange, Orwellian phrases like “oversupply management” and “power over-generation.” And you might be asking: what does this have to do with saving wild salmon? Turns out: A LOT. Our efforts at restoring the lower Snake River for threatened salmon and steelhead populations, and improving salmon passage at Columbia River dams, have a lot of overlap with Northwest electricity, since the largest killer of fish is our hydroelectric dams. And it’s why our Coalition is proud to work alongside groups like the NW Energy Coalition, that are leading the development of renewable energy and energy efficiency.

    The truth is that saving salmon and developing innovative renewable power sources like wind, solar, and energy efficiency provide an opportunity to achieve mutually beneficial goals. More power generated by renewables means less power needed from the hydrosystem, which in turn means restored fish, more jobs, and cleaner energy for the Northwest. But the current policies of the Bonneville Power Administration run counter to this opportunity, and counter to important priorities of the Obama administration. Too much hydropower? We’re lucky in the Northwest to have abundant renewable power sources. In fact, last year we had so much snow that our rivers filled and huge amounts of water pushed through the 200+ hydroelectric dams of the Columbia and Snake River basins. We actually had TOO MUCH hydropower in the spring last year (this will likely be the case into the near future). So BPA regularly turned off wind farms’ access to the transmission grid over a 2-month period, depriving them of millions of dollars in revenue. BPA framed this issue in the media as an oversupply problem – “too much wind” which the agency simply couldn’t keep up with. But the base problem was too much hydro, a predictable situation BPA had several years to plan for that it did not take good advantage of. BPA blames fish. BPA’s justification for cutting off wind energy last year was that it was "necessary" to protect endangered salmon. This is false. Salmon have higher survival when the river runs like a river; not surprisingly, their odds of surviving their downstream journey increase if they’re washed over the tops of dams rather than sucked through power turbines or physically collected and trucked or barged downstream. It’s true that too much water spilling over the tops of dams can create harmful gas levels in the water, but the science has long been clear that salmon largely benefit from additional spill. Indeed, our analysisshowed that even the high levels of gas last spring and summer were a minor issue for migrating salmon. That’s why SOS’s fishing and conservation groups are urging BPA to adopt policies that increase spill, thus helping both salmon and the wind industry. (read the full breakdown) National media takes note - Congress begins to weigh in. BPA’s decision to cut off wind and blame salmon has received national media attention. Recently, New York Times – Green Blog reporter Matthew Wald published an update on the issue. Wald’s article highlights the disconnect between BPA’s proposals and the Obama administration’s clean energy priorities. The U.S. Department of Energy’s goal is to produce 20% of America’s electricity from wind power by 2030. BPA’s policy needlessly discourages wind industry growth essential to achieving that goal. Members of Congress have also taken note. In early 2011, before BPA initiated their wind cut-off policy, Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) sent a letter to BPAexpressing concern over the policy and urging the agency to delay formal adoption and allow for alternative approaches. Then in May of 2011, Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) sent a letter to Energy Secretary Steven Chu. "I strongly encourage DOE [Department of Energy] to work with BPA to consider all potential alternatives," Markey wrote in the letter. "I ask that BPA pursue options that may be available to avoid a situation that could severely limit current wind production and future development in the Pacific Northwest as well as set a negative precedent nationally for addressing future renewable energy integration challenges," Markey continued. Markey’s comments make clear that BPA’s policies are deserving of this national attention and oversight. Opportunity, not “Problem” As mentioned, this issue isn’t going away. Odds are good we’ll again have too much power this spring. But the situation offers an opportunity – not a problem – for our regional and national leaders to take actions this year, and in the next 5-10 years, that benefit fish, clean energy, jobs, and ratepayers. We will continue to fight for better BPA policies that seize this opportunity, starting this spring. Here’s a timeline of the last year to help illustrate what’s happened so far: Winter 2010-11: Heavy snows pack our mountains. Spring 2011:Snow pack begins melting, increasing water levels in NW rivers to very high levels. February 18, 2011:BPA issues “Draft Record of Decision on Environmental Redispatch and Negative Pricing Policy,” the oddly-named proposal to shut down wind power in high water conditions. May 12, 2011:Op-Ed by SOS executive director Pat Ford runs in the Seattle Times. May 13, 2011: BPA issues final Record of Decision, thereby implementing the so-called “Environmental Redispatch” policy. May 18, 2011:First wind farms curtailed as a result of the policy. June 11, 2011: Wind industry members file official complaint with FERC against BPA. July 10, 2011: Last of the curtailments of wind occur and wind farms resume normal operation. July 18, 2011: SOS intervenes in the complaint to FERC on the side of salmon . September 21, 2011:SOS releases report on the impact of dissolved gas on salmon following the curtailment policy and finds NO BIOLOGICAL BASIS for the policy. December 7, 2011:FERC rules in favor of the wind industry and salmon. February 7, 2012:BPA publicly presents a new draft protocol for 2012 in response to the ruling from FERC. February 7 - February 21, 2012: Nearly 90 groups submit comments on BPA’s draft protocol, nearly all in opposition. March 6, 2012:BPA formally submits its protocol to FERC, ignoring the vast majority of the comments submitted. March 27, 2012:SOS files an official protest and comments with FERC, again citing the lack of biological basis for BPA’s curtailment policy, and instead proposing practical solutions that benefit both salmon and clean energy.

    Above Image Credit: Garrett Downen

  • Caddis Fly Blog: Obama Administration Comes to Portland, Talks Salmon

     

    caddisfly
    March 28th, 2009
    Yesterday, Dr. Lubchenco, head of the NOAA and Nancy Sutley who leads the White House Council on Environmental Quality came to Portland to discuss the latest salmon recovery plan for the Columbia basin with government scientists, state agencies and federal officials in a closed door meeting at the Double Tree Hotel in Portland and salmon activists were outside the hotel  to greet them.
     
  • Call to Action: Court-Ordered Columbia-Snake Salmon NEPA Review: Phase 1 – Public Hearings this Fall!

    freethesnake.cutoutSpeak out for our endangered fish and rivers! It's time to 'Free the Snake'!

    Federal agencies in the Northwest charged with protecting endangered wild salmon and steelhead from the lethal impacts of federal dams in the Columbia and Snake rivers are holding fifteen Public Scoping Hearings this fall in Washington State, Oregon, Idaho and Montana.

    These Scoping Hearings represent the first phase of a court-ordered review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of salmon restoration alternatives in the Columbia and Snake Rivers. This spring, the U.S. District Court in Portland, OR issued a strongly-worded opinion that found the agencies’ latest plan inadequate and illegal - in violation of both the ESA and NEPA.

    This is the 5th plan to be invalidated by 3 judges across twenty years. The next plan – and this NEPA Review – is the public’s opportunity to get involved and ensure that the federal agencies get it right this time! Our salmon (and orcas), our rivers, and our pocketbooks can’t afford another failed and illegal plan. Get involved today!

    Salmon, orca, fishing, boating, river and taxpayer advocates need to seize this critical opportunity to speak up for restoring wild salmon and steelhead and river health by advocating for a lawful, science-based, fiscally-responsible plan that includes the removal of the four costly dams on the lower Snake River.

    You can review the feds' calendar below and get ready to attend the hearing nearest you.

    TO LEARN MORE AND GET INVOLVED this fall, contact joseph@wildsalmon.org and/or sam@wildsalmon.org

    Follow the links below to take action online (but it's still very important that you show up for the public hearings too!) and learn more about our endangered wild salmon and steelhead in the Columbia and Snake rivers.

    -- TAKE ACTION ONLINE here.

    -- Full NEPA Scoping Hearing Schedule posted below.

    -- Sept. 30 press releases re: Scoping Hearings from Earthjustice, Idaho's conservation and fishing advocates, and the Nez Perce Tribe.

    -- Background and media coverage of the May 4, 2016 Simon Court Ruling.

    -- Factsheet: A Restored Snake River - Our nation's best opportunity to restore salmon, save money and confront a changing climate

    -- Factsheet: Removing the Lower Snake Dams - Why it's different today

    -- Earthjustice Explainer: What you need to know about Columbia and Snake River salmon

    free.the.snake-- Spokesman Review: Feds Ask the Public to Weigh in on Breaching the Lower Snake River Dams (Sept. 30)

    Fall 2016 NEPA SCOPING SCHEDULE FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER WILD SALMON AND STEELHEAD:

    Monday, October 24, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., Wenatchee Community Center, 504 S. Chelan Ave., Wenatchee, Washington
    Tuesday, October 25, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., The Town of Coulee Dam, City Hall,  3006 Lincoln Ave., Coulee Dam, Washington
    Wednesday, October 26, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., Priest River Community Center, 5399 Highway 2, Priest River, Idaho
    Thursday, October 27, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., Kootenai River Inn Casino & Spa, 7169 Plaza St., Bonners Ferry, Idaho
    Tuesday, November 1, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., Red Lion Hotel Kalispell, 20 North Main St., Kalispell, Montana
    Wednesday, November 2, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., City of Libby City Hall, 952 E. Spruce St., Libby, Montana
    Thursday, November 3, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., Hilton Garden Inn Missoula, 3720 N. Reserve St. Missoula, Montana
    Monday November 14, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. The Historic Davenport Hotel, 10 South Post Street, Spokane, Washington
    Wednesday, November 16, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., Red Lion Hotel Lewiston, Seaport Room, 621 21st St. Lewiston, Idaho
    Thursday, November 17, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Courtyard Walla Walla, The Blues Room, 550 West Rose St. Walla Walla, Washington
    Tuesday, November 29, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., The Grove Hotel, 245 S. Capitol Blvd. Boise, Idaho
    Thursday, December 1, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Town Hall, Great Room, 1119 8th Ave., Seattle, Washington
    Tuesday, December 6, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., The Columbia Gorge Discovery Center, River Gallery Room, 5000 Discovery Drive, The Dalles, Oregon
    Wednesday, December 7, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., Oregon Convention Center, 777 NE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Portland, Oregon
    Thursday, December 8, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., The Loft at the Red Building, 20 Basin St., Astoria, Oregon.
    Tuesday, December 13, 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., and 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., PST, webinar

    Link to the Federal Register Office - Northwest Agencies' Notice of Intent

  • Canadian Broadcasting Company: Calls to terminate Columbia River Treaty spark concern after 2 years of negotiations

    Canada and the U.S. have been renegotiating 56-year-old treaty, which regulates flow of Columbia River

    Bob Keating and Tom Popyk, CBC News
    Dec 12, 202

    CRT.Duncan.DamA cross-border treaty that has regulated the flow of the Columbia River for over 50 years could be in jeopardy as a group of American politicians calls on the president to invoke his executive authority and terminate the treaty.

    The Columbia River Treaty was ratified by the United States and Canada in 1964 and resulted in the construction of four huge hydro-electric dams — three in Canada and one in the U.S. — to reduce the risk of flooding and generate billions of dollars worth of electricity. 

    According to the Canadian government, the treaty is considered a model of international cooperation on hydropower development.

    Certain provisions of the treaty are set to expire in 2024 and negotiators in Canada and the U.S. have been working on a new deal for more than two years.

    But U.S. Congressman Dan Newhouse will table a resolution in the House of Representatives asking President Donald Trump to issue a termination notice for the treaty. He has the support of other members of congress.

    Newhouse calls the treaty a "bad deal" and says it is "outdated and unfair." 

    Under the terms of the deal, the Americans have tremendous sway regarding when water is released for power generation and flood control — and they pay hundreds of millions of dollars for that right.
    The U.S. states of the Pacific Northwest essentially want to pay far less for the right to store water in British Columbia. 

    CRT.map.CBCThe storage of water in B.C. also allows for the generation of more hydro-electricity at 11 dams south of the border.  Under the treaty, Canada and the U.S. share that benefit on a 50-50 basis.

    The U.S. transfers $100 million to $350 million worth of electricity to B.C. every year to pay for the water storage and management rights.

    Canada and the United States began negotiations to modernize the treaty in 2018, addressing concerns over downriver environmental impacts and Indigenous rights. 

    Christelle Chartrand, a spokesperson for Global Affairs Canada, said the Canadian government is aware that some members of congress are asking for the treaty to be terminated. 

    "Canada and the United States have been working together to develop options to modernize the Columbia River Treaty to ensure that both countries benefit from flood control and power generation as well as looking at how to make ecosystem improvements in the basin," she said in a statement.

    "Canada has been committed to strengthening this agreement for the benefit of both countries and has focused on ensuring that British Columbia and Columbia River Indigenous Nations have played key roles in developing our objectives for a modernized treaty and local communities have had a strong voice in the process."

    Eileen Delehanty Pearkes, author of A River Captured: The Columbia River and Catastrophic Change has been following the talks closely. 

    She says the new congressional resolution damages Canadian-U.S. relations, and could threaten ongoing talks and cooperation.

    "Nothing is accomplished for the greater good of all through confrontation and through the kind of approach that pits one country against another," Pearkes told CBC News.  

    "It certainly seems to be a strongly political move. Every signal I had been getting was that neither country wanted to terminate."

  • Canoe & Kayak: Paddling Against Deadbeat Dams at the Free the Snake Flotilla

    October 5, 2015

    sr.damBy Sam Mace, Inland Northwest Director, Save Our Wild Salmon


    Spokane, WA: More than 300 people launched from Wawawai Landing for Lower Granite Dam Saturday where the colorful flotilla of kayaks, canoes, drift boats and motor rigs rallied around a 100-foot banner with a simple message: “Free the Snake.”

    Early morning rain, wind and clouds left and the sun came out as spectators cheered the flotilla from shore. Boats adorned with banners and salmon art carried costumed paddlers, orca advocates, anglers from Idaho and eastern Washington, river conservationists, salmon advocates, musicians, artists, scientists, and Nez Perce tribal members across the reservoir.

    After returning to shore, the group celebrated the largest gathering of dam removal advocates in recent history with baked salmon and fry bread.

    The flotilla included several sportsmen who remembered the bounty of the lower Snake River Canyon before slack water inundated thousands of acres of prime hunting lands, wildlife habitat, steelhead runs and hiking, not to mention the productive fruit orchards and farm lands. Some were part of the battle waged by sportsmen to stop the dams in the 1960s and 70s before the four reservoirs flooded the Snake River corridor from Asotin, Idaho, to Pasco, Washington. Though the dams were built, the debate has never ended, and in recent years voices speaking out in favor of dam removal have multiplied.

    This summer endangered Snake River salmon died by the thousands due to hot water in the reservoirs. The water behind the lower Snake dams became especially lethal. In 2015, conditions were so brutal that endangered Idaho sockeye had to be trucked from Lower Granite Dam to central Idaho. Of the thousands of fish that began the journey upstream from the sea, less than 50 fish made it past the dams.

    It’s time to give these fish an easier journey up the Columbia and Snake rivers to the thousands of miles of pristine habitat in the upper Snake River basin–for the good of the rivers, for fishermen, tribes and the Puget Sound orcas that depend on Chinook for survival.

    But salmon aren’t the only reason to remove these four dams. These aging, out-dated dams are costing taxpayers millions of dollars in repairs, upgrades and expensive dredging, while their value to the Northwest is in steep decline. Their original purpose of providing barge traffic to Lewiston, Idaho, is no long makes economic sense; barging is down more than 60 percent as shippers shift to more efficient alternatives. The dams provide less than 4 percent of the power to BPA markets, no flood control and only a small amount of irrigation that could continue without the dams.

    And the dams are stifling Lewiston-Clarkston’s economy. These small towns sit at the confluence of two of the greatest rivers in the west: the Snake and the Clearwater. What could be an attractive waterfront attached to a vibrant downtown is a tall levee blocking the river from the community. Sterile rip-rapped banks have replaced the city beaches that residents once flocked to on hot summer days before the dams.

    It’s time for all who have a stake in the river—conservationists, fishing businesses, tribes, orca advocates, utilities, local towns and farmers—to come to the table and talk dam removal.

    Save Our wild Salmon is committed to working with farmers and others to further support the shift to rail and other transportation that is already occurring. We look forward to working with other stakeholders to bring back the tremendous fish and wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities, free-flowing waterfront and other values now lost under stagnant reservoirs.
    The 350 people who came together at Wawawai are part of a groundswell that is occurring in the Northwest, nationally and in eastern Washington, one that our elected leaders can ignore no longer.

    Learn how you can get involved a contact Sam Mace at sam@wildsalmon.org. Free the Snake!

    View op-ed with photos and links here.

    # # #

  • Capital Press: Environmentalist calls for discussions on Snake River dams

    By MATTHEW WEAVER

    December 4, 2019

    bogaard copyStakeholders need to begin talking about the possible impacts to Northwest communities if four dams on the Snake River are removed, says the leader of a group that advocates their removal.

    “I don’t see any reason why we can’t make a transition to a free-flowing lower Snake River and do so in a way that leaves agricultural communities either whole or with additional opportunities,” Joseph Bogaard, executive director of Save Our Wild Salmon, based in Seattle, told the Capital Press.

    Environmental groups have for years called for the removal of the Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite dams, citing their impacts on federally protected salmon and, more recently, orcas.

    Bogaard said the conservation and fishing communities are committed to finding ways to help ensure greater certainty for all involved, including fishing and farming communities.

    “I don’t think it’s something we do overnight, I don’t think it takes 10 years,” he said. “I think we can, with a plan and political leadership and support and buy-in of key stakeholders, this is something that can be done in three to five years.”

    Bogaard pointed to “a lot of evidence, analyses and studies that have looked at the science and economics” around the dams, arguing that they are “high-cost and low-value dams with services that, while they’re important and there’s communities that rely on them, they are replaceable.”

    “There’s quite a bit of evidence that suggests that some of the services, maybe all of the services currently provided by the dams, can be feasibly and affordably replaced, if we work together (and) put together the kinds of plans that involve timelines, dollars and programming to ensure the communities that currently rely on those dams or reservoirs can transition to alternative means of delivery, say irrigation water or moving transportation on land rather than on the river, or electricity,” he said.

    Advocates for maintaining the dams argue that taking them out would not benefit salmon or orcas to the degree that environmentalists say, and would negatively affect trade. Barges use the Snake and Columbia rivers and pass through the locks at the dams to take grain to market downstream and supplies to farms upstream.

    Pacific Northwest Waterways Association executive director Kristin Meira recently called environmentalists’ arguments simplistic, saying they are touting the idea that one action in one area would lead to species recovery.

    https://www.capitalpress.com

  • Capital Press: Q&A: Simpson continues to push lower Snake River dam plan

    2022.Simpson

    By Matthew Weaver Capital Press
    Sept. 22, 2022

    U.S. Rep. Mike Simpson continues to promote his $33.5 billion proposal to breach four lower Snake River dams.

    Though he has not introduced any legislation, the eastern Idaho Republican says he still supports taking down the dams while replacing the economic benefits they provide to the region.

    Simpson responded to questions about the plan from the Capital Press through email.

    Ever since you first announced your plan, agricultural organizations have spoken out against it. Why do you think this is?

    Simpson: I haven’t seen agriculture groups speak out against the merits or various components of my plan as much as they are vocally opposed to any idea of breaching the four Lower Snake River dams, a position they have held for many years.

    I saw a window of opportunity where we in the Northwest could protect all stakeholders, ensure the survival of Northwest salmon, end the ongoing salmon litigation, and live up to our treaty obligations with the tribes.

    My plan is designed to protect our water and provide operational certainty for generations of agricultural producers.

    I am proud that I was the first to place an actual value on replacing the “benefits” that agriculture and other stakeholder groups receive from the dams. The dams are very valuable, and I determined it would cost $33.5 billion to replace the benefits they produce.

    I do not think many of your readers in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Montana realize how they will benefit from my plan. I intend to protect all agriculture affected by loss of the dams and, at the same time, address water quality and quantity issues throughout the Northwest by ending water lawsuits against agriculture for 25 years.

    Do any ag groups support the plan?

    Simpson: As I mentioned before, agriculture groups seemed reluctant to engage in any discussion regarding the specifics of my proposal that benefit agriculture. It was often hard to get past the obligatory “Hell no.” I get it — nobody likes change.

    I am encouraged by the number of farmers from the Upper Snake River Basin who thanked me for driving this discussion because they are concerned about the 487,000 acre-feet of their water being sent downstream to flush salmon over the dams in Washington. That’s water that can’t be used by Idaho agriculture to irrigate crops or recharge our aquifer.

    Have you made changes to the initial plan since the first announcement, based on feedback from agricultural stakeholders?

    Simpson: As I mentioned, I did not get a lot of feedback on the specifics of my plan from stakeholders. However, there have been a few developments since my announcement.

    On the energy side, there is a growing number of large-scale wind, solar and battery farms coming online and in the queue for the Northwest.

    On the transportation issue — getting grain from Lewiston and downstream ports to the Tri-Cities — electric rail is advancing much faster than even I expected. Companies such as Caterpillar are now producing battery-electric locomotives and supplying them to Union Pacific. I have said that these will be the answer to protect low-cost carbon free shipping of grain between Lewiston and what could be a new regional high-speed barge loading agricultural transport hub in the Tri-Cities.

    What is the status of your plan today? What is the path moving forward?

    Simpson: What I am seeing is that others are using and building from my plan. The (Sen. Patty Murray and Gov. Jay Inslee) report highlighted many facets of my plan and their recommendations included key components that I laid out if we are to recover salmon and protect all stakeholders.

    Thoughts on the Murray-Inslee report indicating breaching of the dams isn't feasible right now?

    Simpson: If you boil their report down to a few words, they said it is very possible, very expensive and cannot be done until the energy and stakeholder benefits are replaced. That’s what I said, except that I believe it can be done now and paid for at less cost than the $17 billion we have already invested in unsuccessful salmon recovery and the many billions more we will be spending as they come closer to extinction.

    What’s interesting is how differently their report is being viewed, especially their statement that “now is not the time.” Many dam supporters seem to be taking a long-term view that “now” means breaching will not be on the horizon for decades and are applauding Senator Murray and Governor Inslee. The tribes and conservation community seem to be taking a short-term view that “now” means as soon as replacements benefits are figured out the dams can be breached within even the next decade, and they too are applauding the senator and governor.

    I’m concerned that the Murray-Inslee report drops the guarantees I insisted on for protecting Northwest agriculture if the dams are breached. We must halt Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act litigation for 25 years if we are going to get farmers, tribes, conservationists, and states working together to improve Northwest water quality and quantity. There is also no mention of my plan to lock in and end litigation against all Northwest dams. They seem to be focusing on solving a lower Snake River salmon problem. I believe we need to solve the whole Northwest salmon problem instead of allowing the litigation target to move to another group of agriculture.

    What, in your opinion, is the likelihood of eventual breaching of the Snake River dams? When might this occur?

    Simpson: I will be very surprised if the dams are still operating in 15 to 20 years. If salmon extinction lawsuits and politics don’t force the breaching issue, the warming climate may do so by itself.

    Witnessing the current crises in the West on the Colorado River, the Great Salt Lake Basin, the Klamath Basin shutoffs, and now conflicts on the Upper Snake Basin — if people think these four dams will be immune from impacts of a warming climate, I think they are gravely mistaken or ignoring realities.

    At some point in the coming decades, the dams may not even function as intended due to water volume issues from loss of snowpack or ancillary issues, such as the clogging of navigation channels from continued silting from the devastating forest fires we see in Idaho and Oregon. A federal judge can’t force the breaching of the dams but can halt the Corps’ dredging operations.

    What is the likelihood of Congress approving dam breaching?

    Simpson: I believe that Congress must authorize the breaching of the dams. I do not see Congress acting unless the benefits to the stakeholders have been replaced.

    The wild cards in my mind are the federal courts. We saw 9th Circuit judges in the Spotted Owl Wars shut down the Northwest timber industry in the face of very powerful Northwest politicians. The Klamath Basin farmers have not fared well, and I don’t see anyone coming to their rescue. If dam removal is not an option and the salmon fail to recover, I can envision scenarios where judges are picking winners and losers up and down the Snake River Basin.

    Please talk about the importance of this issue for you.

    Simpson: Idaho salmon are incredible creatures and do not deserve to be forsaken. When salmon are returning to Idaho’s rivers in abundance, we will know we are doing things right. As I have said many times, man can find a way to do all the other things on the river, but salmon need a direct path to the ocean. Salmon on the John Day and Yakima rivers seem to be able to cope with three and four pools behind the Lower Columbia dams, but the four additional pools of the lower Snake River dams are four too many.

    Is there anything about your plan that agricultural stakeholders are misunderstanding?

    Simpson: It’s less a misunderstanding and more not recognizing the opportunity that may have been missed. My plan viewed the lower Snake River dams in terms of the “benefits” they produce to stakeholders. We can replace the benefits of the dams, but we cannot replace the salmon.

    Any message to farmers?

    Simpson: I fear the bullseye is going to move from the four dams in Washington to the water in the Upper Snake River Basin. As we saw, Northwest politicians had no appetite to roll their sleeves up and solve the lower Snake River dam issue once and for all because it affected so many stakeholders. I worry it may now fall on the backs of Idaho farmers in the Upper Snake Basin who currently send 487,000 acre-feet of water down the Snake River for salmon.

    We are in serious drought conditions now and in 2034 the current Snake River Basin Adjudication will expire and there will likely be even more demand from tribes and conservationist for our Upper Basin water. The day will come when our farmers finally say, “Enough, we can’t send any more water downstream to flush salmon through the four Lower Snake dams.”

    The Upper Snake River Basin is very dry, and we need to immediately begin increasing water storage, expanding groundwater recharge, and enhancing water quality. It’s going to take a lot of work and funding, and I will expect the politicians in Washington and Oregon to step up and help us protect our upper basin water since the water we send downstream benefits their states.

    Anything else I should be sure to include in a story?

    Simpson: You didn’t ask about the Northwest tribes who have treaties dating back to the 1850s. During this process, tribal members have told me they’ve had a gut full of being taken for granted on two of the issues that matter most to them: water and salmon. I would caution agriculture and energy producers of the Northwest that going forward they should not expect it to be business as usual with the tribes. I think the tribes are done with the historic practice of the federal government, Bonneville Power Administration and states treating them as junior partners when it comes to Northwest water, energy and salmon recovery.

    Lastly, I want to make clear I believe we can save salmon and protect farmers and all stakeholders without having to pick winners and losers. My plan would give salmon their best chance for survival while giving stakeholders significant resources for them to maintain the benefits they currently receive from the dams on their terms and in the manner they chose. Working together we can return salmon to their historic abundance and keep all of agriculture and other stakeholders whole.

    https://www.capitalpress.com/ag_sectors/grains/q-a-simpson-continues-to-push-lower-snake-river-dam-plan/article_941351a4-3a89-11ed-bbfc-6fe332498c25.html

  • CBB: 2015 Smolt-To-Adult Return Data For Columbia/Snake Salmon, Steelhead

    Tuesday, December 29, 2015

    biop.fishOverall smolt to adult return data shows that upper Columbia and Snake river salmon and steelhead populations are not meeting the 2 percent to 6 percent goal set by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council in its 2014 Fish and Wildlife Program.

    However, mid-Columbia populations are meeting the SAR goals in most years, according to the 2015 Comparative Survival Study Annual Report, released November 30.

    Council targets are set with an assumption of what the historical levels of productivity were prior to 1970 when the Snake River dams were set in place, according to the CSS report.

    “Results indicate that pre-harvest SARs in the range of 4 percent – 6 percent are associated with historical (pre-1970) levels of productivity for Snake River spring/summer Chinook,” the report says. Snake River fish are decidedly not reaching this target.

    On the other hand, the report says that “Mid-Columbia River wild spring Chinook populations, as represented by the John Day River and Yakima River aggregate groups, have experienced SARs generally within or close to the range of the NPCC 2 percent – 6 percent SAR objective.”

    SARS for those chinook populations were 3.9 percent for the John Day River wild spring chinook and 2.4 percent for Yakima River fish (2000 – 2013). John Day, Deschutes and Yakima rivers wild steelhead SARs also fall within the Council range.

    Wild Hanford Reach fall chinook SARs from McNary Dam to Bonneville Dam, available for the years 2000 to 2012, ranged from a high of 2.6 percent in 2000 to a low of 0.2 percent in 2004.

    Overall, SAR rates to Lower Granite Dam (excluding jacks) for Snake River hatchery subyearling fall chinook were low in three of the seven years they have been analyzed, the report says.

    It goes on to say that fall chinook overall SARs ranged from 0.12 percent to 0.56 percent for hatchery releases in 2006 and 0.0 percent to 0.3 percent in 2007.

    The highest SARs were observed for migration year 2008, ranging between 0.35 percent and 1.07 percent.

    SARs for 2009 were relatively low, ranging between 0.05 percent and 0.23 percent.

    For the 2010 migration year, SARs were between the low returns from 2009 and the highest returns from 2008. SARs for 2010 ranged between 0.20
    percent and 0.97 percent.

    Returns for 2011 migration year are incomplete, the report says, but SARs are similar to 2010. With 3-salt returns now complete, they ranged between 0.08 percent and 0.94 percent.

    For migration year 2012, return data only include 2-salt adults.

    The first of the CSS studies was in 1996. Its objective was, and continues to be, to establish a “long-term data set of annual estimates of the survival probability of generations of salmon from their outmigration as smolts to their return to freshwater as adults to spawn (smolt-to-adult return rate; SAR).”

    The question the study addresses each year is whether collecting juvenile salmon at lower Snake River dams and transporting them downstream of Bonneville Dam where they are released, compensates for the effects of the Federal Columbia River Power System on “the survival of Snake Basin spring/summer Chinook salmon that migrate through the hydrosystem,” the report says.

    The Comparative Survival Study of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer/Fall Chinook, Summer Steelhead, and Sockeye, 2015 CSS Annual Report (BPA Contract #19960200) can be found on the Fish Passage Center website at http://www.fpc.org/documents/CSS/CSS_2105AnnualReport.pdf, or at the
    Bonneville Power Administration website at http://www.cbfish.org/Report.mvc/SearchPublications/SearchByTextAndAuthorAndDate/Index.Aspx.

    It was prepared by the Comparative Survival Study Oversight Committee and the Fish Passage Center (www.fpc.org). The committee includes Jerry McCann, Brandon Chockley, and Erin Cooper, all of the Fish Passage Center; Howard Schaller and Steve Haeseker, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Robert Lessard, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission; Charlie Petrosky, Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Eric Tinus and Erick Van Dyke, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; and Robin Ehlke, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

    The CSS is a long-term study within the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program and is funded by the
    Bonneville Power Administration. The Fish Passage Center coordinates the PIT-tagging efforts, data management and preparation, and CSSOC work. All draft and final written work products are subject to regional technical and public review.

    The overall objective of the annual report is to provide a historical reference for each year to provide a basis for future fish passage mitigation discussions, and a base reference for future analysis of adult returns, the report says. It is the beginning of a longer-term effort, which will need to incorporate effects of density dependence on observed productivity to evaluate population responses relative to SAR rates.

    The study is based upon 20 years of SARs data for wild Snake River spring/summer chinook from 1994 to 2013, 17 years of SARs data for Snake River hatchery spring/summer chinook (1997 to 2013), 16 years of SARs data for Snake River wild and hatchery steelhead (1997 to 2012), and 5 years of SARs data for Snake River sockeye (2009 to 2013), listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act.

    The annual report’s main focus is the smolt monitoring program, which is designed to provide a long-term consistent and continuous juvenile salmon and steelhead passage characteristics data time series, the report says.

    The 2015 CSS Annual Report includes:

    -- Complete return data for smolt outmigration year 2012 for wild and hatchery chinook salmon and steelhead (all Snake River returns are to Lower
    Granite Dam).

    -- Wild and hatchery spring/summer chinook: 3-salt returns from smolt migration year 2012, and 2-salt returns from smolt migration year 2013.

    -- Fall chinook, 3-salt returns from smolt migration year 2011, and 2-salt returns from smolt migration year 2012.

    -- Wild and hatchery steelhead, 2-salt returns, and Sawtooth Hatchery Snake River sockeye 2-salt returns, both from the 2012 smolt migration.

    http://www.cbbulletin.com/435772.aspx

  • CBB: Agencies Outline NEPA/EIS Progress Evaluating Columbia/Snake River Uses, Improvements For Fish

    dam.lsr1Friday, December 08, 2017

    Federal agencies that operate fourteen Columbia/Snake River dams described this week their progress one year into a five-year National Environmental Policy Act process required by a court-ordered rewrite of the biological opinion for protected salmon and steelhead.

    The information was offered at two public open houses this week in Portland.

    Agency representatives responsible for the process – the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation and the Bonneville Power Administration – said at an afternoon and evening meeting Thursday, Dec. 7, that the nearly one-year long scoping for a Columbia River System Operations environmental impact statement had ended and they are now developing alternatives for a detailed evaluation. That, ultimately, will result in a draft EIS one and a half years down the road, in 2020.

    Following the scoping process, the next two steps are a detailed analysis of alternatives (in progress) and a draft EIS by March 27, 2020. The Final EIS is set for March 26, 2021 and a formal Record of Decision Sept. 24, 2021.

    The NEPA/EIS process is broad, evaluating impacts on the multiple uses of the dams, such as flood control, navigation, hydropower production, irrigation, water supply, recreation and fish and wildlife conservation. It is not just aimed at an evaluation of alternatives for a new basin salmon/steelhead BiOp.

    “We recognize that the ESA focus is important and a driver of this EIS,” said Lydia Grimm of BPA’s policy group. “But we have a lot of authorized purposes (for the dams) and we must take a comprehensive look at all of these. Clearly, we’re looking at the ESA issue as a big driver, but that is not the only driver.”

    She added that the federal agencies continue to anticipate meeting U.S. District Court of Oregon Judge Michael H. Simon’s schedule for an interim BiOp by December 31, 2018 and a final BiOp at the end of the NEPA process in 2021.

    Both the broad scope of the NEPA/EIS process and the potential to suspend the interim BiOp requirement were the subjects of a status conference in Simon’s court, Tuesday, November 28 in Portland.

    Plaintiffs in the case that had resulted in the remand – the National Wildlife Federation et al – said last week that the federal agencies’ NEPA review was too wide-ranging and far beyond a focus on reasonable and prudent alternatives that would be needed to inform a new BiOp.

    In addition, Simon acknowledged at the status conference that the 2018 BiOp would not have the foundation of a new EIS, and said “it would be best to dispense of the 2018 BiOp until we get to a point where we can operate under a sufficient EIS.”

    (See CBB, December 1, 2017, “Judge Floats Idea Of Suspending Work On 2018 BiOp For Salmon/Steelhead Due To Lack Of Completed EIS,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/439901.aspx)

    NOAA Fisheries’ biological opinion, or “BiOp,” sets “reasonable and prudent alternatives” intended to mitigate for impacts of the federal dams on 13 species of Columbia River basin salmon and steelhead listed as threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act. Subsequent recovery plans for each listed species outlines the standards
    for recovery and the actions required to meet them.

    During the scoping process, the agencies held at least 16 public workshops in Idaho, Washington and Oregon, two webinar meetings, and met with tribes and other governments, receiving 400,000 comments along the way. A Scoping Summary was published in October (see the report at http://www.crso.info/102017_report.html).

    Comments during scoping were wide-ranging and varied, said Rebecca Weiss of the Corps.

    “We received comments over a broad range of topic areas and we all have different values that we bring to the process,” she said of the parties who provided comments.

    Among the comments were those about the NEPA process itself, suggested alternatives, climate change, water quality and supply, wildlife, flood risk, tribal interests, power and transmission, navigation, recreation, socioeconomic issues and breaching the four lower Snake River dams.

    Preliminary to developing alternatives, the agencies are reviewing more than 100 objectives (defined as the results wanted) and more than 500 measures (an action at a specific location).

    Broad objectives are:

    --Improve juvenile and adult fish passage and long-term survival of anadromous fish.

    --Improve survival and habitat connectivity for resident fish.

    --Provide a reliable power supply and minimize carbon emissions.

    --Maximize operating flexibility and adaptable water management
    strategies.

    --Provide unmet authorized regional water supply.

    Among the alternatives being evaluated for anadromous fish passage, Weiss said, are increased spill up to 125 percent total dissolved gas, flow augmentation, improved fish passage and dam breaching. The EIS will also address resident fish, such as Kootenai River sturgeon and bull trout.

    On the operations side, some alternatives will include water management flexibility, changing rule curves and flood control curves so that the system can be more responsive to current weather conditions – extended dry or wet periods.

    Some secondary objectives include those for unlisted fish, such as lamprey passage at dams.

    Attorney James Buchal, who represents the Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association in the U.S. District Court’s BiOp case, as well as Simon’s injunction to provide more spill at the lower Snake and lower Columbia river dams, suggested at the afternoon public meeting that the agencies should consider the “God Squad” itself as an alternative.

    The eastern Washington irrigators had petitioned President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team in November 2016 to reconvene the Endangered Species Act Committee, known as the God Squad, for a “reconsultation” of the federal power system’s biological opinion for salmon and steelhead. That would, in effect, circumvent Simon’s BiOp remand and make the current NEPA process moot.

    http://www.cbbulletin.com/439928.aspx

  • CBB: Army Corps Responds to Fish Advocates - Report underway on 2015 Columbia/Snake warm water, fish die-off

    large fishFriday, April 01, 2016

    Northwest environmental groups called on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to develop a list of emergency actions that would prevent high water temperatures that caused the massive die-offs of salmon last summer as adult fish migrated through Columbia and Snake river dams and reservoirs. Columbia Riverkeepers and Snake River Waterkeepers, among 14 groups, sent a letter in February to Colonel Jose Augilar, the Corps’ Commander of the Northwestern Division in Portland, saying that the warming of the Corps’ dams and reservoirs last summer created “impassable temperature barriers for adult salmon migrating upriver.” “Summer 2015 was a disaster for salmon – and a disturbing glimpse at the possible future of Columbia and Snake River fisheries,” the letter says. The groups called on the Corps to identify “emergency measures to prevent future fish kills of adult salmon and steelhead due to hot water.”

    Responding to the groups in a March 16 letter, the Corps’ David Ponganis, Director, Programs, wrote that the Corps, Idaho Department of Fish and Game and NOAA Fisheries are working on an after-season report for 2015 that reviews the conditions and considers “opportunities to address similar conditions in the future.” The report, Ponganis said, will look at the flows and temperature in the migration corridor above and below the Corps’ Lower Granite Dam, including those conditions at Little Goose Dam that contributed to poor passage of sockeye salmon through the dams. “The 2015 Report will also include a discussion of potential actions that may help facilitate and improve adult passage at Corps dams  in the event of extreme environmental conditions, such as those that arose in 2015,” the Corps letter said. That 2015 assessment is in process, Ponganis wrote. Once it is compiled, it will need to go through a regional review by the Technical Management Team and the Regional Technical Forum as well as by others that participate in the regional coordination process under the 2014 Federal Columbia River Power System Biological Opinion. The 2015 report will also be shared with the Northwest Power and Conservation Council at the April NPPC meeting, April 12-13. According to the letter to the Corps penned by the environmental groups, reports emerged in July that more than 250,000 sockeye returning from the ocean had died as a result of high water temperatures in the Columbia and Snake rivers. In the Snake River, some 96 percent of returning ESA-listed Snake River sockeye died before reaching Lower Granite Dam. The letter went on to say that reservoirs sustained temperatures in excess of 20 degrees Centigrade (68 degrees Fahrenheit) with a high temperature of 26.2 degrees C (79.1 degrees F), resulting in what the groups say was the “unauthorized ‘take’ of ESA-listed Snake River sockeye.” If that happens again in 2016 or 2017, sockeye could be pushed “to the brink of extinction and erase progress made to recover this distinct population segment,” the letter says. “Anticipating and preparing a course of action is essential, and justifies immediate implementation of measures to prevent a repeat of the 2015 fish kills in the event of similar conditions in Summer 2016,” the groups told the Corps. “If the Army Corps fails to adopt and implement emergency measures, it risks causing further massive fish kills, unauthorized take, failure of mandatory legal duties to protect endangered species, and jeopardizing the continued existence of the Snake and Columbia rivers’ salmon and steelhead populations in 2016 and future years,” the letter concludes. The groups cited a Fish Passage Center report (http://www.fpc.org/documents/memos/159-15.pdf) about the 2015 summer. Among the information from the FPC report are: --96 percent of adult Snake River sockeye that reached Bonneville Dam in 2015 died without passing over Lower Granite Dam. --“Elevated water temperatures in the Columbia and Snake rivers, including adult fishways, is a long-recognized problem that to date remains largely unmitigated.” --“Fish ladders often expose migrating adult salmon to the highest temperatures and thermal stress encountered in the hydrosystem, due to warm surface water used for ladder flow.” --“Fish ladders that use warm surface waters that flow into a cooler tailrace have a high thermal gradient, which affects migration through the ladders.” --In 2015, adult Snake River sockeye that had been trucked or barged downriver as juveniles died at significantly higher rates when migrating upstream than adult fish that had migrated in-river as juveniles. Some 35 people signed the letter to the Corps representing Columbia Riverkeepers, Advocates for the West, American Rivers, Endangered Species Coalition, Fighting Goliath, Friends of the Clearwater, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Idaho Rivers United, Natural Resources Defense Council, Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association, Sierra Club, Save Our Wild Salmon, Snake River Waterkeeper and Whale and Dolphin Conservation.

  • CBB: BiOp Challengers Urge Court To Reject Feds’ Five-Year Timeline

    NEIL.fishFriday, June 24, 2016

    A week after federal agencies said they could complete the NEPA process in five years, not the two years given by U.S. District Court Judge Michael H. Simon to complete both a new recovery plan for protected Columbia/Snake River salmon and steelhead and associated National Environmental Policy Act documents, plaintiffs in the case said the federal plan takes too long. The federal agencies – the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation and the Bonneville Power Administration – had said in June 3 court briefs that the NEPA process needs at least five years if they are to do it right. However, the National Wildlife Federation, the State of Oregon and the Nez Perce Tribe in their joint brief of June 17 says the federal agencies five-year timeline fails to reflect an urgency for fish listed under the federal Endangered Species Act. Their proposal is to complete the combined recovery plan and the NEPA documents by December 31, 2018, the date “on which the agencies indicate the current, illegal BiOp will expire,” the brief said. The defendants’ (federal agencies) opening brief “fails to acknowledge or address the fact that the FCRPS has been operating in violation of the law since at least December of 2000 and, under its current configuration and operation, the system is failing to avoid jeopardy to ESA-listed salmon and steelhead. The lethal conditions these fish faced in 2015 only underscore the urgency of this problem.” Simon had rejected May 4 much of NOAA Fisheries’ 2014 biological opinion for salmon and steelhead impacted by the Federal Columbia River Power System. In his opinion, he said the rejected BiOp “continues down the same well-worn and legally insufficient path” followed by previous recovery plans over the past 20 years.

    He said that the current BiOp’s standard of “trending toward recovery” is insufficient to ensure recovery, that habitat improvement benefits are uncertain, that NOAA Fisheries’ assessment of climate change impacts on recovery do not use the best available science, and that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation must comply with NEPA and assess all reasonable and prudent alternatives (RPAs), including one that federal agencies seem to be avoiding, breeching lower Snake River dams. Simon held that the federal agencies had failed by not preparing any environmental impact statements that would support the 2014 BiOp and its RPAs. If that had been done, according to the judge’s BiOp decision, the EIS may have allowed, even encouraged, “new and innovative solutions to be developed and discussed. The federal agencies, the public, and our public officials will then be in a better position to evaluate the costs and benefits of various alternatives and to make important decisions.” As was required by the Court, the defendants June 3 filed a plan to complete the EIS, but instead of two years, they said it was not possible to complete unless it was given five years. Plaintiffs disagree and offered their own plan in court documents June 17 that would require just a few months more than two years. The lengthy proposed schedule proposed by the federal defendants fails to offer an expeditious path to complying with both NEPA and the ESA, the plaintiffs said, adding that the longer the defendants take to complete these analyses, the longer the species will remain at risk. “Rather than address this situation, Federal Defendants base their proposed schedule for preparing a programmatic EIS largely on EISs prepared on the agencies’ own time line, not under a court order following repeated violations of the law and continuing high risk to
    ESA-listed species,” the brief says. “Their approach could postpone compliance with the environmental laws that govern FCRPS operations for a total of more than 20 years.” They said that other agencies – NOAA Fisheries and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – have completed a NEPA analysis within one year when they have been under a court order to do so and that the timeline to complete the NEPA work should be on the court’s schedule, not the federal agencies’ schedule. “This combined assertion of unique expertise beyond the ability of the Court to assess, and an implied threat of failure if the Court tries, is unwarranted and incorrect,” the brief said. “(T)heir effort to comply with the law should be undertaken with an urgency commensurate to the scale of the problem they have created,” the brief said. And, the brief said, it appears the defendants, by extending the processes (biological opinion and NEPA) by three more years puts the final product beyond the 2018 requirement to complete a new BiOp, committing the same violations for which Judge Simon has put them on the carpet. The federal agencies can and should run concurrent BiOp and NEPA processes and the court should hold the agencies to the two year limit, the plaintiffs said. They offered an alternative schedule to the one proposed by the federal agencies with a completion date of December 31, 2018. The steps include: Scoping – Federal agencies, the brief said, have not provided an adequate reason that they couldn’t publish a scoping notice in the Federal Register by Sept. 30, 2016, with a 90 day public comment period, completing the scoping process by Jan. 1, 2017. The federal agencies in their June 3 brief said the Scoping process would take one year. Draft Environmental Impact Statement -- The draft EIS will need to articulate and evaluate the impacts of a range of reasonable alternatives for operating the FCRPS in a way that avoids jeopardy to ESA-listed salmon and steelhead and otherwise complies with all applicable laws, the brief said. It said that many components of some of these alternatives for a NEPA analysis are already apparent, such as bypassing the four lower Snake River dams, increasing spill during the spring juvenile migration season, drawing down John Day or other reservoirs during juvenile migration season to increase water travel time and increasing river flows to meet specific minimum flow targets on a weekly basis during the migration seasons. For much of this work, the brief said, the government has existing studies as a starting point and does not need to start from scratch. This is the most time-consuming step in the NEPA process, so the agencies may need almost seventeen months, or until November 30, 2017 – to prepare and publish the draft. The federal agencies said this part of the process would take two-and-one-half years. The plaintiffs believe the agencies should also begin to prepare a draft BiOp concurrently with this process so that it is ready for review when the draft EIS is ready. Those documents would be followed by a 90 day comment period. Final EIS – After the close of comment on the draft EIS, the agencies will need to review the comments and prepare a final EIS. “The release of a Final EIS should be closely contemporaneous with release of a new BiOp,” the brief said. Plaintiffs give NOAA and the action agencies until Dec. 31, 2018 to complete the process. Federal agencies said the final EIS will take about one year following publication of the draft EIS. The formal Record of Decisions on both documents would take another 30 to 60 days, they plaintiffs said. Federal agencies said the ROD would take six months. “In short, NWF, Oregon, and the Nez Perce Tribe urge the Court to adopt the schedule set out above, or one that is even shorter, for compliance by Federal Defendants with both NEPA and the ESA,” the brief concludes. The states of Idaho, Washington and Montana, the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Montana, the Umatilla Indian Reservation, the Confederated Bands of the Yakama Nation, the Confederated Tribes of the Warms Springs Reservation of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Inland Ports and Navigation Group, Northwest River Partners, and the Northwest Power and Conservation Council participated in this lawsuit. The Nez Perce was the only tribe to side with the plaintiffs and Oregon was the only state.

  • CBB: Briefs Filed In Appeals Court To Expedite Challenge To Increased Spill For Juvenile Salmon, Steelhead

    gavelFriday, December 08, 2017

    Federal defendants filed opening briefs in late October in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to expedite a reversal of an April 3 U.S. District Court of Oregon injunction that called for earlier spill in 2018 to aid juvenile fish passage and monitoring at federal dams.

    The request for injunctive relief for more spill was enjoined with the earlier case argued in Judge Michael H. Simon’s court that resulted in May 2016 a remand of the federal Columbia River power system biological opinion for salmon and steelhead listed under the Endangered Species Act.

    The spill plea was brought to Simon in January 2017 by the National Wildlife Federation and the State of Oregon, with the support of the Nez Perce Tribe. The groups asked the court to begin ordering spill to maximum total dissolved gas levels beginning April 3, 2017 and to continue for each year of the BiOp remand. Simon agreed that more spring spill would benefit ESA-listed fish, but delayed the action until 2018 while federal agencies completed a spill plan for lower Snake and Columbia river dams. That spill plan is in progress.

    The spill decision was appealed by the federal agencies, Northwest RiverPartners, the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, the states of Idaho and Montana, and the Inland Ports and Navigation Group in early June to the Court of Appeals. The parties have now moved forward in court asking to expedite the appeal and for a decision prior to April 3, 2018, when Simon said the additional spill should begin.

    In their October 26 opening brief, the federal defendants said that Simon had not considered the complexity or cost of adding more spill, that additional spill is not necessary to avoid irreparable harm to species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act, and that he had misused the injunction process that ordered the spill.

    “Equitable principles require that, in considering injunctive relief, a court be mindful of the enormity and complexity of this congressionally- authorized system, as well as the uncertainty of the science pertaining to salmonid species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and affected by this system.”

    The brief continued, saying that the Supreme Court has said that “an injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, never awarded as of right” and that an injunction, when ordered must be “narrowly tailored to remedy only the violation and the specific irreparable harm that would occur in the absence of an injunction.”

    Judge Simon failed this task when he ordered 24-hour spring spill to begin earlier in the year than is required by the current 2014 BiOp, they said.

    “The court ordered wholesale changes in the way these dams are operated—changes that were not shown to be necessary to avoid irreparable harm to ESA-listed salmon and steelhead at the species level,” the brief says. “And the court refused to consider the harm to Northwest communities from the tradeoffs that come with increased spill in the form of increased electricity rates, potential reductions in funding for programs that benefit the region, and increased reliability risks for the federal power system and electrical grid.”

    The federal defendants said that spilling to the “gas cap on a 24-hour basis at all eight dams decreases system-wide operational flexibility, which poses risks to the reliability of the interconnected federal power and transmission systems, particularly during low flow conditions. Such spill operations also impose significant monetary costs that must be borne by the public either through reductions or eliminations of existing programs or through electricity rate increases.”

    Plaintiffs had also failed to prove that irreparable harm to ESA-listed species would result if the spill is not approved, they said.

    “Plaintiffs didn't meet the standards for injunctive relief (it has be ‘narrowly tailored’ but wasn't) and court’s findings on ‘irreparable harm,’" Terry Flores, Executive Director of Northwest RiverPartners said by email. “There has to be ‘irreparable’ harm to plaintiffs and species. Plaintiffs didn't make the case for themselves on irreparable harm and it seems unlikely species will suffer irreparably before the new BiOp and operations in 2018.”

    The brief also claims the spill order diverted already busy and limited agency resources – the Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation – away from the work of preparing a new BiOp.

    “The district court has gone too far. The extraordinary and drastic remedy of an injunction should not be used as a tool to conduct experiments or collect data that the court thinks might be useful,” the federal defendants conclude. “The court’s injunction order should be vacated.”

    Parties to the case have until January 9, 2018 to file briefs and a final decision is anticipated by April 3, the day Simon is requiring the additional spring spill to begin.

    Legislation that would negate Simon’s spill injunction and addresses removal of the four lower Snake River dams has been introduced in
    Congress and is now in the House Natural Resources Committee. H.R. 3144, introduced in late June, would, in effect, reverse Simon’s spill injunction and prohibit breaching the dams without congressional approval.

    The bill was sponsored by Pacific Northwest U.S. Reps. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-WA), Dan Newhouse (R-WA), Kurt Schrader (D-OR), and Greg Walden (R-OR).

    This week Washington Gov. Jay Inslee wrote a letter opposing the bill.

    “HR 3144 would thwart constructive ongoing efforts to improve future salmon and dam management,” he wrote in the Dec. 5 letter. “This would not only hurt salmon but also the recreational and commercial fisheries, tribes, and other species (such as Puget Sound’s southern resident killer whales) that benefit from healthy salmon runs.”

    In addition to modifications made to the dams to aid listed salmon and steelhead over the past 20 years, he said, “there is evidence that salmon may further benefit from additional modifications to dam operations that would help restore salmon populations,” pointing to the spill tests beginning next year.

    “This discussion and learning opportunity would be blocked by HR 3144’s prohibition on any studies or actions that restrict electricity generation at any dams in the Federal Columbia River Power System, even by a small amount,” he said

    “I encourage the Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans, the full Natural Resources Committee, and the full House of Representatives to oppose HR 3144,” he concluded.

    The full text of H.R. 3144 can be found at http://www.wildsalmon.org/images/factsheets-and-reports/2017-MMR-bill-HR3144.pdf. It was introduced June 29.

    In response to the legislation’s potential limits on additional spill at Snake and Columbia river dams, 37 conservation, salmon, orca, clean energy advocacy organizations and business associations sent a letter August 23 to Northwest congressional representatives and policymakers urging them to oppose H.R. 3144.

    http://www.cbbulletin.com/439929.aspx

  • CBB: Cantwell, Canadian Ambassador Meet To Discuss Columbia River Treaty

    maria.cantwellFriday, June 24, 2016

    On Thursday, U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) met with Canadian ambassador David MacNaughton ahead of the North American Leaders Summit to discuss the progress being made toward a new Columbia River Treaty. In March, Cantwell secured a commitment from Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that America’s northern neighbor was willing to move forward to modernize the treaty. “Modernizing the Columbia River Treaty to balance flood control, ecosystem protection, and hydropower generation can be a win – win for both Canada and the United States” said Cantwell. “I am happy to report that Ambassador MacNaughton agreed that there are several areas for our countries to work together.” Updating the treaty, which has not been revised since it was ratified in 1964, will allow the US and Canada, said Cantwell in a press release, to “work on critical clean energy solutions such as smart grid with intermittent power, grid-scale storage and clean infrastructure solutions.” Cantwell said she supports the U.S. negotiating position based on the “Regional Recommendation” to modernize the treaty, balancing ecosystem function including salmon recovery, flood control and hydropower generation.

    (See CBB, Sept. 27, 2013, “U.S. Releases Draft Recommendations For ‘Modernizing’ Columbia River Treaty” http://www.cbbulletin.com/428444.aspx) Cantwell said the commitment from Trudeau was an important step in beginning joint US-Canadian talks to modernize the treaty. The Columbia River Treaty has no specific end date, and most of its provisions would continue indefinitely without action by the United States or Canada. However, the treaty states either the United States or Canada can terminate most of its provisions beginning September 2024, with a minimum 10 years written notice. Cantwell has been a leader in pressing for the modernization of the treaty. Last year, she sent a letter to President Obama with 25 other members of the Pacific Northwest Congressional delegation, urging the Administration to move forward with a strategy for addressing the treaty. North American Leaders Summit will take place June 29 in Ottawa, Canada. President Obama will meet with Trudeau and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto.

     

  • CBB: Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission Names Pinkham New Executive Director

    March 24, 2017

    748ce2f881adb0e04f06e10b04cfbb41 400x400Jaime Pinkham, a member of the Nez Perce Tribe with more than three decades of experience in American Indian governance, policy, and natural resource management, is returning to the Columbia Basin to serve as the executive director of the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.

    Leaders of CRITFC’s member tribes — the Warm Springs, Umatilla, Yakama, and Nez Perce tribes — selected Pinkham to become the tenth executive director in the Commission’s 40-year history. He will take the reins at CRITFC on April 24.

    “As a treaty fisher and hunter, I am humbled to work with the member tribes and CRITFC,” said Pinkham. “CRITFC plays an important role working at the intersection of each tribe’s individual autonomy and their unified voice. Healthy and harvestable salmon runs are fundamental to the sovereign identities and cultures of the four member tribes.”

    Pinkham brings substantial Columbia Basin fisheries and natural resources experience coupled with strong tribal governance policy credentials. Pinkham has been serving as the vice president of the Bush Foundation in St. Paul, Minnesota for the past eight years where he led the Native Nations program that works with tribes across North Dakota, South Dakota, and Minnesota as they redesigned their governing systems. His work led to the creation of the Native Governance Center, a Native-led non-profit delivering technical support to tribes in government redesign.

    Prior to that, Pinkham spent two decades in the Pacific Northwest advocating for tribal sovereignty, self-determination, and treaty rights. He worked for the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission as Watershed Department Manager from 2005 to 2008, supporting the Commission in regional coordination and Congressional affairs. After graduating with a forestry degree from Oregon State University he worked for state and federal agencies before moving home to Nez Perce Country in 1990. During his time there, he held a variety of positions including being elected twice to the Nez Perce Tribal Executive Committee and led its natural resource programs engaging in salmon restoration, water rights negotiations, wolf recovery, and land acquisition

    “Jaime Pinkham’s decades of work on tribal sovereignty and natural resources stood out amid a strong field of candidates,” said CRITFC Chair Leland Bill. “We look forward to working with Jaime as we face a number of current issues that impact salmon and tribal treaty fishing rights including climate change, an altered federal government landscape, and the renegotiation of the Columbia River Treaty.”

    Pinkham succeeds Paul Lumley, who served for eight years in the position before leaving to lead the Native American Youth and Family Association in Portland, Oregon last October. Rob Lothrop, interim executive director since Lumley’s departure, will continue in that capacity until Pinkham’s arrival.

    http://www.cbbulletin.com/438580.asp

  • CBB: Columbia River Springer Fishing Allowed This Weekend; Passage Numbers Low At Bonneville But Improving

    April 18, 2019

    salmonHigh flows and low visibility during last weekend’s limited spring chinook salmon two-day salmon opening resulted in just 20 fish caught by a limited number of anglers braving the poor conditions, prompting the two-state Columbia River Compact this week to add two more days of fishing this weekend, April 20 and 21.

    Few spring chinook have passed Bonneville Dam. As of April 16, just 267 fish had passed the dam, the second lowest passage in 10 years and only 4 percent of the 10-year average of 6,564 fish on that date.

    Conditions, however, are improving. Some 38 fish passed the dam April 16 and 54 passed yesterday, April 17, bringing the total to 321 fish. That’s still just 4 percent of the 10-year average.

    In addition, last week, the Columbia River was nearly 16 feet at the Vancouver, WA. gauge, which is flood level, and turbidity was high. The level dropped to 10 feet this week and is predicted to drop to 8.5 feet by the weekend. Still, turbidity remains an issue, with visibility just one to two feet, as was noted by several recreational advisors and guides who called in for the Compact hearing this week, April 17.

    More good news was weekly test fishing results in the lower river. They began on March 18, with catch rates (chinook per drift) increasing for the first three Mondays (0.3, 0.7 and 0.9) consistent with 2018, but dropping to 0.5 on April 8 (2.3 in 2018). Catch rates improved significantly on April 15 to 5.0 chinook per drift (6.8 in 2018), according to the Compact’s Spring Fact Sheet No. 2.

    At the hearing, the Compact staff had recommended what it termed a “conservative” three days of fishing – Friday, April 19 through Sunday, April 21.

    However, most of the public who testified during the two-hour hearing – recreational advisors, anglers and guides – urged the Council to provide even more days of fishing and to reopen the river to chinook angling Thursday through Monday.

    This weekend's opening comes after fishery managers from Washington and Oregon evaluated additional information collected from the recreational fishery, said Bill Tweit, special assistant with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Staff will continue to closely monitor the run as it progresses.

    "With updated catch estimates still well below the expected harvest numbers, we feel comfortable reopening this section of river for another round of weekend fishing," Tweit said. "Water levels are still high but are starting to stabilize, which may provide improved fishing opportunity."

    Given the uncertainty that the chinook run would meet the preseason forecasted number of 99,300 fish, neither Oregon nor Washington representatives would approve extending the period out the five days that anglers and guides wanted.

    Tucker Jones of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife approved, instead, of the staff-recommended three days, but Tweit worried that harvest could exceed the allowed number of fish if a revised run size forecast due in early May comes in lower than anticipated. “Still, there is no certainty on the run size,” he said.

    So far since the first of March, anglers have caught 1,551 chinook in 27,400 angler trips through April 14. Of those, 1,366 are upriver chinook, which is 37 percent of the 3,689 fish available to recreational anglers prior to a run update, which is not expected until early May. Compact staff said that the run update could drop to as low as 53,300 fish and still accommodate the allowable catch.

    Stuart Ellis of the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission and a member of the U.S. v Oregon Technical Advisory Committee said that other years have seen similarly poor early results, yet still ended up close to preseason forecasts. For example, he said, last year on April 16, just 250 fish had passed the dam, yet the total passage at Bonneville by the end of the season was 108,000 fish. On the other hand, the 2007 count at the dam April 16 was a robust 4,200 fish, but the final count was just 81,000.

    “It’s too early to know for sure,” he said.

    Dave Moscowitz, Executive Director of The Conservation Angler, reminded hearing participants that steelhead are also having a tough year with passage at the dam of 1,547 steelhead (846 wild), which is 49 percent of the 10-year average of 3,125.

    The fishery will reopen on the Columbia River April 20 and 21 upstream from the Warrior Rock boundary line to Bonneville Dam. The lower river downstream from Warrior Rock remains closed to fishing for salmon, steelhead, and shad, WDFW said in a news release. Anglers may retain one adult chinook and one adult steelhead, or two adult steelhead, per day. Only hatchery fish may be retained, and barbless hooks are required when fishing for salmon and steelhead.

    Waters above Bonneville Dam to the Oregon/Washington state line above McNary Dam remain open to salmon fishing through May 5.

  • CBB: Columbia/Snake Steelhead runs downgraded again, so far only 25 percent of average; Idaho considers closing fishing, other states would follow

    September 19, 2019

    salmon.steelheadThe number of summer steelhead forecasted to pass Bonneville Dam and travel into the Snake and Clearwater rivers was downgraded for the third time this month.

    The U.S. v Oregon Technical Advisory Committee, which monitors fish runs, and sets preseason and in-season forecasts, dropped the forecasted run of steelhead at its meeting Monday, Sept. 16, to 69,200 fish, which includes both A-run and B-run fish.

    Passage of summer steelhead at Bonneville Dam by Wednesday, Sept. 18, was 65,457 fish (25 percent of the 10-year average), both A- and B-run. Some 33,457 of those fish were unclipped. The 10-year average for Sept. 18 is 256,938 steelhead, with 91,044 of those unclipped fish. The count on this date last year was 85,810, with 29,052 unclipped.

    Further upriver at Lower Granite Dam on the Snake River, the number of steelhead that have passed is 6,650 fish, with 3,307 unclipped (both A- and B-runs). The total passage is just 15 percent of the 10-year average of 44,592 for the total run, and the unclipped passage is 22 percent of the 10-year average of 14,770 unclipped fish. Last year’s passage on this date at Lower Granite was 12,889, with 3,908 unclipped fish.

    Just last week, TAC downgraded the run size to 71,600 fish from the 74,000 it had forecasted the first of September. Its preseason run-size forecast was 126,950. A-index or A-run are those fish less than 78 centimeters (about 31 inches) and B-run are larger than 78 cm.

    TAC also downgraded the expected passage of unclipped summer steelhead to 34,300, with a downgrade of the B-run forecast to 2,500, including 1,300 unclipped fish.

    It was the number of unclipped B-run fish passing Bonneville Dam and heading to the Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (a number determined by PIT-tag readings at Bonneville) that caused the Nez Perce Tribe to break away from lower river tribes who were calling for some extension of commercial gillnetting at the Tuesday, Sept. 17 two-state Columbia River Compact hearing.

    Generally the treaty tribes come to the Compact with a consensus recommendation to continue fishing, but this week just the Yakama Nation sponsored the gillnetting proposal, suggesting a one day extension of fishing this week in Zone 6 (Bonneville pool upstream through the John Day pool) and two and a half additional days next week. The extra day this week is Thursday, Sept. 19, and the extended days next week are Monday through Wednesday, Sept. 23 – 25.

    Concerned about meeting the B-run hatchery broodstock goal and the impact continued gillnetting lower in the river might have on the remaining B-run fish, the Nez Perce Tribe opposed the Yakama’s fishing proposal.

    “The 2019-20 return of summer steelhead is expected to be extremely low, specifically the Dworshak Hatchery releases,” Casey Mitchell of the Nez Perce told the Compact. He said the hatchery broodstock requirement is for 2,000 B-run fish, but just 1,300 are predicted to arrive.

    In a Sept. 16 memorandum, the Tribe said that the considering the poor ocean conditions, “it is likely the fish we released last year, next year and following will also be subject to poor returns. Every fish is needed to meet brood needs …”

    “We will make a recommendation to the Idaho Commission soon to close all the tributaries to steelhead fishing,” Mitchell said.

    In fact the Idaho Commission is meeting, Friday, Sept. 20 to consider the closure, according to Idaho Department of Fish and Game’s Lance Hebdon.

    “From our perspective, we support the Nez Perce,” he said. “It is clear that the situation with broodstock at Dworshak and Clearwater (Clearwater National Fish Hatchery) is in danger this year. The Idaho Commission meets Friday and one of the items on their agenda is a complete steelhead curtailment.”

    He added that the Commission is currently allowing the retention of steelhead, but only those under 28 inches – mostly females – as a way to reduce the impacts on the larger B-run fish.

    “However, it’s clear from the PIT-tag update and the TAC downgrade that even that will be insufficient,” Hebdon said.

    If Idaho closes steelhead retention, then Washington will do that as well in Washington waters it shares on the Snake River, said Bill Tweit, special assistant with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Tucker Jones, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife’s manager of ocean salmon and Columbia River fisheries, said Oregon would likely follow suit.

    Some 59,810 A- and B-run summer steelhead had passed Bonneville Dam as of Sept. 16, including 30,747 unclipped fish. The summer steelhead run that began July 1 is typically 86 percent complete by Sept. 16. The counts for unclipped fish total more than the clipped hatchery fish. This has not been observed since clipped and unclipped counts for steelhead began at Bonneville Dam in 1994, according to the Compact’s Fall Fact Sheet No. 8.

    Also at risk is escapement of fall chinook salmon to the Spring Creek National Hatchery, which is located in the Bonneville pool. At this point, hatchery managers are uncertain they will meet the escapement goal.

    Preston Bronson, representing the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, said he could support the one day extension of fishing this week, but would like to come back to the table to further discuss next week’s fishery. “As of now, we do not have a particular ask (of the Compact or other tribes), but we want to express our concerns for the B-run steelhead,” he said.

    “It’s less awkward when the tribes arrive at a consensus,” Jones said as he and Tweit mulled how to rule on continued Treaty gillnetting when the states have little legal leeway to influence whether fishing should continue.

    “Our role isn’t to pass tribal choices,” Tweit explained. “Ours’ is to allow tribal sales of fish to buyers. But even if we choose to not authorize state-licensed buyers, we don’t have a yeah or nay authority to rule on the fishing.”

    So how does that impact the conservation issues before them? he asked. “We need to try hard not to make Dworshak or Spring Creek worse.”

    “There are a lot of URBs left in the river and only about 40 B-run steelhead would be impacted,” said the Yakama Nation’s Roger Dick. URBs are upriver bright chinook, a constraining stock in the fishery. “Having this fishery is not going to make or break the Dworshak escapement.”

    He added that the fall run of chinook salmon is big for tribal families and the “issues with steelhead have persisted for a long time and seem to be getting worse. But, this is an issue with the hatchery fish (steelhead), not with wild fish and it doesn’t seem to be the fault of the tribal fishery.”

    The projected tally of fall chinook harvested by tribal fishers by the time commercial gillnetting ends next Wednesday is 37,041. The constraining run – the type of chinook stock that limits the total number that can be harvested – is URBs. Tribes expect the harvest of URBs by Wednesday to be 15,375. A late fall platform fishery will add an additional 500 of the fish harvested, bringing the total fall harvest of URBs to 15,875. The allowed catch based on the new run size, however, is 38,456, which leaves 25,081 URBs to be harvested after next week and after the late fall platform fishery.

    The tribal harvest of steelhead is expected to hit 1,990 fish, with 203 of those the B-run fish. However, add in 100 B-run steelhead from the platform fishery and the total B-run catch will be 303, just under the 325 allowed harvest, based on the new run size.

    Some 173,154 fall chinook adults had passed Bonneville Dam as of Sept. 16, with upriver brights accounting for 152,385 of the fish. The chinook jack count was 27,974, 54 percent of the 10-year average on of 51,582. Passage of the adult run is typically 73 percent complete on that date, according to the Fact Sheet. Tule’s totaled 20,769.

    TAC had also downgraded the anticipated fall chinook run, but by only 1 percent. The preseason forecast was of 349,700. Still, the run’s composition changed, with the Bonneville pool tule run downgraded to 31,000 at the Columbia River mouth and 22,300 passing Bonneville. TAC upgraded the number of URBs to 167,200 at the river mouth and 155,345 at Bonneville. The PUB run size was upgraded to 66,200 at the river mouth and 61,055 at Bonneville.

    With some 36,276 fall chinook having passed McNary Dam by Sept. 16, the Fact Sheet says the fish management goal of 60,000 fish will be met (the run at McNary is 46 percent complete on that date).

    The tally for adult early stock coho salmon over Bonneville Dam by Sept. 16 was 33,566 (defined as coho passing prior to October 1). That’s more than last year (21,461) but less than the 10-year average of 49,614. Passage of upriver early stock coho is typically 71 percent complete by Sept. 16. The Coho jack count to date is 2,918, less than last year and less than the 10-year average of 3,112.

    The Compact also met Wednesday, Sept. 18, to consider opening the Columbia River from Buoy 10 to Bonneville Dam for one day of fall chinook fishing and to close fall chinook fishing from Bonneville Dam to the Washington/Oregon border. Fall chinook angling ended in the lower river Sept. 6, but continued in the river upstream of the dam.

    As of Sept. 20, the projected Buoy 10 fishery had harvested 14,764 fall chinook, including 2,167 URBs. The harvest from Tongue Point to Warrior Rock is 2,481, with 1,702 URBs, and from Warrior Rock to Bonneville the harvest is 5,467 with 3,669 URBs. Upstream so far, the fall chinook harvest is 3,046 with 925 URBs. The total fall chinook caught in the Columbia River mainstem is 25,758, with 8,463 URBs. The allowable URB impact is 9,606 fish, leaving 1,142 URBs for harvest. However, a non-retention mortality through December of about 390 URBs would bring the allowable catch for any fishery to just 752.

    With the few fish available for harvest, Oregon and Washington agreed instead to leave the upstream river open and the downstream river closed and to revisit the issue next week.

  • CBB: Corps releases Dworshak water to cool Lower Granite tailwater for Salmon; Low sockeye run downgraded by one-third

    July 11, 2019

    By Mike O’Bryant

    Lower Granite SpillRiver temperatures in the tailrace of Lower Granite Dam on the Snake River rose above 67 degrees this week and the air temperature is predicted to rise above 90 degrees this weekend.

    That prompted the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to increase releases of water from Dworshak Dam to keep Lower Granite tailwater temperature under 68 degrees, partially as an aid to the few adult sockeye salmon expected to return to the Snake River and Sawtooth Basin this year.

    Anticipating higher air and water temperatures, the Corps increased flows from Dworshak to full powerhouse, or 9,450 cubic feet per second, July 6, and this week added more flow by spilling 3 kcfs beginning midnight, July 10, according to Johnathan Roberts, a water reservoir regulator with the Corps’ Walla Walla District.

    He outlined at the interagency Technical Management Team meeting Wednesday, July 10, the Corps’ plans to keep Lower Granite tailwater under the temperature limit set by NOAA Fisheries’ biological opinion for the federal power system.

    The BiOp requires the Corps to meet several objectives to enhance salmonids listed under the federal Endangered Species Act, the Corps said in a news release, including maintaining minimum water flows for resident fish and salmon, and releasing Dworshak Reservoir water to maintain lower Snake River water temperatures and help speed juvenile fish (mostly fall chinook) downriver to the ocean.

    “We are required to maintain water temperatures at Lower Granite below 68 degrees, if possible, using available reservoir-system management methods,” Roberts said. “It takes about three days for cold-water releases from Dworshak to reach the downstream side of Lower Granite Dam, where the target temperature gauges are located. So, we have to plan well ahead and make adjustments at Dworshak that will be effective at the time we’ll need them further down the river.”

    Additional discharges from Dworshak to cool the Lower Granite tailwater have become an annual operation. In 2018, the Corps began to release 12.9 kcfs of the cool water on July 9. As is the case this year, most of the outflow is through the dam’s turbines, with some 3.2 kcfs through a controlled spill, keeping total dissolved gas levels under the Washington state-mandated clean water limit of 110 percent.

    Migrating adult sockeye hit a thermal block in 2015 as river temperatures rose considerably above the 68 degree F limit. Some 90 percent of sockeye died before reaching Ice Harbor Dam, the lower of the four Snake River dams. IDFG, NOAA Fisheries and the Nez Perce Tribes set up a rescue project at Lower Granite Dam to trap the adults and haul them to the hatchery at Eagle, Idaho.

    Water discharges from the dam on the North Fork Clearwater River prior to the operation was previously at 5,300 kcfs, according to a Corps news release announcing the change.

    Downstream of the dam water in the Clearwater River rose by as much as one foot with the higher release.

    “With hot weather forecasted to continue, water temperature at Lower Granite is likely to soon exceed 68 degrees if not regulated, creating conditions in the reservoir system that are unhealthy for ESA-listed fish,” Roberts said. “Dworshak’s 43-degree outflows make a big difference in water temperature there and further down the Snake River.”

    Cold-water releases from Dworshak will be adjusted as needed to keep temperatures below the BiOp threshold, while conserving as much water as possible, Roberts added.

    Idaho Fish and Game biologists had expected few endangered sockeye to return to Idaho this year, and midway through the run, the number of fish crossing Snake River dams is lower than expected, but the exact number of Idaho fish returning is difficult to determine because few of the fish have electronic PIT tags that help biologists monitor the run, according to IDFG.

    “With most of the returning Snake River sockeye currently making their way through the Columbia River to Idaho over the next couple of weeks, we should get a better idea of whether our Snake River sockeye salmon were affected by the same processes that led to the downgrade in the Columbia River-wide sockeye forecast at the end of June,” said John Powell, IDFG fisheries research biologist.

    The preseason sockeye run size was downgraded by one third to 62,800 fish based on the recent 5-year average run timing at Bonneville Dam. The preseason forecast was 94,400 fish. The U.S. v Oregon Technical Advisory Committee met July 8, downgrading the expected sockeye run (most of those sockeye will travel to mid-Columbia River tributaries, with few turning into the Snake River).

    Some 57,875 sockeye have been counted at Bonneville Dam as of July 9, according to the Fish Passage Center. That’s less than 20 percent of the 10-year average of 294,509 fish. Last year on this date 182,458 sockeye had passed.

    Just eight sockeye had passed Lower Granite Dam as of July 8, far lower than the 10-year average of 350 fish.

    Of those eight fish, just one PIT tagged fish passed Bonneville Dam, according to Powell. “With only one PIT tag, we are unable to make a precise estimate of the number of Snake River sockeye salmon that are currently in the Columbia River.”

    On average about 75 percent of the sockeye destined for Redfish Lake have passed Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River on or before July 4. But Idaho’s sockeye are typically mixed with other sockeye that continue up the Columbia, while Idaho’s fish proceed up the lower Snake River and are counted through its four dams, IDFG said.

    “It is still early for most of these fish to have made it to Idaho, approximately 50 percent of the run usually crosses Lower Granite Dam in the two weeks following July 4, thus, we will know more about the size of the Snake River sockeye run in the next couple of weeks,” Powell said.

    A major factor in the low forecast and likely low return revolves around how long sockeye spend in the ocean before returning to the Sawtooth Basin near Stanley, according to IDFG. Typically, about 83 percent of IDFG’s hatchery-released sockeye and 75 percent of the naturally produced fish spend two years in the ocean, so most of this summer’s return went to the ocean in 2017.

    Post-release survival of young sockeye reared at Springfield Hatchery was the lowest in 2017. Only 16.4 percent survived the downstream migration to Lower Granite Dam, which is still about 400 miles from the Pacific Ocean. Biologists also estimated that 2017 had the second-smallest number of natural-origin juveniles leaving Redfish Lake since 2002.

    Idaho’s sockeye face a long and arduous journey. They must travel about 900 miles and 6,000 vertical feet to return to their spawning sites in the Sawtooth Basin. In 2018, the first sockeye arrived to the Redfish Lake Creek trap on July 26.

    A total of 276 sockeye crossed Lower Granite Dam in 2018. Of those, 113 completed their migration to the Sawtooth Basin. The 10-year average is 620 sockeye returning to the Stanley area.

    TAC left its previously adjusted summer chinook forecast untouched at 34,200 fish. The preseason forecast for summer chinook was 36,345 fish, according to TAC member Stuart Ellis, also of the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. TAC will meet again July 15 to discuss the sockeye and summer chinook runs.

    The preseason forecast for Skamania steelhead (April 1 to June 30) was 8,800 total fish of which 3,400 were unclipped, Ellis added. However, the Skamania steelhead return to Bonneville Dam this year was 3,131 total fish of which 1,624 were unclipped.

    “We have not started updating the A/B-Index run which goes from July 1-Oct 31,” Ellis said.

    The Corps said that Dworshak Reservoir reached recreation pool elevation of 1,598 feet on June 7, offering earlier-than-usual prime water-recreation conditions, with all boat ramps and campsites accessible for visitors.

    Park Rangers advise boaters to be aware of potentially hazardous conditions associated with the reservoir being full.

    “That means woody debris that is usually beached along the shoreline later during the summer is floating around and can make boating difficult,” explained Colten Shimer, Dworshak natural resource specialist. “Before proceeding at higher speeds, boaters should become familiar with the area and be on the lookout for woody debris or rocks, stumps and shallow areas not visible from the surface.”

  • CBB: Council F&W Committee Talks Policy About BPA Project Funding Cuts, Columbia Basin Fish Accords

    Friday, July 13, 2018gillnetter

    Looking for a 10 percent cut in Bonneville Power Administration fish and wildlife funding and with an extension of the Columbia Basin Fish Accords still uncertain, one member of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council this week says he would like to see a closer coordination between the Council and Bonneville in determining priorities, especially with the Accords.

     
    BPA announced to the Council at its meeting in Portland June 12 that it must cut its direct spending on fish and wildlife due to BPA’s fiscal uncertainties. This week at its meeting in Missoula, Montana, Bryan Mercier, executive director of BPA’s fish and wildlife division, said that he has begun reviewing and negotiating with fish and wildlife project leaders to “squeeze efficiencies” from projects.
     
    “No one is happy about the reductions,” Mercier said. “But for the most part the response has been collaborative.”
     
    Bonneville funds regional fish and wildlife projects associated with the four-state Council’s Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife program. For more information about the Council, its regional fish and wildlife program and program projects go to https://www.nwcouncil.org/fish-and-wildlife.
     
    Mercier also said that Bonneville is in discussions with tribes and states to extend the Accords, which expire in September. The previous Accord agreement was for 10 years, but the next agreement may be just through 2022 and likely will be tied to a new salmon/steelhead environmental impact statement and biological opinion for the Federal Columbia River Power System.
     
    (For more information about the Accords go to https://www.salmonrecovery.gov/Partners/FishAccords.aspx)
     
    “At best, this is an exercise in parallel planning, but it doesn’t seem to be coordinated” between the Council and BPA, Oregon Council member Ted Ferrioli told Mercier. “It seems there is not transparency,” he continued, commenting specifically on Accord negotiations between BPA and the Tribes. “How does the Council plan when one-third of the projects are partitioned from its view?”
     
    Mercier acknowledged the challenge for the Council with the Accord process, but said that tribes, states and BPA discussions must remain between BPA and those entities. However, he said, there should be a public review of the Accords in early August. “That’s our goal right now.”
     
    In 2008, the federal agencies that own and operate the Federal Columbia River Power System – BPA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Bureau of Reclamation – entered into fisheries agreements with tribes and Washington, Montana and Idaho. These agreements, known as the Columbia Basin Fish Accords, committed BPA to provide $100 million a year for 10 years for habitat, hatchery, and lower Columbia estuary projects to benefit the basin’s fish, particularly salmon, steelhead and lamprey.
     
    As for BPA’s review of fish and wildlife projects related to the Council’s fish and wildlife program, that will continue for about a year. “We want to squeeze efficiencies out of projects before we have to make changes that impact fish,” Mercier said.
     
    “Meanwhile, we will have issues like the one we had earlier this morning on how to deal with funding our next year,” said Bill Booth of Idaho.
     
    During the Tuesday, July 10 meeting, the Fish and Wildlife Committee had given tentative approval to tribes to restore Pacific lamprey runs in Columbia River tributaries through artificial propagation and translocation. However, the Committee was not able to guarantee funds for the restoration work given the funding uncertainty, whether from BPA fish and wildlife funds or from the Accords.
     
    Mercier said everyone will face some uncertainty, as the lamprey project shows. However, the potential extension of the Accords could provide funding the lamprey project needs.
     
    “We are at a point of finite funds. We have to reallocate about $279 million to say $250 million,” he said. “The Council can lead with saying what projects we should be funding first and, with limited funds, what’s not a priority.”
     
    A July 5 Council discussion memorandum (https://www.nwcouncil.org/sites/default/files/2018_0710_f2.pdf) by Tony Grover, director of the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Division, outlines some of the policy issues that arise with the BPA budget cuts, at least those cuts known to the Council at this time. Among the reductions and their policy implications in the memo are:
     
    -- eliminate Select Area Fisheries Enhancement funding over 3 years for commercial gillnetters in the lower Columbia River. This program, Grover said, should have been self-sufficient by 2010. That could reduce fish provided by the program for harvest augmentation and could increase adverse impacts on ESA-listed fish, the memo says.

    -- reduce Lower Snake River Compensation funding by several million dollars. This is a fund that has been collected in BPA rates that, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is a cooperative hatchery program. The reduction, according to the memo, would have minimal effects as budgeted funds have exceeded expenditures for several years. Mercier called this reduction a “right sizing.”

    -- technical assistance functions of some umbrella projects and estuary habitat work. Mercier said BPA is trying to be more strategic when reviewing these projects.

    -- reduce Water Transaction Program funds by $1 million. It is important that funds are not focused solely on BiOp purposes, that criteria continue to be applied consistently across the basin, and that administrative changes in the program at the contractor or qualified local entities level do not impede transactions, the memo says.

    -- Reduce StreamNet funding by at least $54,000 and reduce funding to other data management efforts.

    -- Eliminate most funding for the CHaMP and ISEMP projects for a roughly $5 million savings. Much of the reduction has already been made, according to Grover.

    --Budget adjustments with the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho. Mercier said the budget negotiation with the Tribe is complete and that the adjustment to flows will have no negative effect to the benefits to fish associated with this work.

  • CBB: Council Hears Presentation On How California’s Booming Renewables Affecting BPA Revenues

    solar.manColumbia Basin Bulletin
    November 17, 2017

    Randy Hardy, an energy consultant and former head of the Bonneville Power Administration (1991-97), told the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Wednesday that California is engaged in a “fascinating social experiment” in its encouragement of renewable energy, particularly solar power, with serious implications for BPA that could worsen.  

    The Golden State has fueled solar power by policy and tax incentives that have created a situation where homeowners and other energy consumers would be “crazy” not to invest in solar power, Hardy said at the Council’s November meeting in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.  

    Renewables currently provide about 30 percent of power needs in California, but that state has set a target for renewables to provide 50 percent of energy needs by 2020. Combined with low-cost natural gas and transmission-limited wind power, the overall effect is to drive electricity costs below $30 per kilowatt hour. The continuously growing solar market may keep prices below $30 for the next 10-15 years. (BPA’s wholesale power rate for 2016-17 is $33.75 per megawatt hour.)  

    “They are already at capacity for solar and that’s only going to get worse,” said Hardy, explaining how California has an ever-growing mid-day power surplus, and power load periods that occur in the evening and night hours.  
    “It’s already had tremendous implications for Bonneville,” partly because it has washed away the spring hydropower surplus, said Hardy, who heads up Hardy Energy Consulting Co.  

    Hardy warned there is even potential for California solar energy prices to go zero or below zero, and because of the tax benefits, it may even make sense for solar power to producers to keep generating power despite below-zero prices.   “You still get the tax credit to keep producing,” he explained.   Hardy predicts there will be increasing curtailments on power production, and not only during the summer months. He explained how curtailments basically work: solar power producers will be compelled to “trip the breaker and the solar plant shuts down.”  

    But the tax incentives will still be in place and it will still be economical to keep building solar power infrastructure, continuing to exacerbate the surplus problem. Hardy said California officials so far are “very reluctant to admit there are any problems associated with this … that adds to the dynamic of trying to address this,” and he believes that reluctance is partly due to labor interests associated with the solar power industry.  

    BPA is faced with some tough choices, Hardy said, but there are some upsides in the outlook. Hydropower and natural gas are modern, flexible energy resources. Hydro can meet demands in California during periods that solar can’t provide it.  

    Increasingly, “transmission, transmission, transmission” will be a leading driver for moving renewable energy, he said, noting that up-start independent solar power producers are already finding they cannot transmit the energy they produce. Hardy surmises that large-scale electricity storage is still about 10 years away.   BPA has transmission capacity, but Hardy said there may be bottlenecks in the system where they didn’t exist before.  

    “The industry is in the midst of enormous technological changes and it is fascinating to watch,” said Hardy, noting that Seattle has, by every account, more commercial construction going on than any other city in the country. Despite the apparent increase in power demands that new development would bring, Seattle’s power load is actually going down due to modern light bulbs and electrical systems that are being put to use city-wide.  

    Hardy ultimately suggested that marketing its flexible, on-demand energy, transmission capacity and moving to longer term contracts — five to seven years — at above cost prices could be part of a more solid financial outlook.  

    Jim Yost, an Idaho council member, wondered if removal of upper Snake River dams — a move that has been advocated by many — may become unavoidable in a low-cost energy environment.  

    Hardy said that may be worth considering eventually, but for now the dams provide 15 percent of the power system’s valuable transmission capacity while providing just 5 percent of the power the system generates. He reiterated that transmission capacity is becoming very valuable.  

    Bill Booth, an Idaho council member who resides in Coeur d’ Alene, said BPA potentially faces a “financial crisis,” even bankruptcy, if the surplus low-cost power situation persists.  

    Hardy noted during his talk that “continued low-power prices for Bonneville will leak into other areas like fish and wildlife,” along with other financial pressures and necessary operational changes to get hydropower to markets at the right high-demand times.  

     

  • CBB: Cross-Border Coalition Urges Collaboration In Modernizing U.S.-Canada Columbia River Treaty

    Columbia River GorgeFriday, February 12, 2016

    A cross-border coalition from a broad group of 51 organization and associations are urging the U.S. and Canadian governments to modernize the 52-year old U.S.-Canada Columbia River Treaty in order to protect the environmental values of the river.

    The groups sent a letter this week to policymakers from the United States and the Canadian province of British Columbia urging them to develop and share critical information as an essential step in protecting and restoring the Columbia River and its watershed as they negotiate the treaty.

    “As citizen-based coalitions in Canada and the United States, we are writing on behalf of organizations in both countries that collectively represent millions of people,” the letter says.

    The letter was signed by Martin Carver of Nelson, British Columbia, Principal, Aqua Environmental Assoc. and by Joseph Bogaard, Executive Director of Save Our Wild Salmon Coalition in the U.S.

    “We support modernizing the 1964 U.S.-Canada Columbia River Treaty, to improve the health of basin ecosystems and ensure that the river and its people are more resilient to the increasing effects of climate change,” the letter continues.

    Other signers include leaders from conservation, commercial and recreational fishing, and faith communities. The letter is addressed to Canada’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Stephane Dion; United States Secretary of State John Kerry; and British Columbia’s Premier Christy Clark.

    A copy of the letter can be downloaded here.

    “Modernizing the Columbia River Treaty to meet the challenges of the 21st Century must focus on protecting and restoring the health of this important river and its watershed,” Carver said.

    According to the coalition’s news release, Carver is among the non-governmental leaders in Canada working with those in the United States to broaden the Treaty’s current scope to include a new purpose that prioritizes the protection and restoration of the Columbia River.

    The scope of the original Treaty of 1964 was limited to just two purposes, the coalition says – coordinated power production and flood management – and that the upcoming negotiations between the U.S. and Canada provide an opportunity to elevate the ecological needs of the river and address the mounting impacts of climate change.

    “The organizations signing this letter represent millions of people who understand that the health of the Columbia River and the interests of communities in both nations will be best served by Treaty negotiations based on collaboration rather than competition,” Bogaard said. “Though the Columbia River might span two countries, it is one river within its own watershed. Our two nations need to work together to manage and protect it as a single system.”

    The letter offers two recommendations:

    1. adding “ecosystem-based function” as a third Treaty purpose

    2. developing a “common U.S.-Canada analytic base to explore and assess
    operational scenarios and watershed futures across the whole Columbia
    basin.”

    Restoring ecosystem-based functions could include such measures as restoration of wetlands, riparian areas and floodplains; approximation of natural hydrographs; reduced impacts of reservoir and dam operations on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems; fish passage and reintroduction of anadromous species; and adaptive management to continuously improve ecosystem functions, the letter says.

    The common analytic base would “provide a framework for understanding the potential for improvement of ecosystem function, and also to adequately assess tradeoffs and synergies between all water uses in the basin (ecosystems, power production, flood control, irrigation, domestic, navigation, etc.).”

    The 1,242 mile-long (2,000 km) Columbia River originates in the Canadian province of British Columbia before flowing south into Washington State. It forms the border between Washington and Oregon before it flows into the ocean between the two states. It has been heavily dammed primarily for power, water storage and flood management.

    “The health of the Columbia River’s ecosystem was compromised from over- development in the last century and now climate change in this one,” said Greg Haller, conservation director for Pacific Rivers in Portland. “A modernized Treaty must protect and restore the health of the river, its fish and wildlife and help ensure that its communities are more resilient to the intensifying effects of climate change.”

    “The Canadian portion of the river was heavily impacted by the construction of dams pursuant to the 1964 Treaty” said Bob Peart, executive director of the Sierra Club of BC.  “Treaty modernization offers the best chance for restoring some of the ecological values and environmental services that were lost when the dams were built and that continue to be impacted on a daily basis. The health of the river will benefit if both nations work together towards mutual environmental goals.”

    The Treaty was first established by the United States and Canada in 1964 to coordinate power production and flood management on the Columbia River. Important provisions of the Treaty are set to expire in 2024 and a window to update or modernize the Treaty opened in September 2014, according to the coalition.

    As it approaches the Treaty negotiations with British Columbia, the U.S. State Department in June 2015 said it would include ecosystem-based functions, along with power production and flood control, in the talks.

    http://www.cbbulletin.com/436053.asp

  • CBB: Draft Annual Salmon Survival Study Considers Impacts Of Lower Snake Dam Breaching, More Spill

    salmon1.massFriday, Oct. 06, 2017

    An annual study that looks at salmonid survival through Snake and Columbia river dams for the first time evaluated juvenile fish survival in the Snake River with and without the presence of the four lower dams on the river, as well as the impact on survival if spill is increased, as it may beginning next year.

    The Fish Passage Center released a draft of its annual Bonneville Power Administration-funded Comparative Survival Study in late August and is asking for comment from fisheries managers and the public by October 15. The final CSS is scheduled for completion by the end of December.

    The study weighs in on two court-ordered issues: a requirement to consider an option for recovering Snake River salmon and steelhead by breaching the four lower Snake River dams and the value of more spill.

    The study says that its analysis provides insight into the potential for dam breaching and whether it can play a role in recovering the Snake River spring/summer chinook that are listed under the federal Endangered Species Act.

    “The results presented demonstrate the relative sensitivity of survival and long-term return abundance to changes in hydrosystem operations,” the draft CSS says. “Relying on the empirical estimates of life cycle model parameters, and particularly the finding that powerhouse passage is a significant determinant of in-river survival and early ocean survival, we demonstrated that dam breaching and increased spill can benefit population recovery in relative proportion to the productivities and capacities of the populations.”

    The analysis predicts that average return abundances and smolt-to-adult returns increase at higher levels of spill and when dams are breached. That is “owing to the empirical finding that survival is higher when powerhouse passage and water transit times are lower.”

    The draft study also says that the results are preliminary because the future conditions simulated by the CSS model are speculative and have a strong influence on predicted survival, but also because the passage assumptions after breaching the dams have not been empirically tested.

    “The predicted outcomes represent approximations of the relative magnitude of increased survival and return abundance that are predicted relative to expected passage and water transit time values under flow, spill, and breach conditions,” the draft study says.

    In a river that still has the four dams in place, the report predicts a 2 to 2.5 fold increase in return abundance when spill is increased beyond levels called for in the latest biological opinion for the federal Columbia/Snake river power system, and up to levels that would result in total dissolved gas levels of 125 percent.

    If the lower Snake River dams – Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite dams – are breached and the remaining four lower Columbia dams – McNary, John Day, The Dalles and Bonneville dams – operate at BiOp spill levels, then the CSS analysis predicts a 2 to 3 fold increase in abundance above that predicted at BiOp spill levels in a river where the four dams remain. If the TDG limit at the Columbia River dams is increased to 125 percent, then the analysis predicts a 4-fold increase in abundance without the Snake River dams.

    “This analysis predicts that higher SARs and long-term abundances can be achieved by reducing powerhouse passage and water transit time, both of which are reduced by increasing spill, and reduced further when the lower four Snake River dams are breached,” the draft CSS concludes.

    This part of the analysis was triggered by two decisions in U.S. District Court in Portland by Judge Michael H. Simon.

    In May 2016 Simon rejected the 2014 biological opinion for salmon and steelhead for the Columbia River hydropower system and ordered a new BiOp be completed by the end of 2017. In addition to sending federal agencies back to the drawing board to redo the BiOp, Simon said that in the National Environmental Policy Act process that was to follow and is currently underway, that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should analyze breaching the four lower Snake River dams as a reasonable and prudent alternative to retaining the dams.

    In addition, conservation groups, the state of Oregon and the Nez Perce Tribe asked for injunctive relief that resulted in court-ordered earlier spring spill in a January 9 filing, enjoining the BiOp case.
     
    The draft CSS study analyzes both dam breaching and spill from a biological perspective by estimating fish survival benefits of the breaching. It will leave to others to analyze the costs of breaching.

    It analyzed four spill levels – BiOp spill; increased spill up to 120 percent TDG in tailraces of the dams; 120 percent TDG spill; and up to 125 percent TDG spill, and three flow levels.

    The Independent Scientific Advisory Board will evaluate the study and its methodology.

    In Chapter 5 of the draft CSS, it examines the association of SARs to life-cycle productivity for wild spring/summer chinook and steelhead.

    “Major population declines of Snake River spring/summer Chinook and steelhead are associated with SARs less than 1 percent, and increased life-cycle productivity has occurred in years that SARs exceeded 2 percent,” it says. “Pre-harvest SARs in the range of 4 percent to 6 percent are associated with historical (pre-FCRPS) productivity for Snake River spring/summer Chinook. Historical levels of productivity for John Day river spring Chinook are associated with pre-harvest SARs in the range of 4 percent to 7 percent.”

    The “Comparative Survival Study of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer/Fall Chinook, Summer Steelhead, and Sockeye DRAFT 2017 Annual Report,” can be found at http://www.fpc.org/documents/CSS/DRAFT2017CSS.pdf.

    Comments should be sent by October 15 to Michelle DeHart at mdehart@fpc.org.

    The study’s project leader is the FPC’s DeHart, but the report is compiled by the Comparative Survival Study Oversight Committee and the Fish Passage Center. Contributors include Jerry McCann, Brandon Chockley, Erin Cooper and Bobby Hsu of the FPC; Howard Schaller and Steve Haeseker are from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Robert Lessard is with the Columbia River InterTribal Fish Commission; Charlie Petrosky is from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Eric Tinus, Erick Van Dyke and Adam Storch are from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; and Dan Rawding is with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

    http://www.cbbulletin.com/439682.aspx

  • CBB: Heading Into Summer Water Supply Forecasts Across Basin Above Normal; One Of Wettest Years

    stanleybasin.snowFriday, May 12, 2017

    No matter the location in the Columbia and Snake river basins, as the region heads into summer, forecasts for water supply are all above normal, driven by higher than normal precipitation and snowfall during the 2016-17 water year. Overall precipitation across the basin since October 2016 has put the water year as the eighth wettest in a 57-year record. And the January to July water supply forecast at The Dalles Dam on the mainstem Columbia River was the fifth wettest on record at 139 percent of normal, although that has dropped slightly in the April to August forecast to 127 percent of normal with a forecast of 111.123 million acre feet. “The take-home message is that this year we’re ranking in the highest number of wet years, ever,” Doug Baus of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers told the interagency Technical Management Team at its first meeting in three weeks Wednesday, May 10. Even if below record levels, all of the Columbia River basin’s storage dams are forecasted to have above normal water supplies this year, according to the May water supply forecasts posted to the Corps’ website May 3 (http://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/tmt/documents/WSF/WSF_WY17_05.pdf).

    The April to July water volume forecast for Hungry Horse Dam, according to Mary Mellema of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, which operates the dam, is 1.878 million acre feet, 119 percent of normal. The dam is on the South Fork of the Flathead River in Montana. On the Snake River at Lower Granite Dam, the upstream dam of the four lower Snake dams, the water supply forecast, April to July, is 29.118 MAF, 147 percent of normal. Libby Dam is 8.190 MAF, April to August, 139 percent of normal. Libby is located on the Kootenai River in Montana. A water supply of 2.941 MAF, 121 percent of normal, April to July, is expected at Dworshak Dam on the North Fork of the Clearwater River in Idaho. Grand Coulee Dam on the upper Columbia River in Washington is expected to have a water supply, April to August, of 68.159 MAF, 120 percent of normal. The water supply forecast, April to August, at Albeni Falls Dam on the Pend Oreille River in Idaho is 16 MAF, 130 percent of normal. Precipitation throughout the basin was far above normal (average of annual precipitation from 1981 to 2010), especially in the Snake River basin where annual precipitation in the upper Snake River basin upstream of Hells Canyon Dam was 140 percent of normal and 145 percent in the basin above American Falls. The Payette River basin was 147 percent of normal, the middle Snake River tributaries were at 143 percent of normal. In the Upper Columbia River basin, the Flathead River precipitation was 138 percent of normal and Kootenai River basin was 133 percent of normal. In Canada, the Columbia River upstream of Arrow Dam was 113 percent of normal. Precipitation in the middle Columbia River upper tributaries was 118 percent of normal; the Yakima River was 112 percent of normal; and the lower tributaries in the middle Columbia River was 118 percent of normal. The Columbia River mainstem precipitation, as measured both above Grand Coulee Dam and above The Dalles Dam was 126 percent of normal. Precipitation at The Dalles Dam in March was 176 percent of normal and in April it was 129 percent of normal, according to Baus. Precipitation in the Willamette River basin upstream of Portland was 138 percent of normal. Water Year Precipitation Tables for water year October 1, 2016 through May 9, 2017 are at https://www.nwrfc.noaa.gov/water_supply/wy_summary/wy_summary.php?tab=4. The water in the basin, both rain and the melting of lower level and some higher level snow, is resulting in significant flows and spill that is causing high total dissolved gas in the tailraces of Northwest dams (http://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/ftppub/water_quality/spill/201705.html). Spill is generally capped when total dissolved gas exceeds 115 percent to 120 percent, but with the high flows, spill over the gas cap is unavoidable this year. The 24-hour average flow at Little Goose Dam on the lower Snake River was 165,000 cubic feet per second this week on Tuesday, May 9. Some 79.7 percent of the flow, or 131.4 kcfs, was from spill, which created a TDG in the dam’s tailwater of around 128 percent. Of the 429.9 kcfs of flow at McNary Dam, 300.7 kcfs or 70 percent was from spill, which on May 9 created a TDG in the dam’s tailwater of 129 to 130 percent. The Dalles Dam flow, spill and TDG were similar, but spill at the John Day Dam was a lower 194.9 kcfs or 44.4 percent spill of the total flow of 433.4 kcfs. TDG in the John Day tailwater, however, was high, between 133 and 136 percent. The 6 to 10 day forecast is for continued below average temperatures, but with near normal precipitation, Baus said. Looking out over 30 days, however, there is an equal chance of normal or above normal temperature and rainfall (https://www.nwrfc.noaa.gov/climate/climate_fcst.cgi).

  • CBB: Hot Summer. Will Sockeye Get Slammed Again?

    bonneville damFriday, June 24, 2016

    Columbia Basin fish and water managers are planning for operations at Dworshak Dam on the Lower Snake River to regulate water temperatures for the benefit of migrating sockeye salmon this summer. It was the dominant topic at Wednesday’s meeting of the Technical Management Team, an interagency panel that guides hydro operations throughout the basin. And, it has been a topic on the minds of all Columbia River federal and state fisheries managers, as well as basin hydroelectric managers this year as they met in a forum in May. The forum was organized by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council to share data and set up what the Council is calling an “early warning system.” The focus is on how warm water can harm sockeye spawners and the best way to keep temperatures below a 67 degree Fahrenheit threshold in waters between Dworshak and Lower Granite dams to aid that passage. TMT and other managers want to stay ahead of the game by keeping Snake River temperatures as low as possible, rather than trying to re-cool water after it gets warm.

    As it stands, the plan from TMT this week is to maintain temperatures at 67 degrees or lower using flow augmentation from Dworshak Dam beginning June 29. The lower Snake River has had the fortune of maintaining relatively cool water temperatures recently, but a warming trend is expected to begin July 1. The 12-hour average temperature in the Lower Granite Dam tailwater yesterday was 61.26 degrees F. That’s expected to rise to about 64 degrees by June 27. Flow augmentation from Dworshak Dam in order to maintain the 67 degree target or less gets underway once the river reaches 65 degrees. There was some discussion at TMT about setting the target at 66 degrees or less, but it would involve starting flow augmentation earlier and that could use Dworshak’s valuable stored cold water earlier, leaving less water for later in the summer. Oregon TMT representative Erick Van Dyke said there should be a greater emphasis on paying  attention to water temperatures throughout the entire lower Snake River, rather than concentrating on temperatures in the reach between Dworshak Dam on the North Fork of the Clearwater River and Lower Granite Dam on the Snake River. Most Snake River sockeye in 2015 died before they reached Ice Harbor Dam, the lowest dam on the river. There is growing evidence that summer sockeye are the most vulnerable to harm from warm water, compared with other salmon runs. “Last year we saw some pretty clear indications that sockeye were affected by thermal blockages in the river,” one TMT member remarked. “Of all the fish we try to benefit in the river system, sockeye end up being in the worst condition in this section of river.” In 2015, low flow conditions, coupled with extremely high air temperatures and warm water in the major tributaries in the lower Snake and Columbia rivers from mid-June to mid-July, resulted in the highest mainstem temperatures recorded in the Columbia River. At 68 degrees F sockeye salmon begin to die and most of the fish passed Bonneville Dam in 2015 after the water temperature had hit 73 degrees F. The Northwest Power and Conservation Council heard a “lessons learned” report at their meeting in April from Ritchie Graves, chief of the Columbia Hydropower Branch at NOAA Fisheries. “There was a lot of in-season discussion about survival and getting fish past the Snake River projects,” Graves told the Council. “But, we probably talked too long. We needed to act more decisively.” Graves and Idaho Department of Fish and Game’s Russ Keifer presented a draft of the report to the Northwest Power and Conservation Council that examined why few Snake River sockeye made it to Lower Granite Dam and even fewer found their way to spawning grounds. For  background, see CBB, April 15, 2016, “NW Power/Conservation Council Hears ‘Lessons Learned’ Report On High Mortality For 2015 Sockeye Run,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/436491.aspx In fact, 99 percent of Snake River sockeye that were counted crossing Bonneville Dam died before they reached the upper Salmon River’s Sawtooth Valley where the salmon, listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act, spawn. Just 56 adult sockeye salmon made it on their own to the Sawtooth Valley and another 51 were transported from a trap at Lower Granite Dam to the Eagle Hatchery in Idaho. And only 3 percent to 4.5 percent of the fish heading up the Columbia River and into the Okanagan River ever made it to the spawning grounds. Some 10 percent to 15 percent made it to the Wenatchee River to spawn, the passage report said. More recently, the Council has been heading up an effort to improve data-sharing and accelerate decision-making when hot weather heats water beyond what biologists believe is the upper thermal limit for salmonids, and sockeye are the most sensitive to higher temperatures. The idea is, in essence, to create an early-warning system. In May, more than 30 representatives of fish and dam management agencies talked by conference call about how to ready the region for another summer like 2015. The conference was inconclusive, but, according to Council information,  topics emerged for future talks that include (http://www.nwcouncil.org/news/blog/sockeye-warm-water-update-june-2016/): --Consider setting a water temperature trigger for emergency actions below the lethal limit of 68 degrees so that fish aren’t on the edge of catastrophe before options are discussed. --Improve coordination and communication through existing committees that oversee river conditions and advise on fish-passage actions, such as the Fish Passage Advisory Committee and TMT. --Document the locations of cool-water refuges where migrating adult salmon and steelhead can reside temporarily when water temperatures are high. --Positon mobile laboratories along river corridors to be able to respond quickly to assess dead fish and determine causes of death and the effects of temperature. --Close fisheries and reduce irrigation withdrawals in tributaries when conditions are lethal in order to protect fish and keep cool water in streams. --Over the long haul, overlay climate-change models with the location of fish kills to improve the ability to forecast where and how often low flows and high temperatures might affect fish, then develop place-specific mitigation plans. --Conduct additional temperature monitoring in rivers and in fish ladders. One action that worked in 2015 was NOAA’s timely permitting process along with efficient actions by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game and the Nez Perce Tribes. The actions allowed Snake River fisheries managers to begin trap and haul operations at Lower Granite Dam when it appeared that sockeye had hit a thermal limit at the dam and would not enter the fish ladder. Since then, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has installed a permanent adult fish ladder water cooling system that will pull cold water from deep in the Lower Granite forebay into the fish ladder. (See Corps information on the project at http://www.nww.usace.army.mil/Missions/Fish-Programs/Lower-Granite-Fish-Ladder-Temperature-Improvement/ and CBB, June 17, 2016, “Corps Moves Forward On Fish Passage Improvements At Lower Granite Dam, Includes Fish Ladder Cooling,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/436933.aspx) At the same time, adult migration will be monitored at both Lower Granite and Lower Monumental dams. Adult health will be monitored at the Lower Granite trap and if a passage emergency is declared, Snake River sockeye will be transported from the dam to Idaho. The group will meet again, probably in December.

  • CBB: Hot Summer. Will Sockeye Get Slammed Again? (2)

    bonneville damFriday, June 24, 2016

    Columbia Basin fish and water managers are planning for operations at Dworshak Dam on the Lower Snake River to regulate water temperatures for the benefit of migrating sockeye salmon this summer. It was the dominant topic at Wednesday’s meeting of the Technical Management Team, an interagency panel that guides hydro operations throughout the basin. And, it has been a topic on the minds of all Columbia River federal and state fisheries managers, as well as basin hydroelectric managers this year as they met in a forum in May. The forum was organized by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council to share data and set up what the Council is calling an “early warning system.” The focus is on how warm water can harm sockeye spawners and the best way to keep temperatures below a 67 degree Fahrenheit threshold in waters between Dworshak and Lower Granite dams to aid that passage. TMT and other managers want to stay ahead of the game by keeping Snake River temperatures as low as possible, rather than trying to re-cool water after it gets warm.

    As it stands, the plan from TMT this week is to maintain temperatures at 67 degrees or lower using flow augmentation from Dworshak Dam beginning June 29. The lower Snake River has had the fortune of maintaining relatively cool water temperatures recently, but a warming trend is expected to begin July 1. The 12-hour average temperature in the Lower Granite Dam tailwater yesterday was 61.26 degrees F. That’s expected to rise to about 64 degrees by June 27. Flow augmentation from Dworshak Dam in order to maintain the 67 degree target or less gets underway once the river reaches 65 degrees. There was some discussion at TMT about setting the target at 66 degrees or less, but it would involve starting flow augmentation earlier and that could use Dworshak’s valuable stored cold water earlier, leaving less water for later in the summer. Oregon TMT representative Erick Van Dyke said there should be a greater emphasis on paying  attention to water temperatures throughout the entire lower Snake River, rather than concentrating on temperatures in the reach between Dworshak Dam on the North Fork of the Clearwater River and Lower Granite Dam on the Snake River. Most Snake River sockeye in 2015 died before they reached Ice Harbor Dam, the lowest dam on the river. There is growing evidence that summer sockeye are the most vulnerable to harm from warm water, compared with other salmon runs. “Last year we saw some pretty clear indications that sockeye were affected by thermal blockages in the river,” one TMT member remarked. “Of all the fish we try to benefit in the river system, sockeye end up being in the worst condition in this section of river.” In 2015, low flow conditions, coupled with extremely high air temperatures and warm water in the major tributaries in the lower Snake and Columbia rivers from mid-June to mid-July, resulted in the highest mainstem temperatures recorded in the Columbia River. At 68 degrees F sockeye salmon begin to die and most of the fish passed Bonneville Dam in 2015 after the water temperature had hit 73 degrees F. The Northwest Power and Conservation Council heard a “lessons learned” report at their meeting in April from Ritchie Graves, chief of the Columbia Hydropower Branch at NOAA Fisheries. “There was a lot of in-season discussion about survival and getting fish past the Snake River projects,” Graves told the Council. “But, we probably talked too long. We needed to act more decisively.” Graves and Idaho Department of Fish and Game’s Russ Keifer presented a draft of the report to the Northwest Power and Conservation Council that examined why few Snake River sockeye made it to Lower Granite Dam and even fewer found their way to spawning grounds. For  background, see CBB, April 15, 2016, “NW Power/Conservation Council Hears ‘Lessons Learned’ Report On High Mortality For 2015 Sockeye Run,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/436491.aspx In fact, 99 percent of Snake River sockeye that were counted crossing Bonneville Dam died before they reached the upper Salmon River’s Sawtooth Valley where the salmon, listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act, spawn. Just 56 adult sockeye salmon made it on their own to the Sawtooth Valley and another 51 were transported from a trap at Lower Granite Dam to the Eagle Hatchery in Idaho. And only 3 percent to 4.5 percent of the fish heading up the Columbia River and into the Okanagan River ever made it to the spawning grounds. Some 10 percent to 15 percent made it to the Wenatchee River to spawn, the passage report said. More recently, the Council has been heading up an effort to improve data-sharing and accelerate decision-making when hot weather heats water beyond what biologists believe is the upper thermal limit for salmonids, and sockeye are the most sensitive to higher temperatures. The idea is, in essence, to create an early-warning system. In May, more than 30 representatives of fish and dam management agencies talked by conference call about how to ready the region for another summer like 2015. The conference was inconclusive, but, according to Council information,  topics emerged for future talks that include (http://www.nwcouncil.org/news/blog/sockeye-warm-water-update-june-2016/): --Consider setting a water temperature trigger for emergency actions below the lethal limit of 68 degrees so that fish aren’t on the edge of catastrophe before options are discussed. --Improve coordination and communication through existing committees that oversee river conditions and advise on fish-passage actions, such as the Fish Passage Advisory Committee and TMT. --Document the locations of cool-water refuges where migrating adult salmon and steelhead can reside temporarily when water temperatures are high. --Positon mobile laboratories along river corridors to be able to respond quickly to assess dead fish and determine causes of death and the effects of temperature. --Close fisheries and reduce irrigation withdrawals in tributaries when conditions are lethal in order to protect fish and keep cool water in streams. --Over the long haul, overlay climate-change models with the location of fish kills to improve the ability to forecast where and how often low flows and high temperatures might affect fish, then develop place-specific mitigation plans. --Conduct additional temperature monitoring in rivers and in fish ladders. One action that worked in 2015 was NOAA’s timely permitting process along with efficient actions by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game and the Nez Perce Tribes. The actions allowed Snake River fisheries managers to begin trap and haul operations at Lower Granite Dam when it appeared that sockeye had hit a thermal limit at the dam and would not enter the fish ladder. Since then, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has installed a permanent adult fish ladder water cooling system that will pull cold water from deep in the Lower Granite forebay into the fish ladder. (See Corps information on the project at http://www.nww.usace.army.mil/Missions/Fish-Programs/Lower-Granite-Fish-Ladder-Temperature-Improvement/ and CBB, June 17, 2016, “Corps Moves Forward On Fish Passage Improvements At Lower Granite Dam, Includes Fish Ladder Cooling,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/436933.aspx) At the same time, adult migration will be monitored at both Lower Granite and Lower Monumental dams. Adult health will be monitored at the Lower Granite trap and if a passage emergency is declared, Snake River sockeye will be transported from the dam to Idaho. The group will meet again, probably in December.

  • CBB: Hot Water Temperatures Prompt Oregon/Washington To Close Deschutes, Yakima River Mouths To Fishing

    steelhead nps2 391 205 80autoFriday, August 10, 2018

    Rising water temperatures and poor passage are causing Oregon and Washington fishery managers to shut down fishing at the mouth of the Deschutes River in Oregon and the mouth of the Yakima River in Washington.

    Oregon closed to all fishing, including catch and release, the mouth of the Deschutes Aug. 9 in order to protect summer steelhead that may be taking sanctuary in the cooler water provided by the tributary of the Columbia River, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife said in a news release.

    In addition, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife closed to sockeye and summer salmon angling what is effectively the confluence of the Columbia and Yakima rivers from the Highway 395 Bridge upstream to the Interstate 182 Bridge. The closure is Aug. 6 through Aug. 15.

    WDFW said in a notice to anglers (https://fortress.wa.gov/dfw/erules/efishrules/erule.jsp?id=2179) that elevated water temperatures in the Yakima River has resulted in a barrier to fish passage. Sockeye returning to the Yakima River Basin are vulnerable to over harvest while staging in the Columbia River at the Yakima River confluence.

    Effective Aug.16 all areas of the Columbia River between Hwy 395 and Priest Rapids Dam will be closed to the harvest of sockeye, WDFW said.

    Some 155,347 sockeye have passed McNary Dam (the next dam downstream of the Yakima River) as of Aug. 8, or 68 percent of the 10-year average of 230,103. On this date last year, 63,878 had passed McNary Dam. Of this year’s passage at McNary, 656 were endangered Snake River sockeye that were counted at Ice Harbor Dam. That’s 69 percent of the 10 year average on this date of 957 fish. Last year, the number of Snake River sockeye on this date was 391. Just 268 sockeye passed Lower Granite Dam, the upper of the four lower Snake River dams.

    At its Aug. 3 meeting in Salem, the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission had directed ODFW staff to amend fishing regulations for the Columbia River near the Deschutes and in the lower Deschutes from the mouth upstream to Moody Rapids. The direction included closing this area to all fishing until river temperatures have stabilized below 68 F.

    According to ODFW, the staff will continue to monitor river temperatures and run sizes throughout the fall to determine when the area can be reopened. This is unlikely to occur prior to late-September, the agency said.

    Concerns about the vulnerability of fish to fishing pressure in the mouths of some tributaries of the Columbia River were sparked by the historically low returns of Snake River-bound summer steelhead in 2017, ODFW said. At that time the states of Oregon and Washington adopted unprecedented restrictions, including rolling closures of steelhead retention, to several fisheries to reduce mortality on these fish. In June 2018, ODFW staff outlined for the Commission a plan to take a comprehensive look at potential thermal sanctuaries throughout the Columbia River. That review process will include a series of public meetings in the fall of 2018 followed by rulemaking in early 2019.

    According to the Fish Passage Center, as of Aug. 8 some 44,526 steelhead (34 percent of the 10-year average of 132,058 for that date) had passed Bonneville Dam, including 19,481 wild fish (also 34 percent of the 10-year average of 57,969). Last year on this date, passage was 33,486 steelhead, including 15,683 wild.

    The Conservation Angler, a wild fish conservation organization approved of the closure, calling the closed area a cold water refuge.

    “While current regulations require many wild fish to be released unharmed, the lethal and sub-lethal effects of encounters in the fisheries (both indirect and direct) can and does have an impact on their fitness, survival and productivity,” said David Moskowitz, executive director of The Conservation Angler. “The very low wild summer steelhead run-size and the extreme heat and its effect on water temperatures really make this sanctuary area a critical conservation action for the entire Columbia River above Bonneville Dam.”

    The closed areas at the Deschutes River mouth are:

    --All waters south of a straight line projecting from the flashing red USCG light #2 upstream to the lower South Channel Range B marker located approximately 3/4-mile upstream of the mouth of the Deschutes;

    --The lower Deschutes River from the mouth upstream to markers placed on the downstream end of Moody Rapids.

    Also see:

    --CBB, August 26, 2016, “Identifying, Preserving Columbia/Snake Cold Water Refuges Important Salmon Recovery Tool,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/437376.aspx

     

     

     

  • CBB: Idaho Sockeye Run Second Worst In 10 Years But Good Conversion Rates From Lower Granite To Sawtooths

    salmonSeptember 29, 2017 Some 157 of the 401 Snake River sockeye that passed Bonneville Dam this year made it into the Sawtooth Basin in Idaho. That’s the second lowest run into Idaho’s Sawtooth wilderness in the last 10 years. The worst year was during the low and hot water conditions of 2015 when just 91 of the sockeye returned. Nearly half of those fish had to be trapped at Lower Granite Dam, far short of their destination in the Sawtooth Valley, and hauled to Eagle Hatchery. The other half completed the 900 mile journey to the Sawtooths. Snake River sockeye were listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act in 1991. The comparison, however, between this year and 2015 ends there. About 4,000 Snake River sockeye passed Bonneville in 2015, part of a run of more than 500,000 sockeye that flooded into the Columbia River basin (most were headed into the upper Columbia River and the Okanagan Valley). But an estimated 90 percent of the Snake River fish perished in the more than 70 degree waters of the Columbia River before even arriving in the Snake.

    This year, the total estimated run of sockeye was much smaller: the preseason forecast was 198,500 fish, with 1,400 of those headed to the Snake River. However, poor passage numbers at Bonneville Dam resulted in a mid-season downgrade in the forecast by the U.S. v Oregon Technical Advisory Committee to 88,200 fish as measured at the river’s mouth, with just 401 heading to the Snake River. Overall, 227 sockeye salmon passed Lower Granite Dam, the most upstream of the four lower Snake River dams, and 157 were trapped in the Sawtooth Basin this summer, according to Idaho Department of Fish and Game information. "We are very pleased with this return given the estimate of only about 400 Idaho sockeye made it to Bonneville Dam this summer based on PIT tag estimates," said Eric Johnson, research fisheries biologist for ODFG. Biologists were concerned about so few fish crossing Bonneville in early summer and whether they would complete the 900-mile migration from the Pacific that includes crossing through eight dams and climbing 6,500-feet elevation to the Sawtooth Basin, IDFG said. But Johnson said migration conditions were good for Idaho sockeye because rivers did not warm until most of the sockeye had already reached the Salmon River. Cool water from a higher-than-average snow pack helped their final leg from Lower Granite Dam about 30 miles downstream of Lewiston to the Sawtooth Basin. "This year, we observed higher-than-average conversion rates between Lower Granite Dam and the Sawtooth Basin," Johnson said. Conversion rate is the ratio of fish that arrive at an upstream point, in this case the Sawtooth Basin, from a downstream point (Lower Granite Dam). The run is well-below last year's return of 595 fish, IDFG continued, and the second-lowest in a decade. The 10-year average is 690 sockeye trapped annually in the Sawtooth Basin, which ranged from a high of 1,579 to a low of 91. While recent sockeye runs to the Snake River are tiny compared with other salmon runs, they’re a vast improvement over the 1990s. When Idaho sockeye were listed only four adults returned to the Sawtooth Basin. The combined annual returns from 1991-99 was 23 fish, which included two years when no Snake River sockeye returned. Idaho has a three-prong strategy to recover sockeye: Adults returning from the ocean are collected annually in the Sawtooth Basin at Redfish Lake Creek and the nearby Sawtooth Fish Hatchery. Some of those returning adults are spawned in the hatchery, and others released to spawn naturally in Redfish Lake. Fish and Game also raises in captivity a small population of adult sockeye that are spawned to augment those returning from ocean. Those three sources provided about 740,000 young sockeye that were released, or naturally migrated from Redfish Lake, during spring, IDFG said. All anadromous returning sockeye are incorporated into a brood year spawning matrix (this year is BY2017), with the exception of natural sockeye assigning back to Pettit or Alturas Lakes, said Marc Garst, fish production program manager at IDFG. “We have released captive broodstock from Eagle Hatchery and NOAA into Redfish and Pettit Lakes to spawn naturally,” he said. Some 99 adults were released September 12 in Pettit Lake from NOAA’s captive broodstock hatchery in Manchester, Washington. Broodstock at that facility serves “as a safety net for the Eagle Program in case of a catastrophic event,” Garst said. IDFG’s Eagle Hatchery released 305 captive broodstock into Redfish Lake September 11 and 12. NOAA released captive broodstock into Redfish Lake from Manchester September 12 (404 fish) and again September 20 (428 fish). Overall, 1,137 sockeye have been released into Redfish Lake and 99 into Pettit Lake. The 157 fish that completed their journey will all be used as spawners in the hatchery, Garst said. The justification for incorporating all anadromous returns into the BY17 broodstock matrix, according to Garst, is: “Under the IDFG Springfield Master Plan (1454 Permit) at least 10 percent of the broodstock should be natural origin returns, but if those numbers are not possible then we can back-fill with hatchery origin anadromous returns to meet the goal of 10 percent. Our goal is to incorporate 50 percent of the anadromous return and transition from 100 percent captive spawners to 100 percent anadromous spawners over time. To maximize the effective population size and retention of genetic diversity in hatchery we aim to represent each family in the brood and equalize family size at the adult stage using genetic pedigree information. We will also try to represent anadromous run-timing during the selection of spawners.” Johnson said it's still possible, but unlikely, more fish will return this fall. "We will operate the trap until around the first of October in hopes of getting another fish or two, but I would not be surprised if this is our final count for the year," he said. The best year for returns of sockeye to the Sawtooth Basin was in 2014 when 1,579 fish made the full journey. The year 2010 was second with 1,355; 2011 was 1,117; 2009 was 832, 2008 was 646; 595 in 2016; 272 in 2013; 257 in 2012; 157 in 2017; and 2015, the worst year, was 91.

     

  • CBB: Independent Science Panel Reviews Draft Report On Columbia Basin Salmon Survival

    Friday, October 27, 2017

    Sockeye in RiverAn independent panel of scientists has completed its eighth annual review of the Fish Passage Center’s draft 2017 report on Columbia River basin salmon survival, again finding that the methodology used by the FPC when calculating such items as smolt-to-adult survival and juvenile migration time and survival is already developed and useful.
     
    The Independent Scientific Advisory Board’s first review of the Bonneville Power Administration-funded Comparative Survival Study was in 2010 and many of the methods the FPC uses in the report have already been reviewed by the ISAB.
     
    The survival report now typically includes only updates to the previous year’s data and expands the analyses as more recent data are acquired.
     
    “As more data are acquired, new patterns and questions arise on the interpretation of the results—this interpretation is now the primary focus of the ISAB’s reviews,” the ISAB said in its review. “The ISAB appreciates the CSS’s detailed responses to suggestions provided in previous reviews and does not expect the CSS to necessarily respond immediately to new requests for further analyses by the next report.”
     
    The CSS is an annual study that looks at salmonid survival through Snake and Columbia river dams. For the first time it evaluated juvenile fish survival in the Snake River with and without the presence of the four lower dams on the river and it assessed the impact on survival if spill is increased, something that may occur by court order beginning next spring.
     
    (See CBB, June 23, 2017, “Litigants In Salmon BiOp Case Working Together To Develop Court-Ordered Spill-For-Fish Plan In 2018,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/439147.aspx)
     
    The Fish Passage Center released its draft report in late August and took comments from fisheries managers and the public through October 15. The final CSS is scheduled for completion by the end of December. The full draft report, titled “Comparative Survival Study of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer/Fall Chinook, Summer Steelhead and Sockeye, Draft 2017 Annual Report,” is at http://fpc.org/documents/CSS/DRAFT2017CSS.pdf..
     
    The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s 2014 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program tasks the ISAB to ensure an independent and timely science review of FPC’s analytical products, including its annual survival study. The ISAB’s full October 18 review of the report is at https://www.nwcouncil.org/media/7491355/isab-2017-2-reviewcssdraft2017annualreport18oct.pdf.
     
    The ISAB noted some changes from previous survival reports. The chapter on life-cycle modeling (Chapter 2) was updated “with a revised fit of the life-cycle model using more data, and now separate smolt-to-adult ratios (SARs ) are modeled for in-river and transported fish.”
     
    Examining 12 spill and flow scenarios, the report found similar results as last year, that more spill generally leads to higher in-river survival and improved SARs, the ISAB said. A new component was dam breaching and additional spring spill, with the report concluding that breaching would result in 10 percent better in-river survival and a doubling of SARs.
     
    Chapter 3 that looked at juvenile travel time and survival was also updated and added an investigation of the impact of total dissolved gas on the instantaneous mortality and survival probabilities of juvenile salmon and steelhead.
     
    “While this approach did not show any evidence of an impact of TDG on either instantaneous mortality or survival probabilities, a more comprehensive approach of including TDG directly in the modeling process would address concerns about the interrelationship between TDG, spill, and flow that may confound results,” the ISAB review said.
     
    Chapters 4, 5 and 6 evaluated SARs, finding that pre-harvest SARs of 4 percent to 6 percent are associated with pre-1970 levels of productivity for Snake River spring/summer chinook.
     
    What the CSS didn’t answer, according to the ISAB, was “given the large amount of effort in the past to improve SARs through dam passage improvements, habitat improvements and other changes, to what extent might further improvements in hydrosystem management, predator control, and estuarine habitat lead to achieving SARs of 4 percent-6 percent?”
     
    Chapter 8 (CSS adult success) is a new chapter that looks at the relationship between survival of adults upstream of Bonneville and travel time, temperature, and arrival date. “A complex modeling framework was used, but the ISAB is concerned that not enough assessment of the fit of the model to the data has been done to ensure that conclusions are appropriate,” the ISAB review said.
     
    The ISAB further recommended the following topics for future reports:
     
    1. Modeling flow, spill, and dam breach scenarios is very useful for policy makers. Consequently it is important that all assumptions be clearly stated and that the results are robust to these assumptions.

    1. Include other important processes in the life-cycle models. Interactions among the various populations, including compensatory responses, are important and whenever possible should be folded into future modeling efforts, particularly if restoration actions increase the abundance of out-migrants. Are predator control programs effective and what is needed to address the impacts of predators, such as pikeminnow, birds and pinnipeds?
    2. There appear to be sufficient data to try to elucidate reasons for shifts in the age distribution of returning spring/summer chinook. The ISAB suggests doing so.
    3. The graphical analysis of the impact of TDG could be improved using direct modeling to deal with potential confounding effects of spill, flow, TDG, and temperature.
    4. The (new) modeling of adult survival upstream of Bonneville should be continued and improved to identify the limiting factors to adult returns. Once these factors are identified, are there modifications to the hydrosystem operations that could be done to mitigate some of the factors?
    5. The CSS report is a mature product and the authors are very familiar with the key assumptions made and the impact of violating the assumptions. These should be collected together in a table for each chapter to make it clearer to the readers of the report.
  • CBB: Judge Denies Irrigators‚ Motion For Hearing On 2015 Spill/Transportation, Spread The Risk

    dam.irrigationColumbia Basin Bulletin

    December 1, 2017

    Irrigators in eastern Washington will not get a court hearing to show how the choice of spill over transportation in 2015 resulted in a loss of adult fish returning to the Snake River.

    The Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association had alleged that the choice in 2015 to continue spilling water for juvenile fish instead of putting them on barges resulted in the loss of 65 percent of wild spring chinook adults that would have returned in 2016 and 2017, and that the choice violated the 2014 Biological Opinion‚s mandate to spread the risk.

    Some 13 percent of juvenile salmon and steelhead were barged during the low flow and high water temperature year, the CSRIA alleged, the lowest percent transported since 1993.

    The CSRIA petitioned September 29 the U.S. District Court in Portland to convene an evidentiary hearing to air their assertions in court before Judge Michael H. Simon. That information, they said in their petition, is not being considered by NOAA Fisheries and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as they plan additional court-ordered spring spill operations at Snake and lower Columbia river dams that are to begin April 3.

    (See CBB, October 6, 2017, „Irrigators Seek Hearing In Federal Court On Spill/Transportation Protocol In Low Water 2015,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/439681.aspx)

    In May 2016, Simon remanded the 2014 BiOp and set a 5-year schedule for federal agencies ˆ the Corps, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and NOAA Fisheries ˆ to complete a National Environmental Policy Act process and redo the BiOp by 2021. The request for injunctive relief for more spill was enjoined to this case in January 2017 by the National Wildlife Federation and the State of Oregon, with the support of the Nez Perce Tribe. The groups asked the court to begin ordering spill to maximum total dissolved gas levels beginning April 3 this year and to continue for each year of the BiOp remand. Simon gave the federal agencies one year to design a spill plan, putting off the beginning of additional spring spill until April 2018.

    The federal agencies and Northwest River Partners have taken Simon‚s spill decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and are asking the Appeals Court to decide by April 3, 2018.

    The plaintiffs in the irrigators‚ case, as well as most of the defendants, objected to what they called „relitigating‰ Simon‚s spill decision and Simon agreed in his November 21 order denying CSRIA‚s motion for an evidentiary hearing.

    In his denial, Simon said that CSRIA was making the same argument that it made in opposing additional spring spill.

    „The Court did not find this argument persuasive and granted the injunction over CSRIA‚s objection. CSRIA also argues that the government has ignored its obligation to Œspread the risk‚ and has improperly reduced smolt transportation. In so arguing, CSRIA uses the exact same chart that it included in its brief in opposition to the original injunction motion,‰ Simon wrote.

    Simon went on to say that „CSRIA‚s motion is nothing more than a disguised motion for reconsideration. ∑ Any assertion by CSRIA that its current motion is not a motion to again debate the merits of additional spill is belied by the motion itself.‰

    Besides, Simon acknowledged, his decision to allow more spring spill is now being appealed before the Ninth Circuit Court and so he no longer has jurisdiction to reconsider his own opinion.

    Also see:

    --CBB, July 21, 2017, „Irrigators Petition Corps, NOAA To Investigate River Management Decisions During 2015 Low/Hot Water,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/439311.aspx

    --CBB, June 23, 2017, „Litigants In Salmon BiOp Case Working Together To Develop Court-Ordered Spill-For-Fish Plan In 2018,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/439147.aspx

    --CBB, June 9, 2017, „Federal Agencies Give Notice Of Possible Appeal Of Court Ruling Providing Earlier Spill For Fish,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/439055.aspx

    --CBB, April 1, 2016, „Corps Report On 2015 Columbia/Snake Warm Water, Fish Die-Off Will Discuss Actions To Avoid Repeat,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/436358.aspx

    -- CBB, December 2, 2016, „Irrigators Petition Trump Transition Team For ŒGod Squad‚ Intervention In Salmon BiOp Remand,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/438042.aspx

    -- CBB, December 4, 2015, „Post-Mortem 2015 Snake River Sockeye Run; 90 Percent Of Fish Dead Before Reaching Ice Harbor Dam,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/435642.aspx

    -- CBB, November 6, 2015, „Report Analyzes Impacts, Causes Of This Year‚s Warm Fish-Killing Water In Columbia/Snake,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/435505.aspx

    -- CBB, September 11, 2015, „Snake River Sockeye: Lowest Return Since 2007, Captive Broodstock Program Increases Spawners,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/434944.aspx

  • CBB: Judge Floats Idea Of Suspending Work On 2018 BiOp For Salmon/Steelhead Due To Lack Of Completed EIS

    gavelColumbia Basin Bulletin

    December 1, 2017

    A five-year federal review of the Columbia/Snake River power system will not produce a finished environmental impact statement until 2021. That has U.S. District Court Judge Michael H. Simon asking whether a new biological opinion for salmon and steelhead, scheduled for 2018, should simply be suspended until the EIS is completed.

    NOAA Fisheries‚ biological opinion, or BiOp sets recovery standards and recovery actions for 13 species of Columbia River basin salmon and steelhead listed as threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act.

    A status conference Tuesday, November 28 in Portland, weighed the progress of the 5-year National Environmental Policy Act/EIS process required by Simon‚s 2016 order to redo the 2014 (and current) BiOp for Columbia Basin salmon and steelhead.

    The conference was also to discuss the progress of an injunctive spring spill plan that was to be done by the Tuesday meeting. A discussion of the plan for more spill at the dams for migrating juvenile fish was put off.

    Parties to the BiOp lawsuit instead debated the status of the NEPA review process that is in progress by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and NOAA Fisheries.

    Acknowledging that the next BiOp, which is due by December 31, 2018, would not have the foundation of a new EIS, Simon said that if the NEPA process will not be done by 2018, then "it would be best to dispense of the 2018 BiOp until we get to a point where we can operate under a sufficient EIS," and he asked both plaintiffs and defendants in the case to offer their thoughts on the idea.

    Until 2021, when the court-ordered BiOp is due, the system could continue to operate under the current 2014 BiOp, Simon added.

    That could also mean that the system would operate with the additional court-ordered spring spill through 2021.

    The 5-year long process under NEPA to produce an EIS was put into motion by Simon in his remand of the 2014 BiOp. At their request, Simon granted the operating agencies five years to complete the process, initially expecting a new BiOp in 2018 and another, final BiOp in 2021 at the end of the process.

    (For more information on the process background, see CBB, January 6, 2017, "Comment Period Extended For Feds‚ Scoping On New EIS For Columbia/Snake River Hydro System," http://www.cbbulletin.com/438159.aspx)

    A status report on the NEPA process from the agencies was due to the court on October 30. After a comment period in which plaintiffs weighed in on the federal agencies‚ progress, a status conference was held this week.

    The draft EIS is to be completed and ready for public review in March 2020, with the final EIS in March 2021, followed closely by a record of decision.

    In their status brief, the federal agencies described a wide-ranging NEPA review, far beyond a focus on reasonable and prudent alternatives that would inform a new BiOp, according to comments by the plaintiffs.

    In its counter brief to the federal status report, the National Wildlife Federation said that the NEPA status report by the federal agencies indicates they „have chosen to prepare an EIS that is substantially broader in scope and complexity, and so much more expensive and time consuming, than the EIS the Court indicated is necessary.

    „Rather than address the Court‚s conclusion that the agencies should comply with NEPA by preparing an EIS Œparallel in scope‚ to a new proposed action or reasonable and prudent alternative that avoids jeopardy to ESA listed species from operation of the federal dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers, Federal Defendants have embarked on preparing a sweeping system operations EIS that seeks to consider and balance all of the multiple purposes and uses of the hydrosystem and of each dam.

    „This unnecessary choice will lead to an EIS that obscures, rather than clarifies, the tradeoffs among reasonable alternative courses of action for dam operations and mitigation measures that comply with the ESA. It also is the main cause of Federal Defendants‚ repeated expressions of concern about the demands of preparing an EIS, and of their oft-repeated anxiety about meeting the current remand schedule.‰

    The plaintiffs also noted that the process would violate NEPA in 2018 by issuing a biological opinion that would include proposed reasonable and prudent alternatives "without any accompanying NEPA analysis or document, the very problem the Court asked the agencies to address and resolve in their status report."

    Simon agreed but said he did not have the authority to change the NEPA schedule, leaving the scope and schedule up to the federal agencies. He would, however, entertain a motion that would dispense of the 2018 BiOp and leave the 2014 BiOp in place until the conclusion of the NEPA process and new BiOp in 2021.

    Todd True of Earthjustice and lead attorney for NWF said plaintiffs would submit such a proposal in January.

    However, the defendants‚ lead attorney at this week‚s status conference, attorney Romney Philpott, III, of the Justice Department, disagreed, saying that "NOAA Fisheries and the action agencies are focused on meeting the deadlines originally proposed."

    He added that it‚s absurd to say the NEPA review is too broad.

    "The ESA is a very important issue and it will be fully covered," Philpott said at the status conference, "but it‚s not the only issue. We‚re intent on complying with your order, but we also have the NEPA requirements. The proposal to get rid of the 2018 BiOp tries to solve a problem that doesn‚t exist."

    "You‚re not anticipating an EIS until 2021 and we need to ensure that the next BiOp I see is NEPA compliant," Simon said. "The best way to integrate, coordinate and sequence these obligations is to suspend the 2018 BiOp and wait to see the 2021 BiOp."

    Rather than the broad NEPA review proposed by the defendants, True said the federal agencies should first focus more on the range of alternatives that would comply with the ESA and then they could go on to evaluate the impacts on all their other obligations.

    Attorneys James Buchal of the Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association and Jay Waldron of the Inland Ports and Navigation Group, both defendant intervenors in the BiOp case, suggested that the real reason plaintiffs want to suspend the 2018 BiOp is to extend the experimental spring spill out to 2021.

    In response to this worry of some defendant intervenors, Simon suggested all parties propose how spill would be extended or ended. That, he said, could be included in a proposal on whether to suspend the 2018 BiOp.

    The request for injunctive relief for more spill for fish was enjoined with the earlier case argued in Simon‚s court that resulted in the remand. The spill plea was brought to Simon in January 2017 by the National Wildlife Federation and the State of Oregon, with the support of the Nez Perce Tribe. The groups asked the court to begin ordering spill to maximum total dissolved gas levels beginning April 3 and to continue for each year of the BiOp remand. Simon agreed that more spring spill will benefit ESA-listed fish, but delayed the action while federal agencies completed a spill plan for the lower Snake and Columbia river dams.

    However, the spill decision was appealed by the federal agencies and Northwest River Partners in early June to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the parties have now moved forward on expediting the appeal, asking the Appeal Court for a decision prior to the additional spill beginning April 3, 2018.

    Also see:

    -- CBB, Nov. 3, 2017, "Federal Agencies Update Court On NEPA, EIS Process For Columbia/Snake Salmon, Steelhead" http://www.cbbulletin.com/439818.aspx

    -- CBB, June 23, 2017, "Litigants In Salmon BiOp Case Working Together To Develop Court-Ordered Spill-For-Fish Plan In 2018," http://www.cbbulletin.com/439147.aspx

    --CBB, May 19, 2017, „Spill Advocates, Federal Agencies Agree To Status Conference Schedule, Protocol In Salmon BiOp Case,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/438950.aspx

    -- CBB, April 7, 2017, "Court Order Requires Earlier Spill For Salmon In 2018; Orders Design Study, Monitoring," http://www.cbbulletin.com/438675.aspx

    -- CBB, May 6, 2016, "Federal Court Again Rejects Columbia Basin Salmon/Steelhead Recovery Plan; Orders New BiOp By 2018," http://www.cbbulletin.com/436667

  • CBB: Listed Steelhead Move Into New Habitat Created By Removal Of Obsolete Dam On Idaho's Potlatch River

    March 24, 2017

    maxresdefaultWhen a couple of concerned citizens witnessed adult steelhead spawning downstream from an obsolete dam outside a small town in Idaho, local agencies came together to remove the fish barrier and restore passage to historic spawning grounds unattainable for nearly 100 years. City of Troy’s mayor Ken Whitney said Cliff Swanson lives on the outskirts of this Latah County town 11 miles from Moscow. In 2012 he said Swanson took pictures of steelhead spawning below the Dutch Flat Dam. Swanson said a friend called and told him about seeing the steelhead. He took several still photos and video of spawning fish downstream from the dam. Swanson’s video got a lot of attention, Whitney said, and a movement to take out the dam got momentum. According to Brian Knoth, who oversees Potlatch River steelhead monitoring and evaluation for Idaho Fish and Game, the dam was also on his agency’s radar. Since 2005, Knoth said his agency has been monitoring wild steelhead due to their threatened status on the Endangered Species List. He said the Potlatch’s steelhead is an important component of the larger Clearwater River population, a tributary to the Snake River. Knoth said Fish and Game surveys identified Dutch Flat as a barrier to steelhead passage blocking adults from spawning grounds and juveniles from getting downstream.

    “Removing the Dutch Flat Dam was one of the first major restoration projects in the Potlatch River watershed,” Knoth said. Swanson said before the dam was removed a Fish and Game biologist filmed futile attempts by steelhead to jump over the barrier. Latah County Soil and Water Conservation District got involved with Bill Dansart as the main planner on the project. He said the dam was originally constructed in 1919 to store Troy’s water supply, but by 1925 the reservoir had filled in with sediment. “It (the reservoir) became a slab of concrete with a bunch of dirt behind it - then it became an area folks used as an unofficial dump site,” Dansart said. After Snake River Basin steelhead were listed, the species’ habitat, especially habitat degraded as badly as the area around the Dutch Flat Dam, qualified for restoration funding. Not long after Swanson shot his video, a design to demolish the dam was drawn up and a variety of agencies shared the cost burden, including the Bonneville Power Administration and NOAA’s Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Fund. Environmental Protection Agency money passed through the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality and the City of Troy. Troy city public works employees spent the better part of the summer of 2013 removing the dam using jack hammer attachments and excavators, Dansart said, but the project didn’t get the same level of attention as the removal of the Elwha or Condit dams in Washington. “I would say most of the people in the county didn’t know it existed,” Dansart said. Swanson said you can barely see the tiny stream from a nearby hiking trail that connects Moscow and Troy or an adjacent road. After the city crews removed the dam they cut in a new channel 10 feet wide and a foot deep for the creek, connecting it to a channel below the dam, Dansart said. Now the stream is carving its own channel. Whitney said the area looks a lot nicer now; the shrubs, forbs and grass the conservation district planted have all but covered up the former dump site. Since the dam’s removal Dansart said North Latah County Highway District replaced culverts that were impeding fish passage and Idaho Fish and Game are tracking how far fish are getting upstream. Knoth said in 2015 as part of the state’s monitoring effort radio tags were inserted into adult steelhead coming over Lower Granite Dam, the last of the Lower Snake hydroelectric projects. “One of the reasons we were putting radio tags in steelhead was to know where they were spawning and how they are interacting with some of the restoration work going on,” Knoth said. The first time steelhead were documented upstream from the old dam was in 2015. Knoth said three radio-tagged steelhead were tracked migrating past the former dam site and six redds were found in a subsequent spawning ground survey. Swanson said in 2015 he captured images of steelhead spawning above the old dam site. Steelhead seem to be finding the new access quite suitable. In 2016 Knoth said redd surveys documented five steelhead redds, five live fish and one spawned-out carcass. Looking for signs of spawning in this tiny stream is part of Fish and Game’s large scale monitoring work in the Big Bear Creek drainage as well as the greater Potlatch River watershed. “The restoration in the Potlatch is just getting started,” Knoth said. In the coming years Knoth said he anticipates Fish and Game will be involved with more barrier removals along with projects that add large, woody debris to streams to create more complex habitat, meadow restoration and flow supplementation throughout the Potlatch River basin.

    http://www.cbbulletin.com/438579.aspx

  • CBB: Memo Offers Preliminary 2019 Juvenile Salmon/Steelhead Survival Estimates Through Columbia/Snake Dams; Sockeye Show Improvement

    September 26, 2019

    1sockeye.web 2Survival estimates for juvenile salmon and steelhead during the 2019 spring migration through Snake and Columbia river dams – Lower Granite Dam to Bonneville Dam – varied: Snake River sockeye survival was above average, while Snake River yearling chinook survival was near average, and Snake River steelhead survival fell below average, according to a recently released NOAA Fisheries memorandum.

    The Sept. 19 memo from Richard Zabel, director of the Fish Ecology Division at of NOAA’s Northwest Fisheries Science Center, to Ritchie Graves, chief of the NOAA Fisheries’ West Coast Region Columbia River Hydropower Branch summarizes conditions in the rivers and provides preliminary estimates of survival for salmon and steelhead passing through the reservoirs and dams.

    The memo also includes estimates of travel times and the proportion of juveniles that were transported this year from Snake River dams.

    The memo, “Preliminary survival estimates for the passage of spring-migrating juvenile salmonids through Snake and Columbia River dams and reservoirs, 2019,” is at http://pweb.crohms.org/tmt/agendas/2019/0925_2019_Preliminary_Survival_Estimates_Memo_.pdf.

    It was introduced this week at the interagency Technical Management Team meeting Wednesday, Sept. 25, by Paul Wagner and Claire McGrath, both of NOAA Fisheries. Wagner said a final report with updates will be published in February or March 2020. Survival estimates could change at that time by as much as 4 percent, he said.

    The study, funded by the Bonneville Power Administration, relies on information from PIT-tagged salmon and steelhead, including 21,332 river-run hatchery steelhead, 15,261 wild steelhead and 6,363 wild yearling chinook salmon released into the tailrace of Lower Granite Dam, the memo says.

    Overall, water temperatures were average during the spring migration, with just a few spikes with higher temperatures; flows were generally high, especially in the Snake River; and with a new spill agreement, spill was higher than in most past years, the memo says. Spill as a percentage of flow at Snake River dams averaged 38.5 percent, higher than the long-term mean (2006-2019) of 34.6 percent. In addition, total dissolved gas was higher and averaged between 115 to 120 percent.

    In general, here is how juvenile salmon and steelhead survived their outmigration from upstream of Lower Granite Dam on the Snake River to the tailrace at Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River:

    After several years of juvenile survival that was far below average due to water chemistry issues at the Springfield Hatchery in Idaho, Snake River sockeye salmon, listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act in 1993, continued to rebound. At 43.4 percent from Lower Granite to Bonneville, Snake River sockeye survival (hatchery and wild) was above the long-term average of 40.7 percent.

    Survival of Snake River sockeye outmigrating juveniles took a hit in 2017, with a survival estimate from Lower Granite to Bonneville for combined hatchery and wild fish of just 17.6 percent, which was the fourth lowest survival estimate from 1998 to 2017, according to that year’s survival estimate by NOAA. That was the third consecutive year the juvenile Snake River sockeye survival had been below the 39.2 percent average. 2016 survival was 11.9 percent and 2015 was 37.3 percent. The highest survival – 82 percent – was in 2008.

    Upper Columbia sockeye survival from Rock Island Dam to Bonneville was higher than Snake River survival, with an estimated survival of 73.7 percent, far higher than the 10-year average for that reach of 50.6 percent.

    At 54.5 percent, survival estimates for PIT-tagged yearling chinook salmon from seven hatcheries upstream of Lower Granite Dam down to the dam were some of the lowest on record since 1998. Mean survival was 63 percent. 

    Yearling chinook salmon traveling from the Lower Granite tailrace to McNary Dam survived at an average of 62.8 percent (long-term average is 73.3 percent), and survival from McNary to the Bonneville tailrace was 83.8 percent (average is 70.2). The mean estimated survival for yearling chinook from Lower Granite to Bonneville was 52.6 percent and the long-term average is 52.1 percent.

    For yearling chinook, adding the Lower Granite pool, survival from the Snake River trap to Bonneville Dam was 41.3 percent, far below the long term average of 48.9 percent.

    “Yearling Chinook survival through the hydropower system was below the mean in the previous four years 2015-2018; these low system survival estimates were driven mostly by poor survival in the McNary to Bonneville reach, while survival in Snake River reaches was generally high. These trends were reversed in 2019, with above average survival in the McNary to Bonneville reach but poor survival in several Snake River reaches,” the memo says.

    Wild Snake River yearling chinook survived at a higher rate. Survival from Lower Granite to McNary was 66.9 percent and from McNary to Bonneville 81.3 percent. Survival from the Snake River trap to Bonneville was 47.2 percent, which is slightly above the long-term average of 44.9 percent.

    Survival for Snake River steelhead (hatchery and wild combined) was above average in all individual reaches except for the John Day Dam to Bonneville reach where survival was below average. It was above average from Lower Granite to McNary (71.8 percent), but below average for McNary to Bonneville (59.5 percent). The combined Snake River steelhead survival estimate from the Snake River trap to Bonneville Dam tailrace was 41.2 percent, below the long-term average of 45.7 percent. From Lower Granite to Bonneville, survival was 42.7 percent, below the long-term mean of 47 percent.

    “In contrast to Chinook in 2019, this below-average estimate is driven by poor survival in the McNary to Bonneville reach; steelhead generally had above average survival in the Snake River,” the memo says.

    Again wild fish fared better. Wild Snake River steelhead survival from Lower Granite to McNary tailraces was 77.2 percent, and from the McNary tailrace to Bonneville tailrace it was 64.0 percent. Estimated survival from the Snake River trap to the Lower Granite tailrace was 97.3 percent, which resulted in estimated survival from the Snake River trap to the Bonneville tailrace of 48.1 percent, which is higher than the long-term average of 41.8 percent.

    Fish from the upper Columbia River also had mixed results:

    The estimated survival of hatchery yearling chinook migrating from the upper Columbia from the McNary tailrace to the Bonneville tailrace was 78.5 percent, near the long-term average of 81.2 percent.

    Hatchery steelhead survival from the upper Columbia was 60.6 percent from McNary to Bonneville, which is below the long-term average of 76.4 percent.

    Some 41.6 percent of wild spring-summer chinook smolts were transported this spring and 33.6 percent of hatchery spring-summer chinook smolts were transported. Some 36.7 percent of wild steelhead and 36.4 percent of hatchery steelhead were transported. The study estimates that 32 percent of hatchery chinook and 47 percent of hatchery and wild steelhead had migrated prior to transporting. Juveniles were transported either from Lower Granite, Little Goose or Lower Monumental dams beginning April 24. The date transport started in 2018 was April 23.

    In April chinook travel times were several days longer than they were in 2017 and 2018. However, in May chinook travel times decreased to levels similar to 2017 and 2018.

    Steelhead travel times were about one day longer in 2019 than they were in 2017 or 2018, the memo says.

    “Since the institution of court-ordered spill in 2006, and the concurrent installation of surface collectors at four additional federal dams during that period, travel times have decreased on average between Lower Granite and Bonneville dams for steelhead, but the effect is smaller for Chinook,” the memo says.

  • CBB: More Salmon/Steelhead To Columbia River Than Last Year, But Forecasts Mixed Among Species 

    Friday, March 15, 2019

    2salmonballet.webNOAA Fisheries saw the lowest number of juvenile coho salmon in 21 years in offshore test nets in 2017, leading to low returns of coho to the Columbia River basin one year later in 2018 when the fish were adults.

    However, in 2018 NOAA netted many more juvenile coho than in 2017 and that signals a better adult coho run in 2019, according to a briefing this week at the Northwest Power and Conservation Council in Portland.

    Much of the reason is improving ocean conditions – cooler water than the ocean warmup during the 2014 – 2017 “blob” with more fat-rich food, said Brian Burke of NOAA’s Northwest Fisheries Science Center.

    Burke and biologists from Washington, Oregon and Idaho briefed the Council Tuesday, March 12, on 2018 fish run results and offered forecasts for 2019.

    Overall, the number of salmon and steelhead forecasted to arrive at the mouth of the Columbia River will be higher this year than in 2018, with 1.3 million chinook, coho, sockeye and steelhead expected in 2019 compared to last year’s actual return of 665,000 fish, said Dan Rawding, Columbia River policy and science coordinator with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Still, that’s far below the total run of salmonids of more than 3.5 million in 2014.

    The upriver component of the total salmonid run is forecasted at 968,000 fish this year compared to last year’s 619,400.

    Leading the increase in the total number of fish is coho. Last year the forecasted run size was 286,200, but the actual run size was half that at just 147,300 fish. This year, biologists are forecasting a run size of 726,000 coho.

    However, ocean conditions affect species differently, Rawding said, as the various species and runs have different timing when they both enter the ocean and when they return to the river, and each species has its own migration pattern when offshore.

    As a result, predicted run sizes for the remainder of the species are simply near or below what last year’s runs were, which was not a particularly good year for most Columbia River species of salmon and steelhead.

    Upriver spring chinook will continue a series of years with very low returns: this year the forecast is 99,300 upriver spring chinook at the river’s mouth, which is lower than last year’s forecast of 166,700 fish and the actual run size of 115,000. In years before The Blob, the run size averaged about 200,000 fish, with over 300,000 in 2010 and about 140,000 in 2013.

    The forecast for Upper Columbia River spring chinook, listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act, is 11,200, including 2,100 wild fish. Last year’s actual run was 12,844, with 1,977 wild, and the forecast last year was a bit more optimistic at 20,100, with 3,400 wild. The 2014 run was about 38,000 fish, with about 4,000 wild.

    Upper Columbia summer chinook forecast is down to 35,900 fish from last year’s actual return of 42,120 (the forecast in 2018 was 67,300). Upper Columbia summer chinook have been in a steady decline since 2015’s run of over 120,000 fish.

    According to Lance Hebdon, anadromous fishery manager at the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, of the upriver spring/summer chinook, some 6,130 natural origin spring/summer chinook will migrate into Idaho this year. That’s down from last year’s actual return of 6,863 (the forecast was 12,655). The 10-year average is 16,912, but the minimum abundance threshold for recovery is 31,750.

    The hatchery origin spring/summer forecast, he said, is 25,701 chinook. Last year’s actual run was 31,820 and the forecast was 53,218. The 10-year average is 58,393.

    Fall chinook are forecasted to return this year in higher numbers than in 2018. Some 340,400 fish are expected to return to the Columbia River’s mouth, with 261,100 upriver fish. The 2018 run was less at 291,100 (214,000 upriver) and the forecast was 375,700 (286,200 upriver).

    Natural origin fall chinook into Idaho “really is a bright spot,” Hebdon said. They are forecasted at 5,435 fish, also down from last year’s actual return of 6,133 fish (forecast was 6,113), but higher than the minimum abundance threshold of 4,500. The 10-year average is 10,708.

    The forecast for hatchery fall chinook into Idaho is 10,016, a little higher than last year’s actual count of 9,936. The 2018 forecast was for 12,013 and the 10-year average is 28,321.

    Columbia River chum, which historically did not pass Celilo Falls near The Dalles, Rawding said, will come in this year about the same as last year’s actual run – 10,000 fish. That’s about average for 21st century chum runs, but far below the peak run in 2016 of about 42,000 fish.

    Some 42,900 Willamette River spring chinook are expected this year, according to Art Martin, Columbia River Coordination Section Manager for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. That’s about half-way between last year’s forecast of 55,950 fish and the actual return last year of 39,660. In 2010, about 120,000 spring chinook returned.

    The upriver summer steelhead actual return at 100,483 was the lowest on record, Rawding said. The 2019 forecast is just a bit higher at 126,950. Last year’s forecast was 190,350. The return in 2009 was about 600,000 fish, but the numbers have mostly declined since.

    For Idaho, natural origin summer steelhead is forecasted at 17,615 fish, higher than the 2018 actual run of 10,834 fish. The forecast last year was 24,780 and the 10-year average is 29,166. However, the minimum abundance threshold at 21,767 fish is higher than the 2019 forecast. Of the total 16,950 are expected to be A-run fish and 665 B-run fish.

    “The B-run (natural origin) is pretty low, but the hatchery summer steelhead performed much worse than the wild,” Hebdon said. “Last year the run was actually the worst until you go back to the 1990s.”

    The 2019 run of hatchery summer steelhead is forecasted at 43,085, slightly higher than 2018 when the actual run was 38,086 fish (forecasted to be 71,300) The 10-year average is 116,426 fish. Some 38,150 will be A-run fish and 4,935 B-run.

    There will be a slight uptick in wild winter steelhead, almost all which are below Bonneville Dam, Rawding said. Some 14,400 are forecasted in 2019, while last year’s forecast was 11,700 and the actual run was 11,323. The return was about 24,000 in 2016, but dropped to about 10,000 in 2017.

    Columbia River sockeye are forecasted to continue the low returns experienced the last couple of years, with this year’s forecast set at 94,400 fish. Some 210,915 were forecasted last year, but just 99,000 showed up at the mouth. About 650,000 returned in 2014.

    Wild Snake River sockeye, listed as endangered under the ESA, are forecasted to be a very low 43 fish. That’s “because we prioritize hatchery production” as they rebuild the stock, Hebdon said. Just 36 wild fish returned last year, although the forecast was far higher at 216. The 10-year average return is 194.

    The hatchery return of Snake River sockeye is also very low, he said, forecasted at 86. Last year’s actual return was 240, the forecast was 162 and the 10-year average is 873.

    Spring chinook anglers downstream of Bonneville Dam in 2018 kept 7,500 hatchery fish in 90,000 angler trips. 600 hatchery fish were kept from Bonneville to the Oregon/Washington border and 740 hatchery fish were kept in the Washington waters in the Snake River, according to information provided by Rawding.

    Summer season: 1,000 hatchery chinook, 2,400 hatchery steelhead and 400 sockeye were kept downstream of Bonneville in 27,500 angler trips; 430 hatchery chinook and 100 sockeye were caught from Bonneville to Priest Rapids Dam; 3,000 hatchery chinook and 16,100 sockeye were kept from Priest Rapids Dam to Chief Joseph Dam.

    During the fall season, Buoy 10 anglers caught 11,600 chinook and 6,800 hatchery coho in 67,300 angler trips. The catch downstream of Bonneville was 9,800 chinook, 650 hatchery coho and 1,100 hatchery steelhead in 69,600 angler trips.

    Some 6,700 chinook were kept at Hanford Reach in 20,100 angler trips.

    Non-tribal commercial gillnetters fishing the 2018 fall season in the mainstem river caught 8,300 fall chinook and 380 coho (spring and summer mainstem fishing was closed to them). Select Area Fisheries (SAFE) gillnetting took 8,700 chinook in the spring, 2,200 chinook in the summer and 15,000 chinook in the fall, along with 12,500 coho.

    Treaty gillnetters and hook and line fishers took 10,900 spring chinook, 9,300 summer chinook, 5,400 sockeye, 1,200 summer steelhead in the spring and summer, and 5,000 summer steelhead in the fall. In fall fishing, they took 49,800 fall chinook and 3,600 coho.

  • CBB: NOAA Fisheries proposes expanding critical habitat for killer whales from Washington to California; New details on eating Columbia River fish

    September 19, 2019

    orca eating salmon CFWRNOAA Fisheries is proposing to expand critical habitat for Southern Resident killer whales along the West Coast, based on information about their coastal range and habitat use.

    The proposal would extend critical habitat for the whales along a roughly 1,000-mile swath of West Coast waters between the depths of 6.1 meters (20 feet) and 200 meters (about 650 feet) from Cape Flattery, Wash., south to Point Sur, California, just south of Santa Cruz and Monterey Bay. The additional area covers roughly 15,626 square miles, or more than 10 million acres.

    NOAA Fisheries is seeking public comments on the proposal.

    Research documenting the Southern Residents’ use of coastal waters included collection of prey and fecal samples. Genetic analysis of the samples showed that while frequenting the West Coast the whales prey on salmon from as far south as California’s Central Valley and as far north as the Taku River in Alaska.

    “We now know more clearly that that the whales rely on a diversity of salmon stocks from different rivers up and down the West Coast,” said Lynne Barre, recovery coordinator for the Southern Resident killer whales in NOAA Fisheries’ West Coast Region. “The critical habitat proposal takes that all into account.”

    The designation of critical habitat pertains to federal agencies, which must avoid damaging or destroying critical habitat. Activities that are not funded, authorized, or carried out by a federal agency remain unaffected.

    Critical habitat recognizes areas with the physical and biological features essential to the conservation of listed species. In the case of Southern Resident killer whales, that includes:

    Water quality that supports growth and development of the whales

    Sufficient prey species to support growth, reproduction and development

    Passage conditions that allow the whales to migrate, forage, and rest

    In 2006 NOAA Fisheries designated critical habitat for the killer whales in the inland waters of Puget Sound and the Salish Sea, where the whales typically spend much of the year. At the time there was not enough information to support extending the critical habitat to the outer coast.

    Since then, satellite tracking, acoustic monitoring and sightings data have confirmed that two of the three Southern Resident pods regularly range south along the West Coast as far as the Central California Coast during winter. The third pod, J Pod, typically remains further north, either in inland waters or off the west side of Vancouver Island.

    The critical habitat proposal includes six sections of coast, each with different habitat features. For instance, the availability of prey was the primary habitat feature along the Washington and northern Oregon coasts, the Northern California Coast, and the Monterey Bay area of California.

    The proposal excludes the Navy’s Quinault Range Site off the coast of Washington and a 10-kilometer (6.2 mile) buffer around it, because the impacts to national security outweigh the benefits of designating it as critical habitat.

    Research supporting the critical habitat proposal includes new details of the Chinook salmon stocks and other species that the Southern Residents prey on during winter off the West Coast.

    Most of the Chinook the whales were documented eating came from the Columbia River Basin, including spring Chinook from the lower Columbia, fall salmon from the middle Columbia, and spring/summer Chinook from the upper Columbia.

    While they mainly preyed on Chinook salmon, the whales also consumed halibut, lingcod, steelhead, chum, skate and northern anchovy at times.

    While traveling the outer coast, the whales spent time during every month of the year off the Washington Coast, generally ranging between the Strait of Juan de Fuca and the mouth of the Columbia River given the seasonal abundance of salmon there. The whales also spend much of their time in late winter and early spring near the mouth of the Columbia River, coinciding with spring Chinook salmon returning to the Columbia and Snake rivers.

    The Center for Biological Diversity in August, 2018 filed a lawsuit with the Western District Court of Washington in Seattle, aiming to compel the government to proceed with a rule expanding and revising “critical habitat” designations for coastal waters used by the whales.

    The group contended the agency has failed to protect West Coast habitat of a distinct and imperiled population of killer whales that is now estimated to include just 75 orcas.

    The lawsuit said the Southern Resident killer whale population had reached its lowest point in 34 years and is continuing to decline, and that as of June 2018, the population estimate came to just 75 individual whales.

    “Low availability of Chinook salmon, the whales’ primary prey, is contributing to their decline, and many of the animals are starving and emaciated. Southern Resident killer whales have failed to reproduce successfully since 2015. The principal threats to Southern Resident killer whales — starvation, contamination from toxic pollution and harassment from noise and vessels — can be reduced by better habitat protections.”

    Earlier that month, NOAA Fisheries and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife unveiled a prioritized list of West Coast chinook salmon stocks that are important to the recovery of killer whales. Several of the chinook stocks are also listed under the Endangered Species Act.

    In January of 2014, The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned the National Marine Fisheries Service to expand critical habitat designations for waters off the Washington, Oregon and California coasts. The agency determined in February of 2015 that revising the designations is warranted, and indicated that new designations would be proposed in 2017.

    “To date, the agency has failed to propose, much less finalize, a rule to revised Southern Resident killer whale critical habitat,” the August, 2018 lawsuit said. “This ongoing delay deprives these endangered killer whales of important legal protections and the population has experienced an alarming decline in the meantime.”

    “We’re happy these endangered orcas are finally getting the habitat protection they desperately need,” said Julie Teel Simmonds, an attorney at the Center, said Wednesday. “Expanding orcas’ habitat protection will help save these extraordinary animals and their prey from pollution, harassment and habitat degradation. Orcas are in crisis, and we need quick, bold actions to ensure their survival.”

    A draft Biological Report for the Proposed Revision of the Critical Habitat Designation for Southern Resident Killer Whales says “Human activities managed under a variety of legal mandates have the potential to affect the habitat features essential to the conservation of Southern Resident killer whales, including those that could increase water contamination and/or chemical exposure, decrease the quantity, quality, or availability of prey, or could inhibit safe, unrestricted passage between important habitat areas to find prey and fulfill other life history requirements.”

    “Examples of these types of activities include (but are not limited to): (1) salmon fisheries and bycatch; (2) salmon hatcheries; (3) offshore aquaculture/mariculture; (4) alternative energy development; (5) oil spills and response; (6) military activities; (7) vessel traffic; (8) dredging and dredge material disposal; (9) oil and gas exploration and production; (10) mineral mining (including sand and gravel mining); (11) geologic surveys (including seismic surveys); and (12) upstream activities (including activities contributing to point-source water pollution, power plant operations, liquefied natural gas terminals, desalinization plants). These activities were identified based on NMFS’ ESA section 7 consultation history since 2006 for existing critical habitat, along with additional information that has become available since the original designation.”

    The biological report describes “categories of activity and their potential effects on the essential habitat features in areas being considered for new critical habitat designation.”

  • CBB: NOAA Releases New 2019 BiOp For Columbia Basin Salmon/Steelhead; Includes Flexible Spill 

    April 2, 2019

    slider.spill.damA new biological opinion for the federal Columbia River power system aimed at protecting and recovering salmon and steelhead listed under the federal Endangered Species Act was completed Friday and posted without fanfare to the NOAA Fisheries website.

    The new 2019 BiOp supersedes NOAA’s 2008/2014 BiOp, which was remanded in federal court in 2016.

    In remanding the BiOp, U.S. District Court Judge Michael H. Simon said, among other things, that the 2014 BiOp was not supported by a full-blown National Environmental Policy Act process.

    For that reason, hydroelectric action agencies are now in the midst of completing a NEPA environmental impact statement of the eight lower Snake and Columbia river dams. That process, resulting in a new BiOp, is due for completion in late 2020. However, this 2019 BiOp is not supported by a NEPA process.

    While Simon did not require NOAA to complete a BiOp this year, the fisheries agency said last year it would complete a 2018 BiOp (now a 2019 BiOp) so that it can update its incidental take statement.

    The new BiOp was expected at the end of 2018, but the action agencies initiated consultation with NOAA in order to incorporate a flexible spill operations agreement signed and delivered to Simon’s court Dec. 18, 2018 by the Bonneville Power Administration, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, the states of Oregon and Washington, and the Nez Perce Tribe. Consultation was initiated Nov. 2.

    Also delaying the final 2019 BiOp was the January government shutdown.

    The new flexible spill operation for juvenile salmonid passage that is now tucked into the new BiOp began this week (April 3) at lower Snake River dams, according to the Corps. Spill at lower Columbia River dams begin next week, April 10.

    Spring spill in 2019 looks different than it did in previous years, the Corps said in an April 2 news release. It began implementation of its 24-hour flexible spill operations for the purpose of supporting downstream juvenile fish passage while also providing operational flexibility that allows federal power system benefits at these dams.

    “This year’s operation allows us to take advantage of the off-peak, lower power demand hours to provide 16 hours of spill for juvenile fish passage, while reducing spill for up to eight hours during periods of greater power demand,” said Tim Dykstra, senior fish program manager for the Corps’ Northwestern Division.

    The transition to summer spill begins June 21 at Snake River dams and June 16 at Columbia River dams. Summer spill for juvenile fish passage ends at all eight dams at midnight September 1.

    According to NOAA, the effects of its proposed action in the new 2019 BiOp “are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence” of the 13 species of salmon and steelhead listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA.

    In addition, the agency has determined that the proposed action “will not destroy or adversely modify designated critical habitat for the same species” nor is it likely to “adversely affect Southern Resident killer whales and the southern distinct population segment of green sturgeon or their designated habitat.”

    NOAA had said last year that it needed to complete a new BiOp in 2018, even before the action agencies completed the NEPA process, so that it could take any necessary administrative steps to address incidental take of species listed under the ESA that would occur between the expiration of the 2008/2014 biological opinion and the 2020 BiOp.

    In the letter introducing the 2019 BiOp, Michael Tehan, Assistant Regional Administrator for NOAA Fisheries’ Interior Columbia Basin Office, said that an incidental take statement is included.

    The ITS includes reasonable and prudent measures (RPMs) that the agency “considers necessary or appropriate to minimize the impact of incidental take associated with this action. The take statement sets forth nondiscretionary terms and conditions, including reporting requirements that the Action Agencies must comply with to carry out the RPMs. Incidental take from actions in compliance with these terms and conditions will be exempt from ESA take prohibitions,” Tehan wrote.

    Last year spring spill to state total dissolved gas limits, known as gas caps, at lower Columbia and Snake river dams was due to Simon’s April 2017 order. He had ordered 24-hour spring spill for the year 2018 only beginning April 3 at lower Snake River projects and April 10 at lower Columbia River projects, and ending June 21 on the Snake River and June 16 on the Columbia River.

    However, with the new flexible spill agreement signed Dec. 18, although start and end dates are the same, daily timing of the spill will now be flexible as to dam and time of day in order to reduce costs to the Columbia River basin power system. The new spill agreement will be in effect until federal agencies complete by the end of 2020 a federal Columbia River power system EIS and BiOp for salmon and steelhead listed under the ESA.

    The agreement calls for flexible spill operations that meet three objectives:

    -- Provide fish benefits of spring spill in 2019-2021 for juvenile salmon migrating through the eight reservoirs that are at least equal to 2018 spring fish passage spill operations ordered by the Court;

    -- Provide federal power system benefits as determined by Bonneville, with the understanding that Bonneville must, at a minimum, be no worse financially compared to the 2018 spring fish passage spill operations ordered by the Court;

    -- Provide operational feasibility for the Corps implementation that will allow the Corps to make appropriate modifications to planned spring fish passage spill operations.

    The 2019 BiOp is at https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/hydropower/fcrps/master_2019_crs_biological_opinion__1_.pdf.

    Action Agencies continue to work on an EIS of the federal hydro system as required by the federal court. The EIS Process Schedule up to this point began September 2016 with a notice of intent, which was followed by scoping the extent and content of the EIS from September through February 2017. The agencies developed alternatives through December 2018 and are currently analyzing the alternatives.

    The agencies’ revised EIS schedule is at https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jan/09/2002077981/-1/-1/0/190109-A-A1408-001.PNG:

    -- a draft EIS will be ready for review in February 2020 (the original schedule called for the completion of a draft March 27, 2020;

    -- by June 2020, the public comment review and synthesis, preparation of the final EIS and identification of the preferred alternative will be complete;

    -- June 2020, issue final EIS (the original schedule called for a final EIS by March 26, 2021);

    -- September 30, 2020, the final Records of Decision (previously, that was scheduled one year later, Sept. 24, 2021).

  • CBB: NOAA Releases Preliminary 2018 Juvenile Salmonid Survival Estimates Through Columbia/Snake Dams

    Friday, October 12, 2018

    bonneville damYearling chinook salmon from upstream of Lower Granite Dam on the Snake River down through Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River survived at a below average rate this spring if they were from a hatchery and at an above average rate if they were wild, according to a recent preliminary report from NOAA Fisheries on juvenile survival through the hydro system.

    The information was delivered in a September 19, 2018 memo from Richard Zabel, director of the Fish Ecology Division at NOAA Fisheries’ Northwest Fisheries Science Center, to Ritchie Graves, chief of the NOAA Fisheries' West Coast Region Columbia River Hydropower Branch.

    The memo, “Preliminary survival estimates for the passage of spring- migrating juvenile salmonids through Snake and Columbia River dams and reservoirs, 2018,” is at http://pweb.crohms.org/tmt/agendas/2018/1003_2018_Preliminary_Survival_Estimates_Memo.pdf.

    The final report is generally released the following February, said NOAA’s Paul Wagner at the interagency Technical Management Team meeting Wednesday, Oct. 3. Survival estimates in the final report could change by as much as 4 percent, the report says.

    The report says that Snake River yearling chinook estimated survival from Lower Granite Dam tailrace to the Bonneville Dam tailrace was 43.2 percent, which is “substantially below the long-term (1999-2018) average of 52.1 percent.

    “Yearling Chinook survival through the hydropower system has been consistently below the mean for the past four years, despite a range of different environmental conditions within these years,” the report says.
    “These low system survival estimates seem to be driven mostly by poor survival in the McNary to Bonneville reach.”

    For Snake River steelhead the overall estimated survival from Lower Granite tailrace to Bonneville tailrace was 53.3 percent, higher than the long-term mean of 47.0 percent. This above-average estimate follows three consecutive years of survival estimates below the mean.

    Estimated survival of Snake River sockeye between Lower Granite and Bonneville tailrace was 64.3 percent, the third highest from 1998 through 2018, the report says. The component survival estimates for the
    Lower Granite Dam to McNary Dam reach and the McNary Dam to Bonneville Dam reach were both above average. This above-average estimate follows three consecutive years with very low survival.

    “The Idaho Department of Fish and Game has adjusted their acclimation methods this year in order to address the causes of the low Snake River Sockeye survival from the past three years; their efforts almost certainly contributed to the higher survival estimate this year,” the report says.

    Survival of juvenile Upper Columbia River sockeye in the McNary to Bonneville Dam reach was also above average.

    Factors that impacted survival in 2018 were higher water, more spill as a result of a U.S. District Court order and near average water temperatures during the spring migration period.

    In more detail:

    Survival for yearling chinook from hatcheries upstream to Lower Granite have been relatively stable since 1998, the report says. The 2018 mean survival was 64.8 percent. Last year’s survival was 65 percent and survival 1998 through 2018 is 65.1 percent.

    Estimated survival through the four lower Snake River projects (combined hatchery and wild) for yearling chinook was above average, but survival dropped to “substantially” below average on the trip from McNary Dam to the John Day Dam and the John Day Dam to Bonneville Dam.

    For Snake River hatchery yearling chinook:

    -- Mean estimated survival from Lower Granite tailrace to McNary tailrace in 2018 was 73.3 percent.

    -- Mean estimated survival from McNary tailrace to Bonneville tailrace was 59.0 percent.

    -- Mean estimated survival from Lower Granite tailrace to Bonneville tailrace was 43.2 percent

    -- Estimated survival for the Lower Granite project (head of reservoir to tailrace) was 88.0 percent based on fish PIT tagged at and released from the Snake River trap.

    --The combined yearling chinook salmon survival estimate from the Snake River trap to Bonneville tailrace was 38.1 percent, substantially below the long-term average of 48.9 percent.

    For Snake River wild yearling chinook:

    -- Mean estimated survival from Lower Granite tailrace to McNary tailrace was 76.0 percent.

    -- Mean estimated survival from McNary tailrace to Bonneville tailrace was 76.2 percent.

    -- Estimated survival from the Snake River trap to Lower Granite tailrace was 87.1 percent, which resulted in estimated survival from the Snake River trap to Bonneville Dam tailrace of 50.4 percent. The long- term average is 44.8 percent.

    Survival for Snake River steelhead (both wild and hatchery) was above average in all reaches between dams, although, according to the report, the reach from John Day to Bonneville was uncertain.

    For hatchery steelhead:

    --Mean estimated survival from Lower Granite tailrace to McNary tailrace was 73.3 percent.

    -- Mean estimated survival from McNary tailrace to Bonneville tailrace was 72.7 percent.

    --The combined Snake River steelhead survival estimate from the Snake River trap to Bonneville tailrace was 52.4 percent, which was above the long-term average of 45.6 percent.

    For wild Snake River steelhead:

    -- Mean estimated survival from Lower Granite tailrace to McNary tailrace was 73.6 percent.

    -- Mean survival from McNary tailrace to Bonneville tailrace was 82.2 percent.

    -- Estimated survival from the Snake River trap to Lower Granite tailrace was 84.8 percent, which resulted in estimated survival from the Snake River trap to Bonneville Dam tailrace of 51.3 percent.

    For Snake River sockeye, both wild and hatchery, the estimated survival from the tailrace of Lower Granite to the tailrace of Bonneville was 64.3 percent. The long-term average is 40.6 percent.

    The report also looked at survival for chinook and steelhead coming from the upper Columbia River. For hatchery yearling chinook:

    -- Estimated survival from McNary tailrace to Bonneville tailrace was 74.9 percent, which was below the long-term average of 81.4 percent.

    For hatchery steelhead from the upper Columbia River:

    -- Estimated survival from McNary tailrace to Bonneville tailrace was 116.1 percent, but the estimate has high uncertainty.

    -- The long-term average is 77.4 percent.

    “For fish released from upper Columbia River hatcheries, we cannot estimate survival in reaches upstream from McNary Dam (other than the overall reach from release to McNary Dam tailrace) because of limited
    PIT-tag detection capabilities at Mid-Columbia River PUD dams,” the report says.

    It also said that in this preliminary report some estimates for “technical reasons” exceed 100 percent.

    “When this occurs, we report the actual estimate, but for practical purposes these estimates should be interpreted as representing survival probabilities which are less than or equal to 100 percent,” the report says.

    The estimated survival of Columbia River sockeye salmon (hatchery and wild combined) from the tailrace of Rock Island Dam to the tailrace of Bonneville was 66.7 percent. The long-term average is 51.1 percent.

    Some 44.1 percent of wild spring-summer chinook smolts in the Snake River and 45.4 percent of hatchery smolts were transported in 2018. This is substantially higher than in most recent years, and one of the highest rates since 2006, reversing the trend of very low transportation rates during the 2015 – 2017 period, the study says.

    A reason for the higher rates is that transportation began eight days earlier on April 23, as opposed to May 1 in past years.

    “We estimate that 45 percent of the annual total passage of wild yearling chinook and 24 percent of hatchery yearling chinook occurred at Lower Granite Dam before transportation began, compared to averages between 2006-2014 of 42 percent and 31 percent respectively.”

    “These estimates represent the percentage of smolts that arrived at Lower Granite Dam that were subsequently transported, either from Lower Granite Dam or downstream at Little Goose or Lower Monumental Dam,” the report says.

    Mean flow at Little Goose Dam (April 1 – June 15) was 110,800 cubic feet per second, well above the long-term average of 92.6 kcfs.

    Mean water temperature at Little Goose Dam was 11.5 degrees Celsius (52.16 degrees Fahrenheit), which was near the long-term mean of 11.2 degrees C.

    Mean spill discharge at the Snake River dams was 41.3 kcfs, substantially above the long-term (1993-2018) mean of 27.7 kcfs. Spill as a percentage of flow at Snake River dams averaged 37.2 percent, higher than the long-term mean of 27.2 percent.

    As a result of higher flows and more spill, travel time for both chinook and steelhead from Lower Granite to Bonneville was substantially shorter than the long-term average.

    “Travel time was a record,” Wagner said. “Flow and spill resulted in the time from Granite to Bonneville in less than ten days, so they were cookin’ through the river.”

     http://www.cbbulletin.com/441656.aspx

  • CBB: NW Power/Conservation Council Hears Details On Flexible Spill Agreement To Aid Juvenile Salmonids 

     

    February 15, 2019

    DaggerFallsAn agreement was signed by federal agencies, states and one tribe in December that sets a framework for how spring and some summer spill at Columbia/Snake river dams will be conducted this year and for a couple of years into the future until its concept can be tucked into a new environmental impact statement and biological opinion of the federal power system in 2020 and into the interim 2018 BiOp expected to be released by NOAA Fisheries in April.

    The Columbia River Flexible Spill and Power Agreement was signed Dec. 18, 2018 by the states of Oregon and Washington, the Nez Perce Tribe, the Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation.

    The agreement has been acknowledged as a collaborative and creative way to provide spill to help juvenile salmon more quickly and more safely migrate downstream through Columbia and Snake river dams, while also providing benefits in electricity produced by the system for BPA. Those who devised the spill agreement are also looking to it as a model in how the fish and power sides can seek common ground on future issues.

    “We all know we have challenges ahead of us, but we hope this model will serve as an innovation for the future,” said Elliot Mainzer, BPA Administrator.

    Mainzer and others from power and fisheries agencies who were responsible for crafting the agreement laid out the backstory of how they arrived at a consensus on spring spill for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council at its meeting, Wednesday morning, Feb. 13.

    “This is impressive and great public policy that recognized the competing interests and optimizes the two,” said Tom Karier, Washington Council member after listening to the entire presentation.

    Along with Mainzer, the lead players briefing the Council were Rob Lothrop, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, Ed Bowles, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Dave Johnson and Jay Hesse, Nez Perce Tribe, Jason Sweet, BPA, Tim Dykstra, Corps, Michael Garrity, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Ben Zalinsky, BPA. All had a hand in developing the agreement.

    In 2018, spring spill to state total dissolved gas limits, known as gas caps, at eight lower Columbia and Snake river dams was by an April 2017 order from Judge Michael H. Simon of the U.S. District Court of Oregon. Simon had ordered 24-hour spring spill for the year 2018 only, beginning April 3 at lower Snake River projects and April 10 at lower Columbia River projects, and ending June 21 on the Snake River and June 16 on the Columbia River.

    However, with this Dec. 18 flexible spill agreement, although start and end dates are the same, daily timing of the spill will now be flexible as to dam and time of day in order to reduce costs to the Columbia River basin power system. In 2019, enhanced spill up to 120 percent TDG will occur during daytime hours – about 16 hours each day – and power production with less spill and more water going through the turbines will occur during shoulder periods in the evening, night and morning.

    Introducing the panel at the Council presentation, Zalinsky said that these are groups have not always historically agreed on issues, but that “we’re all committed to the principles of this agreement.” He added that CRITFC was “central to the thinking on the flexible spill issue, but it was the only organization at the table today that did not sign on to this.”

    Lothrop said that all the parties agree to the principle of the flexible spill operations and what he called the “three pillars” of the agreement: provide benefits for fish, provide federal power system benefits and provide operational feasibility.

    Showing a graph matching spill levels with survival levels for Snake River wild spring/summer chinook salmon, Bowles said there is a long history tracking spill and juvenile salmon survival, and, generally, the more spill the higher the survival.

    In addition, he said, there is a long track record of looking at the assumed negatives of spill, such as TDG. With information showing that dissolved gas levels can safely be higher than current state TDG standards, TDG levels in 2019 will rise to 120 percent in the tailraces of the eight dams (it was 115 percent).

    The Washington Department of Ecology has set in motion a public process to raise its standard to 120 percent, Garrity said, and Oregon is already at the needed standard. Acceptable TDG levels will rise to 125 percent for spill in 2020. Both Oregon and Washington will need to change their standards in the coming year. (See CBB, February 1, 2019, “Washington Ecology’s Draft EIS Raises Gas Cap To Allow More Spill For Fish At Columbia/Snake Dams.”

    According to Bowles, spill will increase when the value of power is low and will decline during times when the value of power is high (performance standard spill).

    “Daytime hours are now less profitable (for BPA) due to the amount of solar and wind in the system, but the shoulder periods are profitable,” he said.

    However, for the flexible spill to work, spill needs to be “optimized” during the hours of spill while not robbing the shoulder periods of water. “To do this, we needed to alter the water quality standards (TDG) to meet the fish spill needs,” he said.

    The result of the agreement is the avoidance of litigation in 2019 and 2020, Lothrop said. Still, there is a certain amount of uncertainty predicting fish and power effects.

    Hesse said fisheries agencies, led by CRITFC and the Nez Perce, developed an analytical tool that, during the negotiation process, helped to lower the uncertainty level.

    At the same time, a power system technical team was analyzing the impacts on the power system and operational feasibility, which is the ability of the Corps to implement the spill agreement while still meeting all Congressionally authorized purposes, Dykstra said.

    The fish benefit “logic path,” according to Hesse, starts with increased spill, decreased power house encounters by the juveniles (PITPH), increased smolt to adult survival and increased adult return abundance. The result is a drop in fish encounters (PITPH) from the 2014 BiOp spill level, indexed at 2.98, to the court-ordered spill, indexed at 1.76, to the 2019 120 percent flexible spill, indexed at 1.73, and to 125 percent spill in 2020, indexed at 1.47 at six projects and at 1.38 at John Day and The Dalles dams.

    The actual amount of spill in 2019 at Lower Granite Dam, for example, during the 120 percent spill hours is 45,000 cubic feet per second. That drops to 20 kcfs during performance standard spill when more water goes through turbines. In 2020, when TDG is 125 percent, daytime spill rises to 72 kcfs. Another example is the John Day Dam where spill this year and next year at John Day Dam will be 146 kcfs, dropping to 32 percent of the river for power production.

    Some summer spill operations are also affected and will be divided into spill June 21/16 to Aug. 14 and Aug. 15 to Aug. 31.

    Summer spill operations for 2020 are yet to be finalized, according to Sweet of BPA. “The economics are a little more challenging in 2020,” he said. “We all agree that if we can’t offset the spring costs (with power produced), we will need to do something a little different. We may need to offset spring costs with reduced summer spill.”

    Although spring and summer spill has to some extent been a part of Columbia and Snake river operations for years, more recently the initial request for injunctive relief for spring spill to gas cap levels was enjoined with an earlier case argued in District Court. The initial case, heard by Simon, resulted in a May 2016 remand of the federal Columbia River power system biological opinion for salmon and steelhead listed under the Endangered Species Act.

    The spill plea was initiated in January 2017 by plaintiffs in the original case, the National Wildlife Federation and the State of Oregon, among others. Simon agreed that more spring spill would benefit ESA-listed fish but delayed the action until 2018 while federal agencies completed a spill plan for the dams.

  • CBB: Ocean Conditions Appear To Be Heading In Right Direction For Improving Salmon-Steelhead Runs 

    March 15, 2019

    By Garfield, Harvey, Greg Williams of PFMC and Dr. Nick Tolimieri

    Chinook.SalmonCoastal waters are cooling and attracting higher value, more fat-rich food -- a good sign for salmon, steelhead and ocean predators, such as Orcas -- after several years of unusually warm conditions (2014 – 2016), when the warm water “blob” dominated coastal conditions, according to a report released last week by NOAA Fisheries.

    However, ocean conditions are still mixed.

    The good news is that copepods off Newport, Ore. are mostly of cool-water, lipid rich species; krill lengths off Northern California have increased, an indicator of available forage for salmon and other species; anchovy numbers are on the rise; and several indicators of juvenile and adult salmon survival increased slightly off the Northwest Coast, especially for coho salmon, which are expected this year at average numbers after several years of low returns, according to the report.

    The less than good news is there was still some evidence of unfavorable conditions during 2019: there is warmer than average subsurface water in the southern portion of the California Current; there is strong hypoxia (lack of oxygen) on the shelf in the northern areas; and pyrosomes (sea cucumbers) that moved north in high numbers during The Blob remain abundant in the northern and central waters.

    Although the report forecasts low returns of chinook salmon to the Columbia River in 2019 (these are the last survivors that entered the ocean during the warm years and are now returning to the basin to spawn), there is a potential for higher returns in coming years as salmon in the ocean are now benefitting from the improved conditions.

    Researchers found some of the highest numbers of juvenile coho they had ever seen off the coast, following the steep decline in marine temperatures in 2014 – 2017, leading to, perhaps, better future coho runs. Juvenile chinook salmon catches were near normal, according to the report.

    The annual report given each year to the Pacific Fishery Management Council is a product of scientists from NOAA’s Northwest Fisheries Science Center in Seattle and its Southwest Fisheries Science Center in La Jolla, Calif.

    Climate, oceanographic and streamflow indicators were near average in 2018, “though indices suggest weakening circulation and emerging mild El Nino conditions,” the report says. Ocean conditions have yet to fully return to the stable cold water pattern scientists saw prior to 2014.

    “We’re coming off of some really bad conditions and returning to more normal conditions,” Dr. Toby Garfield, director of the Environmental Research Division at the Southwest Fisheries Science Center, and co-editor of the report, said on an informational conference Friday. “Although there is this potential to return to more normal conditions, we’re concerned that a change back to warmer conditions could occur sooner than would allow for species recovery.”

    For this year – 2019 – the report calls for a 65 percent chance of a weak El Nino at least through spring, average coho returns and below average chinook salmon returns, and extensive hypoxia and acidified bottom waters over the shelf off Washington and Oregon.

    “Is this the new normal or will we return to the conditions we saw prior to 2014?” Garfield asked about the current mixed results and uncertainty.

    The report also noted an increase of 27.4 percent in West Coast fishery landings from 2016 to 2017, with revenues increasing by 12.3 percent. Most of the increase was driven by Pacific hake, Dungeness crab and market squid.

    There was also a higher number and growth of sea lions along the coast and some seabirds, a result of more food along the Pacific coast.

    Echoing Garfield’s comments, Chris Harvey, ecologist at the Northwest Science Center, and co-editor of the report, said “This is a time of transition in the California Current Ecosystem, and the ocean and marine life reflect that. What we don’t know yet is where the transition will take us – whether the system will stabilize, or keep changing.”

    “The annual report tracks a series of species, and climate and ocean conditions, as barometers of ocean health and productivity and also draws on economic indicators that reflect the state of West Coast communities,” NOAA Fisheries said in a blog by the agency’s Michael Milstein.

    It also supports NOAA Fisheries’ shift toward ecosystem-based management, which considers interactions throughout the marine food web rather than focusing on a single species.

    “Pulling all the indicators together into a picture of how the ecosystem is changing can also give us clues about what to expect going forward,” Garfield added.

  • CBB: Oregon Governor Expresses Support For Lower Snake Dam Removal; Must Mitigate ‘Potential Harm To Vital Sectors’

    February 18, 2020

    dams“The science is clear that removing the earthen portions of the four lower Snake River dams is the most certain and robust solution to Snake River salmon and steelhead recovery,” said Oregon Gov. Kate Brown in a letter last week to Washington Gov. Jay Inslee.

    “No other action has the potential to improve overall survival two-to-three-fold and simultaneously address both the orca and salmon recovery dilemma while providing certainty in the legal challenge that has complicated operations for decades,” Brown wrote.

    However, Brown was to careful note that dam removal in her view was a long-term solution and should not take place before extensive and expensive mitigation actions to protect other river uses are in place.

    “I believe restoring the lower Snake River must be a key presumption of our long-term solution for salmon and orca recovery,” Brown said, “But much must be done before this is accomplished in order to help minimize and mitigate for potential harm to other vital sectors. Among other considerations, this includes an affordable, nimble and reliable power system that can help us to integrate renewables to meet our climate goals; continued water supplies for agriculture and municipalities; and efficient and affordable ways to get commodities to market.”

    Much of the letter focused on efforts to halt the decline of Puget Sound orcas.

    “I am writing to thank for your leadership and initiative to restore health to our iconic orcas,” Brown told Inslee, “and to share with you my perspective on long-term and interim steps necessary to support that effort. The imperilment of Southern Resident Killer Whales is a tragedy shared by all of us in the Pacific Northwest and Oregon stands with you to boldly address those factors contributing to their demise.”

    Brown said Oregon’s primary opportunity to assist in these efforts is to enhance the availability of salmon to foraging orcas.

    “The recent draft report from your task force Lower Snake Dams Engagement Report provides a good context for sharing my perspective on long-term and interim steps to enhance the availability of salmon to foraging orcas.,” she said.

    Brown contends that removing the four lower Snake River dams “would likely provide a dramatic increase in salmon available for orca forage, particularly during the late winter when vulnerable gestating orcas may be foraging off the mouth of the Columbia River. This option reduces the direct and delayed mortality of wild and hatchery salmon associated with dam and reservoir passage and provides the most resilience to climate change (e.g., reduced thermal loading in the lower Snake and Columbia rivers and better access to and from the alpine headwaters most resilient to shrinking snowpacks).”

    Brown’s letter and her views on dam removal come just as federal dam operating agencies, under a federal court order, are evaluating the dams’ removal and the resulting impacts to commerce, agriculture, navigation, power generation, municipalities and threatened and endangered salmon and steelhead.

    A Columbia River System Operations (www.crso.info) draft environmental impact statement is due this month from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bonneville Power Administration and the Bureau of Reclamation.

    While Brown stressed that dam removal is a long-term solution, “In the interim, I believe there are two important actions that we can take together to address immediate needs of orcas and salmon. First, the Flexible Spill and Power Agreement that we both signed can provide the foundation for an effective bridge to a long-term solution for salmon that also preserves the hydropower system as an important tool in meeting our carbon objectives.”

    “Hopefully we can work together to improve on that agreement, which will enhance survival of juvenile wild and hatchery salmon which translate into additional orca forage only two years later,” she said.

    Brown also stressed increased hatchery production to increase food supplies for orcas.

    “Oregon has capacity to increase interim hatchery production of salmon important for orca forage. This increased production must be focused in areas with low ecological risk to existing wild salmon populations, such as lower Columbia River off-channel areas and other areas outside the range of historical natural production areas.

    “In recognition of this urgent need for orca forage, Oregon already has fish in the queue that could be available to orcas as soon as 2021. I would like to partner with you to help ensure this initiative is fully funded and sustainable during the necessary interim period while long-term solutions are addressed.”

    The Pacific Northwest Waterways Association reacted Monday to Brown’s letter, saying it expressed “Brown’s support for breaching the four lower Snake River dams.”

    “We share Governor Brown’s passion for the recovery of the three southern resident orca pods that frequent Puget Sound, and the Snake River salmon runs that make up a portion of those orcas’ diet. But the timing of the governor’s letter is surprising. The federal agencies that operate the lower Snake River dams and others in the Columbia Basin are currently conducting a comprehensive science-based evaluation of salmon and the river system, and will issue a draft report and recommendations at the end of February. That report is being developed in collaboration with and input from a variety of Oregon and Washington state agencies,” said PNWA Executive Director Kristin Meira.

    “The States of Oregon and Washington, like all other partners and stakeholders of these federal projects, will have an opportunity to review and provide feedback on the draft environmental impact statement in just a few weeks. Indeed, Governor Inslee’s office commissioned a $750,000 stakeholder engagement process to inform his review and feedback. It is surprising to see a letter of this nature, expressing a position for the State of Oregon for an extreme approach on the river system, prior to the release of the federal agencies’ proposed operations,” Meira said.

    “PNWA is also concerned about the scientifically inaccurate information in the letter. Its portrayal of the role and importance of the lower Snake River dams in the survival of the southern resident orcas is at odds with information available from NOAA Fisheries, the federal agency responsible for the recovery of both orcas and Chinook salmon,” Meira said.

    “The lower Snake River dams are federal projects. Since their construction in the 1960s and 1970s, every presidential administration and every Congress has recognized the immense benefits to the region those projects provide, and funded their continued operation accordingly and without interruption,” Meira said.

    The letter angered Washington state’s three Republican U.S. House members, who want to keep the dams, the Tri-City Herald reported.

    “Gov. Brown’s position is not only misguided, it is shocking and extreme,” said Reps. Dan Newhouse, Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Jaime Herrera Beutler, in a joint statement.

    The three said it is best to wait for the release of the court-ordered draft EIS evaluating the dams’ removal.

  • CBB: Oregon Study Shows How Increasing Abundance Of ESA-Listed Salmon Can Translate Into A Dollar Value, Deliver Economic Benefits

    August 15, 2019

    CohoFernsA new study provides evidence that increasing the abundance of a threatened or endangered species can deliver large benefits to the citizens of the Pacific Northwest. The study, “The non-market benefits of early and partial gains in managing threatened salmon” published this week in the journal PLOS ONE, finds that a two-thirds increase in the average annual number of returning coho salmon to the Oregon coast would generate up to $518 million per year in non-market economic benefits to residents of the region. The study comes the same week that the U.S. Department of Interior announced that it will implement a new rule that stipulates that economic impacts for listing a species be considered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. “When we think about actions to protect endangered and threatened species, we often focus on the costs,” said David Lewis, an economist in OSU’s College of Agricultural Sciences and corresponding author on the study. “The benefits of protecting threatened species are difficult to estimate since they are considered to be non-market and arise from the public’s values for things like the existence of abundant salmon in the wild. This study gives us a way to evaluate the benefits.” “If an agency is considering a policy or program that would increase the number of salmon by a certain amount, our study translates the benefits for that amount of salmon to a dollar value,” said Steven Dundas, study co-author and economist in OSU’s College of Agricultural Sciences and Coastal Oregon Marine Experiment Station. “This provides evidence of the economic value Pacific Northwest residents place on protecting threatened and endangered species,” Dundas said. “We can compare it to how much we actually spend on salmon restoration activities, to see if there’s a net benefit to more investment.”  The study, a collaboration between OSU and the Alaska Fisheries Science Center in Seattle, also found that the public attaches a substantial value — up to $277 million a year – to achieving conservation goals sooner rather than later. “There are sizable benefits to achieving conservation goals quickly,” Lewis said. “That has real implications for conservation programs, showing that there’s significant value to the public in up-front investments.” Another key study finding: People benefit from Oregon Coast coho salmon conservation even if the fish aren’t declared recovered and removed from listing under the ESA. “That’s an important concept,” Lewis said. “This indicates that we shouldn’t evaluate ESA activities only by whether a species is recovered or not. It’s not all or nothing.” For the study, the researchers mailed surveys to 5,000 randomly selected households in Oregon, Washington, Idaho and northern California in the fall of 2017. The surveys included scenarios with levels of attributes associated with improving the abundance of Oregon Coast coho salmon: how many fish come back from the ocean, how quickly they come back and what their conservation status would be under the ESA. Associated with these scenarios was an annual per-household cost from a combination of additional taxes and higher prices for lumber and agricultural products, ranging from $10 to $350 per year. Survey respondents then chose their preferred conservation scenario or a status quo option with $0 cost. Twenty-one percent of the surveys were returned. By analyzing the responses, the researchers determined the public’s average household willingness to pay for salmon conservation, which is then multiplied by the number of Pacific Northwest households to get the final benefit numbers. “The surveys create a situation for someone to make a decision about a public good — as if increases in salmon abundance were something they could choose off the shelf at the grocery store,” Dundas said. Lewis, Dundas and co-author David Kling are all on the faculty in OSU’s Department of Applied Economics. Co-authors also included Daniel Lew at the Alaska Fisheries Center and Sally Hacker in the Department of Integrative Biology in the College of Science at OSU. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration funded the study through its National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Competitive Research Program. The study’s abstract: Threatened species are increasingly dependent on conservation investments for persistence and recovery. Information that resource managers could use to evaluate investments–such as the public benefits arising from alternative conservation designs–is typically scarce because conservation benefits arise outside of conventional markets. Moreover, existing studies that measure the public benefits of conserving threatened species often do not measure the benefits from partial gains in species abundance that fall short of official recovery, or the benefits from achieving gains in species abundance that happen earlier in time. We report on a stated preference choice experiment designed to quantify the non-market benefits for conservation investments aimed at threatened Pacific Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) along the Oregon Coast (OC). Our results show that a program aimed at increasing numbers of returning salmon can generate sizable benefits of up to $518 million/y for an extra 100,000 returning fish, even if the species is not officially declared recovered. Moreover, while conservation investment strategies expected to achieve relatively rapid results are likely to have higher up-front costs, our results show that the public attaches substantial additional value of up to $277 million/y for achieving conservation goals quickly. Our results and approach can be used to price natural capital investments that lead to gains in returning salmon, and as inputs to evaluations of the benefits and costs from alternative conservation strategies.

  • CBB: Religious, Tribal Leaders Send To President, Prime Minister Declaration On Columbia River Treaty

    Declaration1September 26, 2014

    Religious and indigenous leaders this week transmitted to U.S. President Barack Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper a “Declaration of Ethics and Modernizing the Columbia River Treaty,” which they say should serve as the foundation for international negotiations regarding renewal of the Columbia River Treaty. “Both nations need to work together to right historic wrongs and promote water stewardship in the face of climate change,” according to the letter from the religious and tribal leaders. The letter is signed by 14 religious leaders and seven indigenous leaders representing nearly all tribes and First Nations in the Columbia River basin. "The declaration speaks very clearly of how important and critical it is for there to be justice to correct the many years of injustice to the native people of the Columbia basin, including the First Nations of Canada,” said Matt Wynne, chairman of the Upper Columbia United Tribes. UCUT is an organization involving five major interior Columbia basin tribes, the Coeur d'Alene Tribe, the Kalispel Tribe of Indians, the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, the Spokane Tribe of Indians and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation. UCUT is focused on ensuring a healthy future for the traditional territorial lands and taking a proactive and collaborative approach to promoting Indian culture, fish, water, wildlife and habitat.

    “Religious and indigenous leaders coming together to sign and support this declaration underscores that the future of the Columbia River is not just a political, but a moral issue. Native Americans suffered the greatest losses and the most damage as a result of not being included in the first negotiations leading up to the 1964 treaty. It helps keep my spirit strong knowing that our struggle for justice and stewardship of the river carries so much faith-based support." “Rarely does the convergence of political responsibility, indigenous rights, and ecosystem benefit converge in such a dramatic and urgent way,” said Bishop Mark MacDonald, the Anglican Church of Canada’s first National Indigenous Anglican bishop. “A modernized treaty for the Columbia River is an opportunity for all the peoples of the Columbia - and the great system of life which is the river ecosystem - to walk through to a new day of justice and well-being.” The CRT is an agreement between Canada and the United States for the cooperative development of water resources regulation, primarily for flood control and power generation, in the upper Columbia River Basin. It was signed in 1961 and implemented in 1964. The Columbia River is the fourth largest river on the continent as measured by average annual flow and generates more power at dams in Canada and the northwestern United States than any other river in North America. Its headwaters originate in British Columbia, but only about 15 percent of the 259,500 square miles of the Columbia River basin is actually in Canada. But Canadian waters account for about 38 percent of the average annual volume, and up to 50 percent of the peak flood waters, that flow by lower Columbia’s The Dalles Dam. The treaty says that either Canada or the United States can terminate most of the provisions of the treaty any time on or after Sept.16, 2024, with a minimum 10 years’ written advance notice. Both countries announced within the past year that they would like to update the treaty but neither has given formal notice. And negotiations have yet to commence regarding any changes to the document. A recommendation sent by the U.S. “Entity” heads of the Bonneville Power Administration and the U.S. Corps of Engineers’ Northwest Division -- in December to the U.S. State Department said that a modernized treaty would need to: “-- better address the region’s interest in a reliable and economically sustainable hydropower system and reflect a more reasonable assessment of the value of coordinated power operations with Canada;
    “-- continue to provide a similar level of flood risk management to protect public safety and the region’s economy;
    “--  include ecosystem-based function as one of the primary purposes of the Treaty; and
    “-- create flexibility within the Treaty to respond to climate change, changing water supply needs and other potential future changes in system operations while continuing to meet authorized purposes such as navigation and irrigation.” Each country has stated that the benefits stemming from the treaty – revenues from power production and flood control – need to be more fairly apportioned. The U.S. Entity says that current “entitlement” payments (currently worth $250-$350 million per year) delivered to Canada are higher than actual benefits produced in the United States today. The declaration developed by the tribes and religious leaders sets forth eight principles for modernizing the Columbia River Treaty that include respecting indigenous rights, protecting and restoring healthy ecosystems with abundant fish and wildlife populations, and providing fish passage to all historical locations. Political leaders in Ottawa and Washington D.C. have not taken a position on the renegotiation of the Columbia River Treaty. Federal agencies within the United States have recommended that the United States and Canada "develop a modernized framework for the treaty that ensures a more resilient and healthy ecosystem-based function throughout the Columbia River basin while maintaining an acceptable level of flood risk and assuring reliable and economic hydropower benefits." All four Northwest states, 15 Columbia Basin tribes, fishermen and environmentalists support that recommendation. British Columbia provincial officials released their draft recommendation in March of 2014. Their recommendation was that the treaty be renewed and that changes occur within the existing framework. The B.C. Province maintains that ecosystem values are currently an important consideration and that they should continue to be a consideration, as well as adaptation to climate change, in treaty planning and implementation.  The federal government in Ottawa that will negotiate with the United States has not yet issued Canada’s recommendations on the treaty. The declaration highlights what the tribes and religious groups say are key points regarding the rights and management authorities of the Columbia Basin tribes in the United States and the First Nations in Canada that were ignored when the Treaty was implemented 50 years ago. The declaration is based on the Columbia River Pastoral Letter, signed by the twelve Roman Catholic bishops of the international watershed, that called on everyone to “work together to develop and implement an integrated spiritual, social and ecological vision for our watershed home.” The request sent to Obama and Harper this week also follows 17 multi-faith prayer vigils held in August along the 1,200 miles of the mainstem Columbia River that focused on the need to restore salmon runs now blocked by dams. The Columbia River Treaty governs the management of the Columbia River, shared by Canada and the United States. Dams transformed the Columbia River into the world’s largest integrated hydropower machine and reduced flood risk allowing flood plain real estate development. Dams blocked returning salmon, permanently flooded vast river valleys and wildlife habitat, forced thousands of people from their homes and ancestral fishing sites, and destroyed a way of life known to indigenous people from time immemorial, according to the tribes and religious groups. “The trust, treaty and honor obligations of the United States and Canada to ensure healthy, sustainable populations of salmon, sturgeon, lamprey, bull trout and other native fish and wildlife, their habitats and other cultural resources were not provided for in the treaty and tribes were not consulted during its negotiation,” according to a press release from the tribes and religious groups. Both U.S. and Canadian recommendations have said that environmental concerns, such as restored passage for fish, should be included in treaty negotiations. Links –
    -- Declaration on Ethics & modernizing the Columbia River Treaty.
    -- Columbia River Pastoral Letter.
    -- One River, Ethics Matter (video link).

  • CBB: Report On 2018 BPA Fish/Wildlife Costs Released For Comment; $16.8 Billion Since 1981 

    Friday, March 15, 2019

    John Day Dam fish ladderThe Bonneville Power Administration spent nearly $260 million in direct costs for its Fish and Wildlife Program in fiscal year 2018, according to a draft report approved for public comment by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council.

    Since 1981, the region has spent a total of $16.8 billion for fish and wildlife programs, the draft report says.

    The “2018 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Cost Report,” also known as the Governor’s report, is the 18th annual report to Northwest Governors. It will be out for public comment until April 15, according to the Council’s John Harrison, the report’s author.

    In the report, the Council lists all the fish and wildlife costs associated with its and BPA’s program expenditures between Oct. 1, 2017 and Sept. 30, 2018. It is prepared solely for informational reasons, it says, and is not required by the Northwest Power Act.

    Total direct expenses of the program during the fiscal year amounted to $258.7 million. That is the amount that pays for projects such as habitat improvements, research, and some fish hatchery costs. Of that, $5.4 million goes to capital projects, $176 million to anadromous fish, $55 million to resident fish, $24 million to wildlife and $23 million to program support.

    Of the $258.7 million, $47 million or 18 percent goes to the Columbia Basin Fish Accords for projects that do not directly support the FCRPS biological opinion, while $57 million (22 percent) is for Accord BiOp projects.

    In addition to the direct expenses, some $89.9 million goes to reimburse the federal Treasury for expenditures of appropriated funds by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The reimbursement is for investments in fish passage and fish production, such as the O&M expenses at federal fish hatcheries, but it also includes one-half of the Council’s $11 million budget.  The other half of the Council’s budget is assigned to BPA’s Power Business Line budget.

    Debt service amounted to $105.1 million. That includes interest, amortization, and depreciation of capital investments for hatcheries, fish passage facilities at dams and some land purchases for fish and wildlife habitat.

    For BPA, spill at the dams results in lost revenue for the agency. The cost of foregone hydropower sales was $2.9 million in FY2018.

    But the agency also at times of spill or when it stores water during the winter in anticipation of increasing flows for fish later needs to supplement its power requirements with purchased power. That cost to BPA was $24.3 million last fiscal year.

    The total of these numbers -- $480.9 million – doesn’t include borrowing from Treasury ($83.2 million). That is repaid by BPA, so including them in the total as debt service on capital investments would double count some of the costs, according to the draft report.

    The total also does not reflect a credit of $70.1 million from the federal Treasury related to fish and wildlife costs in 2017. BPA is required to take the credit by the Northwest Power Act. Subtracting that credit reduces BPA’s total fish and wildlife program cost to $410.8 million.

    The $480.9 million total program cost comprises 19.5 percent of Bonneville’s entire Power Business Line costs of $2.450 billion. In addition, about one third of Bonneville’s 2017-2019 wholesale rate of $35.57 per megawatt hour is estimated to be associated with its fish and wildlife program.

  • CBB: River Managers Clarify Priorities On Using Dworshak’s Cool Water For Salmon Into September; Lower Granite Sockeye Passage Dismal So Far, Only 19 Fish

    July 18, 2019

    A system operational request brought to the interagency Technical Management Team this week by fisheries managers and approved by both fisheries and hydro managers helps clarify priorities for the use of cool water from Dworshak Reservoir on the North Fork of the Clearwater River in Idaho.seattletimessockeye Each July and August, Dworshak’s 43.5 degree water (the temperature deep in the reservoir this week) is used to maintain temperatures at under 68 degrees Fahrenheit downstream in the lower Snake River at Lower Granite Dam. That is the upper temperature allowed in Lower Granite’s tailwater, according to NOAA’s 2019 federal Columbia River power system biological opinion.  The SOR (#2019-1), the first of the year, is based on that BiOp, helping to clarify operations at Dworshak through August and into September. Last week, river temperatures at Lower Granite rose above 67 degrees and air temperatures rose, prompting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to increase releases of water from Dworshak Dam to aid the few adult sockeye salmon expected to return to the Snake River and Sawtooth Basin this year, as well as adult spring/summer chinook, steelhead and fall chinook. In addition, the cool water helps migrating juvenile fall chinook salmon, according to the SOR. Snake River sockeye salmon are listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act. In 2015, sockeye hit a thermal block as river temperatures rose considerably above the 68 degree F limit. Some 90 percent of sockeye died before reaching Ice Harbor Dam, the lower of the four Snake River dams. Idaho Fish and Game, NOAA Fisheries and the Nez Perce Tribes set up a rescue project at Lower Granite Dam to trap the adults and haul them to the hatchery at Eagle, Idaho. The preseason sockeye run size for the entire Columbia River basin was downgraded by one third to 62,800 fish based on the recent 5-year average run timing at Bonneville Dam. The preseason forecast was 94,400 fish. The U.S. v Oregon Technical Advisory Committee met July 8, downgrading the expected sockeye run (most of those sockeye will travel to mid-Columbia River tributaries, with few turning into the Snake River).  Sockeye numbers into the Snake River are low again this year. Just 19 had made it to Lower Granite by July 17, just 3 percent of the 10-year average of 693 fish. Last year on this date, 167 sockeye had passed the dam. Flows from the dam were increased to 9,450 cubic feet per second July 6, which is where it stood Wednesday during TMT’s meeting. This week, according to Jon Roberts, a water reservoir regulator with the Corps’ Walla Walla District, cooling was expected Thursday and Friday and that will help drop the temperature at Lower Granite to about 66 degrees. However, warming by late weekend and continuing into early next week is expected to heat the river up once again. The temperature in Lower Granite’s tailwater as of Thursday morning was 66.9 degrees. “With that forecast, we will begin to spill water (Thursday, July 18),” discharging 13.1 kcfs from the dam. WaDams.Dworshak.Snaketer over 9.45 kcfs is spilled and that will increase total dissolved gas levels downstream and at nearby hatcheries. The 13 kcfs flow with spill will continue until Friday, July 19, and then go to 14 kcfs to compensate for the upcoming 100 degree temperatures, Roberts said. “We want to push as much water as we can while its cool,” he said. “With the higher temperature, TDG will go up close to 110 percent, the Washington state upper limit for TDG. He added that Dworshak would be at least at full powerhouse through August and the reservoir would drop to an elevation of 1,535 feet, but it would have little cool water left for September. While they want cool temperatures in the Lower Granite tailwater, fisheries managers also want Dworshak water for flow augmentation and cooling into September. The SOR “seeks to have Dworshak summer (July and August) discharge management prioritize temperature management when allocating available water,” the SOR says. “As such, 1,535’ on August 31st should be viewed/treated as the limit for maximum drawdown, not as a target. After August 31st, water above the 1,535’ elevation (if any) would be added onto the Snake River Basin Adjudication Dworshak Dam release of 200 Kaf (200,000 acre feet) and used to extend water temperature management as far into September as possible, while still achieving a 1,520’ pool elevation by September 30.” BiOp actions for Dworshak summer water discharges target both temperature for cooling and for flow augmentation, the SOR says. It cites pages 38 and 39 of the BiOp, which says “Once the reservoir is refilled, Dworshak is operated in the summer for the gradual evacuation of water through a combination of temperature objectives to maintain Lower Granite Dam tailwater temperatures below 68° F and reach an elevation of 1535 feet by August 31 and elevation 1520 feet by September 30.”   The SOR says that “Fisheries managers support the use of Dworshak discharge to meet the Lower Granite Dam tail-water temperature criteria to not exceed 68°F between July 1st and August 31st. However, there are also biological benefits for applying cooling water for adult migrants in September. Cool water releases in September maintain a cool migratory corridor and holding areas in the lower Snake River below Lewiston, Idaho, and in the Clearwater River (including fish being held at Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery) for pre-spawn adult salmon, steelhead, and lamprey.

  • CBB: River Managers Opt To Save Cool Dworshak Water For Upcoming Salmon/Steelhead Migration

    salmonAugust 10, 2018

    With air temperatures expected to exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit this week in the Clearwater and Snake river basin, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monday increased flows of cold water from Dworshak Dam from about 10,000 cubic feet per second to 13 kcfs.

    Dworshak is located on the North Fork of the Clearwater River and the dam’s cold water is used to cool the tailwater downstream in the Snake River at Lower Granite Dam, but the cold water takes about three days to arrive at Lower Granite, according to Steve Hall of the Corps’ Walla Walla District.

    Hall told the interagency Technical Management Team meeting Wednesday, August 8, that air temperatures in the lower Snake River were expected to reach 105 degrees Wednesday, 111 degrees Thursday and 105 degrees Friday, causing an expected rise in Lower Granite tailwater temperature. Air temperatures in the basin are expected to exceed the average through September, he said.

    Dworshak water is used to hold the dam’s tailwater temperature at or below 68 degrees to improve the migration of adult salmon and steelhead.

    Complicating that cooling process is up to 24 kcfs of “very warm water” from Idaho Power’s Hells Canyon Dam, Hall said, as the utility generates more power to sell into the power market, largely to help meet air conditioning demand.

    Surface water temperature in Lower Granite’s forebay just upstream of the dam is consistently over 70 degrees and the dam’s removable spillway weir is passing 75 degree water, Hall said.

    Temperatures increase further downriver all the way through McNary Dam on the Columbia River, according to Charles Morrill of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

    As it turns out, very few fish are currently passing the dam. Just 268 endangered Snake River sockeye salmon have passed Lower Granite so far this season and the run is just about over, according to Russ Kiefer of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Further upstream in the Stanley Basin the first sockeye was trapped July 26 and as of Sunday Aug. 5, 26 have been trapped, Kiefer said. Three of the fish are wild/natural.

    Daily steelhead passage at Lower Granite is averaging about 35 fish and daily summer chinook salmon passage is averaging in the mid-20s. No fall chinook have arrived at the dam.

    In addition, juvenile subyearling chinook passage downstream is about 1,000 fish per day, according to NOAA Fisheries’ Paul Wagner.

    “As we get into September, fall chinook and steelhead will become a more significant concern,” Hall said, adding that saving some of the Dworshak water in August will aid those runs later.

    He said that to hit the elevation goal of 1,535 feet in the dam’s reservoir at the end of August, output at the dam will need to average 8.7 kcfs through the remainder of the month.

    “You need to consider which approach with limited resources you want to take,” Hall told TMT’s salmon mangers. “We can hope there will be a cooling trend, but that’s not predicted. Or, you can make a conscious decision that more water later would be more valuable, giving you greater flexibility later.”

    Fish managers opted to search for ways to save the water for later. They asked that the Corps turn off the RSWs at Lower Granite and Lower Monumental dams and for the Corps to target 68 degrees in Lower Granite’s tailwater.

    Although the federal Columbia River power system biological opinion calls for an upper limit of 68 degrees, in modeling water temperature weekly and sometimes daily, the Corps has been targeting 67 degrees in the dam’s tailwater.

    “If there is an opportunity to save water, then use it (reduce flow at Dworshak) without having to contact TMT,” Wagner said.

    The Corps this week announced in a press release that flows from Dworshak Dam are expected to fluctuate between 5 kcfs and 13 kcfs through August.

    “This process of releasing cool North Fork Clearwater water from Dworshak Reservoir to improve fish passage in the warmer water of the Snake River is part of the Federal Columbia River System’s (FCRPS) ‘salmon flow augmentation’ program,” the Corps said. “The Corps implements this part of the program annually, starting during the summer when water temperatures increase, and ending in early fall when water temperatures begin to cool naturally. The flow augmentation program allows blending of this cooler water with the warmer water arriving from the upper Snake River as it passes through Lower Granite Lock and Dam.”

    The BiOp requires the Corps, Bureau of Reclamation and Bonneville Power Administration to comply with mandated water-management actions to enhance ESA-listed fish survival on an annual basis, including:

    - Release salmon flow augmentation water to benefit resident fish and salmon.

    - Release cold reservoir water to maintain lower Snake River water temperatures below 68 degrees to improve conditions for adult salmon and steelhead migrating upstream to their spawning grounds.

    - Manage total dissolved gasses to not exceed 110-percent saturation. When water spills over the dam, gas is entrained and held in solution due to pressure differences in the water at depth. High TDG levels can be stressful for fish, the Corps said.

    Flow augmentation of 200,000 acre feet of water is important to tribes, said Jay Hesse of the Nez Perce Tribe. Even with that water, he said, fish are experiencing pre-spawn mortality. He added that the 200 kaf is distributed over 15 days of decreasing flows beginning at about 8 kcfs and rapidly ramping down.

    In addition, with high temperatures in the Tri-Cities area and rising demand for air conditioning, Ice Harbor Dam may need to increase its generation above the current minimum generation level to meet the Tri-City electricity demand, said Tony Norris of BPA. More generation means less spill at the dam.

    “The demand in the Tri-Cities was over 10 megawatts yesterday (Tuesday this week) and its possible they may need more to keep the lights on,” Norris said. “Conditions should ease Friday.”

    Norris was uncertain whether the additional generation would be needed.

    Also see:

    --CBB, July 27, 2018, “River Managers Ponder Passage Gaps For Snake River Sockeye At Lower Snake Dams,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/441185.aspx

    --CBB, July 13, 2018, “With Temps Rising, Corps Cools Snake River With Dworshak Water To Aid Endangered Snake River Sockeye,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/441108.aspx

    -- CBB, June 12, 2015, “NOAA Fisheries Releases Snake River Sockeye Salmon Recovery Plan: 25 Years Of Actions At $101 Million” http://www.cbbulletin.com/434233.aspx

  • CBB: Salmon BiOp Challengers Argue New 2018 BiOp Due End Of Year Would Be Illegal Without EIS Foundation

    gavelFriday, January 26, 2018

    Plaintiffs in a case before the US District Court of Oregon that resulted in a remand of NOAA Fisheries’ 2014 biological opinion for Columbia Basin salmon and steelhead are now arguing that the schedule for the remand should be changed.

    In a brief filed this week, National Wildlife Federation attorney Todd True said that the National Environmental Policy Act process now underway would not result in a finished environmental impact statement on the federal Columbia River power system’s impacts on threatened and endangered salmon and steelhead until 2021.

    Staying on the course set by the court to complete a BiOp by the end of this year, then, would be illegal because it would lack the backing of an EIS.

    True was echoing a question raised by District Court Judge Michael H. Simon in a status conference in late November 2017. He had set the meeting to weigh the progress of the 5-year NEPA/EIS process required by his May 2016 order to redo the 2014 (and current) BiOp for Columbia Basin salmon and steelhead.

    At that Nov. 28 status conference, Simon acknowledged that the next BiOp would not have the foundation of a new EIS, asking that if the NEPA process will not be done by 2018, then “it would be best to dispense of the 2018 BiOp until we get to a point where we can operate under a sufficient EIS.” He asked both plaintiffs and defendants in the case to offer their thoughts on the idea in January briefs.

    Until 2021, when the court-ordered BiOp is due, the system could continue to operate under the current 2014 BiOp, Simon added at the time. That could also mean that the system would operate with the additional court-ordered spring spill through 2021.

    NOAA Fisheries’ biological opinion, or “BiOp,” sets “reasonable and prudent alternatives” intended to mitigate for impacts of the federal dams on 13 species of Columbia River basin salmon and steelhead listed as threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act. Subsequent recovery plans for each listed species outlines the standards for recovery and the actions required to meet them.

    After Simon’s remand in 2016, he set a schedule for federal agencies to replace the 2014 BiOp. The agencies charged with the NEPA process – the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation and Bonneville Power Administration – said the process would require five years of public involvement and work, but along the way it would meet the prior schedule for a 2018 BiOp, complete the EIS in 2020 and submit a new BiOp to the Court in 2021.

    NWF, in its Jan. 22, 2018 brief to the court, said keeping the 2018 BiOp in the schedule would not be in compliance with NEPA and the federal Endangered Species Act, saying it would be appropriate to modify the current remand order to “eliminate the requirement for a new biological opinion by December 31, 2018, since Federal Defendants will not be preparing an EIS or other NEPA document to accompany such a BiOp. Consequently, any decision by the federal action agencies to adopt the proposed action or reasonable and prudent alternative (“RPA”) in such a BiOp would violate NEPA and be contrary to the Court’s decision.”

    NWF went on to say that it would also “be appropriate to continue the Court’s spring spill injunction pending compliance with NEPA and the ESA in 2021, as well as continue the Court’s direction to the federal action agencies regarding implementation of the RPA from the 2008/2014 BiOp.”

    In the brief, True said that he had approached the federal agencies to get their agreement on this change in schedule, but that the agencies and NWF were not able to come to reach that agreement.

    In a Dec. 13, 2017 letter to True, defendants’ counsel Michael Eitel of the U.S. Department of Justice, said:

    “As you also are aware, the 2008/2014 BiOp and associated incidental take statement expire at the end of 2018. Thus, to comply with the Court’s order and to ensure ESA compliance after that date, the agencies must complete consultation and NMFS must issue a new biological opinion by the end of 2018.”

    He went on to say that the agencies have pursued the court-ordered NEPA process for the last 18 months, that the agencies are now consulting with NOAA Fisheries and that NOAA intends to issue a new BiOp and incidental take statement by the end of December.

    “We are not aware of any changed factual or legal circumstances since that time that would warrant re-opening the Order of Remand to pursue Plaintiffs’ proposal to strike the 2018 BiOp deadline and replace the BiOp with some alternative action or process,” Eitel wrote. “Accordingly, the Federal Defendants intend to continue the consultation and preparation of a final BiOp by the end of 2018 as ordered by the Court, and we believe that issuance of a new BiOp is the appropriate mechanism to meet the agencies’ obligations to comply with ESA after 2018.”

    Regardless, the NWF’s brief said, the agencies have not explained how they would actually comply with both NEPA and ESA for a 2018 BiOp, and they have not offered a plan that would explain how they would comply with both laws.

    True also said that he knows of no law that would require a new BiOp after ten years (the remanded BiOp is the 2008/2014 BiOp) and that there is no specific expiration date on a BiOp. Nor, the brief said, is there any indication that consultation is in progress between the agencies and NOAA.

    “The agencies were provided an opportunity to offer a plan to comply with both the ESA and NEPA, and could have done so in a number of ways, including by deciding to continue implementing the 2008/2014 BiOp until they completed an EIS for a new BiOp, or by choosing to comply with NEPA in time for a BiOp in 2018, but they did not do so,” the brief concluded.

  • CBB: Salmon Fishing Rules Off NW Coast To Be Guided By Need To Protect Low Numbers Of Chinook 

    Friday, March 15, 2019

    CohoFernsWith a strong coho salmon run expected this year, but low estimates of chinook salmon, the Pacific Fishery Management Council has developed three options with quotas for fishing off the Washington coast.

    The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has packaged the three options that include catch quotas and areas where fishing is allowed with the aim of protecting the limited number of chinook, the primary food of threatened southern resident killer whales. WDFW now wants to know what the public prefers. The agency has put the options out for public review and will host a public meeting in March.

    The three options for ocean salmon fisheries were approved Tuesday, March 5, by the PFMC at its meeting in Vancouver. With input from NOAA Fisheries, Tribes, states and others, the PFMC establishes fishing seasons in ocean waters three to 200 miles off the Pacific coast.

    The three alternatives are designed to protect the low numbers of chinook expected to return to the Columbia River and Washington's ocean waters this year, said Kyle Adicks, salmon fisheries policy lead for WDFW.

    "With these alternatives in hand, we will work with stakeholders to develop a final fishing package for Washington's coastal and inside waters that meets our conservation objectives for wild salmon," Adicks said. "Anglers can expect improved opportunities to fish for coho salmon compared to recent years while fishing opportunities for chinook likely will be similar to last year."

    Like last year, the 2019 forecast for Columbia River fall chinook is down roughly 50 percent from the 10-year average, WDFW said. About 100,500 hatchery chinook are expected to return to the lower Columbia River. Those fish – known as "tules" – are the backbone of the recreational ocean fishery.

    On the other hand, fishery managers estimate 905,800 coho will return to the Columbia River this year, up 619,600 fish from the 2018 forecast. A significant portion of the Columbia River run of coho contributes to the ocean fishery, WDFW said.

    The options include the following quotas for recreational fisheries off the Washington coast:

    Option 1: 32,500 chinook and 172,200 coho. Marine areas 3 (La Push) and 4 (Neah Bay) would open June 15 while marine areas 1 (Ilwaco) and 2 (Westport) would open June 22. All four areas would be open daily and La Push would have a late-season fishery under this option.

    Option 2: 27,500 chinook and 159,600 coho. Marine areas 1, 3, and 4 would open daily beginning June 22 while Marine Area 2 would open daily beginning June 29. There would be no late-season fishery in Marine Area 3.

    Option 3: 22,500 chinook and 94,400 coho. Marine areas 1, 3, and 4 would open daily beginning June 29 while Marine Area 2 would be open five days per week (Sunday through Thursday) beginning June 16. There would be no late-season fishery in Marine Area 3.

    Fisheries may close early if quotas have been met.

    Last year, the PFMC adopted recreational ocean fishing quotas of 27,500 chinook and 42,000 coho.

    WDFW is working with tribal co-managers and NOAA Fisheries to take into account the dietary needs of southern resident orcas while developing salmon fishing seasons, the agency said. The declining availability of salmon and disruptions from boating traffic have been linked to a downturn in the region's orca population over the past 30 years.

    "We will continue to assess the effects of fisheries on southern resident killer whales as we move towards setting our final fishing seasons in April," Adicks said.

    Chinook and coho quotas approved by the PFMC will be part of a comprehensive 2019 salmon-fishing package, which includes marine and freshwater fisheries throughout Puget Sound, the Columbia River and Washington's coastal areas. State and tribal co-managers are currently developing those other fisheries.

    State and tribal co-managers will complete the final 2019 salmon fisheries package in conjunction with PFMC during the PFMC’s April meeting in Rohnert Park, Calif.

  • CBB: Salmon Fishing Seasons:Good Opportunities For Coho, Some Restrictions To Protect Low Chinook Returns

    April 17, 2019

    fishinboxAnglers can expect a mixed bag of salmon fisheries this year with increased coho opportunities in the ocean and the Columbia River, but additional necessary restrictions to protect chinook in Puget Sound.

    The state's 2019 salmon fishing seasons, developed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and treaty tribal co-managers, were finalized today during the Pacific Fishery Management Council's meeting this week in Rohnert Park, Calif.

    This year's fisheries were designed to take advantage of a higher number of coho salmon forecast to return to Washington's waters as compared to recent years, said Kyle Adicks, salmon policy lead for WDFW. However, projected low returns of key chinook stocks in Puget Sound prompted fishery managers to restrict fisheries in Puget Sound.

    "We're able to provide more opportunities to fish for coho in some areas, particularly in the ocean and Columbia River, than we have been able to do for several years," Adicks said. "But continued poor returns of some chinook stocks forced us to make difficult decisions for fisheries in Puget Sound this year."

    Again in 2019, fishery managers projected another low return of Stillaguamish, Nooksack and mid-Hood Canal chinook and took steps to protect those stocks. Notable closures of popular fisheries include: the San Juan Islands (Marine Area 7) in August; Deception Pass and Port Gardner (areas 8-1 and 8-2) in December and January; and Admiralty Inlet (Marine Area 9) in January.

    WDFW Director Kelly Susewind acknowledged the reductions in Puget Sound salmon fisheries are difficult for both anglers and the local communities that depend on those fisheries.

    "Reducing fisheries is not a long-term solution to the declining number of chinook salmon," Susewind said. "The department will continue working with the co-managers, our constituents, and others to address habitat loss. Without improved habitat, our chinook populations will likely continue to decline."

    Limiting fisheries to meet conservation objectives for wild salmon indirectly benefits southern resident killer whales, said WDFW in a press release. “The fishery adjustments will aid in minimizing boat presence and noise, and decrease competition for chinook and other salmon in these areas critical to the declining whales.”

    Anglers will also have limited opportunities to fish for pink salmon in Puget Sound due to projected low returns this year. There are no "bonus bag" limits for pink salmon in 2019.

    For the Columbia River, the summer salmon fishery will be closed to summer chinook (including jacks) and sockeye retention due to low expected returns this year.

    Fall salmon fisheries will be open under various regulations. Waters from Buoy 10 upstream to the Hwy. 395 Bridge at Pasco will open to fall salmon fishing beginning Aug. 1.

    "While we anticipate a robust coho fishery in the Columbia River this year, we're taking steps to protect depleted runs of chinook and steelhead," Adicks said.

    Steelhead fisheries in the Columbia and Snake rivers this season will be similar to those in 2017, when a similarly low run was projected, he said.

    In Washington's ocean waters, "we expect some good opportunities for fishing in the ocean this summer," Adicks said.

    For 2019, PFMC adopted a significantly higher quota for coho, and a similar quota for chinook compared to last year. All four of Washington's marine areas will open daily beginning June 22.

  • CBB: Science Review Of Salmon Survival Study: Snake River Fish Not Meeting Smolt-To-Adult Return Goals 


    Friday, November 04, 2016

    

lots of fishCalling it a “mature product,” the Independent Scientific Advisory Board completed its review of the latest draft of the Fish Passage Center’s Comparative Survival Study October 21.  

    As it has found in each year it has produced the CSS, smolt-to-adult returns of salmon and steelhead out of the Snake River are not meeting the 2 percent to 6 percent SARs goals set by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council. However, fish out of the mid-Columbia River generally had SARs that fell within the NPCC range.  

    It also found that the effectiveness of transporting fish from the Snake River downstream to below Bonneville Dam decreases as river conditions improve.   

The draft CSS – titled “Comparative Survival Study of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer/Fall Chinook, Summer Steelhead, and Sockeye” – was released for public review by the Fish Passage Center and  the  Comparative Survival Study Oversight Committee at the FPC website (www.fpc.org) August 31. Comments were due October 15 and some of the most comprehensive and technical comments each year are those from the ISAB.   This is the ISAB’s seventh annual review. The first review in 2010 and all subsequent reviews were called for by the Council’s 2009 Fish and Wildlife Program.   



    “Overall, the presentation is well organized and well refined,” the ISAB review document said. “An overarching comment is that connections with larger ecological concerns are not apparent. That is, there appear to be opportunities to involve researchers working on studies of other species, food webs, physiology, contaminants, and disease. Such combined studies might give added insights into mechanisms causing the observed temporal patterns in migration and survival.”   

The CSS draft report is laid out in eight chapters and three appendices.  

    In its summary, the ISAB says the first chapter is an overview of the entire CSS report and is similar to previous years, but with recent results added. The CSS in 2016 also added two fish populations that hadn’t previously been included – Okanagan River sockeye and natural-origin summer chinook salmon from upstream of Wells Dam.   But the CSS also says that PIT-tags increased in size from the 9 to 12 millimeters of previous reports to 11 to 12 mm. That could have impacts on tagged fish, the ISAB says, and should be explored.   



    “If this is a real change, the rationale for the change is needed along with a discussion of potential impacts on the fish (e.g., are larger fish now tagged to accommodate the larger tags?),” the ISAB review says.  

    

The first chapter also outlines three new topics:  

    1) statistical relationships among total annual flow and salmon population parameters such as survival, smolt-to-adult-return rate (SAR), and other response variables in the life cycle model;

    2) impact of the juvenile bypass system on delayed mortality as measured by SARs; and 3) average age of maturity across stocks and years.   



    No new features were added to the second chapter about lifecycle modeling, although the CSS did evaluate alternative levels of spill and flow on smolt to adult returns and long-term abundance of spring/summer chinook through 2050. It also looked at the benefits of improving juvenile passage versus improving spawning productivity and capacity, concluding that:   


    • greatest benefits to SARS occur at highest spill and lowest flow 


    • relative return abundance appears to be mostly limited by capacity of the habitat to support the fish.   



    The third chapter on the effects of in-river juvenile travel time, mortality rates and survival is mainly an update with the latest information. It found that there is a variation in the results among years and among cohorts, and that mortality tends to increase over the migration season and as water temperature rises, with the exception of sockeye salmon. The mortality is likely due to a combination of increasing water temperature, according to the CSS report, and to:  

    1) declining smolt energy reserves or physiological condition over the migration season,

    2) increasing predation rates on smolts,

    3) increases in disease susceptibility or disease-related mortality, or

    4) some combination of these often interrelated mechanisms.  
 


    The ISAB suggested that testing these hypothesis could result in survival improvements, but also wondered about the sockeye salmon anomaly.   Chapter 4 of the CSS report describes overall annual SARs and includes new data.   



    “Overall SARs of Snake River wild spring/summer Chinook and steelhead fell well short of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s 2 – 6 percent SAR objectives, while those from the mid-Columbia region generally fell within this range,” the CSS report says. “For Snake River populations, none of the passage routes (in-river or juvenile transportation) have provided SARs within the range of the NPCC objectives.”  

    

Among other findings, the CSS report found that “the relative effectiveness of transportation decreases as in-river conditions improve,” and that “SARs are highly correlated among wild and hatchery populations within and between regions, indicating common environmental factors are influencing survival rates from outmigration to the estuary and ocean environments.”  

    

“It is not surprising that the transport TIR is inversely correlated with in-river survival (Lower Granite Dam to Bonneville Dam),” the ISAB said. “This new analysis identified the value for in-river survival when the benefits of transportation appear to disappear.” TIR is the transport to in-river ratio.  

    The CSS also reported on the relatively large absolute difference in SAR based on PIT-tags versus run reconstruction, the ISAB said. While there is an evaluation of PIT-tag effects on salmon survival, the results will not be ready until after summer 2017. “Potential bias in survival caused by tagging methodology (or in the run reconstruction methodology) is an important issue to resolve, and the ISAB looks forward to the results of this study.”  

    Chapter 5 looks at the association of SARs to life-cycle productivity for wild spring/summer chinook and steelhead populations. Major population declines of these Snake River stocks are associated with SARs of less than 1 percent, and increased life-cycle productivity has occurred in years when SARs exceeds 2 percent, the CSS report says. The historical (pre-1970s) SAR was in the range 4 to 6 percent.  

    Faced with these figures, the ISAB asked to “what extent might improvements in hydrosystem management, predator control, and estuarine habitat lead to SARs of 4 percent to 6 percent?”   



    The ISAB recommended five topics for future reports:   


    1.         Use more realistic and more variable future flow conditions for the study on the impact of flow/spill modifications under future climate change. Simulating only low flows or high flows for decades may not be a realistic scenario. 


    2.         What is the impact of the new restricted tag sizes? Are there fish that were previously marked and are now not marked (e.g. smaller fish) due to the larger PIT tags being used? Similarly, conclusions from studies of compensatory mortality (e.g. in relation to predator control) may be affected by the choice of fish that are tagged. 


    3.         A life-cycle model is the natural way to study predator control impacts, but the current version of the CSS life-cycle model appears to incorporate density dependence only at the spawner-to-smolt stage, the ISAB said. Modify the life-cycle model to allow a range of compensatory responses ranging from complete additivity (as now is the case) to plausible compensatory mortality effects related to density dependence and predator selectivity (see ISAB 2016-1).

    
4.         Both the CSS and NOAA provide estimates for in-river survival. How do these estimates compare to each other? 


    5.         What factors have led to declining proportions of four and five-year old and increases in three-year old spring/summer chinook? Models that include ocean factors associated with salmon growth and climate change, differences in hatchery practices, or freshwater environments (tributary temps, or annual differences in migration corridor) may be of interest.   



    ISAB’s 2016 review can be found at http://www.nwcouncil.org/media/31294/isab2010_5.pdf. Previous reviews are at http://www.nwcouncil.org/media/31294/isab2010_5.pdf (2010), http://www.nwcouncil.org/media/31306/isab2011_5.pdf (2011), http://www.nwcouncil.org/media/31327/isab2012_7.pdf (2012), http://www.nwcouncil.org/media/6888183/ISAB2013-4.pdf (2013), http://www.nwcouncil.org/media/7148430/isab2014-5update.pdf (2014), and http://www.nwcouncil.org/media/7149637/isab2015-2.pdf (2015).  

    

The 2016 CSS report is at http://www.fpc.org/documents/CSS/Draft_CSS_2016_1.pdf. It was prepared by the Comparative Survival Study Oversight Committee and the Fish Passage Center (www.fpc.org). The committee includes Jerry McCann, Brandon Chockley, Erin Cooper and Tommy Garrison, all of the Fish Passage Center; Howard Schaller and Steve Haeseker, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Robert Lessard, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission; Charlie Petrosky and Tim Copeland, Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Eric Tinus and Erick Van Dyke, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; and Robin Ehlke, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.   

Also see:   CBB, December 29, 2015, “2015 Salmon Survival Report Updates Smolt-To-Adult Return Data For Columbia/Snake Salmon, Steelhead,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/435772.aspx <http://www.cbbulletin.com/435772.aspx>

  • CBB: Snake River Sockeye Run Lowest In More Than A Decade, Currently 6 Percent Of 10-Year Average

    August 8, 2019

    seattletimessockeyeThe first endangered sockeye salmon returned to the Redfish Lake Creek trap Aug. 2, later by nearly a week than the first that led the way last year and in 2017, according to the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Since then, two more wild sockeye have reached the trap near Stanley, Idaho, for a total of two trapped females and one male, all unclipped fish, according to Russ Kiefer of IDFG. Just 61 of the Snake River sockeye, listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act in 1991, have cleared Lower Granite Dam as of August 6. That’s 6 percent of the 10-year average on that date of 1,001. The average annual return between 2009-2018 has been 620 adults, ranging from a low of 91 adults in 2015 to 1516 adults in 2014, according to Eric Johnson, sockeye research biologist at IDFG. Recovery of Snake River sockeye salmon could take 50 to 100 years and over the next 25 years cost over $101 million, according to a Snake River Sockeye Salmon Recovery Plan released in 2015 by NOAA Fisheries. “The species remains at risk of extinction,” said NOAA of the endangered fish. Johnson said a combination of conditions is responsible for the low return of sockeye this year, including ocean conditions (2015 to 2017) that contributed to poor growth and survival for all salmon and steelhead. After migrating to the ocean, sockeye typically remain there for two years (5 percent will return after one year).  “The ocean surface temperatures have been warmer than average and upwelling of cooler, nutrient-rich water has been limited and has impacted the food web in a way that the composition has shifted to a less desirable food items and a lower biomass of desirable food items,” he said. In addition, survival of Snake River sockeye juveniles migrating downstream took a hit in 2016 and 2017, with a survival estimate from Lower Granite to Bonneville Dam for combined hatchery and wild fish of just 17.6 percent, which was the fourth lowest survival estimate from 1998 to 2017, according to that year’s survival estimate by NOAA Fisheries’ Northwest Fisheries Science Center.  That was the third consecutive year the juvenile Snake River sockeye survival had been below the 39.2 percent average. 2016 survival was 11.9 percent and 2015 was 37.3 percent. The highest survival – 82 percent – was in 2008.  The lowest smolt survival was of juveniles reared in the newly constructed smolt production facility, the Springfield Hatchery. “The impacts were greater this year because we phased out hatchery sockeye smolt production at 2 other hatcheries that contributed to adult returns in 2017 and 2018,” Johnson said. “Rearing sockeye at the Sawtooth Fish Hatchery (near Stanley, ID) and the Oxbow Fish Hatchery (lower Columbia River near Cascade Locks) was discontinued in 2016 and 2017, respectively.  “Hydrosystem survival of Springfield Hatchery reared sockeye has improved significantly in 2018 and 2019 as a result of acclimating fish for a 2-3 week period of time prior to release,” he continued. “The Springfield Hatchery has much ‘harder’ water compared to water leaving Redfish Lake and we have found that acclimating fish to an intermediate hardness for a period of time improved survival.” The water quality difference induced stress levels in smolts high enough to cause significant post-release mortality. Idaho has since adopted two strategies to counter the water chemistry difference, seeing positive results and survival rates to Bonneville Dam as high as 50 percent in 2018.

    The preseason sockeye run size for the entire Columbia River basin was downgraded by one third to 62,800 fish based on the recent 5-year average run timing at Bonneville Dam. The preseason forecast was 94,400 fish. The U.S. v Oregon Technical Advisory Committee met July 8, downgrading the expected sockeye run (most of those sockeye will travel to mid-Columbia River tributaries, with few turning into the Snake River). Some 62,940 sockeye have passed Bonneville Dam as of Aug. 6, less than 20 percent of the Columbia River basin sockeye 10-year average of 319,741 on the same date. Last year the count at Bonneville was 193,669. Lower Granite is the farthest upstream of the four lower Snake River dams and the last dam the fish encounter before swimming into Idaho. In 2015 the sockeye encountered a thermal block – high water temperatures and low water – that decimated that year’s run. Water in the dam’s tailrace has been cooler this year, with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers largely maintaining the under-68 degree temperature in the dam’s tailrace that is required by NOAA Fisheries’ 2019 Columbia/Snake River biological opinion of the federal hydropower system. Saturday, Aug. 3, the Corps increased the outflow at Dworshak Dam from 9,800 cubic feet per second to 11.8 kcfs, anticipating this week’s warmer weather. The additional water is through spill at the dam, which is on the North Fork of the Clearwater River. The cool Dworshak Reservoir water, which takes up to three days to arrive at Lower Granite, mixes with lower Snake River water and cools, among other things, the fish ladder sockeye use to move upstream and the juvenile fish passage facilities to aid juvenile fall chinook passing downstream. In a news release, the Corps’ Walla Walla District warned that downstream of the dam, water elevation will likely result in Clearwater River surface elevation increasing by about 7 inches at the at USGS gage located at Peck, Idaho. The Corps expects total dissolved gasses from the spill to remain below 110 percent, Washington State’s upper limit for TDG this time of year, and will be closely monitored. When water spills over the dam, gas is entrained and held in solution due to pressure differences in the water at depth, the Corps said. High TDG levels can be stressful for fish. The 2019 sockeye run through Lower Granite so far is below last year’s total of 276 fish, as well as the 2017 total of 228 fish, which was the lowest return in a decade, IDFG said. It is likely that the returns in 2019 will be lower. By Aug. 20 each year, about 33 to 70 percent of the fish at Redfish Lake have been trapped. Over the 10-year average 54 percent of fish have been trapped by Aug. 20. The 10-year average of trapped fish is 661. Idaho sockeye must complete a 900-mile migration from the Pacific Ocean that includes crossing eight dams and climbing 6,500-feet elevation to reach the Sawtooth Basin. When Idaho sockeye were listed in 1991 under the federal Endangered Species Act, only four adult sockeye returned to the Stanley Basin. The combined annual returns from 1991-99 was 23 fish, including two years when no sockeye returned to Idaho. Between 1996 and 2007, annual sockeye returns over Lower Granite averaged 52 fish.  Since 2008, sockeye returns over Lower Granite have averaged 1,115 fish with an annual range of 228 to a high of 2,786 in 2014, IDFG said. Prior to the sockeye listing, only 58 wild sockeye returned to Idaho during the years 1985 to 1990. Before the turn of the twentieth century, an estimated 150,000 sockeye returned annually to the Snake River basin. The sockeye in those days ascended the Snake River to the Wallowa River basin in northeastern Oregon and the Payette and Salmon River basins in Idaho to spawn in natural lakes. Within the Salmon River basin, sockeye spawned in Warm Lake in the South Fork Salmon River basin, as well as in the Sawtooth Valley lakes: Stanley, Redfish, Yellowbelly, Pettit and Alturas lakes. A smaller Sawtooth Valley lake, Hellroaring Lake, may have also supported some sockeye. In 2013, the $13.5 million Springfield Hatchery was completed with the capability of producing up to one million juvenile Snake River sockeye salmon annually for release in the Sawtooth Basin of central Idaho, the headwaters of the Salmon River. The additional capacity moves the sockeye recovery effort from the conservation phase to a re-colonization phase where emphasis is on returning increasing numbers of ocean-run adults to use in hatchery spawning and to release to the natural habitat to spawn. The increase in adult fish may eventually mean recreational and tribal fishing seasons on Snake River sockeye, officials said during a 2013 ceremony marking the completion of the hatchery. “The story of the Snake River sockeye is one of perseverance: Their numbers were once so depressed by harvest, predation, habitat loss and dams that many in the scientific community declared them functionally extinct,” said Lorri Bodi, vice president of Environment, Fish & Wildlife for the Bonneville Power Administration at the time. “But these fish are survivors, and the state of Idaho, BPA, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes and other stakeholders weren’t willing to give up on improving conditions for these fish. The Springfield Hatchery is just one piece of a larger effort that has proven successful in bringing back the Snake River sockeye.” “This is a great example of how constructive collaboration can work – work for the species and work for the people we serve,” said then Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter said in 2013. “Idaho has a lot of aquaculture expertise, and using hatcheries like this to help boost the runs is a smart investment.” “Opening this hatchery is a big step toward continuing to bring back Idaho’s unique sockeye,” Fish and Game Director Virgil Moore said at the time. “With the help and support of our partners in this effort, we look forward to the day when we can set a sockeye season for Idaho’s tribal and recreational anglers.”

  • CBB: Songbird Study Shows River Ecosystem Recovery After Dam Removal, Return Of Salmon Nutrients

    Tuesday, December 29, 2015

    American.DipperA songbird species that flourishes on the salmon-rich side of dams in the western United States struggles when it tries to nest on the side closed off from the fish and the nutrients they leave behind. But the songbird and the rest of the divided ecosystem rebounds, faster than some experts expected, when dams come down and rivers are allowed to resume their natural flow. Two new studies led by Christopher Tonra, assistant professor of avian wildlife ecology at The Ohio State University, illustrate the stress dams impose on species that rely on salmon and the impact of dam removal on the well-being of that wildlife. The areas previously depleted of salmon are on a fast track to recovery in a shorter time than he ever expected after the dam removal, Tonra said. "It's exciting to be able to show a real positive outcome in conservation. We don't always get that," he said. "That these rivers can come back within our own generation is a really exciting thing." During his time conducting the studies in Washington, Tonra watched reservoir beds that looked like moonscapes return to vibrant, rich habitat and cascades emerge where none had been, at least for the last century. "Watching that happen was just incredible," he said. Tonra and his colleagues studied the American dipper, a bird set apart by its unusual feeding style. Dippers, which are equipped with a transparent second eyelid (think water goggles for birds), dive below the river's surface and walk the riverbed scouring the rocky floor for meals, mostly aquatic insects in their larval stage. They also eat some small fish, including juvenile salmon when they're available.

    The studies are the first to examine the effects of dams, and dam removal, on the dipper, considered an indicator species and the only bird of its type found in North America. Dippers that are faring well point to a strong ecosystem in and around the river. "These birds are right where aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems meet," Tonra said. Tonra and his colleagues spent four years in Washington's Olympic National Park and surrounding tribal, federal and private lands. The Elwha River winds through the park and is the site of the largest dam removal in history. Crews started tearing down the Elwha and Glines Canyon dams in 2011 and concluded in 2014, freeing the path for migratory fish for the first time in a century. Salmon, which do most of their growing in the ocean, carry marine-derived nitrogen and carbon back into freshwater systems when they return to spawn and die. They benefit animals and plants, whether through direct consumption or because nutrients find their way into plants and other food, including larval mayflies and other insects for which the dipper dives. "They're truly fertilizing the river and so that makes its way all the way up through the food chain," Tonra said. In one study, the researchers documented that American dippers with access to salmon were in better physical condition and more likely to attempt multiple broods of offspring in a season. They also produced larger female offspring and were more likely to stay in breeding territories year-round. The research, published early online, will appear in an upcoming issue of the journal Ecography http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0587 Tonra and his colleagues worked along four streams, three of which were blocked to salmon either by waterfalls or dams. They banded the birds, weighed them and collected blood samples. They looked at carbon and nitrogen in the birds' blood to determine their level of marine-derived nutrient intake. The research team watched for multiple attempts to breed and an inclination to stay in the nesting area year-round, and tracked what type of food was delivered to nestlings. The birds with salmon access had more marine-derived nutrients and were 20 times more likely to attempt multiple broods. They were 13 times more likely to stay year-round and had an annual adult survival rate that was 11 percent higher than their salmon-deprived peers. The female birds with access to salmon had larger body mass, suggesting they were healthier. Fledgling females raised in areas with salmon also were larger. The birds without access to salmon and food enriched by their presence "weren't in very good condition and it looked like they weren't attempting to breed as much," Tonra said. And they took off after they fledged a single brood, presumably for salmon-rich waters. "Within the same river you basically have two different populations," Tonra said. There's good news in the team's second dipper study, published in the December 2015 issue of the journal Biological Conservation: Within a year of the Elwha Dam removal, Tonra and his colleagues were able to document an increase in salmon-derived nutrients in American dippers. Tonra was surprised, and delighted, by how quickly the salmon returned. "It was pretty much as soon as the first dam came out and fish were beating up against the second, wanting to go." Tonra, previously with the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center, worked with Kimberly Sager-Fradkin of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe and Peter Marra of the Smithsonian on both studies. Sara Morley of the Northwest Fisheries Science Center and Jeffrey Duda of the Western Fisheries Research Center contributed to the study published in Biological Conservation. Tonra said he'd like to return to the Pacific Northwest soon to measure changes in the birds' patterns and health since the dam removal. He's hopeful that other birds and bats that feast on insects in the air and on the trees near the river will become stronger as well. The research was supported by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Geological Survey, the Smithsonian Institution and the National Zoo.

    http://www.cbbulletin.com/435773.aspx

  • CBB: Spill Advocates, Federal Agencies Agree To Status Conference Schedule, Protocol In Salmon BiOP Case

    Friday, May 19, 2017

    spill.big.2017Advocates of more spill at Columbia/Snake river dams for juvenile fish passage and federal dam operating agencies have agreed to a schedule for periodic status conferences and a protocol in a federal court case.

    The request for injunctive relief was enjoined with an earlier case argued in the U.S. District Court of Oregon that resulted in a remand of the Columbia River hydropower system’s 2014 biological opinion for salmon and steelhead. The remand was issued by Judge Michael H. Simon in May 2016.

    The request, which was brought to Simon in January 2017 by the National Wildlife Foundation and the State of Oregon, with the support of the Nez Perce Tribe, asked the court to begin ordering spill to maximum total dissolved gas levels beginning April 3 this year and to continue for each year of the BiOp remand.

    In his March 27 opinion and order, which was amended April 3, Simon agreed that spill earlier in the year at the dams would benefit Endangered Species Act salmon and steelhead, but held off on ordering that spill until next year, saying it was “too rushed,” giving federal agencies time to plan for operational changes at the dams resulting from the earlier spill schedule.

    The spill opinion also required the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to operate bypass and PIT-tag juvenile detection systems at the dams beginning March 1, 2018 (that now occurs in mid-March to early April) and for the Corps to provide timely reviews of future capital investments valued at over $1 million at the dams in order to avoid a “significant risk of bias in the NEPA process,” according to the order.

    The plaintiffs could then challenge in court those projects which they believe could bias a National Environmental Policy Act review now in progress by dam operating agencies. However, Simon refused to stop any spending necessary for the safe operation of dams.

    (See CBB, January 19, 2017, “Conservation Groups, Oregon, Nez Perce File To Stop Capital Projects At Lower Snake River Dams,” http://www.cbbulletin.com/438211.aspx)

    Finally, Simon’s amended spill opinion said that he would hold periodic status conferences regarding the spill and planning for the spill, giving the parties 28 days to confer and file recommendations for a schedule for the conferences.

    In a May 1 court filing, plaintiffs and defendants agreed to consider protocols for spill at each dam, consider an adaptive management system and work together to develop a spill implementation plan.

    They’ll do this by identifying a team of technical representatives to “collaboratively plan and carry out tasks such as modeling and analyses of a range of spill levels and spill patterns as they agree is necessary to afford a basis for identifying 2018 spring fish passage spill levels and spill patterns at each of the eight lower Columbia River and lower Snake River dams,” while working with the interagency Technical Management Team and others to complete the tasks.

    The team will take into account spill and gas caps, dam or safety issues, the potential effects of spill levels and patterns on juvenile and adult salmon and steelhead survival, and other factors identified by the Court’s Opinion and Order, according to the joint filing.

    They will document the work and will advise the Court that “there are agreed-to spring fish passage spill operations that may be incorporated into a proposed injunction order, or advise the Court of any outstanding disagreements that may necessitate the Court’s involvement to resolve. If necessary, the Court may then set such procedures as it concludes are appropriate to resolve these issues,” the filing says.

    The parties will file with the court a joint status report June 15, 2017, with a draft available seven days ahead of time. Follow up in-person conferences will occur in early August and late September.

    The status report will have (for each of the dams):

    -- whether spill patterns for increased spill have been modeled, tested and/or agreed;

    -- whether the parties have agreed to fish passage spill cap operations or identified a biological or other constraint that warrants a dam- specific spill operation below spill cap spill.

    It will also include a statement of the tasks completed and a schedule for completing the remaining tasks, with the goal of completing all tasks needed to reach consensus on a 2018 spill implementation plan by September 15, 2017.

    In a May 16 court filing, the federal defendants described theirproposal for notifying the court and plaintiffs about timely reviews of future capital investments.

    Defendants said in their filing that they would notify the plaintiffs of new capital hydropower improvement projects, fish mitigation capital projects and other non-power capital projects and expansions in ranges of $1 to $3 million, greater than $3 million but less than $7 million, greater than $7 million but less than $12 million and projects greater than $12 million. It will provide this information within 30 days of when the budget request is publically available through the President’s Budget.

    In addition to cost, the information provided to plaintiffs would include the timing of project implementation, but it will not provide information on hydropower maintenance projects or activities, or non- hydropower maintenance projects or activities, the filing says.

    Plaintiffs must respond within 60 days of notification for each project.

    Meanwhile, earlier this month four members of the U.S. House of Representatives Northwest congressional delegation delivered a letter to Bonneville Power Administrator Elliot Mainzer, Secretary of the Army Robert Speer, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke, objecting to the additional spill and asking for detailed information on the cost of the region’s fish and wildlife program and the cost of Simon’s order for more spill on ratepayers.

    See https://mcmorris.house.gov/mcmorris-rodgers-sends-letters-administration-officials-snake-river-dam-ruling/

    “We believe that the 2008 BiOp achieved consensus on a plan that has demonstrated for several years that it is working to improve salmon recovery while still allowing operation of the federal dams,” the letter says. “We are concerned that plaintiffs’ continued advocacy for additional spill or preventing needed maintenance of the dams as requested in the injunctions is not only unscientifically based, it is likely to be counterproductive.”

    The May 2 letter was signed by eastern Washington Republicans Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Dan Newhouse and western Oregon Democrats Peter DeFazio and Kurt Schrader.

    A counter letter from 31 conservation and commercial and recreational fishing groups sent to the four U.S. House representatives May 17 said that information in their letter was “based on incomplete or misleading information.”

    It went on to say that the restoration of salmon populations is an “opportunity for our region to invest in the economy, create family-wage jobs and improve our quality of life and the health of our environment,” but that goal remains elusive.

    The letter reminded the representatives that Simon had rejected the current BiOp, which was the fifth time a federal judge had done so.

    “Despite spending by regional electricity customers and American taxpayers totaling $15B - under the direction and guidance of the federal agencies that manage the major Columbia and Snake river dams - not one of the thirteen salmon and steelhead populations listed in the early 1990s as threatened and endangered under the ESA has been delisted; most have shown little or no sign of significant or sustained improvement.”

    The full letter is available at
    http://www.wildsalmon.org/images/PDFs/congress/2017.Ltr.to.4MOCs.May17.final.pd

  • CBB: Spring Chinook Return Had A Little Bounce Then Back To Low Numbers; Insufficient Data For Run Update

    Friday, May 12, 2017

    salmonFishery managers have postponed the annual fishery for hatchery steelhead and jack chinook salmon from Tongue Point upriver to the Interstate 5 Bridge set to begin May 16.

    Lower than expected passage of spring chinook salmon over Bonneville Dam coupled with the spring chinook catch to date in the recreational fishery downstream of Bonneville Dam are the primary causes of the delay.

    As of Wednesday only about 26,000 of the approximately 160,000 forecasted spring Chinook salmon had been counted at Bonneville Dam.

    Just 1,121 spring chinook jacks have passed over Bonneville Dam. Last year on May 10, more than four times that many had passed the dam and the 10-year average is 9,125.

    Although steelhead anglers would have been required to release any adult salmon they caught in the postponed fishery, a certain percentage would die after release. “Unfortunately we just don’t have any lower river sport allocation left to operate this fishery prior to a run update,” said Tucker Jones, ODFW’s Ocean Salmon and Columbia River Program manager.

    “We’re not sure if this run is just very late or also below forecast,” Jones said “Water conditions have been way outside of normal this year, and that could be the primary cause for the low counts to date,” he added.
     
    “The abnormal water conditions this year have injected a level of uncertainty into assessing this run that doesn’t typically exist,” Jones said. “Given the unclear situation we have this year, I wouldn’t be surprised if it takes another week or two before we really know the full story on this year’s return.”

    However, angling for shad will open as usual May 16.

    Over a week ago on April 30, just 3,337 spring chinook had been counted passing upstream over Bonneville Dam. That was the lowest cumulative count of fish at the dam on record for that date.

    By May 8, the 2017 chinook run had rallied somewhat to 23,963 fish and pulled ahead from worst run on record (for that date) to fourth lowest count at the dam for the day. The years 1995, 1949 and 1952 all had lower counts on May 8 than 2017.

    However, the mini-surge of fish since May 4 was not enough for the U.S. v Oregon Technical Advisory Committee to update its spring chinook run size, which it typically does halfway through the run. On average, half the run passes Bonneville by May 7.

    An updated run size by TAC was also needed this week for the two-state Columbia River Compact to reconsider more sportfishing in the lower Columbia River and in the river upstream of Bonneville Dam to the Oregon and Washington border. As a result and without the update, the Compact did not meet this week.

    Angling downstream of the dam ended April 23 and angling upstream of the dam ended May 5. About 6,500 fish were caught by anglers below the dam and very few upstream.

    Earlier this year, TAC estimated in its early season forecast that 160,400 upriver spring chinook and Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon would pass the dam by June 15 (after that date, chinook that pass the dam are considered summer or fall chinook). The total 2017 spring chinook forecast – including upriver and lower river chinook – is down 17 percent to 227,890 fish from the 2016 actual run of 274,652 fish.

    TAC met May 8 to review the upriver spring Chinook run and released this statement Monday:

    “Considering this year's very unusual river conditions in March and April (extremely high flows, high turbidity, cool temperatures) along with a recent rapid increase in flows just as passage was starting to increase, TAC agreed that sufficient data are not yet available to provide an accurate run size update,” the statement said. “TAC will continue to monitor dam counts and meet to review the run again next Monday May 15.”

    When TAC had previously met, Monday, May 1, they had come to the same conclusion.

    The spring chinook run of 1995 is now the worst on record for May 8, with 7,848 fish over the dam on that date (the 2017 run is 305 percent of this number) and the run did not go on to rally, completing the year (June 15) with only 12,783 fish, according to information provided by Stuart Ellis, the TAC lead for 2017 and harvest management biologist with the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
     
    The 1949 run was 9,929 fish on May 8 (2017 is 241 percent of this total) and the final run size was 65,104 fish. The 1952 run was 17,195 fish on May 8 (2017 is 139 percent of this total) and the final run size was 142,226.

    The fourth lowest on record is 2017.

    Fifth on the list is 1950 with 26,400 fish on May 8 and a final tally of 67,729. Sixth is 1956 with 28,654 and a final run size of 73,675.

    High, cold and turbid water may be causing the adult salmon to hold longer in the lower river, but one of the problems may go back to the year the juvenile chinook left the river – 2015 – when river conditions were low and the water was much warmer than normal.

    “The bulk of the return this year would be 4 year old (2-ocean fish) that migrated out in very poor conditions in 2015 and went into an ocean that people generally believe was very poor for salmon,” Ellis said last week. “Our pre-season forecast was down this year because we didn't think we had great survival of these fish. The question will be is whether things were worse than we anticipated.”

  • CBB: States Take Steps To Protect ESA-Listed Snake River Steelhead; Deschutes Fishing Closure (Cold Water Refuge), Rolling Closures Up The Columbia

    August 14, 2019

    salmon.steelheadWith an anticipated low return of upriver steelhead – those that will cross Bonneville Dam – in the Columbia River this year, Oregon and Washington have taken steps to protect the listed fish.  The Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission closed the Columbia River around the mouth of the Deschutes River, along with a portion of the lower Deschutes up to Moody Rapids, this week to protect upriver wild summer steelhead. It made the call at its Commission meeting in Salem Friday, Aug. 2.  The closure that began August 12 and will be in effect through Sept. 15 is to protect wild Snake River fish that may take refuge in the Deschutes’ cool waters on their journey to the Snake River. The fish are listed as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act. “Returns of ESA-listed wild Snake River steelhead this year are forecasted to be similar to the extremely poor return of 2017, and there are ongoing concerns about the potential effects of angling on wild steelhead that may gather in cooler water near tributary mouths like the Deschutes,” an Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife news release says. In an Aug. 1 memo to the Oregon Commission, David Moscowitz of The Conservation Angler, a conservation group focused on Columbia River steelhead, called for the Commission to set aside cool water refugia that attract wild steelhead and salmon as they migrate upriver, including the Deschutes River. “Perhaps the most important cold-water refuge is at the Deschutes-Columbia confluence,” the memo said. “The Deschutes will start cooling in August, just as Columbia heats up and as the up-river salmon and steelhead migration peaks.” The Commission directed ODFW to take similar steps to close the mouth of the Deschutes River last year, as well. Based on additional discussions with the public and regional biologists, the boundary of this year’s closure has been refined to reduce the impact on chinook fishing opportunities, the Commission added. In addition, both Oregon and Washington have begun a series of rolling steelhead recreational angling closures from Buoy 10 at the mouth of the Columbia to the Oregon/Washington state line. Those closures prohibit anglers from keeping both hatchery and wild steelhead, effectively making angling for steelhead during certain periods a catch-and-release fishery. Aug. 1 to 31 from Buoy 10 upstream to The Dalles Dam, Aug. 1 to Sept. 30 from The Dalles Dam upstream to the John Day Dam, Sept. 1 to Oct. 31 from John Day to McNary Dam, and Oct. 1 to Nov. 30 from McNary Dam upstream to the OR/WA state line. Upriver summer steelhead pass Bonneville Dam from April through October and are considered A-Index or B-Index based on their fork length. A-Index, or A-run, are less than 78 centimeters (about 31 inches), and B-Index, or B-run, are longer. Most of the B-run fish are headed to Snake River tributaries in Idaho, while A-run fish are distributed throughout the Columbia and Snake river basins. The forecast for the combined run is 118,000 fish over Bonneville, with 40,450 wild fish (unclipped). But the A-run makes up the vast majority of the fish with a forecast of 110,200 fish, of which 33,900 are wild. That’s 46 percent of the 10-year average for A-run fish. Last year’s A-run forecast was 158,000 and the actual run was less than half the forecast at 69,338. The B-run makes up a small percentage of the total adult steelhead migration, with 8,000 fish (950 wild), which is just 24 percent of the 10-year forecast. The 2018 forecast was 24,400 fish and the actual size of the run was very close at 24,662. Last year’s combined forecast was 182,400 fish, but the actual return to the river was far fewer at 94,000 fish. Passage at Bonneville July 1 through Aug 8 was 32,123 steelhead, lower than the 46,300 expected on this date given the 2019 forecast, according to the Aug. 12 two-state Columbia River Compact Fall Fact Sheet No. 3. Passage at the dam is typically 50 percent complete by Aug. 20. The number of unclipped steelhead from through August 8 is 18,969, which is 89 percent of the expected passage for this period.  The Conservation Angler also listed other cold water confluences with the Columbia River that had been identified by the federal Environmental Protection Agency. Among those are the Klickitat, White Salmon, Wind, Washougal, Cowlitz, Lewis and Kalama rivers in Washington, and the Hood and Sandy rivers, Herman Creek and Eagle Creek. At the Deschutes’ mouth, the Oregon Commission defined the boundary of the angling closure by a line projecting from the South Channel Range “B” marker located approximately 3/4-mile upstream of the mouth of the Deschutes, downstream through Red Buoy Marker “4”, and terminating at the flashing red USCG light #2 on the Oregon shore downstream of the mouth. The Snake River basin steelhead listed as threatened under the ESA include the “distinct population segment,” or DPS, of naturally spawned steelhead originating below natural and manmade impassable barriers in the Snake basin, and also steelhead from six artificial propagation programs: Tucannon River Program Dworshak National Fish Hatchery Program Lolo Creek Program North Fork Clearwater Program East Fork Salmon River Program Little Sheep Creek/Imnaha River Hatchery Program 

  • CBB: Steps Taken To Cool Warming Lower Snake, Reduce Thermal Blocks As Large Basin Sockeye Return Heads Upstream

    500px-USACE Lower Monumental DamFriday, July 1, 2016

    As a larger than predicted run of sockeye salmon head up the Columbia and Snake rivers ˆ some 400,000 fish -- the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers took steps this week to cool water in the lower Snake River.

    At least 1,900 Snake River sockeye, listed under the Endangered Species Act, are predicted to move into the Snake River during this year‚s return.

    Beginning Monday, the Corps increased the outflow at Dworshak Dam on the North Fork of the Clearwater River -- the additional water from the dam cools flows further downstream.

    The Technical Management Team, an interagency panel that guides hydro operations throughout the basin, and the Corps are trying to keep water in the tailwater at Lower Granite Dam at a targeted 67 degrees Fahrenheit and no higher than 68 degrees.

    In addition, TMT at its meeting Wednesday directed the Corps to close the surface spillway weir and modify spill at the dam, which has been an aid to juvenile fish passage. The largest chunk of juvenile yearling chinook salmon migrating out of the Snake River has already passed the dam as have nearly all of the juvenile sockeye salmon. TMT fisheries managers are uncertain what the impact will be for migrating subyearling chinook.

    However, with the surface temperature of the water in the dam‚s reservoir already hitting 77 degrees F (25 degrees Centigrade) on an hourly basis, TMT fisheries managers worried that spilling the warm water would begin to create a thermal block below the dam, which is what happened in 2015 as the few sockeye that made it to the dam were stymied by the warm water and had to be trapped and hauled to Eagle Hatchery in Idaho.

    The RSW draws water from the surface waters and passes that water downstream of the project.  The goal for the adult sockeye migration is to maintain the water below the dam as cool as possible, according to Paul Wagner of NOAA Fisheries.  The fisheries managers agreed to close the surface weir and transfer that volume of spill to the deeper spill bays that draw water from a depth of 50 feet which is much cooler at 67 degrees (19.5C) than the surface weir location.  

    While it is not certain where the subyearlings pass the project during these warm periods, the volume of spill passing the project will not change, Wagner said.  

    It‚s been warm in the lower Snake River basin and is predicted to be even warmer, according to Steve Hall, the Corps‚ Walla Walla District reservoir manager, at TMT‚s meeting.

    After a weekend of relatively low flowsˆ set at about 2,400 cubic feet per second ˆ from the now full Dworshak Reservoir, the Corps increased flows Monday to help cool Lower Granite water. The release of water does not have an immediate affect at Lower Granite and so releases from Dworshak must be timed in order to keep water temperatures within the acceptable range at the Snake River dam.

    "It takes about three days for cold-water releases from Dworshak to reach the downstream side of Lower Granite Dam, where the target temperature gauges are located. So, we have to plan well ahead and make adjustments at Dworshak that will be effective at the time we'll need them further down the river," Hall said. "We are required to maintain water temperatures at Lower Granite below 68 degrees, if possible, using available reservoir-system management methods."

    Hall said that over the weekend the Corps was conserving water and ensuring the reservoir was as full as possible. Prior to Monday‚s release, the reservoir was at an elevation of about 1,600 feet, which is considered full.

    The Corps gradually ramped up flow Monday and about 2 pm it reached what it calls full powerhouse, generally a discharge of 9.8 kcfs, but Hall said full powerhouse currently is closer to 9.4 kcfs. Water elevation in the Clearwater River downstream of the dam also increased by about one-half to two-thirds feet at the North Fork confluence.

    One of the factors that is warming the lower Snake River is discharges at Idaho Power‚s Hells Canyon Dam as the power company generates electricity for air conditioning in the region.

    Based on modeling, the higher outflow at Dworshak Dam will lower the reservoir level by about 10 inches per day. Still, the reservoir will be within 5 to 7 feet of full over this holiday weekend.

    According to Corps information, NOAA Fisheries Columbia River System Biological Opinion requires the Corps to meet several objectives to enhance ESA-listed fish survival, including maintaining minimum water flows for resident fish and salmon, and releasing Dworshak Reservoir water to maintain lower Snake River water temperatures and help speed juvenile fish downriver to the ocean.

    "With such hot weather forecasted to continue, water temperature at Lower Granite could soon exceed 68 degrees if not regulated, creating conditions in the reservoir system that are unhealthy for ESA-listed fish," Hall said. "Dworshak's 43-degree outflows make a big difference in water temperature there and further down the Snake River."

    Snake River sockeye salmon are listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act. There is growing evidence that summer sockeye are the most vulnerable to harm from warm water, compared with other salmon runs.

    The sockeye run this year was predicted by the U.S. v Oregon Technical Advisory Committee in its pre-season forecast to be 101,600 fish, far fewer fish than the 512,500 sockeye that returned in 2015 and below the 10-year average of 290,200. However, 284,345 sockeye had already passed Bonneville Dam as of Thursday this week. The 10-year average on this date is 193,277 (see www.fpc.org for fish passage information).

    TAC updated its predicted run size of sockeye Monday, increasing its estimate to 400,000 sockeye.

    As of yesterday, 231,012 of the sockeye have reached The Dalles Dam, 226,807 the John Day Dam, 190,670 McNary Dam, and some fish are already in the lower Snake River with 275 over Ice Harbor Dam, 240 over Lower Monumental Dam, 110 at Little Goose Dam and 57 at Lower Granite Dam. Last year at this time, 67 sockeye had passed Lower Granite. The 10-year average at Lower Granite is 37 as of July 30.

    Last year at this time, 357,363 sockeye had passed Bonneville Dam, 290,982 at The Dalles, 252,225 at John Day, 183,687 at McNary, 372 at Ice Harbor, 313 at Lower Monumental, 150 at Little Goose, and 75 sockeye at Lower Granite.

    In 2015, low flow conditions, coupled with extremely high air temperatures and warm water in the major tributaries in the lower Snake and Columbia rivers from mid-June to mid-July, resulted in the highest mainstem temperatures recorded in the Columbia River.
     
    At 68 degrees F sockeye salmon begin to die and most of the fish passed Bonneville Dam in 2015 after the water temperature had hit 73 degrees.

    For  background, see CBB, April 15, 2016, „NW Power/Conservation Council Hears ŒLessons Learned‚ Report On High Mortality For 2015 Sockeye Run,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/436491.aspx
     
    Some 99 percent of Snake River sockeye that were counted crossing Bonneville Dam died before they reached the upper Salmon River‚s Sawtooth Valley where the salmon spawn. Just 56 adult sockeye salmon made it on their own to the Sawtooth Valley and another 51 were transported from a trap at Lower Granite Dam to the Eagle Hatchery in Idaho.
     
    And only 3 percent to 4.5 percent of the fish heading up the Columbia River and into the Okanagan River ever made it to the spawning grounds. Some 10 percent to 15 percent made it to the Wenatchee River to spawn, the passage report said.

    Since last year, the Corps has installed a permanent adult fish ladder water cooling system that pulls cold water from deep in the Lower Granite forebay into the fish ladder.

    A similar device at Little Goose Dam is set to be in operation this week. It pumps water from 60 feet in the Little Goose reservoir, where there is 63 degree water, into the dam‚s fish ladder. Surface water highs at the dam are in the 70s, according to the Corps.
     
    (See Corps information on the project at http://www.nww.usace.army.mil/Missions/Fish-Programs/Lower-Granite-Fish-Ladder-Temperature-Improvement/

    and CBB, June 17, 2016, „Corps Moves Forward On Fish Passage Improvements At Lower Granite Dam, Includes Fish Ladder Cooling,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/436933.aspx)

    For more information, see:

    --CBB, June 24, 2016, „Columbia Basin Salmon/Hydro Managers Gear Up For Another Hot Summer: Will Sockeye Get Slammed Again?‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/436997.aspx

    --CBB, April 1, 2016, „Corps Report On 2015 Columbia/Snake Warm Water, Fish Die-Off Will Discuss Actions To Avoid Repeat,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/436358.aspx
     
    -- CBB, December 4, 2015, „Post-Mortem 2015 Snake River Sockeye Run; 90 Percent Of Fish Dead Before Reaching Ice Harbor Dam,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/435642.aspx
     
    -- CBB, November 6, 2015, „Report Analyzes Impacts, Causes Of This Year‚s Warm Fish-Killing Water In Columbia/Snake,‰ http://www.cbbulletin.com/435505.aspx

Share This